Seth Colter Walls
RSS

Hillraisers Donated Less Than $20,000 To Obama In June

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com

July 21, 2008 03:45 PM


Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

***UPDATED BELOW***

By now, most political junkies know that Barack Obama raised a lot of money in June.

But his campaign's $52 million dollar take for the month becomes all the more impressive when considering the utter lack of help he received from Hillary Clinton's high-dollar fundraising machine. When comparing Obama's full FEC filing for June with a list of 311 "Hillraisers" -- or supporters who bundled more than $100,000 in contributions for Sen. Clinton -- the Huffington Post found only eight names in common between the two lists. Not all of those donors maxed out, either, making for a relatively paltry figure of $19,250 in direct, hard-money contributions from Hillraisers for the month.

That does not mean that only eight of Clinton's top donors have contributed to Obama since Clinton dropped out. Several dozen more Hillraisers are rumored to have donated in July, but those details will not be available until late August. Some other prominent Hillraisers, like Barbaralee Diamonstein-Spielvogel, have hosted high-dollar events at their homes, drawing many more times the $4600 limit they each could have given individually by law.

But still, the fact that fewer than three percent of Clinton's donors have donated any money directly to Obama in his first month as presumptive nominee is likely to raise the eyebrows of some leaders in the Democratic Party who are hoping to see signs of unity. Clinton suspended her campaign in early June, and officially endorsed Barack Obama in a speech on June 7.

In addition, only a scattered few Hillraisers donated to the Democratic National Committee or its Victory Fund in June -- perhaps a more worrying development for the party as it tries to keep pace with its Republican counterpart. (Such checks to the party, however, can go as high as $28,500.)

A source close to the Clinton camp who spoke to the Huffington Post on background said the trend was not irreversible for the Obama campaign, however. "The best thing they can do to bring the Clinton people along is to hire Clinton finance staffers to work with their donors," the source said, adding that no high-level Clinton finance figures have been hired to work for the campaign. "There are some people [Hillraisers] who will never come over," the source conceded, "but some of the people just haven't been involved in the process [thus far]. ... And in a tight race, you need as many people as possible. It's a big deal."

The Huffington Post has reported previously on some of the most outspoken Hillraiser holdouts. And, it must be noted, the ultimate usefulness of some of these figures is not how much they donate personally, but whether they perform the hard work of organizing others to open their wallets. Still, individual contributions can be a sign of intent or enthusiasm.

Story continues below
advertisement

Judging by the latest figures, there isn't much of either among Hillraisers at the moment.

The complete list of names for Hillraiser donors in June is below:

Obama for America: 8 Hillraisers

Gary Gensler
John Graham
Lorraine Hariton
Laurence Humphries
Pat Maloney Jr.
Amb. Arthur Schechter
Ann Stock
Eleni Tsakopoulos-Kounalakis

Victory Fund: 6 Hillraisers

Mark Aronchick
Clarence Avant
John Emerson
John Graham
Chad Griffin
Marc Nathanson


DNC: 4 Hillraisers

Rashid Chaudary
Gary Gensler
Amb. Arthur Schechter
Maureen White

LATE UPDATE: The Washington Post's The Trail blog offers another dimension to the picture. Scouring the latest FEC reports, they discovered a total of 2,200 individual Clinton donors -- as distinct from the smaller group of elite Hillraisers we tracked -- who became first-time Obama donors in June, and who donated $1.8 million of the $52 million total (or approximately four percent of the campaign's June take).

As we reported, Clinton and Obama sources described to the Post the fact that some bundlers may help fundraise without writing checks themselves. However, during our own review, it was clear that many more Hillraisers also wrote personal checks to Clinton, in addition to their bundling, than have currently done the same for Obama.

 
 

Comments
940
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (22 pages total)
- dcwblackhorse See Profile I'm a Fan of dcwblackhorse

Yet they want those of us that support Obama to bail her out of debt after she did much of the republican's work for them? Strange thinking.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:53 AM on 07/29/2008
- Diplomacy See Profile I'm a Fan of Diplomacy

Goes to show that Hillary Rodham Clinton's Campaign Fundraising machine is non-existant. They all were 'fair weather' friends who do not support her financially. Otherwise, Hillary Rodham Clinton would have already paid down her debt immediately upone exiting the campaign. Instead, she's had to add $1 million dollars of her own money, yet again to add to the $11 million she had already loaned her campaign.

So done with this NONSENSE!

Hillary, where exactly are you supporters? You tout 18 million supporters, but none of them are willing to donate $2. each? That should really tell you something about the REALITY of your supporters!

Please, please go home to NY and be a Senator. We are all tired of the CLINTON drama, including Hillary, Bill & Chelsea.

