Number Of Disabled Vets Up With Iraq, Afghan Wars

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

JENNIFER C. KERR | May 11, 2008 02:18 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Show your support.
Buzz this article up.
In this Nov. 8, 2007 file photo, wounded soldiers involved in physical therapy wait for President Bush to visit a physical therapy lab for wounded soldiers at the Center For The Intrepid at the Brooke Army Medical Center in San Antonio. Lines of U.S. troops are limping away from the military with damaged bodies and minds, a surging increase in disabled veterans that will cost the nation billions for decades to come _ even as the total of America's vets from all wars has begun to shrink. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert, File)

WASHINGTON — Increasing numbers of U.S. troops have left the military with damaged bodies and minds, an ever-larger pool of disabled veterans that will cost the nation billions for decades to come _ even as the total population of America's vets shrinks.

Despite the decline in total vets _ as soldiers from World War II and Korea die _ the government expects to be spending $59 billion a year to compensate injured warriors in 25 years, up from today's $29 billion, according to internal documents obtained by The Associated Press. And the Veterans Affairs Department concedes the bill could be much higher.

Why?

Worse wounds. More disabilities. More vets aware of the benefits and quicker to file for them.

Also, ironically, advanced medical care. Troops come home with devastating injuries that might well have killed them in earlier wars.

Time is also a factor when it comes to disability compensation costs. Payments tend to go up as veterans age, and an increasing number of soldiers from the Vietnam War will be getting bigger payments as they get older and are less able to work around their disabilities.

The number of disabled veterans has jumped by 25 percent since 2001 _ to 2.9 million _ and the cause really is no mystery.

"This is a cost of war," says Steve Smithson, a deputy director at the American Legion. "We're still producing veterans. We've been in a war in Iraq for five years now, and the war on terror since 9/11."

VA and Census Bureau figures show the previous six-year period, before hostilities in Afghanistan and Iraq, saw a more modest increase of 4 percent in the number of disabled vets. Veterans can make claims for disability benefits long after their military service has ended.

Today's veterans _ disabled or not _ number nearly 24 million. That population is projected by the VA to fall under 15 million by 2033, mostly because of dying World War II and Korean War vets. But costs are expected to rise.

Inflation accounts for a big chunk of the increase. But even when the VA factors out inflation, the compensation for disabled veterans would still grow from $29 billion to $33 billion in today's dollars _ a more than 10 percent increase. And the department acknowledges the estimate could rise by 30 percent.

VA officials were not eager to talk about reasons for the increases. They declined several requests for interviews. In a written response to a handful of questions, the agency noted a few factors at play in the rising costs, such as the aging veterans population, an increase in the number of disabilities claimed and the severity of injuries sustained.

Outside experts provided more insight.

The American Legion's Smithson says the Iraq and Afghanistan wars are resulting in more severe injuries _ amputations and traumatic burns _ the kind of injuries that troops in Vietnam and earlier wars would not have survived.

Smithson says today's veterans also are filing claims for more disabilities.

"People are more aware of the benefits they are able to file for (because of) better outreach," Smithson said. "It's not like the WWII generation and Korean war generation where they weren't aware of what they could file for, and they were also reluctant to file if they didn't think they needed it."

Iraq veteran Christopher Bain filed for about 10 disabilities after his tour in 2004. Bain came under mortar fire outside Baghdad and was hit several times. He successfully fought doctors who wanted to amputate his left arm. But 10 operations later, he still needs help getting dressed each day. An electrical stimulator implanted in his upper buttocks helps dull the pain from his injuries.

"It's hard, you go through certain periods of remorse," said Bain. "I am never going to be the man I once was."

Bain suffers from tinnitus, post-traumatic stress disorder and serious injuries to his arms. He receives a check each month for $2,618 that helps the former Army staff sergeant pay the mortgage, food and clothing costs for his family of five in Williamsport, Pa.

Bain is one of about 755,000 veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Of that group, the VA says more than 181,000 are collecting disability benefits.

Another factor driving up costs and the overall number of disabled veterans is Vietnam. Veterans from that era make up the biggest group of vets today receiving disability compensation. At the end of 2006, more than 947,000 Vietnam vets were getting monthly checks.

