Sam Stein

BIO

Sam Stein

The Huffington Post

Clinton Campaign Stands By Harsh Letter To Pelosi

Clinton Campaign Stands By Harsh Letter To Pelosi

March 27, 2008 02:21 PM


stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

Aides to Sen. Hillary Clinton said on Thursday that they knew key fundraisers for her campaign were sending a letter to Nancy Pelosi, castigating the Speaker over her position on superdelegates and threatening, vaguely, to withhold campaign donations.

And while they did not go so far as to say they approved of the letter's content -- "we didn't know what was in it," said spokesman Phil Singer -- they did argue that the "letter speaks for itself."

"There is clearly a broad feeling among many Democrats and many people who are active in the party," said Singer, "that the role of superdelegates is to exercise independent judgment and make a decision that is best for the party and best for the country."

On Wednesday, Talking Points Memo posted a letter penned by some of the most influential fundraisers of the Clinton campaign, chastising Pelosi for suggesting that superdelegates "have an obligation to support the candidate who leads in the pledged delegate count as of June 3rd." Such a position, the authors wrote, "runs counter to the party's intent in establishing super-delegates in 1984."

To make sure their voices hit home, the Clinton backers reminded Pelosi, somewhat opaquely, that they had been the financial backbone of the very committee that helped elect her Democratic majority.

"We have been strong supporters of the DCCC," they wrote. "We therefore urge you to clarify your position on super-delegates and reflect in your comments a more open view to the optional independent actions of each of the delegates at the National Convention in August."

Early on Thursday, the Center for Responsive Politics calculated that the signatories of the letter had, over the span of more than a decade, put $24 million behind Democratic causes.

Asked whether the Clinton campaign thought it would be appropriate for party financiers to threaten to withhold funds should Pelosi not change her stance, aides to the New York Democrat restated their commitment to helping build a larger Democratic congressional majority.

"As someone who is a former executive director of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, who spent a lot of years working in the House, who has both friends and family working in the House, I feel, as do most of the people I know, absolutely committed to helping elect Democrats to the House in 2008," said Clinton's communications director, Howard Wolfson. "I believe strongly in Nancy Pelosi's leadership. Obviously, some of our donors had an issue that they wanted to put into writing... But Senator Clinton and Bill Clinton will not take a backseat to anyone when it comes to helping Democrats or helping to fund the party committees. And the people here at every level are absolutely committed to large democratic majorities in 2008 and doing everything we can to helping achieve those large majorities."

On Wednesday, a spokesperson for Pelosi said that the Speaker was "confident" in her proclamation that superdelegates -- when deciding between Sen. Barack Obama and Clinton -- should take into primary consideration the tallies of both the popular vote and the pledged delegate count.

"The speaker believes it would do great harm to the Democratic Party if superdelegates are perceived to overturn the will of the voters," said Brendan Daly, a spokesman for Pelosi. "This has been her position throughout this primary season, regardless of who was ahead at any particular point in delegates or votes."


 
 

Comments
808
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (10 pages total)

Clinton and her cronies-total jerks. Trying to black mail congress-can't stoop much lower or can they?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:31 AM on 03/31/2008

I've always suspected the Clintons owned 51% of the shares in the Democratic Party!

Time to crack the whip, eh Hillary?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:56 AM on 03/31/2008

Tell those blackmailing twerps that their little Hilly's campaign is broke. Wonder what they'll do about that.
If they really love her so much, maybe they should pick up those checks that she isn't able to.
And tell Hilly that she shouldn't be so damned nasty with us Democrats, or we'll send her to the other party with her bosom pal Joe.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:30 PM on 03/30/2008

Pilosi was out of line! If she wants to support Obama, just say so instead of saying I am neutral and than throw a bomb at Clinton. .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:41 PM on 03/30/2008

