US Blamed For Ambush On Iranians In Iraq

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

LEE KEATH | May 16, 2008 02:50 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

BAGHDAD — Iran angrily blamed the United States on Friday after at least three of its diplomats were wounded in a Baghdad shooting, saying the Americans are encouraging attacks on Iranians in Iraq.

The United States defended the actions of Iraqi security forces, but said Americans were not involved in the incident and that the U.S. "condemns any attack on guests or visitors of any country."

The shooting _ which may have been by Iraqi soldiers during an argument at a checkpoint _ comes amid unprecedented strains between Iran and the Iraqi leadership, which has long been close to Tehran.

With the U.S. and an emboldened Tehran jostling for power and influence in Iraq and elsewhere in the Mideast, Iranian officials have complained in recent weeks that Iraq's Shiite-dominated leadership is bowing too much to Washington. The tensions have been fueled in part by Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's crackdowns in the past two months against Shiite militiamen. The U.S. accuses Iran of backing the militiamen, a claim Tehran denies.

The shooting occurred Thursday as the Iranians' convoy approached a bridge leading to a Shiite shrine in the northern Baghdad neighborhood of Kazimiyah.

An Interior Ministry official said Iraqi soldiers at a checkpoint on the bridge exchanged fire with the convoy's guards during an argument that broke out when most of the Iranians failed to produce identification cards. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to talk to the press.

A different account came from an Iraqi military spokesman in Baghdad, Qassim Atta, who said "unknown gunmen" were behind the attack.

Iranian Embassy spokesman Manoucher Taslimi said he did not know who the gunmen were.

There were varying reports on how many were wounded.

Taslimi said two Iranian diplomats, another Iranian and an Iraqi administrative employee were wounded and were now in stable condition. The Iraqi ministry official said five people were wounded.

Lt. David Russell, a U.S. military spokesman in Baghdad, said the Iraqi army had found four wounded Iranians in a vehicle with an Iraqi driver.

Reports indicate Iraqi security forces "handled the situation appropriately and with a high degree of professionalism," Russell said in an e-mailed statement.

In Tehran, Foreign Ministry spokesman Mohammad Ali Hosseini criticized the United States, saying its harsh rhetoric against Iran fuels attacks on Iranians. U.S. statements "encourage inhuman behavior by occupiers and terrorist groups active in Iraq," he said.

"Responsibility for providing security to diplomats as well as diplomatic and international bodies in Iraq rests with the occupiers. The suspicious behavior of U.S. forces in security issues has brought increasing insecurity in Iraq," he said in a statement. Hosseini said Iran will pursue the case with the Iraqi government.

The U.S. military said in a statement that the Americans were "in no way involved in this attack" and that it "condemns any attack on guests or visitors of any country."

The United States accuses Iran of financing and arming so-called "Special Groups," Shiite militant cells involved in attacks on American troops.

The U.S.-Iranian dispute over the militants has pulled in al-Maliki's government, whose Shiite members have strong ties to Iran. In March, al-Maliki launched a crackdown on Shiite militants in Basra; the operation flared into several weeks of fighting across southern Iraq and in the Shiite stronghold of Sadr City in Baghdad.

When an Iraqi delegation visited Iran to seek its support in the crackdown, they were scolded by Iranian officials, according to several Iraqi officials in the delegation. The Iranians accused the Iraqis of being tools of Washington and allowing U.S. troops to set up a permanent presence on Iran's doorstep.

Al-Maliki has followed the crackdowns against Shiite militiamen in Basra and Sadr City with a sweep launched Thursday in the northern city of Mosul aimed at rooting out Sunni al-Qaida in Iraq militants.

On Friday, al-Maliki offered amnesty and cash to fighters in Mosul who surrender their weapons. He said he would give 10 days for armed groups to hand over medium and heavy weapons for monetary compensation, as well as amnesty for those "duped" into taking up arms against the government _ so long as they did not "have blood on their hands."

Al-Maliki had made a similar offer to Shiite militias in Basra, but few surrendered weapons.

Mosul, 225 miles northwest of Baghdad, has been the most prominent urban stronghold of the terror network in recent months after its grip was broken in cities of the western province on Anbar.

Like the Shiite militiamen in Basra, al-Qaida's Sunni militants are believed to have infiltrated many levels of life in Mosul, Iraq's third largest city with some 2 million people. Al-Maliki warned on Thursday that many city employees were paying protection money to al-Qaida in Iraq.

The director of the provincial governor's office, police Capt. Ahmed Abdullah, was arrested Thursday, said Duraid Kashmola, the governor of Ninevah province, where Mosul is the capital. He would not say whether the arrest was part of the sweep or whether Abdullah was suspected of al-Qaida ties.

In Mosul on Friday, police and army checkpoints were deployed at major roads as U.S.-backed Iraqi forces conducted house-to-house searches and raids for suspects. There have been no clashes since the operation officially began on Thursday, or in the days of raids proceeding it.

