New Housing Crisis, Old Isms

Posted March 21, 2008 | 01:26 PM (EST)



stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

For many folks, the term "The Fed" (ie. The Federal Reserve Bank) induces drowsiness. It sounds like such a boring institution, dealing in stuff like interest rates and basis points that seem so academic. But as I explain in my newspaper column out today, while The Fed's instruments may be esoteric, its power is enormous - and it is using that power to cut Wall Street a huge check in what is a public embrace of four isms that have taken over our government.

The column really tries to break down this very complex financial crisis in terms that anyone can understand (and I'll admit, it took a heckuva lot of research to be able to boil down all the jargon into a digestible format - I hope I succeeded). It shows that the isms at work in the Fed's decision to spend $200 billion of your taxpayer money - Disaster Capitalism, Big Boy Bailout-ism, Feed the Beast-ism, and Trickle Down-ism. These are ideologies that have been around for a long time, and have been a staple of public policy for the better part of three decades.

The housing crisis is being used as a justification to hand over taxpayer cash to the same financial industry that has created economic emergency we now face. That's not surprising - this is the industry that has contributed about a billion dollars to political candidates since 2002. That money buys a lot - including a Bush-appointed Federal Reserve chairman clearly more interested in floating his Wall Street friends a loan than in helping homeowners now being foreclosed on.

This is the kind of bailout reserved for the big boys - the kind the free marketeers say shouldn't be given to regular folks. At a time of record deficits, the federal government is handing over your taxpayer money to Wall Street with no strings attached, feeding the machine that has brought out economy to the brink. And the public justification is straight "trickle down" economics. We are told that if we just help the banks, the benefits will trickle down to the rest of us.

The good news is that Congress seems to be getting a wee bit more interested in the Fed's shady behavior. Republican Chuck Grassley says he wants better transparency in the deals being cut between America's central bank and the financial industry sharks. Meanwhile, Democrats like Barney Frank and Chris Dodd are pushing back on the Trickle Down-ism with a bill that would help homeowners rather than asking them to wait for crumbs from the barons on Wall Street.

But the bad news is that all the oversight and legislation may come well after The Fed forces taxpayers to foot the bill for Wall Street's predatory lending and irresponsible speculation.

Read the whole column at Creators, Credo Action, The San Francisco Chronicle, The Denver Post, In These Times, Credo Action, TruthDig or Alternet. The column relies on grassroots support, so if you'd like to see my column regularly in your local paper, use this directory to find the contact info for your local editorial page editors. Get get in touch with them and point them to my Creators Syndicate site. Thanks, as always, for your ongoing readership and help contacting local editors. This column couldn't be what it is without your help.

Cross-posted from Credo Action and CAF


 
 

Comments
8
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

I think Disaster Capitolism just about covers all the other isms, it's like the Sponsoring Ism behind all the rest...it's a military disaster or it's a financial disaster, but no matter what kind of disaster, someone's trying to capitolize on it, using the shock and awe and temporary paralysis to invoke and implement whatever is most profitable to the person capitolizing--and usually they are already very rich and very connected to politicians, many of whom have the power to litigate or earmark the changes desired. By the time our heads have stopped spinning, there's new legislation in place that legitimizes the capitolistic policies that were rushed into place after 'the disaster.'

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:25 PM on 03/22/2008

Thanks David for the links to other websites that post your writing. As Huffington Post continues to be infiltrated by propagandists instead of truth tellers it will be important to have other sources for news and information. Your articles are good.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:41 PM on 03/22/2008

.
One thing just keeps rising to the surface. Over 95% of the current national debt was incurred while republiCONS controlled the White House and/or Congress.

Bush entered office with a budget surplus
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:28 PM on 03/22/2008

David,

Thank you for trying to help others understand this debacle. I am a stockbroker..wait!..a honest one..really...have been for years. I am NOT an investment banker but rather..try to assuage fears of my clients over this Wharton MBA (millionnaire) mess. I'm not economist..but could see...years ago..that these CMO's CDO's, MBS hybrids..were..well..there was no "there there". Trust Bear Stearns and Lehman to give them a value..then package these snake oil hybrids..and...PRICE them? This is NOT capitalism..this is HUBRIS..pure and simple. Greed in its purest form. I hate that the Fed saved Bear..but have to admit..the ramifications of letting it fail..probably far to big..BUT...WE (as citizens) MUST DEMAND that this young turk MILLIONNAIRES..GIVE BACK every last dollar they made creating this "emperor's clothing of investments".. I am quite serious. I want LOTS and LOTS of people (most with MBA"s) to go to prison..and I'm NOT kidding. I am livid. My client buy boring things like GE and Microsoft..yet...they too have suffed from this fallout.. We all have..and will...

Dubya et cie...brought us down...and the result will be ...to their chagrin...more regulations.

