George Bush: Spiraling Iraq Violence

George Bush: Spiraling Iraq Violence "A Very Positive Moment"

Think Progress   |   March 27, 2008 02:20 PM


stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

Violence continues across southern Iraq today, as radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr is threatening to end his crucial cease-fire by calling for the "downfall of the U.S.-backed government."

In response, the administration has gone on a desperate PR blitz to label renewed violence in Iraq as "byproduct of the success of the surge." "It's "what critics have wanted to see," said White House Press Secretary Dana Perino, calling it a struggle led by Iraqi security forces.

Today -- as rockets rain down on the Green Zone and two American soldiers died -- Bush cast the activity as a "very positive moment" in an interview with the Times of U.K.:


 
 

Comments
140
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)

Maliki's party has been cozying up to Iran; The Sadr party is on the outs with Iran. The offensive is intended to suppress the Sadrist vote in October. Silly me, but it looks like George Orwell Bush has the U.S. military fighting for Iran and against democracy. On the bright side, when Iran controls Iraq, we can declare victory and bring our guys home.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:42 PM on 03/29/2008

The current Iraqi government is a Shi'ite-dominated police state, in which Sunni Muslims are treated as second-class citizens at best, and targets for death squad murder and ethnic cleansing otherwise. Yet the current violence in Iraq shows that the government is not even doing right by all its Shi'ites. I don't know if Moqtada al-Sadr's militias had anything to do with the death squads and ethnic cleansing, but if he can bring down al-Maliki's government, that can't be all bad. It ought to tell us something that tens of thousands of people in Baghdad demonstrated against the government.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:35 AM on 03/28/2008

The ludicrous thing is that while al-Maliki's government is indeed a Shi'ite-dominated police state, it is also Iranian-dominated to the core, as Porter's article points out. And this struggle for Basra is precisely where Iran has the most strategic interest. Iran wants to back a winner: Hence they, like the U.S. but much less cluelessly, play one faction against another. This is al-Maliki's power grab, and opportunity to get Iran behind him. He then can deal with the Sunnis. But first, he has to ensure that there is no Shi'ite challenger.
We, of course, backing Saudi Arabia (suicidally, since they make up the bulk of foreigners fighting US in Iraq) see this as al-Maliki quashing Shi'ite pro-Iranian rebels. This is wishful thinking. Saddam kept a very tight lid on the cauldron of factions and sects that threatened central rule. We let the genie out of the bottle, and now have only losing options. Bush means to hide this until January, 2009. How many will die for his vanity?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:58 AM on 03/28/2008

Thank you for your analysis. I'll have to make a point of reading Gareth Porter's work. Unlike such writers as Charles Krauthammer, Richard Perle and William Kristol, it sounds as though Mr. Porter actually seeks to base his writing on what is real, rather than on what Republicans like to hear. Of course, his readers will need to gird themselves to comprehend a level of horror that the average brain automatically recoils from processing. The idea that an American president could cynically use American military power in the service of a religious faction with a proved tendency to commit full-scale genocide -- in this case, Iraqi Shi'ites against Iraqi Sunnis -- is ... what it is. It goes far beyond the territory to be addressed by mere impeachment; it's one for The Hague.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:12 PM on 03/29/2008

the shelling of the green zone is a postive moment because the bunkers there needed testing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:42 AM on 03/28/2008

So, the surge was working because it was tamping down violence. Now, it's working because it's ratcheting up violence.

I mean, after a while the only appropriate response is: F**K YOU!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 AM on 03/28/2008

I wonder if the American troops who are getting shot at and bombed know that being shot at and bombed is a romantic endeavor, first, and that by getting injured or killed means they are signs of a successful surge. Those troops are so dumb they may have thought that not getting shot or bombed was successful because they weren't getting injured or dead and to them may have signified success. Success can only be determined when people get shot or are bombed with injuries and death being the true criterion of success.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:52 PM on 03/28/2008

Bush:

Violence Down: The Surge is Working!

Violence Up: The Surge is Working!

22nd Amendment: The Purge is Working!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 AM on 03/28/2008

Moqtada al-Sadr may be a thoroughly reprehensible person. From what I have read about him, however, he has one commendable virtue: he is an Iraqi nationalist. He doesn't want the United States in his country and he doesn't want Iran in his country either. He wants Iraq for Iraqis. Also, he seems to have the support of themajority of the population.

Abdul Aziz al-Hakim, Sadr's chief opponent, on the other hand, seems to be a slimy greaseball, the kind of man who tells you what you want to hear one day and stabs you in the back when it suits his purpose. Even if this is untrue, he is a product of Iran. Even his organization, the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq, takes the name of its Iranian counterpart. There is no doubt he envisions an Islamic theocracy in Iraq modeled upon that in Iran. He clearly intends Iraq to be a satellite of Iran.

