Senate Passes Foreclosure Rescue Plan

RSS stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com

JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS | July 11, 2008 11:24 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Show your support.
Buzz this article up.
Home sale signs are visible on a street corner in Portland, Ore., Friday, July 11, 2008. Wall Street sank further into a bear market today as investors dumped stocks on troubles at mortgage companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac .(AP Photo/Don Ryan)

WASHINGTON — A mortgage rescue to help hundreds of thousands of struggling homeowners avoid foreclosure and get more affordable, safer loans passed the Senate overwhelmingly Friday, but it faces a bumpy road amid continuing turmoil in the housing market.

The 63-5 vote reflected a keen interest by Democrats and Republicans to send election-year help to distressed homeowners with economic issues topping voters' concerns.

The plan lets homeowners buckling under mortgage payments they can't afford keep their homes and get more affordable mortgages backed by the Federal Housing Administration. Banks that agreed to take substantial losses on those distressed loans could avoid costly foreclosures and be assured of recovering at least some money.

The new program would let the FHA insure as much as $300 billion in new mortgages, helping an estimated 400,000 homeowners.

It still faces challenges, however, with the House planning to rewrite key details and the White House threatening a veto without major changes.

"It's not the final stop, but it is a major stop in getting this bill done," said Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., chairman of the Banking Committee. "For those who said this Congress cannot come together in a bipartisan fashion to do something responsible about housing, this bill does that."

Story continues below
advertisement

Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., the Financial Services Committee chairman and an architect of the bill, says the few but significant revisions House leaders are seeking could be made in as little as one week.

Dodd said he was expecting minor "tweaks" that could be dealt with quickly.

But key players are bracing for intense negotiations to resolve the differences. They hope to smooth over disputes with the White House at the same time, with an eye toward producing a bill President Bush could sign later this month.

The White House Friday renewed its warning that Bush would veto the Senate-passed bill without revisions, citing $3.9 billion in the measure for buying and rehabilitating foreclosed properties it said would help lenders, not homeowners.

The measure includes a long-sought modernization of the FHA and would create a new regulator and tighter controls on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored mortgage giants. It also would provide $14.5 billion in housing tax breaks, including a credit of up to $8,000 for first-time home buyers.

Democrats are divided over important elements of the plan, including limits on loans the FHA may insure and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac may buy. The Senate measure sets them at $625,000, while House leaders _ including Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. _ want the cap as high as $730,000.

House leaders also oppose the immediate effective date of the Senate plan, preferring to phase in the new regulations for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac over six months.

"We'd have a hard time agreeing to that," Dodd told reporters Friday. He called a Capitol Hill news conference to dispel fears about the financial health of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as their stocks plummeted on reports that the government was considering taking over one or both of them.

Another key point of dispute is the funding in the Senate measure for buying and fixing foreclosed properties. The House's band of conservative "Blue Dog" Democrats oppose the money, arguing that it would swell the deficit unless paired with cuts or tax increases to cover the cost.

But many Democrats, particularly members of the Congressional Black Caucus, are fighting to keep the funding, which they say will help prevent the communities hardest hit by the housing crisis from sliding into blight.

"There are people who tell me to ignore" that threat, Frank said in a statement Friday. "But there is too much that is important in this bill, and it has already been too long delayed by procedural problems in the Senate, for us to risk the further delay involved in a veto."

He said he was working to find a way to shift the funds to a must-pass spending bill that would be approved before lawmakers scatter for the year in September.

Dana Perino, Bush's spokeswoman, said the money should be stripped out of the measure "so that they can get a housing bill to the president that he could sign right away."

Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., the presumptive presidential nominee, said Bush should drop his opposition to the housing plan and other Democratic efforts to ease economic pain.

"I call on the administration to support this bill along with a second emergency stimulus package to jumpstart the economy and build on this important start to advance more rigorous measures to protect homeowners from foreclosure," he said. Obama was on the campaign trail Friday and did not vote on the measure, which had been expected to pass by a wide margin. He was one of 32 senators not voting.

