Huffpost Business

JPMorgan Settlement Over Madoff Charges Approved

Posted: Updated:
BERNIE MADOFF
UNITED STATES - MARCH 10: Bernard Madoff leaves Manhattan Federal court after a hearing there Tusday afternoon. The bulletproof vest Bernie Madoff wore under his fine suit could not shield him from barrage of charges, which should ensure he spends rest of his life behind bars for greatest swindle. (Photo by Craig Warga/NY Daily News Archive via Getty Images) | Getty

NEW YORK (AP) — A judge on Wednesday approved a non-prosecution agreement reached after JPMorgan Chase & Co. agreed to pay $1.7 billion to settle criminal charges stemming from its failure to report its concerns about Wall Street swindler Bernard Madoff's private investment service.

U.S. District Judge Kevin Castel said there was nothing about the deal between the nation's largest bank and the government that would "require judicial intervention to protect the integrity of the process." He said it seemed the agreement was "knowing and voluntary" and in the best interests of the public.

The judge's approval came a day after the deal was announced in Manhattan by federal authorities. The agreement requires the bank to pay the $1.7 billion forfeiture — the largest by a U.S. bank for a Bank Secrecy Act violation — and to acknowledge failures in its protections against money laundering and reform them.

The judge set a January 2016 court date for the government to report whether the bank has complied with the agreement.

JPMorgan will pay more than $2.5 billion in total to settle claims stemming from Madoff's fraud, which was revealed in December 2008, when he ran out of money to honor requests for withdrawals by thousands of investors. Less than $300 million of their original investment of nearly $20 billion remained, although Madoff had sent statements only days earlier claiming it had grown to more than $60 billion.

Madoff, 75, pleaded guilty to fraud. He's in prison in Butner, N.C., serving a 150-year sentence.

Federal prosecutors brought two Bank Secrecy Act counts against JPMorgan, one for lax money laundering monitoring and the other because the bank failed to report to U.S. authorities in 2008 that its London office had circulated a memo saying it couldn't validate Madoff's trading activity or custody of assets and citing his "odd choice" of a one-man accounting firm.

JPMorgan, which was the primary bank handling Madoff's accounts since 1986, acknowledged in a statement Tuesday that it could have done better. It said it was making "significant efforts" to strengthen its practices against money laundering and believed "the lessons we have learned will make us a stronger company."

A company spokeswoman didn't immediately return a message seeking comment Wednesday.

Also on The Huffington Post

Close
JPMorgan Chase Lawsuits And Regulatory Probes
of
Share
Tweet
Advertisement
Share this
close
Current Slide

Suggest a correction

Around the Web

JPMorgan Is Penalized $2 Billion Over Madoff

JPMorgan's $2.6 billion Madoff reckoning

The Madoff settlement is an enormous win for a guilty JPMorgan

JP Morgan banker joked that Madoff's accounting firm might be a car wash

Decades-long ties to Madoff cost JPMorgan $2.6 billion

JPMorgan to pay 2B over Madoff scheme

Government extracts $2 billion in fines from JPMorgan in Madoff case

How JPMorgan shorted Madoff

JPMorgan to Pay $2.6 Billion Over Madoff Scheme Lapses

JPMorgan pays $2.6 billion in Madoff settlements