Pentagon Announces Troop Deployments Of 42,000 To Iraq, Afghanistan

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

May 19, 2008 06:42 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Show your support.
Buzz this article up.
U.S. Army soldier from the 3rd Special Troops Battalion, 3rd Brigade Combat Team, 4th Infantry Division, is silhouetted against the sun as he climbs over a wall during a patrol in the Shiite enclave of Sadr City in Baghdad Iraq, Thursday, May 15, 2008. (AP Photo/Petr David Josek)

WASHINGTON — The Pentagon on Monday announced upcoming deployments of more than 42,000 troops, including 25,000 active duty Army soldiers who would be sent to Iraq beginning in the fall to replace troops scheduled to come home by year's end.

The deployments would maintain a level of 15 brigades in Iraq, or roughly 140,000 troops _ the number military leaders expect will remain on the warfront at the end of July, once the currently planned withdrawals are finished.

Under the new Pentagon policy effective in August, those active duty Army units will serve for 12 months, rather than the 15-month tours that units in Iraq now are serving. The bulk of the soldiers deploying later this year returned from Iraq late last year, and will have gotten about a year at home to rest and retrain.

As part of the announcement, The Pentagon alerted four National Guard Army brigades, or about 14,000 troops, to begin preparing for deployments to Iraq beginning next spring, and one National Guard Army brigade, with about 3,100 soldiers, to prepare to deploy to Afghanistan in the spring of 2010.

The Guard announcements, said Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman, are being made far in advance so that soldiers and their families can begin training and other preparations for their service.

Guard brigades heading to Iraq will provide security, while the brigade scheduled to go to Afghanistan in 2010 would train Afghan national forces.

Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, has said the U.S. will complete the withdrawal of the 20,000 troops that were sent to Iraq last year to tamp down the escalating violence in Baghdad. At the peak, there were 20 brigades with more than 170,000 U.S. troops in Iraq.

Beyond that, he said he wants 45 days to evaluate the security conditions in Iraq, after which he will begin to decide whether more troops can be pulled out. The plan leaves open the possibility that the U.S. could keep 15 brigades there through the end of the years _ as voters go to the polls and elect a new president.

Currently there are 155,000 troops, including 17 combat brigades, in Iraq.

The seven Army combat brigades and one division headquarters units that would be sent to Iraq later this year are:

_ 25th Infantry Division Headquarters

_ 2nd Brigade, 4th Infantry Division, from Fort Carson, Colo.

_ 3rd Brigade, 25th Infantry Division, from Schofield Barracks, Hawaii

_ 2nd Brigade, 1st Infantry Division, from Fort Riley, Kan.

_ 3rd Brigade, 82nd Airborne Division, from Fort Bragg, N.C.

_ 172nd Infantry Brigade from Schweinfurt, Germany

_ 3rd Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division, from Fort Hood, Texas.

_ 1st Brigade Combat Team, 25th Infantry Division, from Fort Wainwright, Alaska.

The four National Guard brigades being alerted for Iraq duty are:

_ 72nd Brigade Combat Team, Texas National Guard

_ 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 28th Infantry Division, Pennsylvania National Guard

_ 256th Brigade Combat Team, Louisiana National Guard

_ 278th Brigade Combat Team, Tennessee National Guard

The unit told to prepare for deployment to Afghanistan was the 86th Brigade Combat Team from the Vermont National Guard. There are currently 33,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan, including 15,000 serving with the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force, and 18,000 in the U.S.-led effort to train the Afghan Army and conduct counterinsurgency operations.

___

On the Net:

Defense Department: http://www.defenselink.mil

 
 

Comments
58
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

For all the naysayers at huffpost, Mr. Barzani is prime minister of the Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq.

We Are Making Progress in Iraq
By NECHIRVAN BARZANI
May 20, 2008; Page A21

While the media offers mostly images of violence, and many Americans have grown weary of the war in Iraq, I bring hopeful news to Washington this week as I meet with the administration and members of Congress.

Since 2003, we have built the Kurdistan Region as a model for democracy and a gateway for development for all of Iraq. We are willing partners in this transition toward an Iraqi government that is representative of all its people. Through our peshmerga forces, we provide some of the most effective units against al Qaeda and other terrorist groups. We Kurds are committed to a federal, democratic Iraq at peace within its borders and with its neighbors.

