Obama/McCain: Kennedy/Nixon or Eisenhower/Stevenson?

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

Posted May 13, 2008 | 01:37 PM (EST)



Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

Perhaps because it is through telling stories that I pay my rent, but I think that humans reason via analogy and storytelling. We attempt to get a handle on the present and predict the future through comparisons to stories of the past. If someone is trying to sell us some new music they do so by analogy. Check out Amy Winehouse, they tell us. She sounds like the unisexual mating of Dinah Washington and Janis Joplin.

Presidential elections function the exact same way. With the two nominees all but certain we're now in a race to shape the story. The McCain side will draw him as the reincarnation of Ike, Montgomery and Julius Caesar, the noble philosopher/warrior who has put down his armor to come lead his people. They are already busily trying to paint Obama as Adlai Stevenson, an out-of-touch egghead, a well-intentioned but nutty professor.

The Obama side has explicitly been borrowing the JFK and RFK signifiers from the very beginning: the no tie, the youth, the embodiment of a new day.

What the Obama camp needs to do now is turn McCain into JFK's Nixon, the personification of antired old order that has run its course.

The elements are all there and more to paint a compelling and devastating picture of the Senator from Arizona.

As Arianna and others have pointed out he was long-considered the most-likable and most-open-minded of Republicans, but to become the Republican nominee his compromises have been Shakespearean in their enormity. "Shakespearean," is the operating adjective here. The story of John McCain is a tragedy of compromise writ large. The maverick once embodied all that we had hoped for in a reformist politician and to see him now neutered by the extreme right with their death grip on the Republican political machinery is heartbreaking. It needs to be pointed out again and again and again that this once proud warrior is running on a platform that he himself doesn't agree with; many portions of which he himself has voted against. Twice.

Obama needs to get us to weep for McCain as a hero who wasn't felled by our enemies but by the grinding corruption of Washington insider politics. Senator Obama needs to hold him up as the prime example of why he is running for President. To fix a system that has turned one of our brightest hopes into a defeated shell of his former self.

Obama should tell the nation that the problem isn't that seventy-year-old John McCain has been around too long -- he's just been in Washington too long.


Trey Ellis is the author of "Bedtime Stories: Adventures in the Land of Single-Fatherhood."

 
 

Comments
49
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

Obama has absolutely nothing of JFKs national optimism and faith in American exceptionalism. Nothing of JFK's unconditional commitment to bear any burden, pay any price and make any sacrifice for the defense of liberty. His youthfulness is all that he has, behind which there is a staggering naivity about our predatory enemies that would have made JFK's hair stand on end.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:47 AM on 05/14/2008

"American exceptionalism" is hardly a virtue.

My own memory of JFK and afterwards is that when it became apparent that we were using the horror of war as one more political tool in our belt, to shape foreign policy to our own liking (regardless of the morality involved, or lack of it), JFK: [a] refused troops for a military followup to the unauthorized Bay Of Pigs, which the CIA had cooked-up behind his back; [b] issued the order (NSAM 263) to just say the hell with it and start pulling the troops out of Viet Nam.

(We all know how that last one ended up.)

So there goes the argument that "American exceptionalism", which is more a belief system of the Bush/Cheney cabal, somehow was one of the traits that endeared Kennedy to a wide swath of the American people. I really don't think so.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:42 PM on 05/14/2008

American exceptionalism" carries no weight with the Afrocentric Obamas. In that respect they are miles apart from the America-centric JFK, as is today's leftist Kennedy clan.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:08 PM on 05/14/2008

Obama is no JFK.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:40 AM on 05/14/2008

Nor for that matter is he another Martin Luther King.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:58 AM on 05/14/2008

True he isn't JFK but JFK's brother and daughter saw some of the inspirational things that reminded them of JFK . I think they should know......before anyone else. Obam is older that JFK was when he was elected. I lived during the JFK campaign, did you ? His campaign like Barack's was inspirational enough to make my family change from Republican to Democrat.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 AM on 05/14/2008

How about Obama/McCain?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:25 AM on 05/14/2008

The nostalgic connection to JFK and Camelot is understandable. He was the best looking POTUS in modern history and up against Nixon, who was more of a caricaturist's dream than a Hollywood starlet's, it's easy to romanticize JFK's victory. But the myth doesn't resemble the truth. The fact is the 1960 presidential election was almost as close as 2000, and there are many who still believe that voter fraud in Texas and Illinois gave Kennedy the edge over Nixon.