With the administration scrambling to tamp down on investor fears about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Perino called the new regulations in the measure for the two mortgage giants its "most important feature."

Lawmakers and the Bush administration agree on the central concept behind the housing package: allowing the government to backstop new mortgages for struggling homeowners.

To make it more palatable to Republicans, the Senate measure would take responsibility for any losses away from taxpayers and instead cover them by diverting a newly created affordable housing fund drawn from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac profits.

 
 

Comments
55
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- ROBOT8 See Profile I'm a Fan of ROBOT8 permalink

THERE WERE NO WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, THERE ARE NO TALIBAN IN IRAQ, THERE IS OIL IN IRAQ, IN IRAN, IN AFGANISTAN AND IN TURKEY, THERE IS NO MORE MONEY LEFT IN THE TREASURY. WE ARE ON THE BRINK OF COLLAPSE. RUSSIA IS EXPANDING, WEALTHY AND POWERFUL. CHINA IS EXPANDING,WEALTHY AND POWERFUL. INDIA IS EXPANDING ,WEALTHY AND POWERFUL.........................AMERICA IS CONTRACTING, POOR AND IMPOTENT

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:24 PM on 07/13/2008
- raw915 See Profile I'm a Fan of raw915 permalink

Every voter is entitled to a big home and a big yard, a place where the kids and dogs can play...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:51 AM on 07/13/2008
- leftLibertarian See Profile I'm a Fan of leftLibertarian permalink

When is big mommy gubmit gonna help me with my student loans and credit card bills?

Waaaa!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 PM on 07/12/2008
- WIpatriot See Profile I'm a Fan of WIpatriot permalink

Why, are you "too big to fail?"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:36 AM on 07/13/2008
- cruisepuppy7452a See Profile I'm a Fan of cruisepuppy7452a permalink

Another phony let's help out the public Bill. They are getting good at hiding the small print. If anyone reads what also these bills include, they would not think so highly of them. More proof of the levels of corruption. What ever happened to this country is beyond me. I use to think we had leaders who represented the public, now its just let's sell thier souls to the highest bidders and damn the consequences.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:51 PM on 07/12/2008
- zizyphus See Profile I'm a Fan of zizyphus permalink

The article and none of the commenters have noted that the worst part of this bill is the provision that all purchases by credit or debit, any means, will be sent to the IRS so they can know everything you have bought.

"The housing bill calls for credit card companies as well as Internet companies such as eBay Inc., PayPal Inc., Google Inc. and Amazon.com Inc., which electronically process payments for merchants, to track, aggregate and report information to the IRS on the payments they make to merchants. The reporting provision would apply to merchants who earn more than $10,000 and make more than 200 transactions annually.

The provision is tucked away on page 615 of the 631-page housing bill filed last week by Sen. Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.), chairman of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, and ranking member Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.)"The housing bill calls for credit card companies as well as Internet companies such as eBay Inc., PayPal Inc., Google Inc. and Amazon.com Inc., which electronically process payments for merchants, to track, aggregate and report information to the IRS on the payments they make to merchants. The reporting provision would apply to merchants who earn more than $10,000 and make more than 200 transactions annually.

The government is creating huge databases with all our most personal info in them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:40 PM on 07/12/2008
- RTIII See Profile I'm a Fan of RTIII permalink


THANK YOU FOR POSTING!

By law they are prohibited, currently, from doing that. This looks like a back door, sneak attack to get all the data on us!

If you are correct, this is TRULY OUTRAGEOUS.

Time - AGAIN - to get to the phones and letter-writing again, people!
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:37 PM on 07/12/2008
- zizyphus See Profile I'm a Fan of zizyphus permalink

What I think, is that the NSA has already been recording all this, and this provision is just giving us notice after the fact. You notice there was no press on it, but privacy and civil liberty groups reacted quickly.

I think the microchipped cash will be introduced next (this will be sold to the public as way to prevent crime and terrorism), to get all the garage sale/flea market/ fruit stand proceeds. The prototype coin is already being tested.

