Huffpost Politics
Kate Sheppard Headshot

House Republicans Push Bill Curbing Obama's Ability To Designate National Monuments

Posted: Updated:
OBAMA CESAR CHAVEZ
President Barack Obama walks with Cesar Chavez' widow Helen F. Chavez, left, and Dolores Huerta, co-founder of the United Farm Workers, as they tour the Cesar E. Chavez National Monument Memorial Garden, Monday, Oct. 8, 2012, in Keene, Calif. The House is voting on a bill this week that would make it more difficult for the president to declare new national monuments like the Cesar Chavez memorial. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster) | ASSOCIATED PRESS
Print

WASHINGTON –- The House is expected to vote Wednesday on a Republican-backed bill that would make it more difficult for the president to declare new national monuments.

The bill, "Ensuring Public Involvement in the Creation of Natural Monuments Act," was authored by Rep. Rob Bishop (R-Utah). It would put in place new specifications on what a president must do in order to use powers granted under the Antiquities Act, a 1906 law that allows the president to designate "historic landmarks, historic and prehistoric structures, and other objects of historic or scientific interest that are situated upon the lands owned or controlled by the Government of the United States" as monuments.

Republican President Theodore Roosevelt, the "father of conservation," signed the Antiquities Act into law. Since then, 16 presidents from both parties have used the law to designate new protections for national landmarks.

Obama designated his 10th new monument on March 11, adding a shoreline portion to the California Coastal National Monument. He designated five monuments in March 2013, as well as the César E. Chávez National Monument in October 2012, Chimney Rock in Sept. 2012, Ford Ord in April 2012 and Fort Monroe in Nov. 2011.

Republicans in the House have balked at the Obama administration's use of the law, however. Bishop, who serves as chair of the House Natural Resources Public Lands and Environmental Regulation Subcommittee, called Obama's designation of the new portion of the Coastal California National Monument "purely political" and argued that it "undermines sincere efforts to reach consensus on questions of conservation." His bill would require additional environmental analysis and public comment before the president could declare a new monument, and would only allow the president to declare one monument per state per term, unless he or she gets approval from Congress.

Environmentalists, meanwhile, have dubbed Bishop's measure the "No New National Parks" bill. They say the House bill puts up unnecessary obstacles to protecting the country's notable places.

The Antiquities Act, said Kristen Brengel, senior director of legislative and government affairs at the National Parks Conservation Association, "is just a great, bipartisan law that has been used for 100 years."

"If it ain't broke, there's no reason to fix it," Brengel said. "Congress should be focused on fixing the economy, not on dismantling great laws that have protected some of the most important places in the country."

She noted that many of the additions in recent years have helped diversify properties in the National Park Service, adding locations like Maryland's Harriet Tubman Underground Railroad National Monument in March 2013, which is the first monument named for an African-American woman. The Cesar E. Chavez National Monument, designated in October 2012 in honor of the labor leader, is the first to honor a contemporary Latino. This bill would mean "slamming the brake pedal on diversifying the National Park Service," Brengel said.

Chavez's son Paul has also spoken out against efforts to block use of the Antiquities Act. "Any proposal to prohibit or restrict the president’s authority to bestow the honor of a new National Park site to commemorate important American figures and movements that strengthened our democracy should be opposed," he said in a statement.

In a speech last November, Interior Secretary Sally Jewell said that if Congress doesn’t provide new protections for public lands, the administration will. "Congress needs to get moving to pass dozens of locally supported bills," Jewell said. "If Congress doesn't step up to act to protect some of these areas that have been brought forward by communities, then the president will act. President Obama also alluded to using the act in his State of the Union address in January.

At the time of the State of the Union, Congress had gone a record amount of time without designating new areas for wilderness protections. But lawmakers broke their dry spell earlier this month, granting protections for Michigan's Sleeping Bear Dunes.

The bill is slated for a vote on Wednesday, according to a schedule from Majority Leader Eric Cantor's office.

Also on HuffPost:

Close
Conservatives Pointing Fingers
of
Share
Tweet
Advertisement
Share this
close
Current Slide

Suggest a correction

Around the Web

House To Vote On Controversial 'No More National Parks' Policy ...

President Obama Designates Five New National Monuments | The ...

NPS Archeology Program: Antiquities Act Centennial - National Park ...

Protect National Monuments and the Antiquities Act - Take Action ...

16 U.S. Code § 431 - National monuments; reservation of lands ...

White House History Classroom | Primary Documents

National Monuments and the Antiquities Act

Protect National Monuments and the Antiquities Act ! PLEASE ...

Seeking Transparency on Potential National Monument Designations

Will House Republicans pass the 'No More Parks Act' and eviscerate Antiquities ...

House To Vote On Controversial 'No More National Parks' Policy

Hey, Congress, leave the national monuments system alone, will ya?

House Republicans Declare That the American People Will Have No New ...

'No New National Parks': House GOP Backs Bill To Stop Land Conservation

House to vote on bill to curb protected area designations

Republicans, In Full Anti-Obama Frenzy, Take A Swipe At National Parks

House GOP to take aim at Obama's monument declarations

Devil's Glen one of many Montana areas considered for wilderness designation

Travel as it was — and as it can be.