Coincidentally, there were many senior Democrats who worried about JFK's relative inexperience and his Catholicism. Al Smith, the only other Catholic to make it to the general presidential election lost to Herbert Hoover in 1928. It was JFK's victory over Herbert Hoover in the West Virginia primary that bolstered his argument that a Catholic could will the general election.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:09 AM on 05/14/2008

Oops. JFK's West Virginia victory was over Hubert Humphrey not Herbert Hoover. Sorry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:49 AM on 05/14/2008

Trey, JFK had to steal the elction to win. This is undisputed. Are you suggesting that Obama should stoop to criminallity in order to win?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 AM on 05/14/2008

It is disputed.



But it only even has to be, when someone like you trots-out this sick and discredited urban legend.

Third time's a charm:


http://www.slate.com/id/91350/



"Facts are stupid things"-- R.W. Reagan, the Holy Messiah of Death-Metal Republicans, 1988

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:59 PM on 05/14/2008

Trey, this blog entry is predicated on fantasy. The Repubs can't even win in Mississippi.
The only way a Republican wins anything in November is if they call the elections off. People hate, genuinely hate, the President. His negative ratings make Nixon look like George Washington in comparison. McCain, with Lieberman whispering in his ear, has inexplicably emulated this loathed, criminal figure. Ralph Nader could beat a Republican in an honest election this year.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:00 AM on 05/14/2008

Fantasy thinking. McCain will win all the states President Bush won in 2004 and at least three other border states that he lost. Obama is only guaranteed states where there are large percentages of African American voters. Other than that he won't carry middle class voters, asian voters, hispanic voters, jewish voters, Reagan Democrats or senior citizens.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:11 AM on 05/14/2008

Guess what? - McCain with a smirk will retrieve a Texas Democrat's comparison of an Indiana Senator with JFK. Also, JFK was smart enough to figure out that he needed the old line Dems too, which is why he had LBJ (& TX) on his ticket. BO comes up way short compared with JFK. And LBJ was no Senator Reid, thank God.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:37 PM on 05/13/2008

If Barack Obama ever even dared to say directly that McCain is a "hero who wasn't felled by our enemies but by the grinding corruption of Washington insider politics", the GOP smear machine would go into Full Frontal Outrage, and the mainstream media would demand... DEMAND!.. that Obama apologize immediately, for calling the Straight Talking War Hero Maverick "corrupt".

And that is why just about all Obama has ever uttered have been platitudes, bromides and motivational spiel. Blame him for that if you want, but you must understand that literally anything he utters that is not squeaky-positive will be ground back into his face, and he will have no friends in the media, when the GOP bares its scary teeth at them.

There won't be one chance in this election for anyone except, perhaps, MoveOn.org... and just wait until you see what gets said about THEM (like they care, fortunately!)... to speak the necessary truth to John McCain publicly. And the opportunities for them to be heard by vast numbers of voters will be kept to a minimum.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:22 PM on 05/13/2008

Sorry, Obama has already called MCCain corrupt and the MSM parrot his comment for days after.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:20 AM on 05/14/2008

ResidentChimp:


Everything you wrote is a lie.

[a] Cite your sources, on the "corrupt" thing. Or be branded the liar you are;

[b] As your scroll finger is impaired, you obviously didn't see where I made fertilizer out of the gentleman below, concerning that old, old Kennedy crap... emphasis on CRAP.



Here, morally- and intellectually-impovershed troll. Read, weep, disappear:


http://www.slate.com/id/91350/





"Facts are stupid things."-- Ronald Wilson Reagan, 1988

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:34 AM on 05/14/2008

Obama is no JFK, politically atleast. Obama comes from the far left of the political spectrum, whereas JFK was a centrist. And Obama is no bambi. He may not have a lot of Washington experience, but he definetely knows politics -Chicago style! Tony Rezko! Rev Wright. William Ayers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 PM on 05/13/2008

Like JFK, you mean rig the election in Chicago and buy off the opponent to not contest. Obama has a better start, since the Chicago machine helped create him.
Also, if he plans a JFK, he had better be much more selective and not pick an LBJ for a VP.

