House OKs rescue for homeowners, Freddie, Fannie

RSS stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com

JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS | July 23, 2008 11:44 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Show your support.
Buzz this article up.
Senate Banking Committee Chairman Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., left, and the committee's ranking Republican, Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., right, take part in a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, July 23,2008, to discuss President Bush's decision to support the housing bill. (AP Photo/Lauren Victoria Burke)

WASHINGTON — Rescue legislation sailed through the House on Wednesday aimed at helping 400,000 strapped homeowners avoid foreclosure and preventing the collapse of troubled mortgage companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The 272-152 vote reflected a congressional push to send election-year help to struggling borrowers and to reassure jittery financial markets about the health of two pillars of the mortgage market.

Hours before the vote, President Bush dropped his opposition to the measure, which now is on track to pass the Senate and become law within days.

The White House swallowed its distaste for $3.9 billion in grants for devastated neighborhoods. In return, the administration got both the power to throw Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac a lifeline and the legislation Republicans long have advocated to rein in the government-sponsored mortgage companies.

Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson and lawmakers in both parties negotiated the final deal. It accomplishes several Democratic priorities, including aid for homeowners, a permanent affordable housing fund financed by the two mortgage companies and the money for hard-hit neighborhoods. The grants are for buying and fixing up foreclosed properties.

"It is the product of a very significant set of compromises," said Rep. Barney Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee. "We are dealing with the consequences of bad decisions and inaction and malfeasance from years before," said Frank, D-Mass.

Paulson said he would push for enactment of the bill by week's end. Despite disappointment with some items rejected, he said "portions of this bill are orders of magnitude more important to turning the corner on the housing correction and supporting our markets and our economy."

Bush had argued the neighborhood grants would benefit bankers and lenders. But the White House said a showdown with Congress over the proposal would be ill-timed.

Story continues below
advertisement

It was a striking split for Bush and many congressional Republicans. GOP leaders said they would not be stampeded into supporting a bill they called a bailout for irresponsible homeowners and unscrupulous lenders, even as they acknowledged it was probably necessary.

"It's a bill that I wish I could support. It's a bill that the market clearly needs ... but this is not a bill that I can support," said Rep. John A. Boehner, R-Ohio, the minority leader.

One outside observer questioned how much good the legislation would do for consumers.

"This isn't going to be the catalyst for a better housing market," said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Economy.com. "It may staunch some of the downturn, but it's going to have a very modest positive impact."

Only 45 Republicans _ most from districts ravaged by the housing crisis and some facing tough re-election fights _ voted for it.

Liz Glenn, a community planning official in Baltimore County, Md., said the grants "would enable us to acquire and rehab more homes and offer them at an affordable price."

The Treasury Department would gain power to extend the government-sponsored mortgage companies an unlimited line of credit and to buy an unspecified amount of their stock, if necessary. The two companies, chartered by Congress, back or own $5 trillion in mortgages _ nearly half the nation's total.

Sen. Richard C. Shelby of Alabama, the top Republican on the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, said Bush's turnabout reflected political reality.

"They looked at the Hill, they counted some votes and they see there's pretty broad support for this," said Shelby, his party's lead negotiator.

He and Sen. Christopher J. Dodd, the committee chairman, said they would push for swift approval of the measure without any changes.

"We'll be anxious to move this product along," said Dodd, D-Conn.

But conservatives led by Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., were threatening to slow the measure unless Democrats allowed a vote on barring Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from lobbying and making campaign contributions. Senators' objections could delay enactment of the measure until next week.

Congressional analysts estimate that a government rescue of the mortgage giants could cost $25 billion, but they predict there is a better than even chance it will not be needed.

The bill would let the Federal Housing Administration back $300 billion in new loans so an estimated 400,000 homeowners who cannot afford their house payments could try to escape foreclosure by refinancing into safer, more affordable mortgages. Lenders would have to agree to take a substantial loss on the existing loans, and in return, they would walk away with at least some payoff and avoid the often-costly foreclosure process.

"The industry really has to step up and use it," said Bruce Dorpalen, director of housing counseling for Acorn Housing Corp., a nonprofit housing group based in Philadelphia.

The plan also creates a new regulator with tighter controls for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and modernizes the agency. It includes about $15 billion in housing tax breaks, including a credit of up to $7,500 for first-time buyers, and increases the statutory limit on the national debt by $800 billion, to $10.6 trillion.

Lawmakers abandoned efforts to place conditions on any Fannie and Freddie rescue, but the bill hands the new regulator approval power over the pay packages of executives at the companies.

WASHINGTON — Rescue legislation sailed through the House on Wednesday aimed at helping 400,000 strapped homeowners avoid foreclosure and preventing the collapse of troubled mortgage companies Fa...
WASHINGTON — Rescue legislation sailed through the House on Wednesday aimed at helping 400,000 strapped homeowners avoid foreclosure and preventing the collapse of troubled mortgage companies Fa...
 
 

Comments
51
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- rollingdivision See Profile I'm a Fan of rollingdivision permalink

"We don't look to arsonists to help put out fires but we do look to politicians to help solve financial crises that they played a major role in creating.

