Hezbollah to withdraw fighters in Beirut; 12 die in clash

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

SAM F. GHATTAS | May 10, 2008 03:03 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Show your support.
Buzz this article up.
Lebanon's Prime Minister Fuad Saniora speaks during a press conference at the Government House in Beirut, Lebanon, Saturday, May 10, 2008. Saniora called on the army Saturday to restore law and order across Lebanon and remove gunmen from the streets, accusing Hezbollah of staging an armed coup. (AP Photo/Ahmad Omar)

BEIRUT, Lebanon — Hezbollah said Saturday it was withdrawing its gunmen from Beirut neighborhoods seized in sectarian clashes after the army ordered its troops to establish security and called on fighters to clear the streets.

But while tensions in the capital appeared to be defusing, violence spread to other parts of the country.

At least 12 people were killed and 20 wounded when pro- and anti-government groups fought in a remote region of northern Lebanon, Lebanese security and hospital officials said.

It was the heaviest toll for a single clash since sectarian fighting began on Wednesday. At least 37 people have been killed in four days of clashes.

Iranian-backed Hezbollah and its allies seized large swaths of Muslim west Beirut Friday, demonstrating their military might in a power struggle with the U.S.-backed government. It was the worst sectarian violence since Lebanon's 1975-1990 civil war.

The clashes broke out after the government challenged Hezbollah by declaring its private telephone network illegal and saying it would remove the chief of airport security for suspected ties to Shiite militant group.

Hezbollah's leader Hassan Nasrallah said the decisions amounted to a declaration of war and he demanded they be revoked. His Shiite forces then overran Beirut neighborhoods, routing Sunni supporters of the government.

Western-backed Prime Minister Fuad Saniora, in his first public statement since the sectarian violence erupted, said Lebanon can no longer tolerate Hezbollah having weapons. He called on the army to restore law and order and remove gunmen from the streets. He also accused Hezbollah of staging a coup and besieging the capital.

The dream of democracy in Lebanon has been dealt "a poisonous stab by the armed coup carried out by Hezbollah and its allies," he said.

After Saniora's speech, the army called for gunmen to withdraw from the streets of Beirut and reopen blocked roads. It ordered army units "to continue to take measures on the ground to establish security and spread state authority and arrest the violators."

Saniora said he would leave it up to the army to resolve the fight over the airport security chief and the Hezbollah telephone network.

The army offered Hezbollah a compromise, saying the airport security chief would not be sacked and recommending the government revoke its decision to declare the communications network illegal.

The army has largely stayed out of the fighting, fearing its forces could break apart on sectarian lines as they did during the civil war. The army command is respected by Hezbollah.

An opposition statement said its forces will withdraw all their gunmen from Beirut in compliance with the army request.

But it said a "civil disobedience" campaign will continue until its demands are met. The statement did not say whether Hezbollah forces would remove roadblocks around Beirut including one cutting off access to the airport since Wednesday.

Muslim west Beirut appeared mostly calm a day after Hezbollah and its allies seized large parts of the area. Most Hezbollah gunmen had pulled out, leaving small bands of their Shiite Amal allies to patrol the streets.

In other parts of the country, however, violence appeared to be intensifying.

Fighters loyal to Sunni parliament majority leader Saad Hariri and the government battled the Syrian Social Nationalist Party, a secular pro-Syrian group allied with Hezbollah. The clash broke out in the town of Halba in a remote Sunni region of northernmost Lebanon.

At least 12 gunmen were killed and 20 wounded, Lebanese security and hospital officials said. The pro-government fighters stormed the office of the SSNP and set it ablaze after the gunbattle. Nine of the dead were SSNP and three were government loyalists, the security officials said.

Both they and the hospital officials spoke on customary condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media.

In a mountain town east of Beirut, Hezbollah accused a pro-government Druse group of kidnapping three of its members and killing two of them.

Eight people were killed near the town of Aley late Friday in clashes between government supporters and opponents. Another civilian died in the clashes in the southern city of Sidon.

Earlier Saturday in Tarik Jadideh, a Sunni Muslim neighborhood of Beirut, a Shiite shop owner opened fire on Sunnis in a funeral procession as they passed his store chanting insults at Shiite Hezbollah leaders. Troops captured the gunman, who killed two and injured six, police and witnesses said.

