Obama wins Oregon, moves to brink of nomination

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

DAVID ESPO and SARA KUGLER | May 20, 2008 11:53 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Show your support.
Buzz this article up.
Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Barack Obama D-Ill., his wife Michelle and their daughters Malia, 9, and Sasha, 6, join together on stage at a rally Tuesday, May 20, 2008, in Des Moines, Iowa. (AP Photo/M. Spencer Green)

LOUISVILLE, Ky. — Barack Obama stepped to the brink of victory in the Democratic presidential race Tuesday night, defeating Hillary Rodham Clinton in the Oregon primary and moving within 100 delegates of the total he needs to claim the prize at the party convention this summer.

"You have put us within reach of the Democratic nomination," he told cheering supporters in Iowa, the overwhelmingly white state that launched him, a black, first-term senator from Illinois, on his improbable path to victory last January.

Obama lavished praise on Clinton, his rival in a race unlike any other, and accused Republican John McCain of a campaign run by lobbyists.

"You are Democrats who are tired of being divided, Republicans who no longer recognize the party that runs Washington, independents who are hungry for change," he said, speaking to a crowd on the grounds of the Iowa Capitol in Des Moines as well as the millions around the country who will elect the nation's 44th president in November.

Clinton countered with a lopsided win in Kentucky, a victory with scant political value in a race moving inexorably in Obama's direction.

The former first lady vowed to remain in the race, telling supporters, "I'm more than determined than ever to see that every vote is cast and every ballot is counted."

But in a sign of confidence on the front-runner's part, party officials said discussions were under way to send Paul Tewes, a top Obama campaign aide, to the Democratic National Committee to oversee operations for the fall campaign.

And in a fresh indication that their race was coming to an end, Clinton and Obama praised one another and pledged a united party for the general election.

"While we continue to go toe-to-toe for this nomination, we do see eye-to-eye when it comes to uniting our party to elect a Democratic president this fall," said Clinton, whose supporters Obama will need if he is to end eight years of Republican rule in the White House.

Clinton won at least 47 delegates in the two states and Obama won at least 32, according to an analysis of election returns by The Associated Press. All the Kentucky delegates were awarded, but there were still 24 to be allocated in Oregon, and Obama was in line for many of them.

He had 1,949 delegates overall, out of 2026 needed for the nomination. Clinton had 1,769 according the latest tally by the AP.

Obama's total includes more than a majority of the delegates picked in the 56 primaries and caucuses on the calendar, a group that excludes nearly 800 superdelegates, the party leaders who hold the balance of power at the convention.

With about 50 percent of the votes counted in Oregon's unique mail-in primary, Obama was gaining a 58 percent share to 42 percent for Clinton.

The former first lady's victory in Kentucky was bigger yet _ 65 percent to 30 percent _ and the exit polls underscored once more the work Obama has ahead if he is to win over her voters.

Almost nine in 10 ballots were cast by whites, and the former first lady was winning their support overwhelmingly. She defeated him among voters of all age groups and incomes, the college educated and non-college educated, self-described liberals, moderates and conservatives.

"We have had our disagreements during this campaign, but we all admire her courage, her commitment and her perseverance," Obama said of his rival and partner in a marathon race through the primaries. "No matter how this primary ends, Senator Clinton has shattered myths and broken barriers and changed the America in which my daughters and yours will come of age."

As for McCain, he said he would leave it up to the Arizona senator "to explain whether his policies and positions represent long-held convictions or Washington calculations, but the one thing they don't represent is change."

McCain's spokesman countered quickly.

"This election is fundamentally about who Americans can trust to secure peace and prosperity for the next generation of Americans. Without a doubt, Barack Obama is a talented political orator, but his naive plans for unconditional summits with rogue leaders and support for big tax hikes on hardworking families expose his bad judgment that Americans can ill-afford in our next president," said Tucker Bounds in a statement.

In the fundraising chase, Obama reported cash on hand of $46.5 million, all of which can be used for the general election. Unless he takes federal funds, he is permitted to raise as much as he can.

Unlike Obama, McCain is expected to take federal funds, which total about $85 million and bar him from raising other donations for his campaign's use.

"We still have work to do to in the remaining states, where we will compete for every delegate available," Obama said in an e-mail sent to supporters. "But tonight, I want to thank you for everything you have done to take us this far _ farther than anyone predicted, expected or even believed possible."

Both candidates paused during the day to express best wishes to Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, the Massachusetts Democrat suffering from a brain tumor.

"So many of us here have benefited in some way or another because of the battles he's waged, and some of us are here because of them," Obama said.