How did the government help create the current financial mess? Let me count the ways.

In addition to federal laws that pressure lenders to lend to people they would not otherwise lend to, and in places where they would otherwise not invest, state and local governments have in various parts of the country so severely restricted building as to lead to skyrocketing housing prices, which in turn have led many people to resort to "creative financing" in order to buy these artificially more expensive homes.

Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve System brought interest rates down to such low levels that "creative financing" with interest-only mortgage loans enabled people to buy houses that they could not otherwise afford." Thomas Sowell

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:32 AM on 07/24/2008
- sherbug See Profile I'm a Fan of sherbug permalink

If only I could believe that real people would be helped by bailing out Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. This is just another pot of gold to be divided up amongst the thieves. The regulators will be regulated by whom. And should the regulators discover anything irregular, then to whom do they report it to and what is going to be done about it.

Watch out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:07 PM on 07/23/2008
- DMcD See Profile I'm a Fan of DMcD permalink

All good points -----

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 PM on 07/23/2008
- provgrays See Profile I'm a Fan of provgrays permalink

Republicans are never angry about corporate bailouts or corporate welfare but they reserve plenty of hate for everyday people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:54 PM on 07/23/2008
- disgusted48 See Profile I'm a Fan of disgusted48 permalink

And yet everyday people keep voting for them. Can't figure it out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:49 PM on 07/23/2008
- danoj See Profile I'm a Fan of danoj permalink

Pretty hard to veto this terd when he signed the corporate bailouts. Personally think they all should have got slapped with the ol veto.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:31 PM on 07/23/2008
- BPCentrisAmerican See Profile I'm a Fan of BPCentrisAmerican permalink

I hope Boehner didn"t cry over Bush's decision, this fool couldn"t get elected in my state.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 07/23/2008
- darthdarcy See Profile I'm a Fan of darthdarcy permalink

All we needed to do was Peg the Sub Prime Mortgages at 3% above the Fed Rate and or Prime Rate and forgive all penalties to date more than 1/2 of which are illegal as has been reported an set it not to go below 6.25-6.5% and not one dime of Tax Payer money would be involved or spent...

The people the vast majority could remain in their homes and the lenders would ot have lost any money they might not make as much as they hoped but they would have made money secure certain future assets and this would have also prevented a housing crisis involving the rental market that is already limited and inflated and the negative downward pressure that will create for those who can never dream of owning their own home...

Why would they not consider this solution and why are we leveraging and risking up to a $5 Trillion dollar line of credit when this would have cost the American Tax Payer nothing, and enforced and dollar rather than continue to lower it's value...?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:53 PM on 07/23/2008
- outmost1 See Profile I'm a Fan of outmost1 permalink

This would imply that the government would write and enforce some regulation on the "free" market which as we (republican) all know would signal the death of business, a recession or depression, a housing crisis and probably the loss of all of the manufacturing sector jobs to overseas competitors who don't have to face the same regulatory overhead. Free market republicans; anti-american to the core.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:00 PM on 07/23/2008
- danoj See Profile I'm a Fan of danoj permalink

Should have vetoed the corporate bailout and the regular folks bailout. Market would have taken care of the rest.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:22 PM on 07/23/2008
- joebaggadonuts See Profile I'm a Fan of joebaggadonuts permalink

You keep saying that and you keep being right. And our government keeps ignoring you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:07 PM on 07/23/2008
- darthdarcy See Profile I'm a Fan of darthdarcy permalink

Thanks Joe; I have written repeatedly so many politicians of this, my Congressman Hinchey and both of my Senators Clinton and Schumer and the Brookings Institute...

I ran it past my brother who was the Director of Global Finance for the 2nd biggest bank of Germany and now a VP with a Hedge Fund, and he thought it was a great idea and a real solution and he's pretty conservative fiscally and up on everything...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:41 PM on 07/23/2008
- Ammobob See Profile I'm a Fan of Ammobob permalink

And you wonder why Congress' approval rating is 10 points lower than Pres Bush's. This bill will add 100's of billions to the deficit, then tack on the next consumer bailout and we're talking near a trillion added to the deficit. Throw all the BUMS out! Congress just passed a bill authorizing 800 BILLION to be added to the debt ceiling which is now up to 10.6 TRILLION!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:38 PM on 07/23/2008
- ReasonIsMyReligion See Profile I'm a Fan of ReasonIsMyReligion permalink

Save your faux fiscally conservative ire for the Iraqupation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:59 PM on 07/23/2008
- styleturn See Profile I'm a Fan of styleturn permalink

If Bush had vetoed this bill it would have been one of the few things he had done right in his presidency.

As for this fiasco. It was started, in no small part, when the Republican's got rid of the Glass-Steagall, thanks to Clinton signing the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. That bill was not supported by the Democrats in Congress at the time and was a party-line vote. (Wikipedia has the history)

Blaming the current Congress for the more than 12 years of Republican control, with six years of control of all three branches of government, suggests a willingness to completely forget the past. In order for current Democrats to get any legislation at all they have to bow down to anti-Democrats like Lieberman at every turn and get as many Republicans as possible to sign on to every decision. The changes they have made, small as they are, have been subject to the Republican president who signs and implements policy.

