Oil Giants Settle Water Contamination Suit For $423 Million

ADAM SCHRECK | May 8, 2008 03:35 AM EST | AP


Read More: MTBE, Business News
Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

NEW YORK — At least two major oil companies said late Wednesday they have agreed to settle lawsuits over the use of the gasoline additive MTBE, a potential carcinogen that has been found in drinking water.

Representatives of Valero Energy Corp. and Chevron Corp. said they had joined the settlement, although a number of other oil companies are also named in a memo supporting the deal that was obtained by The Associated Press.

The companies confirmed their involvement after The Wall Street Journal reported on its Web site that several oil companies agreed to pay $423 million plus cleanup costs to settle groundwater contamination litigation involving 153 public water providers in 17 states. That would make it the largest settlement to date involving the additive.

"We've worked hard to reach a responsible resolution to the cases being settled and are pleased to be moving forward," Chevron spokeswoman Stephanie Price said.

Valero's agreement "resolves many of the lawsuits" filed against the oil refiner over its prior use of the gasoline additive, company spokesman Bill Day said in a brief statement to the AP.

He said the "settlement agreement is being reviewed by the court and is not yet final." He did not provide details of the agreement and declined to name other companies involved in the deal.

According to the Journal, the other defendants settling include BP PLC's BP America Inc., ConocoPhillips, Royal Dutch Shell PLC's Shell Oil Co., Marathon Oil Corp., Petroleos de Venezuela SA's Citgo Petroleum Corp. and Sunoco Inc.

Those companies were among those listed in the court document obtained by the AP. Messages left with the companies seeking comment were not immediately returned.

At least six companies declined to settle, the largest being ExxonMobil Corp., the Journal said.

Each company's contribution to the settlement was undisclosed, as was the potential cleanup cost. Past estimates have put the tab to remediate all tainted sites as high as $30 billion, the Journal reported.

The newspaper's report quoted Scott Summy, an attorney for the plaintiffs, who said covering the cleanup costs for 30 years was a "creative approach" to resolving a matter that involves so many parties. That provision of the settlement removes the threat of litigation over future contaminated wells, he told the Journal.

The AP could not immediately reach the plaintiff's attorneys for comment.

MTBE, or methyl tertiary butyl ether, is a chemical added to gasoline to boost its octane level and cut air pollution. It was first added to gasoline in 1979, but its use declined after it was banned in a number of states.

MTBE has been found in ground water, including in some communities' drinking water supplies. The Environmental Protection Agency said the chemical is a potential human carcinogen at high doses, although it is unclear at what level it poses a health risk.


Comments
5
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

Hint sample
View Comments:

This is pocket change. What surprises me is that they were even given a fine.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:31 PM on 05/09/2008

The problem with cases like this is "in high doses" vs. "is found in." Where do you draw the bright line?

Chemical-presence tests can detect the presence of parts-per-billion. During cold season it is possible to detect the presence of the chemical by-products of metabolized cold-medications in any glass of water ... even one that comes in a plastic bottle. (You can also detect "the presence of" some pretty-nasty chems that were used to make that bottle.)

If someone knows that there is "the presence of" a chemical (at whatever concentration) that "could" cause, say, cancer, then that someone might demand that every trace of it be removed. Not possible. Yet they want to pump their own gas.

No, I don't work for the chemical industry. Nobody paid me to write this. But chemicals are a two-edged sword that we cannot live without. They need a rational public management-policy, and often do not get it.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:44 AM on 05/09/2008

Ethanol has replaced MTBE as an additive and nobody has complained about it leaking into the water.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:34 PM on 05/08/2008

$423 million is not enough. And to think ExxonMobil would not want to participate--what a surprise. They should all be forced to have contaminated water piped into their mansions--that would be suitable justice.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:51 PM on 05/08/2008

"plus cleanup costs". Yeah right. It's a fact that MTBE cleanup costs would be more than their combined profits over several years. They'd have to tear up the ENTIRE Arizona desert to clean up just Arizona.

Not going to happen. The penalty should have been $846 billion and the creation of a company to create water filters that remove MTBE and other solvents and chemicals and pharmaceuticals.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 AM on 05/08/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

Stock Quote

Enter a ticker symbol below:

Data provided by AOL



Related Tags
 

 Site  Web ask.com