You and I have to put up 50% to buy on margin (thanks to the 1929 crash)...but Bear, Lehman..Goldman..were leveraged 90 to ONE!!! (just like we mortals in 1929)... how did this happen..and who can we toss into the gallows...the former CEO of Merrill got $140 MILLION..for almost wrecking his company... Do republican see anything wrong with this picture?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:09 AM on 03/23/2008

Supply side economics has failed under three Presidencies now. Low taxes have to be paid for with spending cuts. Higher spending must be offset with higher taxes.

Let us please end forever the tyranny of "something for nothing" conseravtism.

Conservatives intuitively know that the American people would never accept the level in cuts to military and social spending to pay for the derisory levels of taxation they would be willing to pay. Therefore, the invented a cockamamie economic theory that promises "something for nothing". According to them, lower taxes for the wealthy will cause so much economic growth that new tax revenue will flow in, and there will be so much prosperity, it will trickle down to working and missle class people like a champagne fountain. This theory has failed under three GOP Presidents, all of whom exploded the deficit, each bigger than the last.

Tax cuts for the wealthy do not "pay for themselves." It was the height of immorality for Bush and his neoconservative puppeteers to send working class kids to die in a our launched on lies to the American people while telling the affluent to go shopping. Let us please bury Voodoo economics once and for all. Bush Sr. was right the first time in his 1980 campaign. Too bad they sold their souls to the neocons. Who wouldn't want to believe in something for nothing? What political strategist wouldn't want to try and sell something for nothing to an electorate that desperately wants to believe its true? Through is a sunny personality you'd like to have a beer with and a few weapons of mass distraction and you have a winning campaign.

There used to be patriotic conservatives of conscience, true patriots, not the chicken hawk neoconservative kind, who even though they wanted lower taxes, new balanced budgeting and fiscal restraint comes first. I want higher taxes and higher spending, but balanced bugets so my grandchildren aren't paying off the conservative sponsored irresponsibility of this generation. Any of those "deficit-hawk" conservatives have long been drummed out of the hierarchy of a Republican Party who's only too happy to sell American's future economic and political sovereignty over to the Chinese and Saudi creditors who own our debt, all so they have have unnecessary tax cuts for the wealthy. And then conservatives have the nerve and gall to to call to lecture other people about patriotism and morality.

"Fool me once, shame on you." "Fool my twice, shame on me." What does it say about us we've allowed three conservatives Presidents to sell us this disproven economic theory?

Can we please have an honest discussion about tax levels and spending levels and who pays those taxes? Can we never again let these immoral conservatives sell us "something for nothing"? Can we be mature and adult enough to realize there is no free lunch? Lower taxes require spending cuts. Increased spending requires higher taxes. Can we please get back to simple reality please?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:52 AM on 03/22/2008

I hope that after this election we can finally lay aside the criminal actions that voodoo economic theories really are. George Herbert Walker Bush was right, back in 1980 to call "trickle down" economics "voodoo" He was right, and then he turned into Darth Vader, becoming the strongest supporter of them for more than two decades, until his son came around.

The fact of the matter is, that we DO live in a consumer driven economy. Thus, the demand side of economics is MUCH more important than the supply side. If we were to take all that money that we've wasted since Raygun first became president, we would STILL have the worlds strongest Military, strongest economy, WORLD CLASS healthcare for all, WORLD CLASS internet, and we'd be oil free. Oh yeah, we'd also NOT be $10 TRILLION in debt! And that's just the federal gov't, not looking at the state gov'ts, the county gov'ts, the city gov'ts, the corporations, or the people!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:24 PM on 03/21/2008

LeftRight, you point out we are a comsumer-driven economy. True, but all economic systems are consumer-driven, even command economies. Actjually all economic systems are the same. The difference is the degree of consolidation. A "socialist" economy is 100% consolidated. A "capitalist" economy has a variable degree of consolidation, anhd a communist economy (for those who really understand the difference between "socialist" and "communist") is 0% consolidated.

"Supply side" economics was always a sham, it just sounded profound. Tax cuts on businesses created no consumer demand, via supply, for pet rocks and mood rings. The basic concept in supply side was that supply of a good created demand. Yeah, and Edsels sold like hot cakes.

Curiously, Reagan's, Bush 1's, and Bush1/2's business tax cuts actually are destroying American business. How? Tax shield. Businesses once found it more profitable, after taxes, to pay higher wages and build plant and equipment because the tax shield cut the effective cost to the company. Higher tax rates would tax EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes) sufficiently to make future distributions of retained earnings more valuable than a present distribution.of income. This is one reason why China is undergoing a much higher growth rate than the US.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:51 AM on 03/22/2008

Well, and let's be fair, China also started this cycle with a much LOWER cost of living, and therefore could have a much higher rate of growth than the US could. However, you are correct, the "lower taxes" that raygun, daddy, and the shrub espoused are in fact disastrous for US business, and need to be removed!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 PM on 03/22/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 

 
 
Bloggers Index›
Read All Posts by
David Sirota›
 

 Site  Web ask.com