In this image released by Paramount Pictures, Mike Myers is shown in a scene from "The Love Guru." (AP Photo/Paramount Pictures, George Kraychyk)

Mike Myers' Spoof Hits The "Ohm" Where It Hurts

SANDY COHEN | March 27, 2008 05:33 PM EST | AP


stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

LOS ANGELES — As the people of Kazakhstan know all too well, mockery of culture and religion seems to be kosher in Hollywood, under the following conditions:

The humor must be so over-the-top, so beyond reality, that it could never be misconstrued as mean-spirited. That, and the targeted groups cannot be large enough, loud enough or organized enough so that their hurt feelings make an impact at the box office.

Just ask Borat. Though Kazakhs complained that their country and customs were grossly misrepresented in "Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan," the film was a $128 million domestic success _ among the top-grossing films of 2006.

In the context of Sacha Baron Cohen's uncomfortable in-character interactions with unwitting Americans, Mike Myers' parody of another cultural minority in the U.S. _ as the oversexed, overly ambitious, American-born spiritual leader in the summer comedy "The Love Guru" _ would hardly seem cause for complaint.

Myers' character is an amalgamation of Eastern-style spiritual movements, never making reference to any particular religion. And yet the Guru Pitka _ billed as "the second best guru in India" _ draws a distinct picture.

He wears long hair, a long beard and a flowing caftan. "Prepare to get your enlightenment freak on," Pitka tells visitors to his MySpace page, where he blends real information _ such as the Sanskrit origins of the word "guru" _ with silliness, including impossible yoga poses that would require elastic limbs. He plays sappy pop songs on the sitar. His mantra is "Mariska Hargitay."

Pitka identifies himself as "a spiritual teacher affiliated with no one faith" and has the same crass-and-goofy charm as Myers' Austin Powers and "Wayne's World" characters. And the movie's plot _ he heads West when he's offered $2 million to heal a hockey star's romance so the team can win the Stanley Cup _ is harmless enough.

Still, weeks before the movie is even ready for screening, some in the Hindu community feel that "The Love Guru" has the potential to ridicule important elements of their religion.

Rajan Zed, a self-described Hindu leader from Nevada, demanded that Paramount Pictures screen the film for members of the Hindu community before it is released in June. Based on the movie's trailer and MySpace page, Zed says "The Love Guru" "appears to be lampooning Hinduism and Hindus" and uses sacred terms frivolously.

"People are not very well-versed in Hinduism, so this might be their only exposure," he told The Associated Press. "They will have an image in their minds of stereotypes. They will think most of us are like that."

Paramount, which has screened sensitive films for select audiences in the past, said early screenings would be held for the Hindu community.

"`Love Guru,' which is not yet complete, is a satire created in the same spirit as Austin Powers," Paramount said in a statement, noting that the film features spiritual teacher Deepak Chopra and Hindu actor Manu Narayan. "It is our full intention to screen the film for Rajan Zed and other Hindu leaders once it is ready."

Myers, who declined to be interviewed for this story, says in an episode of the Sundance Channel's "Iconoclasts" that Chopra, his longtime friend, was the inspiration for the Love Guru character.

"He is the basis of why I went down this path of a character like that, and it's because I am interested in higher states of consciousness and I am interested in comedy," Myers says. "The guru, he breaks down your barriers, gets you silly and gets you light so you're in a place to receive love."

But religious communities rarely take well to faith-themed comedies, said Diane Winston, a professor of media and religion at the University of Southern California.

"To be funny, you have to get in people's faces and disturb their complacent perspectives," she said. "Religious groups have tended to be very concerned about their portrayal in the media, especially the entertainment media. Often ... in comedies, it's a very broad representation which they perceive as offensive. It's the nature of stereotype."

Her take on "The Love Guru" trailer and Web site? Rather than a spoof of Eastern religion, it seems more of a satire of American culture's tendency toward materialism, promiscuity and quick spiritual fixes told through a pseudo religious figure.