"You see an awful lot of Vietnam veterans over the course of the years have gone from a 30 percent to 40 percent disability rating up to 100 percent when their employment years start to wane a little bit," said David Gorman, a Vietnam War veteran who is executive director at the Washington headquarters of Disabled American Veterans.

Conditions, such as a bad back or knee, can worsen with age and draw higher payments. A big concern for Vietnam vets is diabetes. Last year, more than 271,000 veterans were receiving disability benefits for diabetes. Most of the disabilities _ 236,000 of them _ were linked to Agent Orange exposure.

Veterans who are approved for disability receive monthly checks for injuries or illnesses sustained or aggravated while on active duty. Ratings are scaled from 0 to 100 percent in 10 percent increments. A rating of 10 percent, for example, is given to tinnitus, or ringing in the ears, which is increasingly common for troops returning from Iraq and Afghanistan because of roadside bombings. Ratings for post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury can range from 0-to-100 percent, and 10-to-100 percent, respectively.

Former Army Sgt. Michelle Saunders was rated at 70 percent by the VA after being shot at during a 2004 convoy mission in Iraq. The bullet was caught in her flak jacket, but she sustained painful injuries, including two ruptured disks in her lower back and nerve damage to her right leg.

"It's turned me from a really alive, pretty happy person into somebody who is numb. I don't know how to feel anymore," she said.

Saunders gets a disability check each month from the VA for just under $800.

Annual benefits run from $1,404 for a veteran rated at 10 percent to about $30,324 for those at 100 percent. Severe disabilities, such as the loss of a limb, draw additional compensation.

____

On the Net:

Department of Veterans Affairs: http://www.va.gov

(This version CORRECTS the lead by changing wording to 'shrinks,' sted begun to shrink)

 
 

Comments
96
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

Illegality¦?

To start a war, a country needs UN Security Council approval, which Bush FAILED TO GET. Otherwise, a nation can fight only in self-defense when attacked. Iraq did NOT attack us¦!!!

Joint statement issued by Russia, China and France outlining their interpretation of UN Resolution: "Resolution 1441 (2002) adopted today by the Security Council excludes any automaticity in the use of force."

Wikipedia: "¦In the leadup to the meeting, it became apparent that a majority of UNSC members would oppose any resolution leading to war. As a result, no such resolution was put to the Council", and "¦according to most members of the Security Council, it is up to the council itself, and not individual members, to determine how the body's resolutions are to be enforced."

By attacking Iraq, Bush VIOLATED the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907, the Kellogg-Briand Peace Pact of 1928, the UN Charter, the Tokyo War Crimes Tribunals, and the Nuremberg Charter, Judgment and Principles.

As all treaties become the supreme law of the land under Article VI of the U.S. Constitution, the Bush-Cheney presidency is GUILTY of breaking all of the above.

WITHOUT Security Council authority, President Bush's war is a "CRIME AGAINST PEACE".

US WAR CRIMES include torture of prisoners, authorized by Rumsfeld and White House lawyers; the use of cluster bombs in civilian areas; and the firing of depleted uranium shells--- this last also a violation of the Geneva Protocol of 1925. It's a WAR CRIME.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:11 PM on 05/12/2008


I say we sign the ICC Accords retroactively and ship the off to the Hague.

Ex post facto means that you cannot create new laws & punishments for

deeds already committed but war crimes have been illegal for decades.

The neocons can retroactively grant immunity for illegal spying, why then

can't we, retroactively sign on to already established International Law?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:00 PM on 05/12/2008

Illegality, chinaskee¦?

To start a war, a country needs UN Security Council approval, which Bush FAILED TO GET. Otherwise, a nation can fight only in self-defense when attacked.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:10 PM on 05/12/2008

Many of us will suffer the consequences, as our children and grand-children will be faced with the moral, social and physical consequences of war.
Many of us today are still dealing with the consequences of the Mexican-American War, World War I, II, Vietnam and Korean Wars, Desert Storm and the Irak War.
The consequences are getting more severe as technology is more advanced. That is a terrible price to pay for our soldiers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 PM on 05/11/2008

Waging war is an expensive business. Waging an unnecessary is an insane business - and growing more expensive with each crazy, unneeded war. What will George Bush's illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq cost us? How about $3 trillion for starters?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:05 PM on 05/11/2008

One of the NON-STORIES of this Administratin is the HUGE number of SEVERELY wounded vets.

