Why the Long Primary Battle with Clinton Will Actually Help Obama Win in November

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

Posted May 21, 2008 | 10:33 AM (EST)



Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

Listen to the talking heads drone endlessly about Obama's drubbing in Kentucky and Clinton's superior appeal among working class whites in Appalachia, and it is hard not to believe that the continuing primary battle won't hurt Obama in the fall. In fact, just the opposite is true. Here's why:

It will all be over soon enough. Notwithstanding his loss in Kentucky, his big win in Oregon put Obama at 1,957 delegates, according to RealClearPolitics.com. That is only 69 delegates from the magic number of 2,026 set by Democratic Party rules to clinch the nomination. There are only 301 delegates left to allocate, of which 215 are superdelegates. Obama just needs 23% of those remaining delegates.

Now that Obama has accumulated an absolute majority of the elected, pledged delegates, the already steady movement of superdelegates to his column will increase. It is likely he will pick up at least 36 delegates in the remaining three primaries. That would leave him needing only 33 more superdelegates, which he would pick up in a couple of days.

Even if the Rules Committee of the DNC seats all of the delegates from Michigan and Florida, the math doesn't materially change. Let's say the Committee allocated 10% more of the Michigan and Florida delegates to Clinton than Obama. Between them, Michigan and Florida would have had 366 delegates -- so that would only net Clinton 37 delegates. Even that would leave Obama needing only one in three of the superdelegates remaining today after the last primary -- and remember that since Super Tuesday he has far outstripped Clinton in the proportion of superdelegates he has accumulated.

The long Democratic primary season has engaged millions of new voters. Every night in most big cities the sportscast reports the hockey scores. For the many people who don't follow hockey, those scores go in one ear and out the other. They don't stick. The same is true for most normal people when it comes to politics, at least until this spring.

Now millions of formerly non-political Americans have started following politics. The primaries have become the most engaging reality TV show around. They've become a sporting event, a drama. My formerly non-political life insurance agent came to see me last week. She's never done anything political in her life. Now she's hooked. She wants to volunteer for Obama.

This new engagement in the Democratic contest is a bonanza for our prospects this fall. In Indiana, the combined Democratic primary turnout was 129% of the total voter that John Kerry got in the general election in 2004. That is unheard of.

History shows that once people vote in Democratic primaries they are much more likely to vote Democratic in general elections.

In general, people are more likely to "act themselves" into a belief or commitment than to be convinced by argument. The 80,000 people who attended the Portland rally for Obama would never have gone had there not been a long primary to necessitate it. The act of attending that rally will do more than dozens of commercials will do to guarantee their commitment and their passion for the Democratic candidate this fall.

The same is true for the tens of thousands who banged on doors or picked up the phone - or argued with a neighbor about the campaign.

The long primary has forced the Obama campaign to develop organizations in all 50 states. Generally, presidential campaigns develop organizations in a few primary states and then go on to develop organizations in the few "in-play" general election states. By forcing Obama to create organizations in every state, the long primary season has helped enormously to broaden the general election playing field. This year, there will be strong, experienced Obama organizations in every state in America.

The battle has hugely increased Democratic registration. In-play states like Nevada that started the year with a majority of Republican registrants, now have a majority of Democrats. The New York Times reports that well over half of new registrants in Oregon were 30 or younger, and that of the 83,000 voters who changed parties this year, a large majority switched to Democratic.

The long primary fight has battle-hardened the Obama organization. Most of Obama's top field people have now been through four or five tough primary contests. That experience has taught even the greenest organizer to "think like a political organizer." It has taught thousands of organizers and volunteers the nuances of political organizing that are only learned through practice.

Great organizations are more than the sum of their parts. They develop distinct values and procedures that combine to form strong organizational cultures. The problem with political organizations is that they are "thrown together." Strong cultures need time to develop. The long primary season has provided that time and practice. It will massively strengthen our ability to mobilize hundreds of thousands of volunteers and millions of voters in the fall.

