The $109 Million Dollar Question: Is Clinton Really A Populist?

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

Posted May 4, 2008 | 11:14 PM (EST)



Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

With Clinton's victory over Obama in Pennsylvania, all the buzz seemed to be about the New York senator's ability to connect with small-town, blue collar voters. In the days that followed, the mainstream media couldn't seem to get enough of her "ordinary folks" credentials. This weekend, as Clinton defended her gas tax proposal against what she described as the "elite opinion" of professional economists, I, like so many others, had to ask the obvious question:

Since when does a Clinton get off as such a populist?

Of course there's much to be said of former President Clinton's backyard barbecues and even his wife's ill-fated attempt to reform a nation's crippled health care system. And of their ability to gloss and sugarcoat, there is no doubt (think the smooth jazz of the famous "is" line, or the senator's sleep-inducing defense of her war vote).

But as a lifelong resident of Michigan (a state that, it could reasonably be argued, defined blue collar with Henry Ford's introduction of the assembly line in the early 20th century), I find it absurd that Senator Clinton, a member already of one of the greatest political dynasties in American history, could even suggest that, in essence, "the elitists are out to get me."

I'm sorry, Senator, but your own tax returns beg to differ.

The fact of the matter is that Clinton's experts-as-enemies defense of her inept gas tax proposal is reinforcing of an increasingly worrisome spate of cowboy swagger:

America stands armed and ready to "totally obliterate" Iran.

"They would face massive retaliation."

You're either with us, or against us.

Not only is Clinton refusing to listen to the voices of reason in calling for her to end a campaign that (with respect to her own senior supporters) is functioning as little more than an oxygen tank - a temporary distraction from an impending defeat; but she is also consciously ignoring the voices of the voters - "elitist" economists and working class "ordinary folks" alike.

At an Indiana town-hall meeting Sunday morning with George Stephanopolous on ABC, Clinton failed to name even one economist that supported her proposed gas tax holiday.

As TPM reported, a woman on the show who claimed to make less than $25,000 a year had this to say:

"I do feel pandered to when you talk about suspending the gas tax. Call me crazy but I actually listen to economists because I think they know what they've studied."

How 'bout them ordinary folks, senator?

 
 

Comments
14
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

Considering that: when this whole thing started, it was just assumed Hillary was going to steamroll through this primary.......her husband is a 2-term ex-President and "Clinton" is one the biggest names in Democratic party history.......she has the entire mainstream media behind her, badgering her opponent over this Jeremiah Wright thing.........and right-wing talk show hosts convincing millions of listeners to change parties and vote for her in the primary......

The question REALLY is: why can't Hillary Clinton close the deal?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:47 PM on 05/05/2008

You just DONT GET IT.

Being rich is NOT ELITISM.

Telling people that its "no big deal" if they save $100 bucks over the summer IS ELTIST>

"Oh we need long term solutions" (nice ifyou can afford it)

"we need to encourage people to drive LESS" (tell that to a 80 mile commuter or a truck driver)

The Elitists' attempts to understand what elitism is is hysterical.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:55 PM on 05/05/2008


$28.50 does not equal "a hundred bucks". sorry.

Apparently MATH is too elite now as well?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:51 PM on 05/07/2008

No, telling folks that the $30 "savings" is a pipe dream is the TRUTH.

Also please look up the definition of "elitist". You are confused.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:47 AM on 05/06/2008

NE73:

It was $30 bucks.

Being rich and telling me that saving $30 is going to do me any good is elitist.

Because, while I salivate over my thirty dollars, getting drunk is only going to get more expensive.

I'd much rather forgo one night of binge drinking now, and hope for many more nights of cheap drunkeness in the future.

Cheers, Tony

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:13 PM on 05/05/2008

Clinton politics lie; deny and holler promise anything give em .....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:37 PM on 05/05/2008

Yes, don't you know she does shots with hillbillies in Pa.?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 PM on 05/05/2008

She's George W. Bush's twin: Just as foolish, just as irresponsible, just as underhanded, just as scary.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:27 PM on 05/05/2008

Bravo for an excellent summarisation, one that I agree.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:20 PM on 05/05/2008

How in the hell do you call a contest where Clinton went in with a 20 point lead an upset?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 PM on 05/05/2008

I have been asking this same question, since the primary. She had a 20 point lead weeks before the primary but only won by 9-10 point. I ask again, how is that a BIG win?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:24 PM on 05/05/2008

Because Sir Talks-A-Lot outspent her 6-1 the first threeweeks in Pennsylvania, then 3-1 the last three weeks, and he STILL couldn't close the deal. You folks need to set aside your Clinton Derangement Syndrome and start looking at reality; Obama does NOT own the nomination by any stretch of the imagination.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:37 PM on 05/05/2008

Exactly. That's like saying that Barack's victory in Mississippi was an upset.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:28 PM on 05/05/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 




Related Tags
 

 Site  Web ask.com