Little by little, one by one, all of our liberties are being taken. I never thought I would live to see this day.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:38 PM on 07/12/2008
- jdfast See Profile I'm a Fan of jdfast permalink

I knew there was more to the story. They want to track us from the time we get up till the time we go to bed. And, we will stand by like sheep while they pass this bill to tale away more of our rights. They simply want to stop the little guy manking money that he does not pay tax on and screw him some more so they can continue the tax cuts for the wealthy and most if not all members of congress are wealthy. Can't everyone see where this is going? In a matter of a few short years, it will be the have's and the have nots and the haves will tell the rest of us with the implants what to do, when to work, when to sleep, and how much to spend and we can't go there, etc. Wake up now before its too late.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:48 PM on 07/12/2008
- zizyphus See Profile I'm a Fan of zizyphus permalink

I agree. They already have a set-up in stores that tracks your every move, including eye movements, so they can find out what attracts your attention, what you pick up, etc.

They already have us used to the surveillance cameras that we can see everywhere (for our safety). The reality shows are getting people used to the idea that it is good to videotaped as you go about life.

There is this mass conditioning going on. All the shows on TV are about crime and violence, idiotic sitcoms, or celebrities and drugs. The military now has it's own channel on TV to promote their propaganda. All the commercials on TV are for drugs or alcohol, others show handsome drivers exceeding the speed limit and executing precarious turns.

"News" shows are limited to right-wing men pontificating on the useless trivia item of the day, or the the latest natural disaster, while the women are mostly stereotyped accessories. This is most obvious on Fox News, where all the women appear to have been chosen for their slatternly looks. I

t is best just to keep the TV off.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:51 PM on 07/12/2008
- marijam See Profile I'm a Fan of marijam permalink

I hate to pop y'all's self-righteous, back-patting bubble, but this crisis was not only caused by speculators and people who didn't know what they were doing. There was fraud and unethical behavior on the part of both real estate agents and lenders. Why do you insist upon grabbing onto only one aspect of this and ignoring all others? As far as the "relief" package goes, as usual, its too little too late and there's no justice involved in it. As usual, its socialism for the corporations, not for the little guy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:20 AM on 07/12/2008
- danoj See Profile I'm a Fan of danoj permalink

There we go let's bail out every frickin moron who got in over there heads. Really irks me that government steps in for this crap. Let it go let the market handle it. If lenders acted in a criminal way ya then get the justice department after those folks, but to my knowledge not much of that has happened it was just stupid people acting stupidly. Why should I pay my hard earned money to bail these morons out. Read before you sign all this crap was written in the contract if you can't get a fixed rate don't borrow the damn money. It's time people started taking some responsibility instead of looking to washington and the taxpayers to solve problems they created.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 AM on 07/12/2008
- Deaninphilly See Profile I'm a Fan of Deaninphilly permalink

Exactly, the realtors, banks, mortgage brokers even down to the appraisers were all in this together. They over inflated the housing market to the point of bust. Housing is now so out of whack of what the salary levels that we are nowhere near seeing the fall of the housing market.

People with secondary homes or investment should not be helped at all only primary homes should be protected. Which the banks if they had any sense would just lower the interest rate and put it at a fixed rate. The "the banks lose money" doesn't wash, because what if the people refinanced the loan, then what? It's not like they would have collected all the interest anyhow, so just lower it to a more affordable rate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 AM on 07/12/2008
- Oldtimer See Profile I'm a Fan of Oldtimer permalink

You hit the nail on the head. Primary home buyers should be guaranteed a fixed rate
mortgage and the banks eat the "loss" (the exorbitant profit they were hoping for).
Americans who jumped on the speculation bandwagon and bought a second or even third investment home should NOT get help. They thought the crap table was fixed and they couldn't lose. They helped blow prices sky high filpping this and that house for a
fast profit. Now they want help? Blow me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:49 PM on 07/12/2008
- VivaZapata See Profile I'm a Fan of VivaZapata permalink

hard work and living within one's means have given way to speculation and extravagance. this is also known as going to hell in a handbasket.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:56 AM on 07/12/2008
- truthyguy See Profile I'm a Fan of truthyguy permalink

Unfortunately the IndyMac Bank seizure and the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bailouts may only be the beginning.