Until two months ago the primary attack from Republicans was that this Congress had done less than any other because the Republicans have been so effective at blocking legislation. The drivers for this economy have been Republicans and those most effective at compromising. If you like the result stand-up for your accomplishments.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:56 PM on 07/23/2008
- ZingoBonMot See Profile I'm a Fan of ZingoBonMot permalink

Like this wanker cares. Six months from now he'll be living in Paragay.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:37 PM on 07/23/2008
- watcher269 See Profile I'm a Fan of watcher269 permalink

He's a Bussy!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 PM on 07/23/2008
- GerryS See Profile I'm a Fan of GerryS permalink

I thought that the "compassionate conservative" was dead. Where did W have the shill buried, and when did they dig it up? Bet it smells bad- explaining the look on his face!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:59 AM on 07/23/2008
- rollingdivision See Profile I'm a Fan of rollingdivision permalink

This bailout of the mortgage industry executives brought to you by the current congress. We can sleep well knowing investment bankers and mortgage speculators won't go hungry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:54 AM on 07/23/2008
- trollsbwild See Profile I'm a Fan of trollsbwild permalink

AND
A chance for those who have high interest mortgages to be able to refi and obtain an affordable mortgage? Others who can't afford the mortgages regardless of rates, etc. were victims of preditory lending practices making millions for crooked industry execs.

Seriously, the mess HAS to be cleaned up. Agreed, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were run poorly and shouldn't have be bailed out. However, at the end of the day, there is no good choice here.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 PM on 07/23/2008
- Pdubya See Profile I'm a Fan of Pdubya permalink

i say tally the write-downs in the bailout and divide it up amongst the individuals who deal with fannie/freddie.

then let the corporation bankcrupt. i'd rather send my tax money directly to the fool who over extended than to the person that preyed upon him.

btw - the federal reserve is the largest predatory lender.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aT0txlTod8w

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:11 PM on 07/23/2008
- Teritt See Profile I'm a Fan of Teritt permalink

.....and none of them will spend as much time in jail as Martha Stewart.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 PM on 07/23/2008
- JJ30 See Profile I'm a Fan of JJ30 permalink

If the gov't is willing to bail out giants like Freddie and Fannie Mac, surely they can assist the little people who are currently struggling to make ends meet. Unlike the CEO of these companies who will still make a cool $20 million in salary (which is utterly ridiculous) while the taxpayers bail them out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:39 AM on 07/23/2008
- MajorKong See Profile I'm a Fan of MajorKong permalink

That's not a very good salute. Almost looks like he's thumbing his nose.

Not that I really care, but I remember a HUGE deal was made about Clinton not saluting properly (proof that he hates the military!). But THIS President we were told, knows how to salute properly (and therefore yada yada yada).

I know this sounds silly, but I recall a viral email going around about just this sort of thing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 AM on 07/23/2008
- vippy See Profile I'm a Fan of vippy permalink

Clinton did not hate the military. He has been misquoted and then the press chimed in and
distorted what he said and all the dummies believed it. Clinton said "he understands why
some people would loath the military." Big difference! I don't care for Clinton, never voted for
him but I despise lies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:56 PM on 07/23/2008
- worldtraveller See Profile I'm a Fan of worldtraveller permalink

Nope different world now.. Bush is doing it correctly and everyone else is saluting incorrectly... See how easy it is.... New salute techniques will be taught to our soldiers by Halliburton staff at $7,000 an hour.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 PM on 07/23/2008
- nellie See Profile I'm a Fan of nellie permalink

Less humiliating to sign than be overridden.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 AM on 07/23/2008
- laffinatlibs See Profile I'm a Fan of laffinatlibs permalink

Great, so people who bought too much house...or shouldnt have owned a house...or where too stupid to figure out that an adjustable mortgage goes up...will get help. Those of us who busted our asses and sacrificed to pay off our houses. like responsible adults get to pay. Get ready for lots of this if Osam...I mean Obama wins, no personal responsibility, gov't will pay for everything.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 AM on 07/23/2008
- disgusted48 See Profile I'm a Fan of disgusted48 permalink

bitter? What did Obama have to do with this bill? In addition, calling someone out of their name is very childish and sad, but not surprising from your ilk(republicans). You guys are very poor, very sore losers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:57 PM on 07/23/2008
- FredOCal See Profile I'm a Fan of FredOCal permalink

If we were really helping those people, it might be worth it. The reality is, this is only helping the investors who made terrible business decisions. Those loans should have never been approved and they should take those losses, but unfortunately, we're into socialized risk. This will be such a debacle for U.S citizens, it will go down as the single greatest transfer of wealth in history. The Goldmans of the world will do quite well, however. They are so embedded in U.S., Britain, and even Canadian government, that they cannot lose.

    Favorite