We are working with Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and the Iraqi leadership in Baghdad on the difficult issues facing our country. Our relationship with Iraq's federal government has never been better. And progress is being made on an oil law, the status of disputed territories, the proper role for Iraq's neighbors to play, and on relations between the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) and Turkey.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:49 AM on 05/20/2008

"... and there are two schools within walking distance, some curbing and city water is already in and it's definitely zoned residential, although there is profitable commercial property within the tax base. upstairs and down stairs baths, indoor jacuzzi, separate dining room, and a half bath in the master bedroom. it can be yours for 80 billion down and 3 billion a week for a hundred years- cheap for these the energy communities. your bad credit and shit currency - no problem. you can move in tomorrow."

there's no sucker like a neocon sucker.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 AM on 05/20/2008

That should be I am terribly sorry

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:08 AM on 05/20/2008

I am terribly I know you view good news about progress in Iraq as bad news, you aren't happy unless you see headlines of deaths.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 AM on 05/20/2008

hundreds of thousands have died in iraq since the first invasion at american hands. this is a staggering tragedy on a par with the japanese invasion of china and the german invasion of russia. that few are dying still means people are dying. you think this propaganda is "good news" because you can't keep the overarching catastrophe in loss of life and destruction in your head it's just too big and hideous a picture. so you seize on these monthly kia reports as some kind of touchstone. most people have seen these years of death and despair of the value of it all. but it just escapes you. it is too enormous a responsibility to associate with your own country. you're years behind the current american perception of this war. even obama is well behind america's current perception of this war. also you're flatly contradicted by this neutral monitor http://icasualties.org/oif/ you're dead wrong anyway.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:03 AM on 05/22/2008

Network coverage of the Iraq war seems to have all but disappeared during this presidential election. Could it be that the mainstream media is bowing to the wishes of their corporate owners and the GOP? It would certainly appear so....I mean, we wouldn't want them to skew the election in favor of those candidates opposed to the war in Iraq (Democrats), now would we?

Be watchful of the mainstream media and the games they play. Don't give them a free pass like they are giving to their "maverick" candidate, John McCain. Stay on them like flies on sh*t. Don't allow them to pull the wool over America's eyes during this very important election. Expose them for the frauds and liars that they are should they attempt to.

...There. I've had my say.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 AM on 05/20/2008

Actually you are close, the MSM is not reporting on Iraq because of all the good news. (see Tator's post below). If you do a little research that the MSM actually leans left. The Democrats don't want to admit that the surge has worked and now the Iraq political progress and their own Army are taking hold. Maliki just returned from Mosul where they captured 1,000 Al Queada members. Iraq has passed some important legislation and elections will occur in October. Maybe if there was equal reporting on the situation in Iraq you would have a different perspective.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 AM on 05/20/2008

The Iraqi Shiites and the Sunnis have embraced and have come to an accommodation? In the absence of this, there can be no true progress, don't you agree?....Will the Shiites demand a theocracy based upon Islam? Or will the government in Iraq be secular and allow democracy to mediate the differences in their postures? All of this has been settled?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 AM on 05/20/2008

Ghost in the machine -- It will take more than one personal anecdotal account of rapprochement to convince me otherwise.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 PM on 05/20/2008

By Charles Levinson, USA TODAY
BAGHDAD " Safa al-Lami knew he might be on a suicide mission.
He had taken a taxi into Adhamiya, one of Baghdad's most dangerous neighborhoods. Now, wearing a white headdress that identified him as a Shiite religious leader, al-Lami planned to walk up unannounced to a Sunni mosque and ask whether he could pray alongside his Muslim brothers.

In an area where militias were shooting many Shiites on sight, "I knew there was a big chance I would be killed," al-Lami recalls. "I kept walking toward the shrine, whispering to myself: 'Don't be afraid.' "

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 AM on 05/20/2008

For those that do not prefer "HP bad news from IRAQ only filtered news" see below.

http://www.nypost.com/seven/05202008/postopinion/opedcolumnists/success_in_iraq__a_media_blackout_111606.htm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:05 AM on 05/20/2008

A very telling Op-ed piece and necessary reading for all those interested in the truth.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:35 AM on 05/20/2008

truth's different every time out, isn't it? different truth every time. by the way, if you ACTUALLY READ THE PIECE (scroll up) you will see it is just a report with no slant at all. yet you impugn that it's slanted. actually you are using an informational report by huffpo to INTRODUCE a slanted piece from ny post. sorry, we see through all this square little flag freak garbage. take it to hugh hewitt or somewhere else nobody goes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:48 AM on 05/20/2008

I support all of our troops being placed in harms way. I detest that they are being placed in that position.
May all of them return home safely, and may our government and citizens provide the full support they need before going on duty, while on duty and after their duty is completed. May Dubya and his comrades be put asunder for the crimes they have committed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:58 AM on 05/20/2008

Some people have the courage it takes to serve in the US Military..Then there are folks like "FalseFlag" that don't..God bless these brave men and women !!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:11 AM on 05/20/2008

Make no mistake--these troops are headed ultimately to Iran.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:41 AM on 05/20/2008

there is no war in Iran !!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:23 AM on 05/20/2008

At this point Bush and Cheney will sacrifice as many soldiers as necessary to claim victory!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:24 AM on 05/20/2008

Obama just got 42,000 more votes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 AM on 05/20/2008

These soldiers are making their own choice on going to this war.

There are plenty of ways to get out of going to war as evidenced here:

http://www.couragetoresist.org

and here:

http://www.catholicpeacefellowship.org

and here:

http://www.objector.org/girights/gettingout/needtoknow.html#pgfId-999615

Please copy and share with your loved ones, freinds and family.