"The character didn't have to be a guru. He could just as well have been a rabbi, minister, priest or imam," she said. "These are problems within the culture at large.

"Hindus were a fresh target," she continued. "Jews and Christians have been parodied before so perhaps Myers thought this was a different take on a familiar comedy routine."

Myers' publicist, Ina Treciokas, declined to comment for this story.

A Hindu nun at the Vedanta Society of Southern California, who asked not to be named because she felt it was not appropriate to seem like she was speaking for the faith, said secular and religious culture are "fused" in India, which could give rise to sensitivity if it appears sacred customs are being ridiculed.

"A good satire should pinch a bit," she said. "To gauge the movie on two minutes is impossible. But I can see, after having seen two minutes, that people who are sensitive would want to see more."

Just as most viewers of "Borat" know that the character's over-the-top antics have little to do with the reality in Kazakhstan, Myers' Guru Pitka is similarly silly _ and has nothing explicitly to do with Hinduism. Still, the film was inspired by Myers' real spiritual quest, which began after his father's death in 1991.

Paramount officials point out that "The Love Guru" is "non-denominational comedy that celebrates spirituality and that the character has his own fictional belief system."

For all its sight gags and goofy jokes, the film is about three things, Myers says: "It's about fate versus choice ... it's about self love and the third part of it is that internal validation trumps external validation."

___

On the Net:

http://www.myspace.com/theloveguru


 
 

Comments
41
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

People whining about a movie they haven't seen yet. Everybody's a victim nowadays. At this rate, making fun of anything will be against the law. So much for freedom of speech.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:15 AM on 03/31/2008

Religion should have no political clout. If we compromise our rights what DO we stand for? There are many movies ridiculing Christianity, Mormonism, Scientology etc. Just because the members of some religions are more incapable of understanding freedom of expression, we cannot change our standards. Remember what happened after the Danish Mohammed cartoons were published and the Muslim world managed successfully to cow the secular media organizations of the world into condemning the issue?

Religion dominates the information networks, cluttering our culture with utter falsehoods, contradictions and bloody tales of suffering and conquest parceled as moral guidelines, and somehow the criticism of religion is the subject of everyone's ire.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:05 AM on 03/31/2008

How is it that the unfunniest SNL alumni go on to have massive movie careers?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:59 PM on 03/30/2008

You have grown tiresome.

Now is ze time ven ve dance!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 AM on 04/01/2008

Peeple of ze wurl, relax.

I'm a meditationista, home in my own USA too, and I favor fostering fewer attachments and find making fun may help dispel some of mine. If Mikey catches me in a phony posture so much the better for both of us.

I'll decide whether Mike has been funny after I see the movie. There's certainly no a priori reason for those of us who seek the atman or the absence thereof to think its fourfold whatever to be absent a human attitude as native as humor.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:37 PM on 03/30/2008

New Age is a religion, and thus subject to dogma and fanaticism and endless sheep spouting its endless eulogies. Go to Gaia.com if you want proof. Myers should be heartily commending for sending up this faux form of spirituality, just as Thoreau should be heartily commended for raking Christianity over the coals.

But of course, the sheeple aren't listening. They're too busy weeping and wiping their noses on their savior's moldy robes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:26 PM on 03/29/2008

I agree with you 100%,but the problem for me is it's Mike Meyers,who's as godawful unfunny as Will ferrell.I'd rather have a root canal than sit through either of these guys' movies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:39 PM on 03/29/2008

yes, my dad Deepak has a cameo. But don't forget about me: watch out for my cameo with Mike Myers and Ben Kingsley!!!!

Gotham Chopra

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:51 PM on 03/28/2008

gchop See Profile I'm a Fan of gchop

yes, my dad Deepak has a cameo. But don't forget about me: watch out for my cameo with Mike Myers and Ben Kingsley!!!!

Gotham Chopra
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If your dad married Oprah Winfrey, she'd be Oprah Chopra.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:16 PM on 03/30/2008

Are you kidding me? Did you even fight the urge to jump up and yell "Oh Oh me me!! Oh Oh Oh!! Look at me!"