Said Clinton: "As a lifelong champion for social justice and equality, his work has made the path easier for me, for Senator Obama and for countless others. He's been with us for our fights and we're now with him in his."

The Clinton campaign expressed irritation at Obama's decision to return to Iowa and mark his success in amassing a majority of delegates won in primaries and caucuses.

But he paid no attention. "The question then becomes how do we complete the nomination process so that we have the majority of the total number of delegates, including superdelegates, to be able to say this thing's over," Obama told The Associated Press in an interview.

Clinton looked for a consolation for the strongest presidential campaign of any woman in history. She hoped to finish with more votes than her rival in all the contests combined, including Florida and Michigan, two states that were stripped of their delegates by the national party for moving their primary dates too early. A Democratic convention committee is to meet on May 31 in Washington to decide how _ and whether _ to seat delegates from the two states.

Not counting the results in Kentucky and Oregon, Obama was ahead of Clinton by slightly more than 618,000 votes out of 32.2 million cast in primaries and caucuses where both candidates competed.

The numbers do not include Iowa, Maine, or Nevada caucuses, nor do they count _ as Clinton does in her totals _ Florida and Michigan.

The only primaries remaining are Puerto Rico, on June 1, followed two days later by South Dakota and Montana.

___

David Espo reported from Washington. Brendan Farrington in Florida contributed to this report.

 
 

Comments
1810
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (12 pages total)

Bye bye Georgina Wallace, the new centuries Dixiecrat

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:40 PM on 05/21/2008

I bet Hillary did her usual thing and ignored Obama's win. She rarely congratulates him publicly. She will maybe call the next day privately and mutter a very brief congratulations. She's small and petty like that. Another reason she has failed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:07 PM on 05/21/2008

She rarely even mentions him by name. It's always "My opponent."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:26 PM on 05/21/2008

Then you obvioulsy don't pay too much attention to anything other than Obama, because she has congratulated him, and doesn't ignore him like he does, but judging by your post, you must have inside knowledge.

She failed alright. I mean, she could only get 17,000,000 people to vote for her instead of him! Man what a failure that was! I guess Obama can celebrate the fact he didn't get those same 17,000,000 to vote for him or else he too would be considered a failure! Lucky Dog!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:17 PM on 05/21/2008

Hillary is really pissing me off. Dowd is right on the money in her op-ed in the NYT today. Why should we put Hillary"s feelings over the good of the country? Why should we pussy foot around not offending her ego over Democratic party unity? Pullease!! It"s obvious that she would rather have McCain than let a black man rule this country. It"s clear that Hillary IS going onto the Convention, and mark me: This unseemingly ungracious low class stunt of hers is being pushed and manipulated by BILL CLINTON, who would also rather have a fascist McCain/Lieberman ticket than see a black man in office."I can"t take rejection," you can see Bill say wagging his infamous index lying index finger that introduced the world to Monica. When he became apoplectic that someone suggested we reopen an unbiased investigation into 9/11, you could see that he has gone over to "their side", the fascist dark side. They don"t care about the country. So now they tell us. We"re on our own. If the country elects McCain it"ll be Bill Clinton who prefers it that way. End of story.
Naomi Wolf"s "The End of America" is dead right. It"s happening before our eyes. And we are allowing it to happen, just like we allowed torture, the crematoria and everything else.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:05 AM on 05/21/2008

An interesting thing to think about when you consider the Obama campaign is how it has effected the Republicans. Right now McCain is all over the map trying to shore up his conservative base by moving to Bush on foreign policy and to the right on economic policy. At the same time he is trying to shore up his "maverick" persona by jettisoning lobbyists. If Hillary were the presumptive nominee he wouldn't need to do any of this, Hillary would have activated his base for him, he could claim his lobbyists are better than her lobbyists, and that she is a weak flip flopper on the war. The fact that Obama will be the nominee and even the fact that it's been a close race has created confusion and chaos on the Republican side.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:25 AM on 05/21/2008

Good points. On top of that, Hillary put out this impression that she is more electable because of "scandals" (Rev Wright, bitter comments) with Obama. That perception was based on the clean campaign Obama ran though. He didn't mention Monica. He didn't talk about the questionable pardons. He didn't mention Whitewater, or Filegate, or Hillary's top fundraiser Norman Hsu being in prison, or the Peter Paul lawsuits and scandal, the Clinton business ties to Dubai, etc. etc.

Against McCain, ALL of those things and more would have been thrown at the Clintons. Republicans had been planning to battle Hillary for YEARS. They produced a major documentary attacking her. They had their attacks all prepared.

