How Tech Wars End

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com

Posted May 10, 2008 | 12:36 PM (EST)



Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

Note: I've been a blogger for a long time, by some counts 14 years, and most of the stuff I've blogged about has been technology; that's my background. But there's a lot of politics in tech, and increasingly so is tech a big part of politics. Till now we've been running my political pieces here, but I thought this morning to try an experiment, run one of my tech pieces here and see what happens. BTW: There's a bonus at the end about Obama.

How Tech Wars End

A picture named iwojima.jpgThe tech industry is organized around the concept of wars. In recent memory, the browser wars, the Java wars, before that there were wars over email APIs, desktops, GUIs, networking standards, you name it, if there's money to be made in controlling users, there's been a war to lock those users in. It's been that way since the dawn of time, and it will always be that way. It's in human nature.

It's also in human nature for the users to realize they're being used, get fed up, and create or discover the technology for themselves thereby routing around all the warring parties. It's as if the citizens of France during WWII got fed up with the Germans and the Allies, and decided to create a new France on new land and all move there, leaving the armies to fight over nothing. You can't do it in the real world, but it's how it works in the virtual world.

Having seen a number of these wars, and seeing each of them end not in triumph, but irrelevance, I believe we're getting closer to the end in the warfare defined by social networks. That's the real lesson behind this article by Mike Arrington, about the three companies throwing vapor at each other, two publicly, MySpace and Facebook, and Google in the back channel. Somewhere lurking back there are Microsoft and Yahoo, each with also-rans no doubt coming soon. I wouldn't pay too much attention to what the big players do here, they will be too constrained by BigCo thought processes, and a desire to appear to be giving stuff away without actually giving anything away.

Open is a funny thing, you can't be partially open. You can't edge your way toward open. You can't be open and hold the valuable stuff in reserve for yourself. BigCo's can't afford to do what it takes to coalesce a popular maturing technology around their own platform. It won't happen in BigCoLand. Only a little dude with nothing to lose can choose to build around something truly open. (The big guys are always forced to, eventually.)

The most famous war-collapse was when the web took over from the warfare between Microsoft and the Taligent team (Apple, IBM, Borland, Novell, lots of others). They were all busy blowing smoke at each other over the users when out of nowhere a network that had been around longer than any of them, that had already solved every problem they were trying to solve that was worth solving, swooped in and doused all the warfare. How? The users fell in love, and as we know, love is a very powerful force.

My guess, if I had to make one, is that the social network that we will all be building on in the coming years is already out there. It could be Twitter, after it's federated, or it could be what FriendFeed is teasing about. Or it could be two kids in a garage that no one is paying attention to. Keep your eyes and ears open and trust your gut, you'll know it when you see it.

Bonus

There's a game being played on Twitter that goes like this.

"When Obama wins..."

The game is to fill in the blank creatively. .

Here are some examples.

Here's my entry.


 
 

Comments
5
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- HUstudent See Profile I'm a Fan of HUstudent

i like Facebook.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:23 AM on 05/12/2008
- OSUMercutio See Profile I'm a Fan of OSUMercutio

"When Obama wins..."

I will breathe a sigh of relief.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:12 PM on 05/10/2008
- burnt See Profile I'm a Fan of burnt

Tech "wars" (competition for market share) will never end until technological advances stop... not likely to happen soon. I've been working with computers for about 40 years. You have to believe me when I say that real advances do not slow, they increase geometrically.

Yes, BigCo and gov. tend to slow some tech sectors down a bit at times, but they also speed them up at others... there's some great new advances on the nano scale around the corner... and those didn't come from a garage. This next jump in size and power reduction will allow us to be individually wired and globally connected at all times providing billions of constant feeds and making democratic decisions in a participatory way.

However, I do agree that small entrepreneurs will always play an important part in the game, and at times produce remarkable advances.

The dark part of the next jump entails the way ground wars will be conducted with wired troops, drones and robotic weaponry. It will approach and in some aspects, surpass science fiction.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:02 PM on 05/10/2008
- Obamamo See Profile I'm a Fan of Obamamo

When Obama wins then we will really have a Government for the people, by the people and for the people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 05/10/2008
- carlosb00 See Profile I'm a Fan of carlosb00

I hope that you are right!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:36 AM on 05/12/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 

Related Tags
 

 Site  Web ask.com