Unfortunately, so far the campaign is run more like a Humphrey, McGovern, or Dukakis, Mondale, Gore, Kerry..........Yes, you have students, yes you have the liberal elite, but what about swing voters in swing states. This is concerning, because putting in McCain will be a disaster. Bush wants McCain because it will give him cover for history. Bush will look great in light of a McCain Presidency.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:37 PM on 05/13/2008

noneIn2008:

Google is your friend.

Go find out if Richard Nixon ever undertook an investigation of the "stolen" 1960 election, and what happened (I'm not doing it for you).



(... oh, screw it: http://www.slate.com/id/91350/ :-)


Facts are stupid things.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 PM on 05/13/2008

What Obama really needs to tell you is that he is the Flimflam Man from Nowhere Bamboozle. But don't worry, he'll tell you that when it's way too late to do anything about it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:52 PM on 05/13/2008

Obama is substance like JFK. I was young but remember the Kennedy-Nixon debates. MCain I believe is 72 years old, almost 20 years older than his wife, whom he met while he was married to another woman, by the way who waited for him while he was a POW. She had a terrible auto accident during that time. However, Mr. holier than thou McCain ditched her for money bags junkie Cindy. I am sorry for the pain McCain endured in Viet Nam, however. Oh well, I digress.
I don't thank Obama has to do too much as McCain does it to himself every time he opens his mouth. I exprect him to start snoring during one of his so-called 'speeches'. If you want a country to be proud of for yourself, and if your older for your kids and grandskids, Obama's the one!

Independent for Obama '08

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 PM on 05/13/2008

obama doesn't have to do much. mccain is embarrassing himself well enough on his own

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:21 PM on 05/13/2008

and what McCain needs to do is turn Obama into Reagan's Carter...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:27 PM on 05/13/2008

The Repubs wish they could turn McCain into Carter's Reagan.
But even Repubs will admit that Bob Barr looks more like Reagan than McCain does.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:17 PM on 05/13/2008

Reagan won the first time because Anderson siphoned off the votes that would have gone to Carter, just as Perot did to Bushdaddy. Reagan's borrow and spend policies and deregulation of Savings and loans almost destroyed the US economy, just as the same policies have done under Bushbabby. If voters studied history, and the policies of the candidates, McCain wouldn't get 20% of the vote. Lucky for Republicans, a lot of voters vote with their emotions and not their brains.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:43 PM on 05/13/2008

That won't be hard. He's doing most of the hard work for McCain...it's just that his supporters don't see it.

What I want everyone to remember is how Nixon won the second time around...he appealed to the 'silent majority'...it's out there, guys.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:56 PM on 05/13/2008

True, though McCain is certainly doing his best to channel Tricky Dick Nixon. He's even got that weird, creepy grin down pat. Modern television production will have the guy powdered up and air conditioned in a debate, so we probably won't see his makeup run and armpits get soggy like with Nixon.

However, anyone who's all full of vinegar about not having their favorite Democratic candidate as the nominee will take one look at McCain and realize voting for him is about as stupid as it gets. If you vote for McCain, you really haven't researched the candidates very well. The only reason the guy hasn't been kicked out of the race is because the Federal Election Committee has been deadlocked. McCain has definitely and blatantly violated some of very same campaign finance regulations that he, himself created. If the FEC situation, which has been held up by Bush, is resolved and Bush's guy isn't appointed, McCain could be in a whole mess of trouble. And a president McCain could be impeached within his first 6 months of office.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:57 PM on 05/13/2008

Really bad analogy.

When JFK ran the Democratic had much broader appeal to moderates and conservatives. The Dems are now being led by the left wing and snobby left wingers at that. They look down on white blue collar people.

Obama is doomed in the general election. The Dems will try and make him palatable to white blue collar. They have him holding a cue stick in one hand, a beer in the other. His body language discomfort in these venues speaks volumes. He does not connect.

The other sickening part of Obama is his claims about being beyond politics. He is a product of Chicago machine politics. He got his ticket punched by the extreme left wing as well as the Richard Daley machine. Obama thinks most of the USA is stupid and and just fall into the mindless Obamamania.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:49 PM on 05/13/2008

Meanwhile White workers....Hard working White Americans.... will continue to be screwed by policies that favor the wealthy and well-connected. There are lots of people out here who are really hurting economically. Most people are trying desperately to keep a stiff upper lip and not panic, but how long can this continue? The conservative philosophy of small government and tax cuts has been maxed out. John McCain will not be able to continue George W. Bush policies and keep domestic tranquility.