The continuing primary drama has swelled the number of individual Obama donors. Obama received contributions from 200,000 new donors last month alone. The huge Internet fund raising base will provide a massive political advantage over McCain this fall. It would never have grown so large had the primary battle not continued.

The long primary campaign has battle hardened the candidate. Great long distance runners train for the Olympics by running in the mountains where the oxygen is thin. The tough contest has sharpened Obama's already formidable skills and those of his top advisers as well.

The most difficult issues have already been vetted. The tough primary forced the Reverend Wright controversy -- and the issue of race in general -- to be fully examined by the media and public. The same goes for other standard Republican attacks. Much better that these issues be raised in March than in October. Much better that the voters see Obama win primaries -- and win the nomination -- after dealing with these issues. And of course, it has given Americans the chance to get used to the idea of an African American president.

For many Americans that has happened. While Obama might have less appeal than Clinton among working class white Appalachians, he won 57% of the white vote in mostly-white Oregon -- including 53% of those earning under $50,000 per year.

Obama's big trump card in the fall election is his ability to change the electorate - to register and mobilize millions of voters who have not voted before. The long primary season has set the stage for a fall campaign that does just that. It will place dozens of new states into play. It will change the formula for winning traditional swing states like Pennsylvania, Ohio and Michigan.

In the end, the long primary season has set the stage for what could be a transformational election that sweeps Obama into the presidency, and substantially bolsters Democratic majorities in the House and Senate.

Robert Creamer is a long-time political organizer and strategist and author of the recent book: "Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win," available on amazon.com.

 
 

Comments
568
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)

You're wrong. Have you read the comment sections here, but worse in more mainstream news outlets?

Its not about pundits and pliticians, its about the emotional lives of voters. Too many democratics really, deeply hate one of the cadidates and his/her supporters. Its irrational, but it won't all go away. If people voted for their real interests instead of their feelings, our country wouldn't be in such trouble. The RFK comment has further polarized people- more Obama supporters now say they'll never vote for Clinton.

The damage will be low turnout in November. Voters whose candidate loses will just turn off to politcs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:30 PM on 05/25/2008

Robert Creamer,

Right on the money! Point 3 is a 'biggie', indeed. People will "Act" themselves come Nov.

The media tries to talk about the percentage of Hillary supporters who will vote for McCain in Nov., and that is a silly error in their analysis of the general election. In pure basic math, you have demonstrated (as an expert, not just a pundit) clearly, and accurately, that the negatives in place exist in very limited parameters, and pale in comparison to the plus side in terms of registration, participation, primary-to-general dynamics, etc. It is not hard at all to see that for someone rooting for Sen. Obama in Nov., you really couldn't have asked for a more robust voter excitement.

The hard numbers show that ALL of the registering, volunteering, and turn-out, can in NO WAY benefit John McCain in Nov.... he MUST RELY on low voter interest, turnout, etc! Voters going from Hillary-to-McCain theories fail to account for many facets of an obvious reality.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:05 AM on 05/25/2008

Oregon is ecstatic that the primaries have gone this far. It's not often we've been able to make a difference. I don't think Oregon has ever felt so engaged; I mean, Oregonians have worked to get a nominee/candidate elected before, but this time it's been electric!

Z-z-z-z-t!

This weekend, Obama's gained even more SDs, a few from Hillary's side. This is *totally* better than reality TV!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:27 AM on 05/25/2008

Yes, the quote Obama was from Faulkner " in the South...the past isn't even past yet." I too love his literary references. See how STARVED we are for intelligent speaking and writing after Bushco? Whether he writes his own speeches or not, B.O. can draw the comparisons & references naturally because he is an educated man. His first book Dreams from my Father convinced me that this is an authentic man who understands himself and has READ enough to be able to speak & write lyrically. To know that he is something of a constitutional scholar (see last nite's Moyer's interview w/Jeffrey Toobin) as well is VERY HEARTENING. Believe me, we Dems in KS need heartening!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 PM on 05/24/2008

