People wait in line outside the U.S. Passport Office in Washington in this June 8, 2007 file photo. Anticipating a deluge in passport applications, the State Department last year did what much of the federal government does to manage any manpower crunch: it hired private contractors. But the practice, although widely used, allowed hired hands to snoop around in the three presidential candidates' files and points to questions about whether contractors not directly employed by the government should have access to such sensitive information. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

Passport Snooping Not Limited To Famous Politicians

MATTHEW LEE | March 26, 2008 11:12 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

WASHINGTON — State Department workers viewed passport applications containing personal information about high-profile Americans, including the late Playboy playmate Anna Nicole Smith, at least 20 times since January 2007, The Associated Press has learned.

That total is far more than disclosed last week with the news that presidential candidates Hillary Rodham Clinton, John McCain and Barack Obama had been victims of improper snooping.

An internal department review has found the additional instances of department employees or contractors looking at computerized passport files of politicians and celebrities, according to preliminary results.

It has not been determined if the new cases also involved improper peeking, officials familiar with the review said Wednesday. Smith's case, however, seems legitimate, the officials said. The review is not complete and the exact number of cases was not yet clear.

They spoke on condition of anonymity because the review is going on at the same time as the department's own watchdog investigates passport record security related to the breaches involving the White House candidates.

Smith, 39, died in February 2007 death from an accidental overdose in Florida and was buried in the Bahamas, where she had moved in 2006. The review of her passport file appears to have come after a legitimate request from the U.S. Embassy in the Bahamas for information needed to complete her death certificate, the officials said.

Supervisors recorded each instance a file was viewed because the applications in question belonged to members of a select group of several hundred citizens whose passport files were "flagged" for extra protection due to their visibility, the officials said. Among these people are government leaders, movie stars and athletes, the officials said.

The list maintained by Bureau of Consular Affairs has included as many as 500 people at any one time, they said. The list is kept secret partly to deter workers from making unauthorized inquiries into high-profile records. Although there are no formal criteria for inclusion, people on the list are deemed to warrant special consideration because of their public status, the officials said.

The investigation begun by the department's inspector general after last week's disclosure covers some of the same ground as the internal review but also will examine whether the searches of the candidates' records were politically motivated. Thus far, officials say they believe that snooping resulted from "imprudent curiosity."

Two contractors were fired and a third disciplined for breaching Obama's records three times and McCain's records once. A department employee who looked at Clinton's file as part of a training exercise was reprimanded.

The companies that provided the contractors _ Stanley Inc., of Arlington, Va., and The Analysis Corp., or TAC, of McLean, Va. _ have said their employees' actions were unauthorized and not consistent with company policies.

Accessing any of the flagged files triggers an automatic notification that the record has been viewed. That allows supervisors to check whether it was done for a legitimate reason, such as an official request for verification of information contained in an actual passport.

The review being conducted by Patrick Kennedy, undersecretary of state for management, is expected to result in increased security measures for the passport files of flagged individuals, the officials said.

The most likely step would mean special security for those records, making them accessible to passport employees only after they get permission to view them from a supervisor, the officials said.

That restriction now applies to the files of the three candidates. Kennedy hopes to have it cover all high-profile records before the inspector general's report is completed and ahead of congressional hearings on passport security, the officials said.

In addition, Kennedy wants to expand the list to more than 500 individuals, they said.

But that is unlikely to pre-empt calls for a separate Justice Department investigation into whether the breaches of the candidates' files violated federal laws. Nor would it address concerns that the files of millions of people not considered high-profile enough for the extra protection may also have been improperly accessed.

It is unclear what the contractors might have seen in the candidates' records. Passport applications typically contain only basic personal information such as name, citizenship, age, Social Security number and place of birth. The files generally would not list countries the person has traveled to.

But Passport Services maintain other records that can include information such as marriages overseas, court orders, arrest warrants and medical and financial reports. Further, outside "users" _ including other government agencies and foreign governments _ may be given certain information.

But the department says extraneous information would be included in passport application files only under rare circumstances, such as suspected fraud. Also, foreign governments are not given access to the U.S. electronic system that contains the files, it said.

(This version CORRECTS that Smith died in Florida, was buried in the Bahamas, where she had moved in 2006)


 
 

Comments
12
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

Years ago I worked in a bank. The tellers used to look at everyones private information, especially ex-boyfriends and stuff.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:07 AM on 03/27/2008

This not only happens to passports, but also to people's taxes, and government workers personnel files. People in government use this to take advantage of people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 PM on 03/26/2008

this privatization fetish of the Republicans has worked out so well for the country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:12 PM on 03/26/2008

This is very common with bills, telephone records, hospital, credit cards any place that hire people who deal with the public and have access to the information..Employees will look at the records of the rich and famous.I can understand the concern, but its much ado about nothing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 PM on 03/26/2008

Republicans can't even protect my passport file. How can they protect me from terrorism?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 PM on 03/26/2008

So far each security breach by this republican administration has been greeted by "So?" or its equivalent. It is time to impeach the two worst offenders at the top and send a message to the rest.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 PM on 03/26/2008

Viewing celebs' data is not the full issue. Snooping into persons' files who have secret service protection is another thing altogether. If taxpayers pay for privacy and if the DOJ and DOS are to provide security for political figures, then contractors need to be hired with appropriate clearance and supervised accordingly. Why isn't that the case?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:26 PM on 03/26/2008

The taxpayers pay for privacy? Can you explain? Have you read the Patriot Act?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:43 PM on 03/26/2008

rojo, good point. And, you're right -- we really have no privacy. I suppose I was thinking of the previous personnel rules about employee snooping in classified info. Those were the days...These latest (that we know of) incidents sort of make 'protection' moot in this admin.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:41 AM on 03/27/2008

It seems like this is just some employees getting nosy. However, what it does bring to question is the whole concept of government outsourcing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:18 PM on 03/26/2008

BINGO!

Personal data should be protected from snooping--ALL OF IT. When access to that data is outsourced, accountability goes out the window. It is long past time to do away with the privatization of government services.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:08 PM on 03/26/2008

These Government departments are too lax.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:35 PM on 03/26/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 

 

 Site  Web ask.com