22-Year-Old Efraim Diveroli, Awarded $300 Million Defense Contract To Arm Afghan Forces, Supplied Them With Aging, Defective Arms

22-Year-Old Efraim Diveroli, Awarded $300 Million Defense Contract To Arm Afghan Forces, Supplied Them With Aging, Defective Arms

New York Times   |  C. J. Chivers, Eric Schmitt, Nicholas Wood and Mr. Chivers   |   March 27, 2008 11:20 AM


stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

Since 2006, when the insurgency in Afghanistan sharply intensified, the Afghan government has been dependent on American logistics and military support in the war against Al Qaeda and the Taliban.

But to arm the Afghan forces that it hopes will lead this fight, the American military has relied since early last year on a fledgling company led by a 22-year-old man whose vice president was a licensed masseur.

With the award last January of a federal contract worth as much as nearly $300 million, the company, AEY Inc., which operates out of an unmarked office in Miami Beach, became the main supplier of munitions to Afghanistan's army and police forces.

Since then, the company has provided ammunition that is more than 40 years old and in decomposing packaging, according to an examination of the munitions by The New York Times and interviews with American and Afghan officials. Much of the ammunition comes from the aging stockpiles of the old Communist bloc, including stockpiles that the State Department and NATO have determined to be unreliable and obsolete, and have spent millions of dollars to have destroyed.

In purchasing munitions, the contractor has also worked with middlemen and a shell company on a federal list of entities suspected of illegal arms trafficking.

Moreover, tens of millions of the rifle and machine-gun cartridges were manufactured in China, making their procurement a possible violation of American law. The company's president, Efraim E. Diveroli, was also secretly recorded in a conversation that suggested corruption in his company's purchase of more than 100 million aging rounds in Albania, according to audio files of the conversation.


 
 

Comments
127
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)

Why does this always happen? When it hits newsstands, nobody knows anything, never did....These people all get a cut of this deal, cause it's only tax dollars anyways, and that's why they allow the deal in the first place, but make sure you pick a good shmuck to stick it to when the crap gets knee deep. When do the people of this country rise up to this and fight the government to realize that our dollars are hard-earned, and that if they're going to spend them, spend it on something besides their own selfish, squandering luxuries.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:22 PM on 03/28/2008

The power and the control of the taxpayer money has been taken over by the war profiteers and their pocket politicians (like Cheney, Lieberman and McCain). For example, in 2007 Bechtel reported revenues of 27B dollars (in comparison the total funding of the cancer research @ National institutes of Health is under 5B).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:43 PM on 03/28/2008

Is this another Patriot with dual US/Israeli Citizenship?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:17 AM on 03/28/2008

Hey, it's the Republican creed, the unregulated market has all the answers. Sell crap to the highest bidder, buyer beware. Sell arms to both sides if you can, and keep the conflicts going. We call it illegal arms peddling, like Reagan did in central America in the Contra scandal. Republicans call it entrepreneurship and free enterprise capitalism. War is big business. Freedom isn't free, right ? There's a profit margin.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:57 AM on 03/28/2008

I'll bet this guy has ties to Jeff Gannon and there's no telling what he had to do to win the contract, can you say, bend over. GOP'ers are a bunch of freaks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:13 AM on 03/28/2008

This is the 'Independent Contractors' Our Gov't 'Leaders' have thought were a 'good idea"?. Who's this Kid Related too- The Saudi' Royal 'Family?....A Bin Laden?? Dig a litle Deeper

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:35 AM on 03/28/2008

oh well

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:05 AM on 03/28/2008

The irony to me is I have friends who will never vote for a Democrat ONLY because of gun control issues.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:03 AM on 03/28/2008

this pretty boy needs to go open population in the worse federal facility.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:01 AM on 03/28/2008

The only thing stupider than supplying Afghans with obsolete weapons and 40 year old bad ammunition

is supplying them with new weapons and modern ammunition.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:26 AM on 03/28/2008

Ain't that the truth!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:36 AM on 03/28/2008

No wonder we are winning everywhere.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:36 PM on 03/27/2008

This story is so disgusting, and speaks to the core of the Pentagon's and the Administration's complete inadequacy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:14 PM on 03/27/2008

It's April 1st right?.... Right?..... No?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:05 PM on 03/27/2008

Our GOP leaders and their crooked contractors seem to be doing their usual bang-up job.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:55 PM on 03/27/2008

Some things should never be "for profit". Capitalism like every thing else dose more damage than good when taken to extremes. This is the goal of conservatives . To sell all government off to private corporations and they are succeeding.

GWW

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:25 PM on 03/27/2008

Unbelievable! Another example of the republicans incompetence. Unfortunately, I'm sure they won't have a problem with this - it's the freemarket economy at work.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:28 PM on 03/27/2008

And this is still going on because...? ?!!???