Where is the U.S. government going to get the money to make good on the bank depositors' insurance, shore up mortgage loans and bail out Fannie and Freddie and any other banks that go bad? Oh, yes, that's right. We can just float more debt which we can sell to China and Japan - assuming they still think that the U.S. is a good financial risk even though the U.S. has $5 trillion national debt and an annual operating deficit of $500 billion - excluding the cost of the Iraq war, which Bush has conveniently taken out of the formula for calculating the annual budget. Then we can repay the government bonds out of the annual operating deficit.

Face it. Due to the republicans' actions these past 8 years the U.S. is "bankrupt" according to the accepted legal and accounting definition of the word: "The inability to pay your debts as they fall due."

But according to McCain and his economic adviser Phil Gramm - it's all in your head, you whining sissies. Of course they already have their millions made by marrying money in McCain's case and by using government connections to amass a fortune in Gramm's.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:51 AM on 07/12/2008
- sandiegoconservative See Profile I'm a Fan of sandiegoconservative permalink

Man. I admit it. Libs are finally right about something. My wife and I certainly did the wrong thing. As I sit here in my energy efficient, reasonably sized home in the most expensive housing market in the country, I now realize that it was a bad idea for us to buy within our means, make the best deal we could, and to get out of our adjustable first mortgage the second we had the opportunity to.

Instead, we should have purchased a 5 bedroom house overlooking the ocean in Del Mar or La Jolla, taken that expensive mortgage then whined that we could not afford the payments, and that we need a bailout and a lower new mortgage with lots of protection that makes it nearly impossible to foreclose. That would have been the best thing to do. To hell with responsibility! Give me immediate gratification so that I can keep a house I can't afford and let all those responsible homeowners pay for my mistake!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:30 AM on 07/12/2008
- FreedomBeforeDemocracy See Profile I'm a Fan of FreedomBeforeDemocracy permalink

Well put sandiegoconservative. I am in the same market you are in. I upgraded during the buying frenzy in 2004. Since I was also selling (a condo), I got a little cushion. I could have bought a BMW with all that profit, or even got a bigger. Instead, I banked what I thought would be an appropriate amount to get me past the obvious rough patch that was ahead (put down 20%, plus saved some more). It looks like I'll make it, but I've been prepared the whole time to downgrade.

The government taking away people's responsibility has always led to the same thing; People being less responsible.

As a side note, banks have always been willing (based on my first purchase in 98') to loan much more than people should conservatively take.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:59 PM on 07/12/2008
- ImmanuelGoldstein See Profile I'm a Fan of ImmanuelGoldstein permalink

Why don't you list all those things conservatives have done right over the last eight year's while you are at it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:54 AM on 07/12/2008
- WIpatriot See Profile I'm a Fan of WIpatriot permalink

Sweet, Manny.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 PM on 07/12/2008
- ErnestineBass See Profile I'm a Fan of ErnestineBass permalink

That list wouldn't fill the inside of a matchbook.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:45 PM on 07/12/2008
- truthyguy See Profile I'm a Fan of truthyguy permalink

Right on, sandiegoconservative. Those people people who are skilled labor, blue collar (to you) who bought modestly priced homes when told by banks that they qualified for the introductory low rate mortgage based on current income, were all stupid. They should have gone to college to understand the ramifications of an adjustable rate mortgage made by a lender who knew (but failed to fully explain) that the introductory rate was under market and would go up in 12 months to a rate that generated a payment the borrower would not qualify for if the initial loan was made at that rate.

Apparently you are of the Phil Gramm school of economics.

And if you want to talk about responsible financial management, explain how your republican buddies have run up a national debt of $5 Trillion and have not once in 8 years balanced the budget and have an annual operating deficit of $500 Billion (not including the Iraq war costs, which Bush removed from the annual budget accounting). Oh yes, that's right, we will borrow the money from Japan and China and then pay it back out of the nonexistent annual surplus. Is that your idea of fiscal responsibility, you dumb ass?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:20 AM on 07/12/2008
- FreedomBeforeDemocracy See Profile I'm a Fan of FreedomBeforeDemocracy permalink

If one needs to go to college to understand an adjustable rate mortgage, our progressive public education system is doing worse than I thought (I thought they were doing pretty bad to begin with).