All this money Obama is raising and new voters he is mobilizing will be used to defeat Republicans all over the country. The Republicans are terrified of running against him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:56 AM on 05/21/2008

Exactly. I think your point is further proven by their silly Operation Chaos. The Republicans were willing to do anything, ANYTHING, regardless of how half-baked, to avoid running against Obama. We will see more and more desperate tactics.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 AM on 05/21/2008

I think Operation Chaos was meant to COVER UP the fact that so many Republican voters were leaving their party.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:38 AM on 05/21/2008

Methinks the Republicans are scared outta their minds.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:27 AM on 05/21/2008

Latest polls have Obama winning the general by 8, NOT including the Hillary supporters who will eventually get over the disappointment and frustration from an emotional campaign.

Add even half of the 34% who "would vote for McCain or not at all", and it becomes a 14-point lead. Add to that the fact that phone polls call only landlines, with 4% of Obama's supporters using a cellphone as their primary, it becomes a 16-point lead. Add to that the fact that Obama supporters polled have a 90% likelihood of actually casting a ballot vs. McCain's sub-80%, and you get an over 20-point lead.

Essentially, we might very well be looking at the largest landslide victory in decades.

I'm okay with that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 AM on 05/21/2008

You'd better recheck your poll results. Today's Rasmussen Daily Presidential Poll show a dead heat between Obama and McCain!
Rasmussen also shows Obama leading HRC by 8, but that includes all democrats.
What poll are you quoting when you say he leads by 8, NOT including HRC supporters?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:33 PM on 05/21/2008

I think there is a lot of mental illness among Democrats. The evidence? "I will vote Republican if my candidate is not the nominee."

This is like saying, "If my favorite team does not make it to the playoffs I will gouge out my own eyes with a pocket knife."

If this is all just hyperbolic rhetoric, that's one thing. But anyone who says such things in earnest is insane, and I mean that in the clinical sense. Maybe some commentor here with a background in psychology knows the clinical name for the personality disorder that cuases people to deliberately act in a way that is diametrically opposed to their own morals, including deliberately injuring themselves and those they care about. There's definitely a name for it.

Let's hope it's treatable.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 AM on 05/21/2008

Yes, lots of mental illness among Democrats. It's trickling down from the Clintons.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:12 PM on 05/21/2008

I do not believe every comment posted is from actual supporters. Trolls are getting more devious and if not fishing for liberals then just stirring the pot.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:19 AM on 05/21/2008

Masochism

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:23 AM on 05/21/2008

That is it, exactly, masochism.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:16 PM on 05/21/2008

There is only one consistent argument from Hillary supporters: "Obama isn't electable in November"

When you ask them, citing that both candidates carry virtually identical policies - "If all Obama supporters were to have cast votes for Clinton in November, could she win?"

"In a LANDSLIDE!", they'll say.

"But Obama wouldn't win in a landslide?"

"No! He's not electable!".

Self-fulfilling prophecy. The Dem nominee only becomes unelectable if the Dems who claim that he's unelectable... don't elect him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:39 AM on 05/21/2008

It's like this:

Clinton can beat McCain - and Obama can beat Clinton... but somehow, Obama can't beat McCain.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:03 AM on 05/21/2008

Yup. It's akin to saying

Bob is taller than Jim. Jim is taller then Frank. Therefore, Frank is probably taller than everyone... if you include Florida and Michigan.

It's perverse logic at best.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 AM on 05/21/2008

There is little doubt that some Clinton supporters will not vote for Obama in the general election, just as some Obama supporters won't vote for Clinton. I doubt the actual numbers will be as great as the polls indicate. For Clinton supporters who have been paying attention, they know their candidates only chance is to convince superdelegates that Obama is unelectable. It's in theirs, and their candidate's best interest, to tell pollsters they wouldn't vote for Obama.

If you're a Democrat, and you honestly believe that McCain, version 2008, would be better for this country, then perhaps it's time to declare yourself Republican for future elections.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:27 AM on 05/21/2008

Still time for a third party candidate to shake things up! Long way to go...
Time to take summer off of politics...unless something drastic happens like a Clinton/Hagel team go independent!
back in the fall!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:37 PM on 05/21/2008

REALITY CHECK KENTUCKY POOR DON'T DISCRIMINATE

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:27 AM on 05/21/2008

Reality check - 20% of voters from the Kentucky primary openly said they cast their votes based on race. Add to this the Bradley effect (1.4-1.6), and you have the point of difference in last night's primary.

You can't say "they didn't discriminate", when the voters state verbally and clearly in exit polls - "we discriminated".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:13 AM on 05/21/2008

And you also have to wonder... how many who discriminated did not admiti it in exit polls?