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 PM on 03/27/2008

You could fund education, health insurance and improve our entire infrastructure with the money wasted on paying corrupt defense contractors. Just as the mortgage crisis shows, it would be far cheaper to hire 20,000 gov't regulators to watch over corruption that allow pay hundreds of billions to bail them out... You watch and wait, the next bubble is with defense contractors who will bring us to a new low.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:56 PM on 03/27/2008

This is absolutely crazy.

22 years old? Someone please tell me this is a joke.

The real question is: Who are this kids parents? No really?
There is no way he got this on his own.
Who is this guy connected to that could actually secure a contract like this?
Now any of you out there that have ever tried to get a contract for anything know just how much bullshit is going on behind the scenes, god forbid the contract is related to the sale of ARMS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

PS. Why is this guy not serving in the military?
PS Why couldnt they have found a company with people who actually know something about weaponry
To do this job?

I dont know this guy so I dont want to dump on him unfairly, but something here is not on the up an up.
This has "Good Job Brownie" written all over it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:49 PM on 03/27/2008

He inherited the company from Daddy.

He got the "no bid" contract from the Pentagon. When he was arrested for possession of a forged ID (which he obtained so he could purchase alcohol) he protested that he needed to stay out of jail because he was important in fighting the "war on terrorism". To avoid a conviction which would have prohibited him from dealing in contracts, he entered a diversion program for first offenders and avoided a trial.

What other famous father-son pair does this remind you of?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 PM on 03/28/2008

Good Reporting but Way Late to do anything about it. If our "leaders" were CEO's of any corporation
they (all of them-including congress committee chairpersons) will be kick-out by the Board of Directors. The problem with the USA Board of Directors (the voting public) is that most of us are
interested in the next gossip coming out of hollywood and the next champion in sports events.
Politics and local government administration is never of interest to the vast majority of the public until
3 days before election time. My local experience with groups ages 17 to 24 (in California -Bay Area) is
that they can tell you every detail of the latest entertainer gossip or any sport team statistics but you
ask a simple question such as to name the Capital of California and less than 50% know the answer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:55 PM on 03/27/2008

1) admit there is a problem. Democracy is a system of averages. For your BoD scenario to work, you need 51% in agreement before addressing every instance of malfeasance. 51% of a Board is a few people. 51% of the general population is millions of people. Garnering consensus from a million independent minds it's easy. 2) acknowledge that there is a power greater than you. Who is responsible for handing out these contracts? Who is responsible for oversight? It's a bad idea to have a few million people review every contract. The people in government are responsible for their actions AND the government already contains the structures for oversight. This contract doesn't need to land on your desk before a moral/ethical assessment of its merits can be made. This is a case of vincible ignorance. But not on your part. 3) make a decision to turn one's will toward the care of the greater power. Think of it this way: the second law of thermodynamics says energy tends to move from a place of high concentration to a place of low concentration. The greatest effect one can have on the institution is in a place of high concentration. Turn to the person in line behind you at the grocery store and ask "Have you been affected by this mortgage crisis?" There are many possible outcomes. It's not about affecting millions of minds. The greatest effect occurs at the start not the end. Therefore, just one mind will do.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 PM on 03/28/2008

And who was the government official who OKed this deal?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:45 PM on 03/27/2008

They should have KOed it instead.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:08 PM on 03/27/2008

You go to war with the ammunition you have, not the ammunition you'd like to have.

Even after 6 years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:10 PM on 03/27/2008

ROFL Where would we be without Rummy witticisms?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:03 PM on 03/27/2008

Gotta give him credit-
What's worse him or Haliburton?
How much of this cash has he donated to the McCain campaign?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:41 PM on 03/27/2008

Let's send him over there. I'm not saying put him on the front lines or anything, but judging from the look on his face and what he did with the contract, paying a few dues wouldn't hurt him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:33 PM on 03/27/2008

They could put him in front of the front lines, for all I care. Oh, and take away his allowance.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:08 PM on 03/27/2008

What a punk. I hope the guys fighting the Taliban whose ammo failed find your ass and give you a haircut. Punk.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:21 PM on 03/27/2008

What I would like to know is who awarded that contract; was it a person or a committee? Were existing protocols ignored or are those protocols inadequate allowing loopholes? I find it mind boggling that there aren't any safeguards in place to avoid or discourage this type of graft and incompetency. The company should be made to return the full amount plus interest and a grand jury should be convened to investigate AEY, Inc. and those involved within the government who vetted the contract.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:06 PM on 03/27/2008

I'm sure there is rich daddy who contributed a lot of money to Republicans somewhere in this kid's background.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:47 PM on 03/28/2008

...no one is here to take your message but leave your name and number and we will get back to you...may be...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:51 AM on 03/28/2008

Why would Bush/Cheney turn their backs on the private sector at this point? Well at least this kid isn't just naive and dreamy eyed right out of college. And who said the American dream is dead when he has achieved it at 22.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:05 PM on 03/27/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in