If they still make the immoral choice to go to war after that, at least you will be able to know in your heart that you tried to do everything you could to help prevent them from killing our brothers and sisters in Iraq.

What if they called up 42,000 troops... and no one came?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:45 AM on 05/20/2008

Into the valley of death rode the 600

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:04 AM on 05/20/2008

Although it's only the 19th, we're on pace for the lowest casualty total in the history of the Iraq occupation. It's possible that now the Iraqi military is doing more of the heavy lifting while our guys are training and guarding and rebuilding. If that's the case, then there's no reason whatsoever not to see this through to its completion....a Democratic Iraqi nation that can defend itself.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:33 PM on 05/19/2008

timothe,
A body count is not a measure of success or failure. Think Vietnam.
The administration and it's supporters use the most simplistic and fear inducing examples to support their positions....to get you to "react" the way they want. The weakness in their plan, is that at some point you will begin to "learn". Learn that you are being jerked around by a yo-yo master.
Once that happens, you will look and listen a little deeper before reacting and trusting and believing in their false hope.
You will be developing street smarts. A "BS detector", so to speak....and then hopefully, it will piss you off so much you will join the resistance.

(btw, Vietnam is an almost perfect example...but they try real hard to discourage you from seeing it)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:33 AM on 05/20/2008

Wait a minute!! The media and the left has been using the casualty count to "inform" the people of the terrible war. Now that the Iraqi military is leading missions and our troops are mostly out of harm's way, body count ISN'T a measure of success?

Stop it. You can't have it both ways.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:41 AM on 05/20/2008

we're not there to "lower the body count". if you want to lower the body count -get out. otherwise take full responsibility for every death and maiming for five years. every one. that's not a low count. that's the real count that you have caused.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:15 AM on 05/20/2008

The only "heavy lifting" to be done should be of the body bags of our dead soldiers by people like you.

"lowest casualty total"? Easy for you to say.

My 26 year-old niece, a Lt. in the USAF, is scheduled to be re-deployed to Iraq this year.

If she were to become a casualty, it would be a very high casualty indeed for our family.

I can only hope the new President will wind this moronic occupation down ASAP.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:20 AM on 05/20/2008

42.000 U.S. troops going the WRONG WAY!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:15 PM on 05/19/2008

just another "In-Your-Face" from the boosh war-crime family.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:14 PM on 05/19/2008

More fresh meat with targets painted on their backs - and not one of them will find a cache of WMDs. Seems that the reasons they're being sent to the meatgrinder get less and less believable with every passing day.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 PM on 05/19/2008

Yeah, they aren't the best soldiers in the world or anything, they're just the local village boys called up, supplied with a single-shot rifle.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:18 PM on 05/19/2008


That's certainly what they are facing when they get there.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:19 PM on 05/19/2008

We will train third world security forces to do what we could not do with the world"s best Army and Marine Corps.

Alex

http://web.mac.com/aleko/iWeb/Site%202/Blog/Blog.html

Port Hadlock, WA

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:47 PM on 05/19/2008

mmm...I wonder if there is a link with this:

"Iran must be stopped. They are a threat to the neighborhood and a source of funding for Hamas and Hizbullah," Pelosi told Channel 1.
While hoping there would be no need for a military strike, the House speaker stressed, "I do think we must not take anything off the table."

[source: www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1210668668378&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull]

and to say she never hesitated in taking impeachment off the table...can't serve two masters now, can you?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:51 PM on 05/19/2008

Boy did Pelosi's opinion change after she went to Iraq! I wonder why. (Maybe the Iraqi government showed her proof that Iranians are training insurgents and supplying weapons?)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 PM on 05/19/2008

and maybe she came back with a big bag of money!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:06 AM on 05/20/2008

Pentagon Announces Troop Deployments Of 42,000 Who Are Not From The Bush/Cheney/Romeny Gene Pool To Iraq, Afghanistan

This Brings The Total Troop Deployments Of Those Who Are From The Bush/Cheney/Romeny Gene Pool To Zero.

It also should be recognized that the total number of suicides Of Those Who Are From The Bush/Cheney/Romeny Gene Pool Is Zero.

All very significant numbers on many levels.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:37 PM on 05/19/2008

They aren't from the pelosi or reid gene pools either now are they?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:37 PM on 05/19/2008

Its seems Romneys 5 strapping, pro war sons, of military age, could put their money where their mouth is now.

Eh?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:06 AM on 05/20/2008

What, exactly, does that have to do with it?

Helonais is making a point about the decision-makers, not the hapless hangers-on. At best, your statement merely amplifies Hel's observation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:03 PM on 05/19/2008

This war is as much the dems fault as the repubs. No denying it now. They are choosing to continue the occupation. They chose to vote for it. Sure it was based on lies and half truths but they didn't try to discover that before they voted to send men and women to their deaths. And their families are not in harms way either but it is my understanding that some of the dems are making money from this war.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:13 AM on 05/20/2008