The following article is provided by Civil Beat.
By Sophie Cocke
LIHUE — On the normally placid main street on Sunday afternoon, thousands of people marched in protest. As they snaked down Rice Street, toward the Kauai County Building, they chanted, "No More GMO! No More GMO!”
Much of the symbolism was colorful, even a bit carnival-esque, but grim. People wore masks with skulls. One man carried a pitch fork. As the breeze tussled numerous Hawaiian flags, signs lurched into the sky to scream, "Too Much Poison!”
Despite the underlying anger, the protestors were actually there to be constructive. That was as clear as the writing on their ubiquitous red shirts: “Pass the Bill.”
The thousands of people at the "Mana March" — organizers put the number at 3,000 or 4,000 — were here to promote passage of Bill 2491. Introduced by Kauai County Councilmen Gary Hooser and Tim Bynum, the measure requires that the four biotech companies operating on Kauai — Syngenta, DuPont-Pioneer, Dow and BASF — disclose what pesticides they are spraying, where and in what quantities. The bill also requires buffer zones between biotech fields and public areas, including schools, parks, roads and waterways.
The debate over GMOs surged in intensity in Hawaii during the last legislative session with a state bill that aimed to require labeling of genetically modified foods, at least until that bill died. But the torch has since been picked up at the county level on both the Big Island and Kauai.
A wide array of issues drives the fight on the anti-GMO side. There are heart-felt concerns about the safety of consuming genetically altered foods. Some people question the validity of studies on the risks of consuming GMOs, especially over the long term. Critics also highlight precedents for seeds from GMO crops drifting into organic and conventional fields, with some decrying what they see as corporate greed by biotech companies and their supposed control of the world’s food supply.
But the fight has taken a particularly serious tone on Kauai where residents, schoolchildren and teachers on the island’s west side have worried for years that the pesticides being sprayed on GMO fields are harming their health and poisoning the environment around them.
The local evidence of harm remains anecdotal. One teacher at Waimea Canyon Middle School reported that many of his fish mysteriously died one year and those that survived, in a larger tank, later gave birth to offspring with gruesome deformities.
That school has been closed twice, in 2006 and 2008, due to health concerns about what were believed to be chemical oversprays. In two incidents, the school reportedly sent a total of more than 20 kids to the emergency room after students and staff complained of dizziness, nausea and trouble breathing. Some students vomited profusely, according to past reports.
A state investigation has not been able to determine the exact cause.
Nobody knows for sure whether the chemicals being sprayed on the fields are the culprit. Nor has anybody conclusively verified or debunked rumors that there are clusters of cancer or birth defects. The reasons for die-off of 50,000 sea urchins in a nearby bay also remains a mystery.
But these are the sorts of things that Kauai councilmembers and the protestors who turned out this weekend want someone to seriously investigate. Not to mention what chemicals are blowing in the dust that surrounds them.
As the midday sun beat down on the Kauai County Building, Councilman Bynum stood atop the steps, clutching a microphone and peering down at the flocks of protestors taking refuge under umbrellas, tents and their own signs.
“Don’t give us anything new until we know what you’re doing,” Bynum said to hisses from the crowd and shouts of “Hewa!” directed at the biotech companies.
In addition to disclosure requirements about pesticides, Bill 2491 also mandates that an environmental impact study be conducted to assess any potential health or environmental risks from the GMO fields. The biotech companies wouldn’t be able to expand their operations until after the assessment is conducted.
Bynum claimed that the companies — that are experimenting on both their crops and with their pesticides, as well as growing seed crops on the west side and around Lihue — spray their fields as many as 240 days in the course of a year. By comparison, he said that Kauai Coffee Company, which would also be affected by the bill because it uses restricted use pesticides, sprays just eight times a year.
The biotech companies have fought pressure to disclose specifics about their pesticide use.
Mark Phillipson, a spokesman for Syngenta and president of the Hawaii Crop Improvement Association, which represents the state’s biotech companies, told Civil Beat in an interview on Friday that Bill 2491 is discriminatory and that it unfairly singles out the biotech companies. He noted that other farms, county governments and the pest industry all use pesticides but the bill would hardly affect them, if at all.
“Here’s the real bottom line,” the Syngenta spokesman said, “We are willing to do things that are based on good rationale, on science and not on fear and innuendo.”
But that doesn't extend to disclosing information about pesticide use. The industry worries that if it is forced to share information about that, Phillipson explained, it could be used to unfairly “demonize us.”
Councilman Hooser, who has sorted through a huge number of paper records on pesticide sales (which the state already keeps track of), has come up with his own estimate about usage on the island. He says that the biotech companies, along with Kauai Coffee Company, are spraying 18 tons of restricted-use pesticides on Kauai each year. (A recent Salon article noted that this would far exceed the amount sprayed in any other state. Kauai is one-third of the size of tiny Rhode Island and 1/164th the size of Kansas.)
Andrea Brower, who helped organize Sunday's march, said that the bottom line is this: People need to know what’s being sprayed around them. Otherwise, it’s impossible to know what chemicals and pesticides to test for in the air they breathe, in the water that they drink and on the ground they live on.