Iraqi troops were also chasing suspected al-Qaida fighters who fled the northern city to areas on the outskirts ahead of the sweep. In past major crackdowns, many al-Qaida in Iraq members have managed to scatter after public warnings that an assault was imminent.

Brig. Gen. Khalid Abdul-Sattar, the provincial police spokesman, said more than 800 people have been arrested in and around Mosul over the past five days. He said it was unknown how many al-Qaida figures remain.

___

Associated Press writer Ali Akbar Dareini in Tehran, Iran, contributed to this report.

 
 

Comments
37
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

Wah, Wah, Wah. Maybe the Iranians will get the hint and keep weapons and combantants out of Iraq.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:28 AM on 05/18/2008

*BINGO*

They've played other games in recent past too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:45 AM on 05/18/2008
    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:22 PM on 05/17/2008

Payback is a MF!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:38 PM on 05/17/2008

Sometimes you want a blowback. Create chaos, point fingers and say "we gotta deal with this".

Suits perfectly for the neocons who are so hard trying to sell this war.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:34 PM on 05/17/2008

Hmmm. What does that mean?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:34 PM on 05/17/2008

in bush and cheney, we have without question the two biggest cowards that ever resided in the white house. like cowards they love wars that others have to wage.. like cowards, they totally approve of torture. they spy on americans they disagree with. they rendition. there desperate for heros lying about jessica lynch, pat tilly..and dozens of others. they continue to cover up atrocities by the many psychopaths serving in the all volunteer military. their mid east policies are beyond belief. when an iranian diplomat comes to iraq, they throw out the red carpet, call them brothers, hug them and treat them with the upmost respect. when george bush goes to iraq, he does so in the middle of the night, always unannounced and stays exclusively in the green zone to keep him from being shot.. the neo cons including mccain consider iraq a success story.. the millions of enemies created by bush/cheney will haunt our nation for a generation.. i hope america learned their lesson but i wouldn't bet a lot of money on it..the hatefulness needs to stop. mc cain is now a serious part of the problem, he desperate delusional, and dangerous.. i can't even keep up with his many daily lies...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:13 AM on 05/17/2008

Don't be foolish. If the American people were able to learn from past blunders, they would"ve learned something from Vietnam. If the American people had any conscience they would"ve elected someone else in 2004; that is after the rest of the world discovered the lies and deception that led them into this debacle in Iraq. If the American people were like the rest of the world they would have recoiled from the atrocities their government and their military committed in their name in Iraq.

No, don"t be foolish; go back and take another look at the history of the US and how it came to be.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:16 PM on 05/17/2008

Take a look at Bush. He studies ancient wars and tries to be another Napoleon. Problem is, we're in the nuclear age. His arrogance and ignorance is costing far too much. Man's destiny is up to man. It's sad that the majority of the people want peace, but we have a leader who continues to direct us into war. American people have a conscience, and if you look at history, you will see that in 2000 and 2004, indications are that we didn't elect him either time. We got stuck in the middle of the Bush/Cheney/Rove corruption. May it end soon, and may we all live in peace again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:52 PM on 05/17/2008

Take a look at the history of every country on the planet - they came to be in much the same way. We are a violent and ignorant species.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:47 PM on 05/17/2008

"Take a look at the history of every country on the planet - they came to be in much the same way. " - ndifference

Not every country on the planet. Canadian settlers never went to war with the indigenous native populations of Canada and the only country that Canada has ever attacked first was America, but only becuase America already declared war.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:12 PM on 05/17/2008

I'm sure we can rely on whatever our government says to settle this dispute.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:11 AM on 05/17/2008

Lynyrd Skynyrd "That Smell" is topping the charts in Teheran 60 years later. John McCain has it on his iPOD.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:02 AM on 05/17/2008

This doesn't even come close to how many American and Iraqi soldiers and civilians that were killed by Iranian insurgents and Iranian made roadside bombs.

Deal with it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 PM on 05/16/2008

is there actually anything that proves this though?
For a while all we heard was the myth that foreigners are those who are the cause of the instability but that was proven wrong and now we hear the war drums beating on Iran.

Face it, the neocons want to spread the war so that they can permanently occupy another nation. Had Russia and China not been in the way they'd already have done something.

For now all there is to do is find ways of making it happen. Insiders have warned for a new gulf of tonkin type of event...

You know what P2OG is?

"We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality"

"Stability is an unworthy American mission, and a misleading concept to boot. We do not want stability in Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and even Saudi Arabia; we want things to change. The real issue is not whether, but how to destabilize." Michael Ledeen (neocon)

Create chaos, point fingers and say "we gotta deal with this".