We keep people alive who would've died in other wars - people who live on lacking legs and arms in varying numbers, people with severe brain damage.... add to that people with serious PTSD and the 'normal' injuries suffered in war and this nation is now taking on a population of disabled unlike any other produced by any other war.

We have NO IDEA of how bad this is - or will be... and unfortunately the vets themselves will be suffering the consequences of our ill-prepardness.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:32 PM on 05/11/2008

So we have thousands of wounded soldiers returning home, many without limbs, many paralyzed, or having other disabilities that require use of a wheelchair. Meanwhile, the housing availability for people in wheelchairs continues to diminish, as developers figure out that few cities and county building authorities are checking for compliance with ADA codes.

Many apartment and condo buildings do a poor job of designing accessible units, if they build any at all, since the ADA does NOT require builders of PRIVATE residences to comply with the ADA. Oftentimes the accessible units are rented to first come, first serve, so the units are rented to able-bodied persons who are not in wheelchairs. Only a few cities in the country even keep track of handicap housing and have any type of list whereby someone can sign up for such a unit if it is built or an existing one become available.

There are simply not enough ADA compliant accessible apartments and condos being built to keep up with the growing demand of disabled veterans, not to mention the aging population of baby boomers.

The returning veterans will have enough problems readjusting to society without worrying about where they will be able to live if they need accessible housing provided by the private sector. x republican is x-actly correct; we are not prepared to house these returning wounded soldiers. Perhaps they will have to turn the closed and abandoned military bases into large veterans' homes. What a dishonor that would be.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:20 PM on 05/12/2008

Why do republicunts hate our troops so much?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:21 PM on 05/11/2008

Because they're evil nazi stormtrooper, raping, Ghengis Khan, pillaging, murdering thugs, and blah blah blah! God, don't you watch any Michael Moore movies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:53 PM on 05/11/2008

Mr troll please point out which movie that Moore called our troops what you are refering to.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:51 AM on 05/12/2008

The results of a "cadaver-based" presidency.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:06 PM on 05/11/2008

Over and above other college, and VA benefits.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:14 PM on 05/11/2008

I am a known republican that is welcome on this Democrat web-site. And I study every side of an issue, many times best friend of a liberal. and am always respectful of everyone. Here is an article I wrote that is verifiable EXTREMELY very true, and look at the comment I have to put up with the --Ty"s"that are actually are living in our great United States of America.

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_pat_smit_080508_veterans_vs_amnesty.htm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:14 PM on 05/11/2008

I read everything. You have a right to make your point but I believe things are much more complicated than this. It is actually a much more spiritual/karmic situation. All goes back to the dip shit ass wipes of the Roman Catholic Church and how they treated native peoples 600 years ago. Maybe Rev. Hagee is onto something after all? Ty needs to calm down.

Obama - Webb 08, 12

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:19 AM on 05/12/2008

They can 1100.00 dollars a month to go to college.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:13 PM on 05/11/2008

To hop to college.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:17 PM on 05/11/2008

Thats a shameful response, these kids are fighting for your freedom numbskull.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:28 PM on 05/11/2008

What freedom. Every country in the industrial nations on this globe is as FREE
or more than we are and they don't have this huge miitary. Just think, we
are the bullies of the world and by doing so we will always have lots of
enemies. So what freedom are you talking about. The word "freedom" has
turned into a joke and just keeping to repeat it won't solve this matter any.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:57 PM on 05/12/2008


What do you say to someone that makes such a comment:

"these kids are fighting for your freedom" ?

These kids went to maim and murder. And guess what. They are maimed and
killed because they attacked two countries that did not attack the us and did
not have WMD as the us does.

A clearer mind sees that they went to take away someone else's freedom.
Plain and simple. And they are paying the price.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:24 AM on 05/12/2008

I love each and every one of them with all my heart, and I also love the ones that paid the ultimate price. God bless each and every one of them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:08 PM on 05/11/2008

Number Of Disabled Vets Not From The Bush/Cheney/Romney Up With Iraq, Afghan Wars

Number Of Disabled Vets From The Bush/Cheney/Romney Still At Zero.