After the attack angry people stormed the alleged gunman's shop and set it ablaze. They attacked another shop with stones, shattering its glass.

Tarik Jadideh is a stronghold of Sunni supporters of Saad Hariri, the parliamentary majority leader and son of assassinated former premier Rafik Hariri.

Elsewhere in the capital, residents ventured out in small numbers to streets held by both Lebanese troops and lingering bands of Shiite gunmen.

 
 

Comments
23
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

Based on the information that news reports have given, it sounds as though the current crisis in Lebanon was provoked by a politician who demanded that an organization give up having its own telephone service. Now as a matter of principle, what is supposed to be so bad about an organization's having its own telephone service? It strikes me that a government demand that an organization shut down such a telephone service could constitute just as much an act of usurpation as a government demand that such an organization shut down, say, its newspaper. With that as the context, it's no wonder that violence broke out: it sounds as though the Lebanese government had sought to embark upon what in this country might be regarded as a massive violation of FIrst Amendment rights.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:13 PM on 05/11/2008

Is that telephone or telecommunications system?

And now that you mention it. Wasn't the shutting down of al Sadr's newspaper what initiated the original confrontation with the Mahdi Army in Iraq?

Do I see a trend?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 AM on 05/12/2008

I - living in beirut at the moment - want to point out that the reporter (Ghattas) is wrong in that the fighting is *not* secular. the so-called forces of "future" (loyals & mercenaries of tycoon Hariri (lebanon's version of Berlusconi, only a not cunning version, who follows gullibly what washington & saudi arabia dictate w/o much savvy!!) represents the rabid attack of our gov't (USA) on the mid-east "them" (remember the you're w/ us or against us) forces. This is *not* secular. The other defeated block (so called progressive-socialist who were progressive socialist about 30 years ago until the assassination of their leader, now are a militia) are in alliance w/ the forces of the "future" and the so-called "lebanese forces" who are lebanon's version of Spain's Phalange dictatorship party! This is a bloc that is running the current gov't which represents 3 militias, billions of dollars, but no more that 20% of the lebanese.

My beef? the conflict is a mirror of our policy in Iraq (and not sectarian - though our gov't (USA) would rather ten times see a sectarian fight and weak factions rather a unified country it does not completely and totally control under its and Israel's thumb. The reporter fails in that he/she identifies w/ the view of the US gov't and shallow mainstream US media. I'm afraid that's what's being plotted but not yet realized.

Mr / Ms / Mrs Ghattas - pls take journalism 101 and spare us the peddled venom.

Peace.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:23 PM on 05/11/2008

There will be no peace in Lebanon until Hezbollah the a-hola and Iranian and Syrian stooges are kicked out or killed off. Everything else is just pathetic blather for, and by the ignorant.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:01 PM on 05/10/2008

So you want to kick Hezbollah out of Lebanon?

You really don't know anything about Lebanon, do you...

Ignorant, indeed!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:51 AM on 05/11/2008

There goes a man of peace... The peace Israel's former Prime Minister Sharon likes. I have just finished reading David Hirst's fantastic history of the Middle East: "The Gun and the Olive Branch" - second hand from Amazon. A great learning experience.
NC

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 PM on 05/10/2008


Too bad Ariel Sharon is still in a coma. Back in 2003 in an interview with The Times of London a headline ran "Isreal demands attack on Iran after Iraq". Mr. Sharon is quoted as stating that "Bush should begin invading Iran as soon as victory is reached in Iraq".

The neocon cabal many of whom hold dual citizenship [US/Israelis] long advocates of partitioning the Arab states in the ME along lines designed by Israelis have to get over the hurdle of attempting to live in Biblical times. This is the 21st. Century and not the heyday of colonialism as practiced by Europe, the US and transplanted Jews from all over the world into a region that for centuries has been the home of Arabs, both Christian and Muslims as well as Jews.

Playing the games promoted by Perle, Feith, Wolfowitz, Kristol and others such as Norman Podhoretz and son in law [ Elliot Abrams], Indyk, Wurmser, Ledeen et al will not work [if ithey ever did] anymore.
Its time to give up on arrogance and stupidity in developing relations with Middle Eastern countries.