I have moved on from being a move on subscriber because they lack the judgement as their candidate, Mr. Obama does. Move on is a "has been." Senator Clinton is more qualified and will win the nomination and then the presidency. You are only pissing Senator Clinton's supporter off (in a big way) by try to steal the nomination using Republican style tactics such as not seating the Florida and Michigan delegates, counting the non-democratic caucuses around the country, call her to quit, calling her supporters racist for not voting for a candidate who is not qualified, but happens to be black and so on.
It is disrespectful to millions of voters who voted for Senator Clinton and will vote for her in the next 10 primaries to try to steal the nomination, Republicans did it, and we will not Democrats do it, so by calling for Clinton to quit, all you are doing is making us not to vote for Obama if he is the nominee.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:28 PM on 03/30/2008

kiga, My guess is that you are not a Democrat, MoveOn member or literate because of your right wing talking points and poor math skills. Hillary supporters must come to grips with the evidence (reported by right wing NewsMax) that Bill Clinton is supporting Republican McCain.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:42 PM on 03/30/2008

The majority of voters voted for Obama, even if one factors in Florida and Michigan, so how can he be "stealing" the nomination. I find Senator Clinton's politics (vote for Iraq war etc.) distasteful in the extreme, but will cheerfully vote for her if she is the Democratic nominee. I hope you will find it in your heart to do the same for Senator Obama.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:19 PM on 03/30/2008

Hillary supporters need to face the facts that Bill and Hillary may support (overtly or covertly) the Republican McCain in a general election. Even the right wing NewsMax questions Bill's glowing support for McCain.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:17 PM on 03/30/2008

Well has Nan pulled her head out of her Ass, or is this just another round of smoke & Mirrors.
Could we get any shittier women in Gov't? It's embarassing and infuriating- not to mentiion the leaps backwards their actions and INactions have caused.
these 'Dem' Contributors my find the base they depend on to elect their Operative have left them. Same Assholes who've been imploding th eRepublican party- they are the ultimate SWTICH HITTERS.
We see you lurking in our Party, we kno wyou have sunk your teeth into those in Blue. have them..We are ready to Fire them all- If not send them to Prison- and you are also on the list. I'm Not a Dem, I'm an AmericaN!!!!! Peek a Boo we see YOU TOO!

Cave Adsum

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:49 PM on 03/30/2008

The country showed how much it distained the fat cats making the decisions in smoke filled rooms and screwing the average voter. Clinton is taking her big chance and shredding it. She's misread the public, big time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:17 PM on 03/29/2008

"But Senator Clinton and Bill Clinton will not take a backseat to anyone when it comes to helping Democrats or helping to fund the party committees. And the people here at every level are absolutely committed to large democratic majorities in 2008 and doing everything we can to helping achieve those large majorities."

OK Clintons, how about putting your money where your mouth is? If what you say is true, how about committing to distribute your $20 million general election fund to other Democrats in the various 2008 elections if Hillary Clinton doesn't win the Democratic nomination? That would do a lot to prove this claim.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:08 PM on 03/29/2008

MoveOn was suppose to be for all Democrats but they endorsed Obama early on. I wouldn't support them again and if they ask to support the DEM party, I won't they are not inpartial as they intended to be when they started.

HRC supporters go to sites like:

http://www.hillaryisourchoice.com/flip_flop.htm

for thier news

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 03/29/2008

Hillary voted for the bankruptcy "reform" bill authored by credit card companies and the Iraq war. She stands by her husband's record, which includes the first uses of extraordinary rendition (ie. shipping suspected terrorists to Egypt to be TORTURED into confession), the homophobic defense of marriage act, and financial sector deregulation that led to the current mortgage crisis. I'll vote for Hillary if she's the nominee, but lets face it, she's really a moderate Republican.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:25 PM on 03/30/2008

So the difference between the big money backers of the GOP and the big money backers of the Clintons is? The whole purposed of the Clinton campaign was to offer the American people their choice of two Republicans.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:27 AM on 03/29/2008