Symbolism and patriotism are not going to provide the answers to the structural challenges facing the economic and political system of the US. You talk about connecting with people. In 2004, White workers...Hard working White Americans¦ wanted to have a beer with G.W. Bush. Instead he shit in their faces. How many White workers¦Hard working White people...would still like to invite him over for that Gdamn beer?

We need a leader that can help solve problems and provide answers to deep seated questions about the future of this nation. How in the hell does McCain fit this mold?

Without getting into the specifics of Obama"s policies. How ironic would it be if Obama has the capacity to bring a political approach to the USA that is actually effective "with the caveat being " White workers¦. Hard working White people would have to get over their cultural "sensitivities" and vote for him!!!
Somewhere on Mt. Olympus the Gods must be laughing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:39 PM on 05/13/2008

Not actually true. The whole country was further left then, so moderate democrats and liberal and moderate republicans were further left. There isn't even such a thing as a liberal Republican anymore, the party has moved so far right. truth will still come out, no matter how much Conservatives try to rewrite history.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:36 PM on 05/13/2008

When the Dems went with McGovern all the conservative Dems went over to the Republican party. That was 1972. In 1960 and thru 1968 the Dems still had a balance between left and right.

After 12 years with Reagan and Bush the Dems woke up a bit and realized they are out of touch with a big chunk of America. Clinton closed this gap.

Obama is a cross between McGovern/Kerry/Carter/Dukakis, all of these guys are losers for the presidency with the exception that Carter won one term.

The Dem left wing has hijacked the party again. They assume that given Bush's low rating they can go with a left winger. Stupid is as stupid does. Hillary in 2012.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:38 PM on 05/13/2008

Yeah whatever, you guys keep coming up with ways Obama will lose but he keeps on winning. Bet this time next year you guys will be coming up with how Obama will squander his high approval ratings as President.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 PM on 05/13/2008

Excellent points. Add Mondale in 1984 moving more Dems to Regan.

If Gore would have simply followed the Clinton playbook in 2000, he would have easily won. He listened to the extreme branch. He abandoned swing voters in swing states.

And, why allow the far left select a candidate to lose? This should be an easy win for the Democratic party.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 PM on 05/13/2008

SAME OLD STUFF...AND YOU GUYS PROMISED ME OBAMA WAS DIFFERENT!

Seems like this blogger is advocating that Obama do some old school negative campaigning. It's not as if Obama hasn't done it thus far, in fact, it's refreshing to see of Obama's supporters be so blatant about his desire for Obama to paint his opponent in a negative light.

Wait, isn't that what they complained everyone else was doing to Obama?

Isn't the implication of the word "paint" that you will be altering the story in some way? Is McCain really the guy you want him to be painted as? Or, is he just gonna be another victim of Obama's smears?

Live by the sword, dies by the sword!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:47 PM on 05/13/2008

It's OK to paint if the colors are true.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:44 PM on 05/13/2008

Of course, go for a witty comeback...how about talking about the real issue?

Obama is gonna do whatever he has to to win. Nothing new...just the same old stuff!

I'm not mad at him...I just wonder if his supporters really believe him or if they just wanna win.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:09 AM on 05/14/2008

Clearly, this is not the new politics that Obama has held mantle upon. Why not tell any number of stories of regular people suffering today followed by some actual substance that Obama will push to help folks out? He can do that; it is in reach.

Just because it's not actually Obama doing this old-skool, weak-ass politics, doesn't mean it's the right thing to do. Surrogates actions do reflect on Obama and this is not a good one. And he can win without it. Well, if he can't, he doesn't deserve to win.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:07 PM on 05/13/2008

Hey... That was my idea. I watched the JFK/Nixon debate on History Channel OnDemand yesterday and It was amazing to how similar in rehtorical abilities JFk & Obama have and Nixon & McCain has. I think this will be a perfect strategy.

For anyone who wants to see the debate
Comcast Digital Cable- On Demand- Under the Election 08 button.