She is taking it to the Convention (apparently hoping Obamagets killed before then); no Party in the history of American elections has ever won after a contested convention. The problem with the "good primary" argument is that it assumes Clinton is a good Democratic politician, jockeying for position. She's not - she's a obsessed meglomaniac driven her entire life by the desire to become "first woman President," and she will do everything she thinks will get her there. That is all she and her fanatics believe in. Now, how can that be good for any party?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:50 AM on 05/24/2008

creamer is an embarassment to the democratic party.
recently released from prison, check kite, convicted.
these are words that apply to him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:02 PM on 05/23/2008

Holy crap, really?

I like how the liberal extreme are now calling themselves 'progressive.' A much more appropriate term would be oppressive. Oppressive to those who work hard, oppressive to those who value the constitution, and oppressive to women and minorities.

Not very democratic if you ask me.

Go moderate or go home.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:22 PM on 05/23/2008

Just a few serious disagreements with Creamer and with dhinds. Posted a response yesterday addressing these issues but the post never saw the light of day, and even though I requested a reason was never given one. First, there was a huge turnout in Oregon along the Willamete River where Obama spoke because of a concert, free, by the Decembrists?. Yes, there were people there to hear Obama as well. Second, there are "bad things" that are going to turn up against Obama. The Rezko investigation is not over and Obama is right in the thick of things, things like skimming off the top of health agencies and drug cartels and other entities thousands of dollars. Obama claimed that he only say Rezko a few times a year but the mole inside the Combine....the group of folks interested in skimming as much as they could from the public and private corporations.....knew that Obama had spent a good deal of the time after winning the Senate election at Rezko's mansion, right near his own. Patrick Fitzgerald is investigating the Combine and you know he is no slouch, so before you lay your votes on Obama think what the Republicans will do with some, just some, of the info uncovered.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:13 AM on 05/23/2008

Nobody went to see The Decemberists. Nobody that I know even knew there was going to be music there, so nice try. The Decemberists were riding Obama's coattails, not the other way around.

And the Obama/Rezko issue is a non-issue. Obama was the top bidder on his home (paid full-price) and gave market value compensation for the lot that his wife bought next to their home. In addition, he gave back any money that Rezko raised for his campaign. If we want to get into real land issues, we could talk about how McCain greases the wheels to help his friends (who of course give him lots of money) get land from the government... Just google "McCain land Arizona" to find out (since HuffPo doesn't like links in comments).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:40 PM on 05/23/2008

Nobody went to hear the Decemberists. Nobody that I knew that went even knew there was going to be music there. Nice try. The Decemberists were trying to get exposure riding Obama's coattails, not the other way around.

And the Obama/Rezko issue is a non-issue. Obama bought his house and was the top bidder (paid full-price). Obama has already given back any money that Rezko raised for him. If you want to get into dirty land issues, I believe McCain has a few of those : http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-05-15-mccainland_N.htm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:34 PM on 05/23/2008

Beautiful point! Obama spurred the registration of hundreds of thousands of new voters. Will they quietly accept his rejection as a Presidential candidate? Does the Party care? Not clear. Will Hillary care? Well, she told another person running for office and worried about voters: "Fuck 'em! They didn't support you before!", of something to that effect. She will treat all who don't support her that way, for sure.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:54 AM on 05/23/2008

I like reading articles like this, it puts things in perspective. Even long time voters like myself paid scant attention to primaries before. Our attention was on the general election later. But things have changed a great deal since 2004, there is more 24/7 news coverage and bloggers nitpicking over every single gaffe, making what might be a small error, so much bigger than it actually is. It is so discouraging. The media thrives on conflict, the voters don't fare as well. You make some very valid points. Thanks for the article.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:19 PM on 05/22/2008

Remember the Super Bowl this year?!

New York, against the odds, came through at the end and won.

Prediction:
Hillary, against the odds, wins the nomination in the end, which makes monkeys out of all the pundits, especially Tim Russert.

