It's been nearly a month since a Senate report revealed the gruesome torture techniques used by C.I.A. operatives following the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, and the controversy surrounding whether or not to publish more information continues to stir debate.
In 2004, the ACLU sued the U.S. government for the release of more than 2,000 photos from Abu Ghraib after some of the disturbing photos were leaked that year. According to Mother Jones, a federal judge forced the Obama administration to release the photos or provide detailed information explaining how the release of each picture could threaten national security. The government chose the second option, and now, a hearing has been set for Jan. 20.
While Obama said the release of the photos would “further inflame anti-American sentiment,” some question the true extent of the national security risk.
That includes Human Rights Watch advocacy director John Sifton, who spoke with HuffPost Live's Ricky Camilleri on Monday.
“The United States has made this argument about a number of disclosures, from the location of secret C.I.A. prisons in Poland and Romania to information about Guantanamo abuses to the C.I.A. report," Sifton said. “They always say this and it never comes true.”
Navy JAG officer Brian Mizer also urged the release of the photos for accountability purposes.
“I believe that these photos should be released so we can have a full area of that debate. I mean, the saying is, ‘A picture is worth a thousand words.’ Let’s see if these policies and these activities actually do reflect our core American values,” he said.
Watch the full HuffPost Live interview about the possible release of U.S. torture photos here.
Sign up here for Live Today, HuffPost Live's new morning email that will let you know the newsmakers, celebrities and politicians joining us that day and give you the best clips from the day before!
Related
Before You Go