I answered an exit poll here in RI, and it was a printed form that I filled out. So it was truly anonymous. I wonder how many exit polls are conducted as conversations? If any, what percentage of racists are so ballsy about their bigotry that they would be willing to look a poll taker in the eye and admit it?

I'm guessing that 20% of confessed racists is actually a lower number than the reality.

I'm also interested in the education level of voters in these Appalachian states. They have the lowest percentage of college graduates of any states in the nation. I guess if you're from this region, you don't learn that racism is bad unless you go to college. It's obvious they're not teaching kids that in their public schools.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:23 AM on 05/21/2008

Why don't you Clinton people just admit that you want Obama to lose just so Hilary can run in 2012? A wipeout in Kentucky? WHO CARES? Have you ever been to Kentucky? This state is so ass backwards that when you walk into a gas station people are actually allowed to smoke inside? I went to Kentucky a few years ago and there was an ashtray at the counter for the WORKERS! This is Clinton Nation. Richard Mellon Scaife, Sean Hannity, and the inbreds of Appalachia. Go ahead Clintons, sabotage Obama in 08, we'll be waiting to do the same in 2012. Nothing Obama can say will ever make me support her, and I'll vote for whoever is running against her even if its the devil himself. At this point if Obama even picks her as his running mate, I'll drop him like a rock.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:37 AM on 05/21/2008

How long will you keep posting under the guise that you'll actually vote Democrat in the fall? Just curious.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:33 PM on 05/21/2008

I noticed that too, Wonder what would happen if obama said no matter who the black man may be. There would be an uproar.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:17 AM on 05/21/2008

Notice Hillary said "the nominee--whoever SHE may be!" She plays the gender and racial cards 10 times more than Obama has ever done. That is why I don't get this person posting here saying that Obamaniacs will "accuse you of being a racist". Obama represents the high road. And that is why you hate him. He would have never gotten this far (as a Black with a Muslim name) if he was that kind of nominee.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:14 AM on 05/21/2008

ehhh... no.

Clintonistas have no doubt been whining nowadays about how everyone is "picking on the girl", and this "she may be", and when things get rough she can go hide behind her husband... sheesh... some strong female leader she turned out to be.

But let's be honest.

Obama-maniacs have been downright offensive when it comes to responding to anyone who criticizes their candidate. The slightest hint and that person is branded a racist. The only reason why it may have subsided a little is because it is apparent that Obama will be the nominee. But make no mistake, Obama supporters should hang their heads in shame for the way they have conducted themselves.

Take it from someone who is not in the camp of either candidate. I will vote certainly vote for either one who becomes the nominee, but save the venom and vigor for McCain.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:19 AM on 05/21/2008

I became defensive the day that Hillary supported McCain and denigrated Obama in the same breath with the most contemptuous look on her face imaginable. I was absolutely stunned by the degree of malice in that moment. That is when I decided to defend my candidate wholeheartedly. If that is offensive, then so be it. We are just very passionate about our candidate. We also support his candidacy with contributions. I am not a wealthy woman, but Obama has so included us in his campaign, and we feel we are running with him. I don't see Hillary supporters contributing to her campaign to the same degree. And God knows, she needs their support to help with her massive debt.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:22 PM on 05/21/2008

When Hillary said that McCain was qualified to be POTUS but Barack only has a speech, her absence during the Senate FISA vote, her side-stepping questions about her vote for the Iraq war, and her vote to declare the Iranian guard a terrorist organization, I could no longer remain neutral. It was her actions and her own words that turned me away from her and it was Barack"s words and actions that led me to support him. If she becomes the Democratic nominee, I will cast my vote against McCain but I would prefer to vote for Barack Obama.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:57 PM on 05/21/2008

Obama supporters became pretty hard core when Hillary insulted their candidate in favor of McCain. That is what did it for me. I remember the look of contempt on her face, as if to say, "How dare anyone campaign against ME, Hillary Clinton, and do so well." She chose McCain over Obama a long time ago. And that is when she lost a lot of support that she would have otherwise had. I do not think she is a racist, and I understand how much she wants to be president, but her despiration has caused her to run a very mean-spirited campaign. Many people who know her say she is actually a very warm and likable person. I have not seen that in her campaign. Then there are all those scandals that just keep coming. There are these fraud charges that are supposed to be coming up in November in the State of California. Yet another scandal.. Are they all part of some "conspiracy?" You can only use that excuse for so long. It's kind of sad, because she has so much going for her. If she is the vice presidential choice, I will certainly vote for an Obama/Clinton ticket. She has not been very presidential in this campaign, and Obama has.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 PM on 05/21/2008