She unites the party by having Obama on the ticket, as VP.

Prediction 2:
If Hillary doesn't put Obama on the ticket with her, race riots will break out thru out the nation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:05 PM on 05/22/2008

Dear Flying Spaghetti Monster, that is one stupid AND ignorant comment. Not only would HRC's winning be against the odds, it would be totally against the facts.

Hey, remember the World Series last year? With all the odds, the Red Sox totally crushed the Rockies in 4 games. I would say that has at least as much relevance as the Super Bowl -- that is, NONE WHATSOEVER!

So, aside from being a racist Tim Russert-hater, what qualifications do you have to even comment?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 PM on 05/23/2008

One big difference Maureen: In the super bowl, both teams have to play by the rules set before the game even began. They don't get to whine and complain and change the rules because they are losing. If Hillary won by following the rules, more power to her.

P.S. I resent the implication that race riots will occur if Obama is not put on the ticket. This is your not so subtle way of saying that African-Americans, who support Obama overwhelming, react by staging riots. It is belitting to all African-Americans. Will white women who support Hillary also "riot" if she is not on the ticket? Or "white" women some much more "civilized" than African-Americans?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:11 PM on 05/22/2008

Dream on......

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:43 PM on 05/22/2008

I AGREE, THAT OBAMA WILL WIN. I HOPE HE CHOOSES A GOOD RUNNING MATE
OF COURSE, I WOULD RATHER SEE RON PAUL WIN. HE HAS NOT DROPPED OUT
OF THE RACE. HE HAS STUDIED ECONOMICS AND HAS THE SOLUTIONS TO OUR
PROBLEMS. TALKING ABOUT CHANGE IS NOT ENOUGH. OBAMA WILL NOT END
*INTERNATIONAL SOCIALISM, WHICH IS COSTING THIS COUNTRY DEARLY. .. AND
DRIVING US INTO BANKRUPTCY. HE PLANS TO REDISTRIBUTE U.S. DOLLARS ALL
OVER THE WORLD. THESE ARE FUNDS, THAT SHOULD BE USED TO STIMULATE
OUR ECONOMY, REPAIR OUR INFRASTRUCTURE, SECURE OUR BORDERS AND
PAY THAT OBSCENE DEBT TO CHINA. ONLY RON PAUL WOULD ACCOMPLISH ALL
OF THESE THINGS. IF THE MEDIA WOULD SHOW ACCEPTANCE TO RON PAUL AND
HIS POLICIES, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WOULD TAKE A BETTER LOOK AT HIM AND
WAKE UP IN TIME TO SAVE THIS COUNTRY... I AM 71 YEARS OLD... HOW MUCH LONGER
COULD I LIVE... IT'S THE YOUNGER PEOPLE THAT I AM CONCERNED FOR... MY KIDS
AND GRAND KIDS. GET RON PAUL'S NEW BOOK, "THE REVOLUTION".... EDUCATE
YOURSELVES AND WRITE-IN RON PAUL'S NAME IN NOVEMBER.... IF YOU ELECT ANY
OF THE OTHER CANDIDATES... YOU WILL LIVE TO REGRET IT.... AS WE DID AFTER
ELECTING GEORGE BUSH.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:13 PM on 05/22/2008

Wow! Your second prediction is what people and the cowards in the DNC think will happen if he doesn't get the nomination. What a reason to select a representative like the to carry the Democratic banner! And, on the other hand, race riots will probably assure that there will be a cold day in hell before another black will be put out as a candidate for the presidency.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:25 PM on 05/22/2008

Part C:

So what's at stake is the viability of the Democratic Party. Obama, Edwards and Richardson are on the right track and in the face of a possible (if improbable) Party betrayal of the majority vote, the ONE AMERICA Party would rise from that worn out shell. The DP either rededicates itself (and is thereby Reborn) or it dies. That's what's at stake, here and now.

[Sorry about the duplication - HP's posting limits required breaking up a single post].