So, done with the DRAMA!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:58 PM on 07/22/2008
- rvn1965 See Profile I'm a Fan of rvn1965

Great post! only16 years too late!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 AM on 07/24/2008
- 08politicaljunkie See Profile I'm a Fan of 08politicaljunkie

I really don't understand why this is a surprise to anyone. Hillary couldn't raise enough money to cover own campaign. Otherwise, she'd probably be the "presumptive" Democratic nominee. [laughing]

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:43 PM on 07/22/2008
- mimsnpips See Profile I'm a Fan of mimsnpips

Oh Huff must you!?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:56 PM on 07/22/2008
- NoSpinTruthZone See Profile I'm a Fan of NoSpinTruthZone

Hahahaha... As many Obama supporters have CLEARLY STATED, "We don't need you!'

So.. it looks like I, and about 15+ million others are not going to help one bit. :)

Good luck with everything!

Clinton/Webb in 2012!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 PM on 07/22/2008
- knowhelpnow See Profile I'm a Fan of knowhelpnow

First of all Hillary and Bill have enough money coming in to pay off their own debts, please give us all a break and do it. Second if the Hillary supporters are going to support McCain they really are not Democrats in the first place or very sore losers. We really need to unit NOW our country and the earth can not afford 4 more years of this craziness.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:23 PM on 07/22/2008
- LynnDee See Profile I'm a Fan of LynnDee

I have been reading about the PUMA debate and Hillraiser stories for the last few weeks and really my take seems to be a little different than most.

What it boils down to for me is that the Hillraisers whether they are men or women, are really not concerned about FISA or any other issue that has been raised. It is the unspoken issue that has them scrambling and using propaganda against the O campaign. That issue is the fact they O has said he will raise taxes on the wealthy. Hmmm you think there might be some indigestion on that one for the wealthy that have given so much to the H campaign?? I truly feel that he will follow through on that policy and they are running scared.

The use of the other issues is just a smoke screen to pull in those of us who are not as wealthy and more than likely will not be affected by the tax increase. Yes I see entitlement and lying going on but it is heavily slanted in the direction of the H camp.

For me the middle class woman that I am, there are to many issues at stake in this election to fool around and play these very nasty games. I am asking that they look down from their stratosphere and consider the rest of us who will have to live with these decisions and don't have the money to create a buffer against the backlash.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 PM on 07/22/2008
- joeinvt See Profile I'm a Fan of joeinvt

Three things:

1. Bill Clinton had no trouble raising taxes on the wealthy. He has a proven record of doing what Obama promises (and I am sure will do once elected). So why should he or Hillary now act in ways that are contrary to their thirty plus years of public service? How does the fact that they have more money now change all that.?

2. When Obama takes office he will be a much wealthier man tham Clinton was when he took office, but I don't think he will basing his tax policies on what his best for him and Michelle. What evidence do you have that Hillary would? Hillary is open to legitimate criticism on many fronts so why make stuff up?

3. I was under the impression that Hillary's supporters were working class people whereas Barack has much more support among the elite.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:17 PM on 07/22/2008
- UnknownSoldier See Profile I'm a Fan of UnknownSoldier

Ummm, I think you left out a few words in your description of Hillary's working class supporters.
1.) White
2.) Hard

White Hard Working Class people supported HIllary. That same group he listens to Rush and Fox News.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:57 PM on 07/22/2008
- Bettysdad See Profile I'm a Fan of Bettysdad

Lady de Rothschild

Barbaralee Diamonstein-Speilvogel

Just 2 of the working class Hillary supporters.

There are hundreds more; the richest people you never heard of.

If Obama is getting an average donation of 68 bucks, how elite can his supporters be?

You've got it backwards.

More hype and BS from the Hillary camp.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:52 PM on 07/22/2008
- mairs See Profile I'm a Fan of mairs

That's ok. Let them pay off her debts. Those vendors need to be paid.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 AM on 07/22/2008
- rationalthought1 See Profile I'm a Fan of rationalthought1

If the Hillary donors don't want to help the democrats take back our country from the neo-cons then let them help clean up the financial mess that the Clinton's left behind in their scorched-earth campaign. Why the Clintons just don't pay everything off with the 108 + million they've taken in since his presidency - I don't understand. I'm just tired of all the hysteria and drama. I want to move on.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:47 PM on 07/22/2008
- CindyM2008 See Profile I'm a Fan of CindyM2008

Well well well, so the Cliton supporters actually gave 1.8 mil, as opposed to less than 20,000?
Looks like many within the party are actually looking to unite instead of divide. Good.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:06 AM on 07/22/2008
- Supercruize See Profile I'm a Fan of Supercruize

18 MIllion is a lot. If each one of them gave 2 dollars, that would be enough to get Hillary out of her debt and make a reasonable contribution to the Obama campaign. What they need to realize is that its all over. Hillary is out, Obama is in, Its time to unite and support the Democratic candidate. Move on people. Geez!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:01 AM on 07/22/2008
- BigMike75 See Profile I'm a Fan of BigMike75

The question I still ask of the vaunted "Hillraisers" who seem to have the ability to pull money out of the air, why is Senator Clinton still in debt?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 AM on 07/22/2008
- markkraft See Profile I'm a Fan of markkraft

A few points here, for Obama supporters who might be overly concerned about this story...

1> Insulting Hillary's bundlers and supporters is counterproductive. We're here to heal divisions, and to work towards achieving a victory for *ALL* of us.