Now it is the Mahdi Army of al-Sadr against the Badr Brigades of al-Hakim with the Iraqi government and the U.S. military on the side of al-Hakim. This is consistent with the American practice since World War II to back the side that will have the worst long term effect upon America.

This is not the government taking insurgent outlaws. It is about destroying the political opposition.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 AM on 03/28/2008

I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks the government of Iraq is execrable. Regime change in Iraq is needed now more than it was needed under Saddam Hussein!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:55 AM on 03/28/2008

I can hardly wait until January when 'Enchanted' George is miraculously transported into the real world. (Dress and all.)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:31 PM on 03/27/2008

What does it take to get a psych assessment on a sitting US President? Just asking.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 PM on 03/27/2008

In order to join the military the recruits have to pass a test and a physical while their is no such requirement to be their Commander in Chief of the military. With CAT SCANS and MRI'S it's possible to determine if someone has brain damage. Now, why isn't this a prerequisite for being the Commander in Chief and why is it more difficult to be a Buck Private recruit than it is to be their Commander in Chief? WE use the18th century standards for the 21st century tasks, only for politicians.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:59 PM on 03/28/2008

Darn... I don't know why I didn't see this earlier. He's not a President, he's a Stand-up Comic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:56 PM on 03/27/2008

From Democracy Now, April 29, 2004:
Dems Ignore Negroponte"s Death Squad Past, Look to Confirm Iraq Appointment
At a Senate hearing on the appointment of John Negroponte to the U.S. embassy in Baghdad, Negroponte was never questioned about supporting widespread campaigns of terror and human rights abuses as ambassador to Honduras. We speak to a priest and a nun who lived in Latin America in the early 1980s as well as a human rights activist who disrupted Negroponte at the Senate hearing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:33 PM on 03/27/2008

Negroponte is in Pakistan this week, to bolster Musharef[?]. Where Negroponte goes death squads follow. Central America, Iraq and who knows where else.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:03 PM on 03/28/2008

Spiraling Iraq Violence "A Very Positive Moment"

No, George.

It means that you f*cked up, couldn't get the job done, sacrificed untold lives, spent us into record debt and couldn't plan your way out of a game of spin the bottle.

And when all else fails, do the only thing you do well.... pretend it's good news.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 PM on 03/27/2008

I wonder if anyone in the upper echelons of our Government, hearing this latest pronouncement, has given serious thought to the possibility that Bush is insane, and if so, what can be done about it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:53 PM on 03/27/2008

It's only the National Decider that is spiraling. When will he be placed in five point restraint?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:50 PM on 03/27/2008

Was Bush in his flight suit and cod piece when he announced this latest "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED" moment?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:37 PM on 03/27/2008

The sequel "Missions Accomplished 2" is in production until January 2009. It is being heavily advertised on the MSM complete with production spokesmen and and all of their minion being interviewed extensively. They all say, in concert, how wonderful the sequel is,like it is scripted, but we know better than that, don't we? Funding for another installment of the Missions Accomplished series is in process and it too will have a budget of $100's of billions. Their is concern that the production costs of $3,000,000,000,000 trillions for the 1st 2 of the Missions Accomplished series won't be covered by ticket receipts alone but that the DVD release will help.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:17 AM on 03/28/2008

Spiraling Iraq Violence "A Very Positive Moment"

Just think about how positive it will get when we're in Iraq permanently, have 1000s more positive Amercan casualties, billions more positive dollars wasted, 100s more families shattered (in a positive way).

Why, I can almost feel that magic moment of victory aginst the terrist within my grasp.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:17 PM on 03/27/2008

A positive moment will be when the American public stands up for America and throws out Bush ,Cheney and company.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:15 PM on 03/27/2008

Im sure a whole slew of lawyers from the ACLU have been investigating every millimeter of Bush and Cheney's decisions since 2001. They have nothing. Get over it. As Soros would say "Move On".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 AM on 03/28/2008

That will NEVER happen. The congress does not have the courage to do it and the general amurican has no ability to influence it and those running for president never mention his behavior. Neither Obama or HRC will do anything to investigate bush after he leaves office (if he does). Face it, bush and cheney will get away with it. Who here on huffpost even speaks of impeachment? No one. The starry eyed supporters of obama and hrc don't care about this fight - they have moved on. They only want to fight each other.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:41 PM on 03/27/2008