The throngs of protestors assembled for nearly four hours on Sunday listened to speeches from west side residents, concerned scientists and government officials. The outpouring of support was in part meant to put pressure on the county council, which plans to hold its second hearing on Bill 2491 on Monday. No date has been set for a final vote.
For the crowd, the highlight of the event was a performance by the well-known local musician Makana, who summed up the sentiments of many protestors.
He modified Pink Floyd’s "Wish You Were Here" into "Wish You Would Leave." Over that iconic melody, he sang, “Take your GMOs and your pesticide ho’s, you can’t deceive. Spraying over the same old ground, 10 thousand pounds of atrazine. I wish you would leave.”
Musical purists and biotech supporters might have been troubled, but the crowd cheered wildly.
Also on HuffPost:
A picture taken on October 9, 2008 shows an ultralight helicopter hovering above a field where Greenpeace activists and Austrian organic farming association BIO AUSTRIA wrote the message 'NO GMO' (Genetically Modified Organism) by planting light green coloured organic buckwheat in a field of organic peas in Breitenfurt, some 60 kms south east from Vienna. (DIETER NAGL/AFP/Getty Images)
Thirty-five tons of corn put by Greenpace activists at Mexico City's Zocalo Square as a protest against the sowing of transgenic corn, form a map of Mexico on February 26, 2009. (Ronaldo Schemidt/AFP/Getty Images)
People walk on a plateform past an advert against genetically modified (GMO) food on February 15, 2011 at a subway station in Paris. (MIGUEL MEDINA/AFP/Getty Images)
Greenpeace activists demonstrate against genetically modified organisms (GMOs) on November 24, 2008 in front of EU headquarters in Brussels. Greenpeace called on the European Union to suspend the authorization of GMOs until the EU is capable of evaluating the risks they pose. (DOMINIQUE FAGET/AFP/Getty Images)
Greenpeace activists stand a protest in front of Los Pinos presidential residence in Mexico City against the farming of transgenic corn in Mexico, on June 26, 2009. (ALFREDO ESTRELLA/AFP/Getty Images)
A Greenpeace activist impersonating Brazil's Chief of Staff Dilma Russeff takes part in a protest against the authorization to grow transgenic rice during a meeting of the National Biosecurity Technical Commission (CYNBIO) at the Science and Technology Ministry in Brasilia October 15, 2009. (JOEDSON ALVES/AFP/Getty Images)
Greenpeace activists distribute samples of transgenic rice as part of a protest against the authorization to grow transgenic rice during a meeting of the National Biosecurity Technical Commission (CYNBIO) at the Science and Technology Ministry in Brasilia October 15, 2009. (JOEDSON ALVES/AFP/Getty Images)
The logo of French 'Les faucheurs volontaires' (Volunteer trimmers of GMO) is seen as demonstrators stand in front of the booth of French union 'la confederation paysanne' (farmers union) during an action against GMO at the International Agricultural Fair on March 6, 2010 in Paris. The European Commission authorised, on March 2, the cultivation of a genetically modified potato, developed by BASF, the first such green light for 12 years. The issue of so-called 'frankenfoods' has long been a matter of fierce debate in Europe and the commission stressed that the Amflora potato in question would be able to be grown only for 'industrial use' including animal feed, rather than for human consumption. (BERTRAND LANGLOIS/AFP/Getty Images)
A couple waves after a parody of union between German chemical giant BASF (L) and the European Food Safety Authority (R) - Autorite europeenne de securite des aliments- (EFSA) during the International Agricultural Fair on March 6, 2010 in Paris. (BERTRAND LANGLOIS/AFP/Getty Images)
A giant banner depicting a farm, is seen as Greenpeace activists hold banners to protest against the genetically modified (GMO) food production in front of the parliament building of Budapest on February 10, 2010. (ATTILA KISBENEDEK/AFP/Getty Images)
A grey-cow is pictured near Greenpeace activists in traditional Hungarian costume standing in front of a giant banner depicting a farm as others hold a banner reading 'GMO-free Europe' to protest against the genetically modified (GMO) food production in front of the parliament building of Budapest on February 10, 2011 during a demonstration. (ATTILA KISBENEDEK/AFP/Getty Images)
Greenpeace activists hold a banner to protest against the genetically modified (GMO) food production in front of the parliament building of Budapest on February 10, 2010. (ATTILA KISBENEDEK/AFP/Getty Images)
A man dressed up as a bee holds a placard during a demonstration organized by French Professional Beekeepers Federation (FFAP) to protest against the use of pesticide on September 14, 2011 along the Saint-Bernard quay in Paris. (JACQUES DEMARTHON/AFP/Getty Images)
Anti-Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) demonstrators protest in front of Colmar courthouse on September 28, 2011, eastern France, during the trial of 60 militants accused of destroying MGO plants. (FREDERICK FLORIN/AFP/Getty Images)
An anti-GMO activist holds a banner reading 'Science without conscience is but the ruin of soul' during an action to call for the ban of the 'MON 810', a variety of genetically modified maize (corn) developed by Monsanto Company on January 23, 2012 at a Monsanto storehouse in Trebes near Carcassonne, southern France. (ERIC CABANIS/AFP/Getty Images)
Is Branding Food With "GMO" the Kiss of Death?
Prop 37 in California proposes that genetically modified food be labeled "GMO". If you knew your food was genetically modified, would you still eat it?