Neocon Bolton wanted Iran to kick out Arms Inspectors, he tells AIPAC (audio track as well as text)
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_jim_harr_070302_bolton_wanted_iran_t.htm

We Should Carry Out Regime Change In Iran Because "It Did Work In Iraq
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/bolton-iraq-iran/

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&geopolitics_and_9/11=centralAsia

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:31 PM on 05/17/2008

Iranian insurgents? Mr. Rove, what is the census count of Iranian insurgents in Iraq? What a crock.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:36 PM on 05/17/2008

Ohiomark:

What I find very difficult to "deal" with is when the Sunni insurgents were blowing up Marines in the Sunni triangle. No one said 'let's bomb Saudi Arabia', no one said "let's put sanctions on them".

Think of Falluja, Haditha, Hit, and other cities.....

Also we are now paying these insurgents on average per 10 sq kilometer over $250,000
A WEEK!!!! And giving them amnesty.

Sorry, can't deal w/it

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:19 AM on 05/17/2008

and you have absolute proof of that?? like the WMD's that saddam had I suppose, you americans haen't killed enough the last 8 years??

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:21 AM on 05/17/2008

From a distance you look like my friend,
even though we are at war.
From a distance I just cannot comprehend
what all this fighting is for.


WMDs? ... They had NONE
Saddam?... He was HUNG

So, so, so... We've WON!?

No, no, no... We've only just BEGUN

to toil

for OIL!!!

"The United States accuses Iran of financing and arming so-called "Special Groups," Shiite militant cells involved in attacks on American troops."

Now that Bush/McCain have their sights set on "spreading democracy" in IRAN, I suppose their focus has shifted from "Al Qaeda" in Iraq, to "extremists", "special groups" in Iran?

BUSH is "spreading democracy" one drop of blood and OIL at a time ... so we don't have to "spread democracy" here?

OBAMA '08! (IF it's not too late!)
HOPE & CHANGE!

Stay safe, healthy and happy,
Love, Loretta

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 PM on 05/17/2008

Hey advisor to "Jane's Defense Weekly":

So inform us all: Just how many and by what type of ordnance?

You're just another blowhard who has access to a keyboard.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:37 AM on 05/17/2008

According to the Bush Administration's own intelligence community, there are NO ties between Iran and the insurgency going on in Iraq with personnel or weapons. So you are totally wrong.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 PM on 05/16/2008

How about the NIE report that says the same, ohiomurk?

That analysis comes courtesy of your beloved gobmint, son.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:51 PM on 05/17/2008

I don't trust what I read in the Washington Post.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:05 PM on 05/17/2008

Chillinout is the one who needs education. He can't even tell planted Propaganda from a whole in the ground.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:26 AM on 05/17/2008

" This doesn't even come close to how many American and Iraqi soldiers and civilians that were killed by Iranian insurgents and Iranian made roadside bombs.

Deal with it." - ohiomark

The number of Iraqi civilians killed by Iranians and their roadside bombs pales in comparison to the number killed by American forces as a result of an illegal invasion .

Deal with it Kevin.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:43 PM on 05/16/2008

*

ohiomark
=================

Do you have any prove of that or just making up Lies?

*

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:40 PM on 05/16/2008

You have already made up your mind that what I say is a lie, so why bother.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:08 PM on 05/16/2008

The whole neoconservative agenda is based on deception. You really trust straussian/machivellian types who wish to have a permanent presence in the middle-east.

Tell me. How did Operation Ajax of 1953 end up? Good?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:32 PM on 05/17/2008

Kevin:

You are stupid!!

Deal with THAT!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:00 AM on 05/17/2008

*

ohiomark
==============

No matter what you say, I still remember WMD's in Iraq!

Why do you love WAR and Killing Innocent people so much? Just to pretend you are more safe!

*

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 PM on 05/16/2008

*

Iran Opens War Avoidance Flank

.................. The Iranian leadership has understood that, in order to face the continuing threat of militrary aggression by the war party, it must not only mobilize its military capabilities, as a defensive measure, but, more importantly, that it must move in a positive direction, to build the economic-strategic alliances in the immediate Persian Gulf region, and in the broader regional context -- Russia, Central Asia, India, China. This is precisely what Tehran is doing. This is the signifance of the "package."

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8868

*

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:18 PM on 05/16/2008

It seems that while America tries to secure it's energy needs by the barrel of a gun, Russia and China are quietly working at securing energy from the ME through economic partnerships. Iran knows that foreign investment and infrastructure from China and Russia give them some leverage when dealing with an ever increasing hostile America.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 PM on 05/16/2008

*

cdnnewsjunky
.........Iran knows that foreign investment and infrastructure from China and Russia give them some leverage when dealing with an ever increasing hostile America.
================

You're absolutely right.

People can live in peace only if US stops putting his nose in other nation's business, look at the history of US's Foreign Policy!

*

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 PM on 05/16/2008

I'll agree, the last half-century of US Foreign policy is a pretty dark picture.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 PM on 05/16/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in