Why would lenders want to fool people into taking out loans they can't afford? The answer is they don't (maybe the secondary mortgage market demand, but nothing else). The reason we have FHA 3% down loans is because most lenders required 20% down. To do otherwise was considered too risky, regardless of the fees the lender was picking up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:50 PM on 07/12/2008
- sandiegoconservative See Profile I'm a Fan of sandiegoconservative permalink

Truthyguy- I love how the excuse is always "someone failed to explain it". I was blue collar for years while I worked through school and I am still blue collar on occasion with my work (depending on the job for the day). What does that have anything to do with buying a home and reading the entire contract? It means nothing!

I knew NOTHING about the housing market when we decided to start looking. My wife also knew nothing. So, we sat down and did research- online, in print, and asked about a million questions. Our lender was probably sick of us because of the number of questions we asked, because we wanted to know everything. When they handed us that contract, we asked a few more, then made a copy and went through it line by line, then agreed to sign..

I would like to think that if someone is going into debt for a few hundred K, they would read up on the risks.

And who says I am Republican? Conservative does not mean Republican per se. I have said multiple times on here that out of the 3 elections I have voted in, 2 of my votes were for the Democrat candidate. I am an independent and choose to not blindly follow one party. I hope you would do the same. Besides, don't argue a forclosure issue by talking about people I don't know and really can't control spending too much money. I agree that they have!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:53 PM on 07/12/2008
- speedingpullet See Profile I'm a Fan of speedingpullet permalink

truthyguy, I see your frustration, but...... no matter what your educational level - if you couldn't understand the loan you were signing for, wouldn't that be a Red Flag Warning NOT to sign the darn thing in the first place?

Don't get me wrong, there's enough blame to go round to ALL the players in the game - only this morning, I was watching 'Open House' on CNN, with the delightful Jenny DeGroot trying to explain how 'Seller Lending' worked - ie it helps buyers with less-than-stellar credit ratings and savings get a loan (from the seller!) to buy a house... ugh, as if we don't have enough worries already, here's a new (and legally dubious) way of parting people from their money, to buy something that they shouldn't really be buying.

Anyway, my point being, people - for their own financial safety - need to be cautious in what, for most people, will be the biggest expenditure they will make in their lives.
Yes, blame the lenders, the RE agents, and the banks, for trying to pull the wool over people's eyes. But - in the end- its 'buyer beware'.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 PM on 07/12/2008
- ultracrepidarian See Profile I'm a Fan of ultracrepidarian permalink

This is the bill authored by the Bank of America. Whom do think it will benefit?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:05 AM on 07/12/2008
- WIpatriot See Profile I'm a Fan of WIpatriot permalink

Just a guess, but...BofA?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 PM on 07/12/2008
- FreedomBeforeDemocracy See Profile I'm a Fan of FreedomBeforeDemocracy permalink

Who does this bill help? Politicians. That"s exactly who it"s designed to help. It"s just like the "stimulus" package. Designed to "stimulate" voters to vote for the incumbents. Of course, it might also benefit some irresponsible borrowers at the expense of all taxpayers, but that is completely a side effect.

And the "affordable housing fund" from Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. I"m sure that will stop the crash in their stock prices.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 AM on 07/12/2008
- krm1255 See Profile I'm a Fan of krm1255 permalink

I went through a foreclosure. A big part of this bill is that the lender has to agree to modify the terms of the loan. Well, each loan these days is sold to 7 or 8 investors and nobody knows who's on first or who makes the decision.

I sold my house for slightly less than was owed about 5 times. No one I dealt with had the authority to accept the offer to save these investors the costly foreclosure, so I finally said forget it and let it foreclose.

In that environment how many people do you think this bill will really help? I'm guessing not many.

Political grandstanding at its finest!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:08 PM on 07/11/20