This is also the reason the Democratic Party stands on the edge of disaster after the biggest clusterf*k by the GOP in history. It is because Conyers and co. don't want to risk impeaching an obviously criminal and likely no longer sane President because "it could turn the public against the Democrats," although nothing would please the population more than seeing the Chimp testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee with Dick Cheney sitting on his lap, explaining 'mistakes' like outed spies, loose nukes, etc. It is a dilemma that the Dems have gotten themselves into that is strangely reminescent of Bush's idiocy in Iraq, where Conyers' 'prudence' actually makes it harder for the candidates to sound connected to reality.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:17 PM on 03/27/2008

I'm an Obama supporter and I support an impeachment for Bush, as well as war crimes proceedings. But honestly, the gravest threat to America is not Bush, the discredited laughingstock batshit-crazy lunatic, but John McCain, the bat-shit crazy warmonger who people think is still honorable.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 PM on 03/27/2008

The gravest threat to our country is the assault on our Constitution. All else flows from that. Presidents who feel emboldened to do as they please with no fear of Congress or the SCOTUS start wars, break laws, spy on people, torture people, disappear people, raid the treasury, etc. Impeachment would represent a line in the sand. Too bad we have so few patriots today.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:34 PM on 03/28/2008

Too bad Congress is more gutless than the city council of Brattleboro, Vt. They attached the proper designation to Bush and Cheney, and recommended appropriate action if either were spotted within city limits.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:06 PM on 03/27/2008

What in h--- is Bush smoking he must be back on the weed and booze are may be Cheney told him every thing is going to be alright. All this time I though Bush was just a little slow, I didn't know he was out right stupid. This is typical of a draft dodger mentality

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:21 PM on 03/27/2008

"It was a very positive moment in the development of a sovereign nation that is willing to take on elements that believe they are beyond the law."


You mean, like Bush and Cheney ... ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:05 PM on 03/27/2008

George Bush: Spiraling Iraq Violence "A Very Positive Moment"?

He really meant a Positively Bloody and Gory Moment

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:57 PM on 03/27/2008

turning shit into a milkshake and topping it with whipped cream doesn't change the fact that it's still shit.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:36 PM on 03/27/2008

"It was a very positive moment in the development of a sovereign nation that is willing to take on elements that believe they are beyond the law."

He's right, you know. The Iraqis are standing up for their country and putting it on the line. That's a good thing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:21 PM on 03/27/2008

You obviously didn't read this part of the story: "Most ironically, if U.S.-backed efforts "succeed," Iran"s hand in Iraq will be strengthened. IPS" Gareth Porter explains:

The Badr Organisation and the ISCI had always been and remained the most pro-Iranian political-military forces in Iraq, having been established, trained and funded by the [Iranian Revolutionary Guard] from Shiite exiles in Iran during the Iran-Iraq war."
Porter continues: "Revealing the contradictions built into the U.S. position in Iraq, even as it was blaming Iran for the alleged renegade units of the Mahdi Army, the U.S. was using the Badr Organisation, the military arm of the ISCI, to carry out raids against the Mahdi Army. "
These elements of the 'sovereign' nation are also the most pro-Iranian. No surprise when one compares the reception that Iranian leaders get, compared to Cheney's- very likely Cheney's recent twisting of arms was the last straw for everyone in Iraq.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:02 PM on 03/27/2008

Typical situation for any nation STUPID enough to tangle in 600 year old Arab wars, to find itself in.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 PM on 03/27/2008

Spare us the fairy tale mentality, mixed with militarism and called glorious. If you make it some vainglorious pompous story, you lose contact with reality in a hurry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:24 PM on 03/27/2008



The Bushit is getting thick again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:49 PM on 03/27/2008

Yeah, they're standing up for their country by fighting our soldiers and each other. I don't see much positive in that uless we can get our soldiers out of the way of those opposing forces.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:06 PM on 03/27/2008

Why are American soldiers in Iraq again? What was the rationale?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:19 PM on 03/27/2008

In Bush's War the premise is that our destiny and duty is to rescue the Iraqi's from tyranny and slavery. In the Iraqi People's War the principle is to extricate themselves from the invasion and occupation of neo-colonalists.
The invading occupants kill the resisting Iraqis to save them from the worst fate of dictatorship and slavery. The Iraqis kill the invading occupants to regain their own self-determination, self -espect and mutual understanding as fully acknowledged human beings, fully equivalent with others.
When the invading benefactors recognize that solidarity, fraternity, mutual understanding and need for association on equal terms are as legitimate values as democracy, legal justice and liberty, They will abruptly lift their occupation, apologize and plead for forgiveness of the Iraqi people for the unintended mayhem and sorrow inflicted upon those innocent people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:16 PM on 03/27/2008