2> This race isn't just about Obama winning... it's about Democrats winning across the country. Obama would be the first person to say that this is ultimately about us, and our wishes for a better future. Don't forget it, and don't let your feelings get the better of you.

3> This story shows the same baseless media skepticism we've seen throughout this race. Clinton's bundlers had only 20 days from the time of Hillary's concession to do fundraising, and much of that was a "waiting period", when people wondered if Hillary would support Obama. Bundlers need time to organize fundraisers, collect checks, and get paperwork in order before turning in contributions. Give them time to do their jobs.

4> Bundlers are contacted by Hillary, her people, and by Obama staffers. It would be hard to believe that these bundlers would refuse personal requests to hold fundraisers for either Obama or for the DNC, both of which equal victories for Democrats. Many might prefer raising money for the DNC, before shifting their fundraising towards Obama, to give the rift a bit of time to heal.

Have a bit of patience. Fundraising for Democrats is what these people do, and it's what's expected of them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:47 AM on 07/22/2008
- sherardg See Profile I'm a Fan of sherardg

Well said. We got to be united. I was always an Obama supporter but I thank Mrs. Clinton for her support. She seasoned the media and Mr. Obama and helped prepare him for things to come.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:06 PM on 07/22/2008
- theplaintrutho1 See Profile I'm a Fan of theplaintrutho1

This is a very telling story, what's funny about it is, H supporters keep bragging about how much the 1.8 M financial supporters average out to, $818.+ change, which is mere speculation.

I can get out my PC calculator an speculate as well. Eighteen Mil supporters times the max-out amount of $2,300.00 each = $41,400,000,000.00. That's a pretty big number if they all maxed-out, for anyone to be $20 Mil in debt.

What's wrong with this picture?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:33 AM on 07/22/2008
- UnknownSoldier See Profile I'm a Fan of UnknownSoldier

Yes, you are right but you are make a huge assumption that 100% of the people who voted for her contributed to her campaign. Less than 10% of voters contribute money.

Hillary mismanaged her funds which is one major reason she should not be the head of the executive branch. Obama was better able to manage his funds and he was successful in part because of that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:03 PM on 07/22/2008
- theHardTruthFairy See Profile I'm a Fan of theHardTruthFairy

Is this the biggest campaign debt in the history of the universe?

I swear I can't recall any of the dozens of men who have lost presidential primaries having such a problem. I didn't hear this from Dean in 2004 and I'm not hearing it from Edwards and Kucinich now.

If Hillary wants to dig herself out of the debt she created by running (the most?) financially irresponsible primary campaign in history, the plan was laid out back in June ... both sides agreed to swap payments (since some Hillary supporters had hit the legal limit of contribution.)

If $18 million were sent to Obama, the $18 million would flow back and her debt would be retired. The pact was sealed with Barack and Michelle's own personal checks to HRC's campaign.

Despite, Obama's fundraising efforts (including a big event in NYC earlier this month) it appears that the Clinton side of the agreement is falling flat.

Why? My guess is that it's half vendetta against Obama and half strategy to force Hillary onto the ticket as the VP. With that sort of attitude, the Hillraisers can add themselves to the long list of Hillary supporters (Mark Penn, Bill Clinton, Geraldine Ferraro, etc) who have led her down the wrong path.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:06 AM on 07/22/2008
- Conservalib See Profile I'm a Fan of Conservalib

This debt of Hillary Clinton's is a pretty good indication of what a lousy president she would have made. Even when the math said she couldn't win, she racked up millions of dollars of additional spending which is now a burden on all the Demos. My contributions to Obama have dwindled because I have read that they may be used to pay HER DEBT! How is paying Hillary's debt going to help America? That's what this election is about. Based on this debt, I hope he does not appoint her VEEP as her judgement appears riddled with hubris and arrogance.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:55 AM on 07/22/2008
- ADVOCATE4ZPG See Profile I'm a Fan of ADVOCATE4ZPG

By that standard ("hubris and arrogance"), she would be a perfect fit for the OBAMEE compaign which is largely based on HIS PERSONA and his proposals increasing a tainted brew! The Clintons should shoulder their own debts; they seem to have the cash flow.......!??!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:10 PM on 07/22/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (22 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 

Send us tips and comments:

huffpolitics@huffingtonpost.com
GTalk/AIM: NicoPitneyIM


2007-09-27-feed.jpg FEED

HuffPolitics Reporters
Nico Pitney is National Editor at the Huffington Post.
Read More


Thomas B. Edsall is the Political Editor of the Huffington Post. He is also Joseph Pulitzer II and Edith Pulitzer Moore Professor at the Columbia Graduate School of Journalism.
Read More
Sam Stein is a Political Reporter at the Huffington Post, based in Washington, D.C. Previously he has worked for Newsweek Magazine, the New York Daily News and the investigative journalism group Center for Public Integrity.
Read More

Jason Linkins is a Political Reporter at the Huffington Post, covering media and politics. He's based in Washington, DC. Previously, he wrote for HuffPo's Eat The Press, and has also contributed to DCist and Wonkette.
Read More