Oil Billionaire T. Boone Pickens Orders 667 Wind Turbines

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

STEPHEN SINGER | May 15, 2008 05:04 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

HARTFORD, Conn. _ Maverick oilman T. Boone Pickens' plan for a mammoth wind farm in the Texas Panhandle is a $2 billion bet that Congress will extend a tax credit critical to the environmentally friendly industry.

Pickens' company, Mesa Power, is purchasing hundreds of wind turbines from General Electric Co. to create the Pampa Wind Project, which will eventually cover 400,000 acres and generate enough power for more than 1.3 million homes.

"We are making Pampa the wind capital of the world," Pickens said. "It's clear that landowners and local officials understand the economic benefits that this renewable energy can bring not only to landowners who are involved with the project, but also in revitalizing an area that has struggled in recent years."

Pickens said the total cost of the deal will grow to between $10 billion and $12 billion after the initial $2 billion investment in GE's turbine technology. The entire four-phase project is forecast for completion in 2014. It will eventually have 4,000 megawatts of capacity.

Wind farms and other alternative fuels are gaining more interest as the cost of oil keeps breaking records. Oil prices hit a trading record near $127 a barrel Tuesday.

Pickens, who was born in nearby Oklahoma and made the early part of his fortune hunting for oil and natural gas, said that developing alternative energy projects is critical for the nation's future. But the industry has relied on federal tax credits to survive, a point that Pickens underscored Thursday.

"I believe that Congress will recognize that it is critical not only to this project, but to renewable energy in this country, that they enact a long-term extension of the Production Tax Credits," he said.

Tax credits of 2 cents per kilowatt hour are set to expire this December, said Christine Real de Azua, a spokeswoman for the American Wind Energy Association.

The credits expired in 1999, 2001 and 2003, Real de Azua said. Wind power installation dropped significantly in each year following expiration of the credits, according to the organization.

Because it is unclear that the production tax credit will be in place, financing for many projects is still pending, she said.

"These projects are being held up and investment is at stake," Real de Azua said.

More than 5,200 megawatts of new wind power capacity was installed last year, more than double the amount in 2006, the American Wind Energy Association said.

The deal is a windfall for Fairfield-based GE, which makes jet engines, locomotives and water treatment plants and runs the NBC television network. Normally a reliable producer for its shareholders, GE's failure to hit its own projected earnings marks in the first quarter this year sent a ripple through Wall Street and underscored that even the world's largest companies are struggling with the weakened economy.

The wind announcement came a day after reports surfaced that GE was shopping its 101-year-old appliance business for as much as $8 billion. Last year, it sold its struggling plastics business to a Saudi Arabian company for $11.6 billion.

While GE has worked in recent years to shed underperforming products, Thursday's deal with Mesa Power was in line with its strategy to grow its renewable investment business.

GE set a goal of investing $6 billion in renewable energy by 2010, increasing its investment by 50 percent.

"As America's demand for energy escalates, it is clear that wind can and will play a bigger part in meeting that need," said Jeffrey R. Immelt, GE Chairman and CEO. "We're excited to partner with an energy visionary like T. Boone Pickens to bring our wind technology to the marketplace."

GE fell 14 cents per share, or less than 1 percent, to $32.37, on Thursday.

___

AP Business Writer Adam Schreck in New York contributed to this report.

 
 

Comments
70
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

The big wallets are starting to buy into the alternative energy future - last week Google bought into BrightSource Energy (solar thermal) - joining other investors like Chevron and British Petroleum - putting their money where their mouths are. Mr. Boone Pickens is simply making his (smart) move now, before the real stampede in this direction starts.

The nay sayers and critics had better start watching where the money is going - these people didn't get rich by being stupid and chasing after unprofitable ideas - but nobody gets rich by being the last person to give up on obsolete ideas or to invest in opportunity.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 AM on 05/19/2008

While Bush and the Republicans keep pushing for Billions in subsidies to Exxon, Mr. Pickens is willing to put up his own Billions to do something to help America.
Instead of traveling to Saudi Arabia and begging for more oil, Bush should have been spending the Billions he gave away to his oil buddies on developing renewable energy resources. If Bush had been leading the way in the efforts to develop this and other technologies, instead of getting in the way, we might not have to rely on imported oil today. 7+ plus years of wasted leadership.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:38 AM on 05/17/2008

Mr. Pickens is one of the many behind the Republicans who want to kill Social Security and Medicare to force the American People on to economic slavery with no unions and million of Illegals to compete with for a job.