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:37 AM on 05/22/2008

I agree with almost everything. The part about the most difficult issues alread being vetted is true if there are no more issues. We didn't see Rev. Wright coming until it was here, nobody knew Obama would say the "bitter" comment. So we don't know what will come out of right field.

I also think that the huge number of democratic voters registered isn't a true number. I am not talking about Limbaugh and "operation chaos". I live in Pennsylvania, and I know a few republicans who changed party to vote. Not to mess up the primary, but they wanted their vote to count, they said they will still vote for McCain in November.

There are too many variables between now and November. I hope Obama wins, but I am not taking it for granted, and I hope most democrats aren't. I hear too many "this will be a landslide" that is fine when rooting for a sports team, but some people will hear that this is a forgone conslusion, and stay home. That could be bad.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:26 AM on 05/22/2008

That issue will be the Rezko scandal, the millionaire (money from skimming public health institutions) who loaned (or perhaps gave is the better word) Obama money to buy the $2 million mansion near Rezko's home. Obama received lots of money from Rezko and from other bundlers involved in the schemes of a group called Combine. They also supported the governor of Illinois, Bogdanovich. So, yes, brace yourselves. Lots more to come.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 AM on 05/23/2008

LOOK HILLARY NO BODY IS MAKING YOU GO AWAY BUY SEM OBAMA HAS MOVED ON TO THE GENERAL ELECTION YOU AND B ILL STILL BE LOVED. LET'S GET TOGETHER AND BEAT MCCAIN AND HIS CREW AND GET THIS WAR OVER BRING OUR GUYS HOME IT IS TIME .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 AM on 05/22/2008

I love this Reuters headline, 'Clinton campaigns as attention wanders elsewhere'. Pretty much gives Clinton an equal chance with an Armadillo on a Texas Highway, both are headed for Road Kill Status. There are times when all the money in the world isn't enough, getting beaten by a Black Lawyer must be a double blow for a Southern racists like her !

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:01 AM on 05/22/2008

Part A:

Hillary's successes have been the result of:

I).- Name Recognition;
Including the unquestioned authority granted her by her more poorly informed supporters;

II).- Party Loyalty;
As above, the Clintons are well known Democratic Party stalwarts, with extensive contacts;

III).- Nostalgia;
Thanks to Dubya, life was better during the Clinton years and as Nader predicted, Dubya's abuses have united Democrats against him and his policies, although only partly around Hillary;

IV).- Casting Doubt on her Competitor(s) Character, Behavior, Judgement and Experience, as well as those that criticize (or fail to support) her;
However, this tactic has alienated those who recognize it for what it's worth, including former members of the Clinton Administration, and Obama's proven himself adept at addressing the doubts of all but the most intractable cases of ignorance and incorrigible intellectual dishonesty.

V).- Feminist Issues;
Women have in fact been discriminated against and deserve a shot at the White House;

VI).- Race
Racism & Ethnocentrism are not yet dead in America.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:01 AM on 05/22/2008

Part C:

So what's at stake is the viability of the Democratic Party. Obama, Edwards and Richardson are on the right track and in the face of a possible (if improbable) Party betrayal of the majority vote, the ONE AMERICA Party would rise from that worn out shell. The DP either rededicates itself (and is thereby Reborn) or it dies. That's what's at stake, here and now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:39 AM on 05/22/2008

Part B:

Why she continues:

The combination of all of the above generates enough Public Support to keep the Clinton Campaign alive. The Clinton's survived Whitewater, Bill's Extramarital Affairs and even, his Lying under Oath. So far, they've survived everything thrown at them and are having a hard time accepting the rapidly approaching end to the charmed life they've led to date. This confidence borders on obsession and demonstrates a Starlet Complex, a sense of entitlement that's been evident from the start (and to many, this is hardly a virtue). Apparently, having been the First Lady and being a Senator from New York aren't enough for her.