Such change will in all proability be less costly than the 2/3 trillion US dollars spent in Iraq and Afghanistan and more importantly less American military deaths and young people crippled for life and less hatred on the part of the Iraqis and others in the region.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:21 PM on 05/10/2008

Good summary.....but, you forgot Frum ......Israel Firsters ALL!! Of course, these
traitors do not have THEIR children in Iraq.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:51 PM on 05/10/2008

Well according to the leftists who always echo Islamist policy, the government is a puppet for Israel and America. Therefore they don't have the 'moral authority' to disarm the rebel Islamists that disrupt Lebanese life with war and insurrection.

Of course to the left this rebel group, or state within a state, are FREEDOM FIGHTERS, fighting to destroy the state of Israel (and refusing to participate in parliament), so it follows that they have the 'moral authority' to keep their war-machine and to attack Lebanese society or Israel whenever it suits them.

It always amazes me how our leftists (far-left) ALWAYS parrot and support the Islamist (radical Islam) posturing. Islamist enemies are leftist enemies. Hmmmmmmmmmm....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:10 PM on 05/10/2008

"They don't have the 'moral authority' to disarm the rebel Islamists"

Hell, they don't have the ARMS to disarm Hezbollah. Or fight Israeli invasion for that matter.

And since when has Hezbollah refused to participate in Parliment?

You might try living in a reality based world instead of relying on slogans about leftists etc. Living in a fantasy world has resulted in the Catastrofuck that has been US policy for the past 7 years. Time for that stupidity to end.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:51 AM on 05/11/2008

Khazar???

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:35 AM on 05/11/2008

If the US administration and Israel kept out of Lebanon that country would have been in a much better state than it is now. That despite the fact that at every turn.

One cannot separate what the US administration and Israel are doing now from the miserable performance of Israel's army in the summer of 2006, and its earlier one in 2000.

Will they succeed? May be. But so far they evidently are not. It certainly seems that Hizbullah enjoys considerable popular support, not only while fighting Israel's incursions, but against their US-sponsored (stronger than backed) government. One only needs to skim through British newspapers to size up the size of tghe humiliating defeat of the intentions of the administration and Israel.

And yes, when the 'liberals' are not schizophrenic. They do NOT want the US to be embroiled in adventures that does not concern the people of the US - starting with Iraq and ending with Venezuela.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:44 PM on 05/10/2008

How's it the terrorists always seem to know when to pull out of a bad situation, but the US ARMY can't seem to figure that one out?

Jeepers.

**

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:53 PM on 05/10/2008

the fight was between Hezbollah (Shia) and the Sunni, the Lebanese army had a hands-off approach to the fight. Infact the Lebanese army (Christian) General Michel Sulaiman supports Hezbolla. All positions and entities captured by Hezbollah was handed back to the army even before the withdrawal began. As I mentioned elsewhere most Lebanese (Christians and Muslims) support Hezbolla's stance against the current Lebanese "government".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:07 PM on 05/10/2008

Hmmm, let me see now. Prime Minister Saniora says the airport chief has to go and the phone network is illegal. Hezbolla attacks in Beirut. The Prime Minister lets the army decide which says the airport chief can stay and we'll revisit the phone network issue. The army? They let the army decide who then gives in to Hezbollah? Who's running the country there anyway?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:05 PM on 05/10/2008

To Government had a choice: resign and flee, or rescind the decrees. To 'save face' it passed the decree for 'interpretation' and action by the Lebanese Army. The latter, obviously more caring for Lebanon that the US-Sponsored government, all but annulled them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 PM on 05/10/2008

American foreign policy, hard at work!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:44 PM on 05/10/2008

American policy, sad to say is based on sowing and fermenting total internal chaos in every country in the middle east. sad sad sad.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:10 PM on 05/10/2008

I am waiting for President Barack Obama to help soothe the tensions created by the Bush administration in the Middle East. This will be a new day in our foreign policy --- there will be hope again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:51 PM on 05/10/2008

Yep. We won't have the pesky Israel thing to concern ourselves with anymore.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:57 PM on 05/10/2008

Dream on

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:12 PM on 05/10/2008

I wouldn't get my hopes up too much. Barack Obama has already been compromised by the war lobby. Though, Obama is our best hope.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:29 PM on 05/10/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 

Related Tags
 

 Site  Web ask.com