Mr. Pickens sees the cost of coal running up and the cost of manitance of coal fired power plants he is not stupid when wind mills require less than 1/3 the maintance and fuel is free if you have the right spots and the right height.

If Solar Power was a little more efficent he would be going there too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:02 AM on 05/18/2008

Thanks T. Boone. We need wind mills. You're putting your money at risk and I hope you make a nice profit.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:55 PM on 05/16/2008

This is the signal, people: we have passed the peak.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:35 PM on 05/16/2008

If the American People have any brains at all, they will buy their own windmills, or photovoltiac systems, or hydro-plants. The last thing this country needs is to reinforce the albotross around our necks that the utility companies are! If we decentrlize this industry we save ourselves money and eliminate a network of potentially attractive targets to our enemies! Do the research, you can rid yourself of this parasitic industry right now with about a ten year breakeven point! Less in many areas.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:36 PM on 05/15/2008

Excellent point. Pickens thinks he so advanced in his thinking. 400,000 acres of windmills and he's just starting. Doesn't he see a problem with efficiency of land use? How do we dispose of those windmills when there life is over, just bury them?

I don't even think the design he's using in the most advanced. Pickens needs to stop obsessing on making billions of dollars for himself and work on what is best for the country. Those goofy old bastards who love to build monuments to themselves are killing the US. Eco-Tech shows some real solutions. We need organic batteries and fuel from trash. They have examples of wind turbines that go on large buildings to supply that buildings and uses the wind generated in the cities.

Instead, Pickens wants to fill the countryside with windmills.

The energy grid needs to be local, and it needs to be as close to 100% recyclable as possible. Guys like Pickens want one pipe for water, one pipe for oil and each fuel, and one pipe for clean air...and he wants to own those pipes. To hell with that kind of 'capitalism".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:27 AM on 05/16/2008

If we the people are going to pay this company money we should get equity. We should own part of the company. The dividends from that ownership can go to pay future social security payments. Why just give away money so that rich people can be even richer? Just how dumb can we be?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:32 PM on 05/15/2008

Individuals own the generation sites, and, as Pickens suggests, the investment will disappear if the subsidy is withdrawn. The U.S. is busy spending its $$ on imported oil (refusing meaningful CONSERVATION, e.g., smaller cars....?) and a POINTLESS war in Iraq.....begun by a FAILED, "oil-man-son-of-a-failed-oil man," for which he continues UNCHASTISED!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:21 PM on 05/16/2008

Dont get me wrong from my last post. I am 100% alternative energy. And I have no problem with someone making a profit. But I think there will be a major price to pay if I am correct.
And as usual. I really just want to be wrong. I hate thinking that corporations are out to screw us and control us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:37 PM on 05/15/2008

One distribution line to supply each of what is required for modern life, food, water, clothing, fuel, tools...and a very small percentage is going to own those pipelines. People used to think that was a bad thing. Citizens used to think it was worth dying to prevent that. Now, they just stay huddled behind their computers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:32 AM on 05/16/2008

I just finally get what he is doing. Its not just about generating power and making more money, but under the law in most states, utilities are required to buy back any excess electricity generated by alternative sources, like wind and solar, and , they usually have to pay the retail rate. It was meant to get homeowners to convert and help support themselves and the grid. But Boone is going to pull an Californian Enron scam! Leave it to a US capitalist to figure out how to screw the public even more. Because this will surely raise the price of electricity to the consumer if the power company has to, by law, purchase TBPs electricity at prime rate. Especially the amounts of power this will generate.

Ah, the great American businessman in action. You know that means you better grab your ankles and forget the lubrication.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:34 PM on 05/15/2008

This sure as hell beats nuclear. Pickens is also an investor and proponent of natural gas for vehicles. So he figures wind replaces natural gas and coal for electricity, freeing natural gas for transportation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:02 PM on 05/15/2008

this is so great. first the guy poisons the planet for 25 years and socializes all the costs of his fossil fuel clusterf***, now he is going to permanently obliterate 400,000 acres of wilderness and socialize the cost of that. with "friends" like pickens, the planet doesn't need enemies.

point of use, local, renewable power is the ONLY sustainable solution. REDUCES congestion on existing transmission (so no new powerlines), is more reliable and stable than faraway, wasteful projects running down long lines, and subject to earthquakes, fires and terrorism, and most importantly, local projects on previously developed land allow PEOPLE to participate in the renewable energy economy, not just gigantic corporations.