Those ridiculous donors make me laugh! If we don't let HilLIARy have the nomination, they'll go away mad and take their ball with them. They might even call us some names as they leave. (Their kind is good at that.) But after a while people become immune to such tactics.
And besides, their little old ball ain't all that impressive now. We American people have found a new one, much better and more reliable. Oh, and WE own it!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:45 AM on 03/29/2008

And how out of touch are they?
Twenty four million over 10 years, versus Obama raising 55 million in one month? They just don't get it, they are caught in a time warp of self importance and entitlement they believe is rightfully theirs based on their check book. The Washington players!
They simply do not understand the significance of the change that is happening.
It reeks of the vindictiveness that was and is the Clinton way!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 AM on 03/29/2008

My lord has this campaign gone down hill. Has anyone produced a list of the blackmailers yet?

In case no one has beat me to it, I crown thee... "Fat-Cat-Donor-Gate"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:00 AM on 03/29/2008

Where do read blackmail into this? They are asking Pelosi to stop corrupting the process, and reminding her that they supported her election as a representative of ALL democrats. They are supporters of the Democratic Party - the way it is suppose to be. They are absolutely right about the delegates.

Shouldn't Pelosi be doing something a bit more constructive with her elected office? Isn't there SOME better use of her time? Did any of us want her to win just so she could hang around and try to pull Obama up? Come on!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 PM on 03/29/2008

why don't you ask your candidate to pay her bills?? Its gotten so bad that politico has written about it... stiffing small business owners who cannot afford to go without payment... oh, and she works for them right???

And stop putting the spin on this MI/FL debacle... all candidates knew well in advance that they would not count... now, because she failed to plan beyond Super Tuesday(she thought she had it locked up) she wants them to count...

Your Hillary supporters are a piece of work!!! Should she legitimately win the nomination, I will hold my nose and vote for her bc I will never vote for bomb bomb bomb Iran McBush part 2.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 PM on 03/30/2008

She's wringing her hands over the thought of those poor voters in Florida/Michigan being disenfranchised, but at the same time she and her surrogates are insisting on a system that allows the superdelegates to pick whomever they want, regardless of the primary/cacus votes. So if Florida and Michigan are somehow counted and that does yield a Clinton win, those voters can go right back to being disenfranchised. Ya gotta love someone who can hold two completely contrary views at the same time. It is the definition of a true politician.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:18 AM on 03/30/2008

Wow. First of all, these are Clinton supporters. Next, oh forget it. You are so blinded in defending your candidate that any attempt that I make to explain the obvious will be totally lost on you.

Obama's fund raising abilities makes these type of people obsolete, and I am sure it scares them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:39 PM on 03/29/2008

Read the whole letter. It's a little foolish to get on your high horse without having actually read the letter. There is a link right in Steins post. You seem to be the one who thinks money should buy the nomination. The letter never mentions funds or money at all. Stein is the one who mentioned it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 AM on 03/30/2008

Read the whole letter a-hole.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:52 AM on 03/30/2008

I would like to know where the average person is in all of this? Why don't we stop all the spending and just have the Super Delegates pick who they want.
I find this whole process far from being democratic.
I find it disgusting, we the people, are really nothing in this process from beginning to end. From the Democrat's to the Republicans.
I don't even think we are a Republic anymore much less coining ourselves as a Democratic Nation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:33 PM on 03/29/2008

It is obvious that the super delegates would be the ones who would finally determine the democratic nominee. This is why the threatening letter by Billary fundraisers/supporters to Nancy Pelosi was ill advised and a very big blunder. The threatening letter is a blackmail that says: "If you don't make public statements that favors Billary and help get the super delegates to support and nominate her, we shall cut your funding!"
This is not just a blackmail but an attempt to sabotage the party's electoral rules and therefore it should be considered against the law and the morons who wrote that letter should be indicted and prosecuted for threatening a member of US congress and attempting to sabotage electoral law. Finally, Billary has blown her 30 yr old dream to smithereens. Most delegates would now rush to embrace and support Obama! secret33.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:24 AM on 03/29/2008

Smells like oligarchy to me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:52 AM on 03/29/2008

Wrong time for big donors to threaten DNC. There's a new kid in town with direct link to donor $$$ bigger than they can provide & his name is Obama.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:13 AM on 03/29/2008

No big donors threatened anyone. And Im not sure why you think it's okay to buy the nomination.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:19 AM on 03/30/2008

Wait a minute - hold up!