Her highly paid staff will continue to support her as long as the money holds out. But for the first time in American Political History, campaign funding reflects the depth of a candidate's understanding and message, the organizational and technological skill of the campaign's staff and most importantly, the strength of that candidate's Popular Support.
(As an aside: Would Barack Obama be here if Tim Berners-Lee hadn't donated -and maintained- www protocols in the public domain)?

What's unknown is the depth of the Clinton's obsession and the integrity of the DNC Rules Committee's decision making process. Without reformulating the rules for FL and MI, there's insufficient justification for pressuring Super-delegates to recognize and support her supposed superior electabilility.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 AM on 05/22/2008

Apparently, having been the First Lady and being a Senator from New York aren't enough for her.

There you go, being the opinionated person you are. Gender bias, sexism, is alive and well on HuffPo.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:15 PM on 05/22/2008

So you believe she *is* entitled to the Presidency?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:14 PM on 05/27/2008

These arguments are similar to the ones offered by the Democrats in 1980, and unfortunately will have the same results. A Republican victory in the fall. The Superdelegates of 2008 are presiding over a party split destined to lead to a debacle in November that will reverberate through several election cycles .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 AM on 05/22/2008

1980 is no where close to the same. If you look with a narrow lense at just the primary itself, sure, it's similar. But the political landscape, the shape the country is in, the challenges being faced right now, and everything else to consider when you look at the bigger picture... it's not even close to the same.

1980 was also a year where a weak sitting president went up against a strong challenger and speaker in Ronald Reagan. John McCain is no Ronald Reagan.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 AM on 05/22/2008

Actually, until the hostage crisis really took off, Raygun was perceived as what he was, an intellectually weak former actor, with moronic ideas. The combination of the convention fight and the Iranian hostage crisis caused people to think twice about the (then) most dangerous president in history!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:47 PM on 05/22/2008

Part C:

So what's at stake is the viability of the Democratic Party. Obama, Edwards and Richardson are on the right track and in the face of a possible (if improbable) Party betrayal of the majority vote, the ONE AMERICA Party would rise from that worn out shell. The DP either rededicates itself (and is thereby Reborn) or it dies. That's what's at stake, here and now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 AM on 05/22/2008

Part B:

Why she continues:

The combination of all of the above generates enough Public Support to keep the Clinton Campaign alive. The Clinton's survived Whitewater, Bill's Extramartial Affairs and even, his Lying under Oath. So far, they've survived everything thrown at them and are having a hard time accepting the rapidly approaching end to the charmed life they've led to date. This confidence borders on obsession and demonstrates a Starlet Complex, a sense of entitlement that's been evident from the start (and to many, this is hardly a virtue). Apparently, having been the First Lady and being a Senator from New York aren't enough for her.

Her highly paid staff will continue to support her as long as the money holds out. But for the first time in American Political History, campaign funding reflects the depth of a candidate's understanding and message, the organizational and technological skill of the campaign's staff and most importantly, the strength of that candidate's Popular Support.
(As an aside: Would Barack Obama be here if Tim Berners-Lee hadn't donated -and maintained- www protocols in the public domain)?

What's unknown is the depth of the Clinton's obsession and the integrity of the DNC Rules Committee's decision making process. Without reformulating the rules for FL and MI, there's insufficient justification for pressuring Super-delegates to recognize and support her supposed superior electability.

(Please See Part C)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 AM on 05/22/2008


Part A:

Hillary's successes have been the result of:

I).- Name Recognition;
Including the unquestioned authority granted her by her more poorly informed supporters;

II).- Party Loyalty;
As above, the Clintons are well known Democratic Party stalwarts, with extensive contacts;

III).- Nostalgia;
Thanks to Dubya, life was better during the Clinton years and as Nader predicted, Dubya's abuses have united Democrats against him and his policies, although only partly around Hillary;

IV).- Casting Doubt on her Competitor(s) Character, Behavior, Judgement and Experience, as well as those that criticize (or fail to support) her;
However, this tactic has alienated those who recognize it for what it's worth (including former members of the Clinton Administration), and Obama's proven himself adept at addressing the doubts of all but the most int