government wastes billions of YOUR dollars and millions of YOUR acres of publicly owned wilderness to prop up enormously profitable Big Energy companies, so don't tell me they can't afford to offer the same types of guarantees to us (cheap capital financing, power buybacks, incentives, tax breaks, subsidies, etc). it's OUR MONEY after all. we need to insist on getting these wilderness killers off our corporate welfare rolls and start getting some benefits for ourselves before they create yet another monopoly over commodities we all have - sun and wind! this is NOT an environmental victory, just another blow to the ecosystem and a raid on the US coffers...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:06 PM on 05/15/2008

I don't know if you've been to Pampa, TX but I don't think it's the kind of wilderness that you're thinking of. I'm not sure if rattlesnakes and coyotes have a migration to interrupt.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:17 PM on 05/15/2008

what an odd reply. you think that intentional ecosystems which are critical to balancing other ecosystems are disposable because they have rattlesnakes instead of polar bears? and did you know that the areas right outside Joshua Tree National Park and Death Valley and the Mojave Preserve are all under siege from this kind of development, too? or are those all also disposable ecosystems?

keep in mind, these are not deserts because they are over-logged, poisoned by chemicals or depleted of all their water by man. these are naturally-occurring deserts because the planet needs deserts just like it needs rainforests, coral reefs, mangroves, glaciers and other naturally occurring ecosystems. they are important for water filtration, wind, aridity, hundreds of thousands of species of plants and animals and thousands of reasons we don't yet know.

it is totally insane to obliterate them when there is a more viable, more sensible and less destructive way to do this, no matter how aesthetically unattractive you find them to be. most of LA is a blight on the planet with cheap strip mall after strip mall, so why not raze that and use that space and let the wilderness do what it's intended to do?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:34 PM on 05/15/2008

Sheila. Please turn your computer off. It uses electricity.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:19 PM on 05/15/2008

Is this the same Pickens of "Swift Boaters for Truth" fame?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:56 PM on 05/15/2008

Do the math.

For 36 billion we could provide all the wind 23.5 million Texans need. At night they could plug in their cars and have them recharged for the next day.
400,000 acres sounds like a lot, but it's only a 25 mile by 25 mile piece of land.
Texans used 285,419,000 barrels of oil to drive their cars and trucks.
At $126 a barrel that's nearly 36 billion a year, 3/4 of it going overseas.

36 billion is a small investment. For the price of one year's oil purchases Texas could become energy independent.

This is a no brainer. Congress, if you want to pump up the economy how about doing smart deficit spending? Screw income tax rebates and housing bailouts. Invest our dollars in energy independence.

300 million people in this country. For every 2 billion invested in wind we could provide power to 1.3 million people. Clean power, putting Americans to work in manufacturing and construction. Good for the environment, good for the nation, good for the world (since we consume 25 percent of the energy).

Compare the 460 billion invested in wind against what we spend on oil each year (2. 77 billion a day). In less than 5 months it's paid for itself, good for 30 to 40 years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 PM on 05/15/2008

FYI: Dems and a few Republicans recently tried to take the $12 billion tax giveaways away from Big Oil and move it into renewable development. To pass the Senate, it would have taken 60 votes. They only got 59 votes, so the measure failed. Mr. Flip Flop, McCain, failed to vote for the measure. If he had, it would have passed. He talks like he wants to do something, but he votes against do anything.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:46 AM on 05/17/2008

"Congress, if you want to pump up the economy how about doing smart deficit spending? [...] Invest our dollars in energy independence."

Easier said than done. There are too many people in Congress feeding at the pig trough filled by the oil companies.

But...

Pickens has it right and is placing a no-brainer bet on the future of energy. It's moves like this that will create a major number of jobs throughout the United States because when you begin creating centralized power "farms" you have to revamp the electrical distribution system from high-voltage AC to ultra-high voltage DC.

Another option to what Pickens is doing is to concentrate solar tower generation plants in the southwest and south. The benefit here is that solar tower systems generate a lot of wexcess heat which can be used for water desalinization (yes, we are running out of fresh water too). Spain is already building solar tower systems and a major plan has been developed for a concentrated system along the north coast of Africa that will supply energy to much of southern Europe.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:01 PM on 05/15/2008

I've often wondered why a city-owned power company such as CPS in San Antonio doesn't invest in solar rooftop residential units and then sell the excess energy back to the grid. In cities in the Southwest that have more than 300-325 days of sunshine a year it seems like a city could end up being a net energy producer with a pretty green way of generating income.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:21 PM on 05/15/2008

Solar Panel roofs for the millions of acres of parking lots. No new land use, miles of new transmission lines, and a shady place to park. Would be great here in Phoenix.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:30 PM on 05/18/2008

You're right. It doesn't make sense. Having lived in S.A. there are plenty of commercial buildings with hundreds of thousands of square feet of flat roofs, ideal places to mount solar panels.