This feels like a move The Sopranos would make. Of course the Clinton campaign endorsed it.

It's all about the Benjamins! In the all mighty dollar we trust! But then again, it's power is slowly fading away - the dollar that is. One can only hope the Clintons will too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:12 PM on 03/28/2008

ritenow: I fully agree. Should Mrs. Clinton, against a substantial majority of
presumably democratic voters, get the nomination, you are then facing
something that makes Iraq look like child's play, and John McCain will become
our next president. hipo

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:43 AM on 03/29/2008

MoveOn is a has-been organization...they're just annoyed because they lost all these same, high-dollar donors when they made the incredibly stupid mistake of endorsing one Dem against another.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:49 PM on 03/28/2008

Don't kid yourself...these high dollar donors don't give money to the likes of MoveOn....they only give to people who can give them something in return....it should come as no surprise that 30% of those on the list also slept in the Lincoln bedroom.....remember when the whitehouse was turned into a high-priced bed and breakfast?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:56 AM on 03/29/2008

Yes, I bet all these high dollar donors would show up on Hillary's tax filings from 2000, thats the reason she won't release them , nor the 8 years of Telephone logs from White House and why the 1000 or so pages from While House papers have been so heavily "redacted".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:10 PM on 03/29/2008

These sorry assed, old time, has-been 'big wheels' give approximately $2.4 million to the democratic party per year.

Senator Obama raised more than this in 2 days.

These old f*ckers are irrelvant in the age of the net.

If you have not done so, donate to Obama.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:55 PM on 03/28/2008

i do donate to obama, but have started donating to the dccc in order to offset the loss of the 'fat cats.'

this is the best way to help obama and bolster pelosi's position. let's take our country back from 'fat cat's' everywhere.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:27 AM on 03/30/2008

Pelosi said: Superdelegates should take into PRIMARY consideration the tallies of both the popular vote and the pledged delegate count.

This silly Clintonites are quite "hillaryous." Pelosi said the TALLIES of popular vote/pledged delegates.......whether or not SD's switch back to their respective states, Obama STILL HAS the advantage, he won MORE states, much much more. Wake up and smell DEFEAT.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:31 PM on 03/28/2008

The rules of the nomination process are there are no rules.

Therefore, supporters of either candidate can make whatever arguments they want to help their preferred candidate secure the nomination.

It just so happens that Obama has a nearly insurmountable lead in elected delegates and popular vote, rendering arguments that the supers should ultimately pick him far more compelling from a moral, ethical and common sense perspective.

Getting all worked up about the political gamesmanship going on is silly.

Obama '08

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:11 PM on 03/28/2008

I now give all the money I used to give to Move On to Hillary. They will never get another penny out of me. So rock on Clinton supporters. This petition pissed me off enough to send more money to Hillary today.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:21 PM on 03/28/2008

So Hillary is backed by a bunch of blackmailing bigots who care not a whit for this democratic country, and want to force on us another term of Bushist behavior by our government? And I suppose they will expect us to swallow their Dreck and shout "God bless America!"? Well, I say, "NO! No, no, no!"
They are not God; the America they would give us is a far cry from any decent one. And they can go to .... some other place with their attempted blackmail.
Obama has beaten her and her big unAmerican donors. He can beat them again when they jump to their second Neocon choice, Mr McCain.

I stand for America as she was intended to be, not for a slavish America that serves those blackmailers. Call me a name now if you wish!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:51 AM on 03/28/2008