A very significant number.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:40 PM on 05/11/2008

*

Who DIES for Bush LIES

LIES about the IRAQI Threats

LIES about Profits

LIES about Arming Iraq

GULF war Lies

http://www.whodies.com/lies.html

*

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 PM on 05/11/2008

I have a list of people Clinton murdered if that interests you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:37 PM on 05/11/2008

I have a list of 108 people that where murdered by GHWB want to see it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 AM on 05/12/2008

That kind of stuff don't interest these people on Huff Po.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 PM on 05/11/2008

$59B in 25 years is projected. That will be the NEED. NOT what is ultimately spent as our oh-so-grateful government will send the vets a big one finger salute.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:09 PM on 05/11/2008

*

Pentagon Warns Of "Harm" From Webb"s Effort To Give Educational Benefits To Soldiers After "Only" 2 Years

.............. The Pentagon and the White House oppose the bill, however, apparently "out of fear that too many will use it."................

http://thinkprogress.org/2008/05/06/pentagon-webb-gi-harm/

*

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 AM on 05/11/2008

*

This is a BIG Embarrassment for Bush Administration.

Shame on this Government and it's Supporters.

And Shame on so called "Former POW" McCane who wants to carry on this Illegal Invasion for another 100 years or so.

*

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 AM on 05/11/2008

What was illegal about it ? The UN approved the resolution and Congress voted to give President Bush the authority as well. So where's the illegality ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:24 AM on 05/11/2008

According to the rules of the Geneva Conventions, of which the US IS signatory, the invasion and subsequent occupation of another nation, EXCEPT in the case of ACTUAL self defense, shall be considered an act of aggression, punishable under articles of international law.

Just because we had a bunch of chicken-sh*t congresspersons VOTE for the use of unlimited force in Bush's Waronterruh, does NOT make it legal, nor moral. The US invasion and occupation of Iraq is not considered a "War", which can only be declared by Congress. US Constitution: Article I, Sect. 8, paragraph 11

The purpose of our aggressive invasion and subsequent occupation of Iraq is solely for its "Americanization". Many Germans were executed for the "Germanization" of other nations. That term was coined during The Hague trials. In part, the invading nation must aggressively attack, without provocation, another sovereign nation, mass slaughter innocents (a type of ethnic cleansing), nationalize the conquered nation's government and economy, and claim rights to booty.

Your question should actually be: By what legal authority can America invade and occupy Iraq? There is no doubt that our current and continued presence there is illegal AND immoral. The United States has performed a lawless act. There's a big difference between what is legal and what is just.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:05 PM on 05/11/2008

You didn't listen to chinaskee at all did you, It was Not an illigal war read chinaskee again so you will understand.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:29 PM on 05/11/2008

What resolution?

The UN "approved" if Bush could prove Iraq still had weapons of "mass destruction."
He could not do so. Therefore, the resolution does not in fact pertain.

Congress?

Bush was to prove that Iraq was behind 9/11. Not done because they had nothing to do with 9/11.

So, the "war" is indeed illegal. Bush invaded DESPITE the UN and Congress.

Read the resolution yourself. Part 3.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:02 PM on 05/11/2008

I see now you all believe what you want to believe nothing about the facts interests you. I still love you though. I really hope Obama does get elected,(bite my tongue). Lets just see how much he gets done. No more than Bush, Clinton,Reagan, Bush sr. or any before them. House and Senate term limits folks, term limits.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:50 PM on 05/11/2008

Nice revisionism there legal scholar. Resolution 1441 called for Sadaam Hussein to comply 100% with the weapons inspectors or face serious consequences. He didn't comply 100% and the rest is history.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:25 PM on 05/11/2008

*

chinaskee
===============

When was the last time you have Enlisted to go and fight over there?????!!!!!

*

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:31 AM on 05/11/2008

Thats none of your business but I love you anyway.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:56 PM on 05/11/2008

Thats no of your business but I still love you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:55 PM on 05/11/2008

Can't answer the question can you ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 AM on 05/11/2008

*

chinaskee
=============

In your eyes it is Legal as long as you don't have to go fight over there and come back home in a body bag.

*

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 AM on 05/11/2008