And old warehouses could have a second life. Most are structurally sound. Put solar panels on the roofs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:37 PM on 05/15/2008

Tom,

I like the way you think. I just hope with fresh blood in Congress and in the White House we can pressure those feeding at the trough to go on a severe diet.

You're right about the need for desalinization plants. Another option is massive pipelines bringing fresh water from Canada and the northern U.S. to the arid west.

Investing in infrastructure will enrich this nation, but it will take a long term commitment and it's going to take smart federal investments.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:46 PM on 05/15/2008

So, you think Ol' T. Boone gonna get a piece of all three (electricity) grid pies?

"High-voltage electrical transmission lines in the United States are divided into three separate grids that make up what is often called the national power grid. The three grids cover the contiguous 48 states and parts of Canada and Mexico and are known as the Western Interconnection, the Eastern Interconnection, and the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) Interconnection. "

http://encarta.msn.com/media_701509077_761566999_-1_1/the_national_power_grid.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:26 PM on 05/15/2008

Of course. The wind mill farms will run north/south -- and more transmission added east/west.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:59 PM on 05/15/2008

Hans would agree-or would he?
http://youtube.com/watch?v=XAeBcyJIz20

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:09 PM on 05/15/2008

The man knows from where the wind blows. Congrats. To him and us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:38 PM on 05/15/2008

Hmmmmm...looks like old T. Boone has read the handwriting on the wall.

The Age Of Oil is coming to a close.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:09 PM on 05/15/2008

" T. Boone Pickens" what a name - Southern much?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:12 AM on 05/15/2008

Thats what I was thinking. Lord.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:23 PM on 05/15/2008

So my neighbor is a solar contractor. He has a 4kw system on his house. He recommended a 7kw system for me. He would, since we are neighbors give me the system at cost, meaning 50% of retail. Retail is $45,000, so I would pay 22,500. The problem is with the state and federal rebates at only $2,500 on a $45,000 system, it is still unaffordable for many people, including me. Now if I was a corporation, fed and state rebates would all but pay for the whole system. I live in California where rolling power blackouts are a part of our summer experience.

Shouldn't the govt. help EVERYONE with incentives to stop dependance on oil based energy? Wouldn't empowering everyday people to make the switch start a collective GREEN consciousness in this country?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 AM on 05/15/2008

What I intend to do is spend the 6 to 7 thousand dollars it costs and invest in a geothermal system for my house. That will pay for itself in a couple of years driving my utility bills from 300 a month to 50.

I can then take the money saved from that and invest in an electric car.

The money saved not buying gas I can install a combined system of solar panels.

I don't know where you live but talk to someone about going geothermal and if it's possible. Here the ground is soft. Go 6 feet down, lay pipes, run air or water through them, install a heat pump for the air, heat it to the temperature you like which is only a few degrees, ditto for your water heater, and you're pocketing real coin immediately.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:17 PM on 05/15/2008

Individual photovoltaic solar units is laudable, but not great public policy. It would be better if we spent our tax dollars building giant solar thermal farms.
But Kill the Messenger makes an even better point; we need to do this while learning to conserve. Geothermal heating/cooling of houses, insulated concrete for walls, rainwater capture systems, all of these should be the standard.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:11 PM on 05/15/2008

And I bet if you wanted to you couldn't get a loan. Unless it's a home equity loan at an adjustable rate. Again, we need smart policies, not stupid ones like the one we just saw (160 billion that accomplished nothing tangible).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:50 PM on 05/15/2008

Ok...so don't buy a new car for another 5 years....

Also look at it this way, borrow the money like you would for a car, pay double what you would for power over the next 5 years and from then on you will be able to enjoy it for years to come, it will also probably add to the value of your property as well.

If you plan to stay there its a no brainer.

Tax incentives or not, you can do it for yourself and end up better off in the long run. Or continue to see the cost of your power bill going up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:46 PM on 05/15/2008

No offense, but if you need a 7kW system, you are an energy hog. You would be much better off by going for conservation first, which is cheap in comparison to solar. You should be able to cut your energy consumption down to far less than 1kW continuous (a 7kW peak solar system would be sized for over 1.2-1.5kW continuous!). And then all you need is a 4kW system like your contractor neighbor.

   &