You should try out for Horshack in the remake of Welcome Back Kotter!

LOL

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:27 AM on 03/29/2008

Myers is funny, and there's little to laugh at in today's world! If he had joked about Mohammed, he'd be on a number of hit lists along with the producers and the studio...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:50 PM on 03/28/2008

Making faces and telling fart jokes is not exactly high art. Myers reminds me of Gerry Lewis in a way. Early in both their careers they let the critics' title 'comic genius' go to their head. With each succeeding film each of these 'comic genius's' got more desperate in their comic antics. Every scene seems to be him saying "please please please LIKE me!" More bathos than pathos.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:14 PM on 03/28/2008

Slap a wig ,some makeup and a stupid accent on him and everyone thinks Myers is funny. I guess I don't get the appeal. Give me Ricky Gervais anyday.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:03 PM on 03/28/2008

Mike Myers: Not funny. His desire to make us laugh comes across as very needy. Give me Will Ferrell.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:00 PM on 03/28/2008

I find other religions to be insulting to my religion - comedy. Once in a while even Mike offends my religious sensibilities.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:51 PM on 03/28/2008

"self-described leader" is right. Hinduism doesn't have leaders (a very amorphous diffuse religion), although India does have a surfeit of godmen who resemble the West's televangelists except without the fire and brimstone and with plenty of useful breathing and yoga tips. These folks are ripe for ridicule, although since they are also politically powerful, this is not always a good idea.

I don't know about Myers' get up though. He looks like the Zamfir of the gypsies, rather than an Eastern mystic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:39 PM on 03/28/2008


I like Mariska Hargitay. She doesn't have the 'starved model' look about her..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 AM on 03/28/2008

There is not much of a chance on "free speech" Hollywood's producing a spoof on Muslim preachers. Who wants a fatwa of a death sentence hanging over ur head?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:43 AM on 03/28/2008


Well, the Dane tried much less than that and we know what happened. The moral is you can't make fun of scary people, let's only make fun of non-violent people..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:51 PM on 03/28/2008

You're right kaafir, there's nothing anti-muslim whatsoever being churned out by the popculture certainly not Borat which was featured in the article...had read it you would've seen that.

Second, this story is about Hindus, stay on topic and keep your anti-Muslim obsession under control.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:28 AM on 03/28/2008

You've got to give Mike credit you know because a guy like him,with little talent and no originality,has in spite of those facts,made many $Millions - and doesn't that amount to really "Everything" in America?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:44 AM on 03/28/2008

Hey there, HuffPo editors-

I'm not sure if you authored this headline or just borrowed it from the original, but an "ohm" is a unit of measurement (electrical resistance). The word/sound "om" is a Hindu mantra, generally taken to mean "I am", although others argue it's a sort of harmonic nonsense syllable.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:53 AM on 03/28/2008



I ,for one, applaud whomever it is that is stepping forward. It's about time some stands up for the belief system, if only to minimize the truly egregious depictions. Hindus tend to take these things with a grain of salt, only getting really riled up when people do things that are truly offensive. Which unfortunately allows some serious transgressions to go unpunished. Recall that the silly lady who burned herself on hot McDonald's coffee got millions while the observant Hindus fed cow-laden french fries advertised as vegetarian were basically ridiculed and given a pittance. Would the case have turned out the same had it been pigs and jews/muslims? I think not.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:18 PM on 03/28/2008

"Om" truly is a nonsense syllable or sound often found emanating from non-Hindus mediating or yogaing without any idea of what they"re doing or why. The proper syllable is "AUM" which like most Sanskrit words is quite deep in meaning. The sound is important of course, as is the fact that it integrates the Trimurthi with shakti (the power of the universe, depicted as female and which is necessary for the "male" Trimurthi.) BrahmA, VishnU, Maheshwar (or Shiva). The sound incorporates the aspects of creation, preservation and intellect (destruction of ignorance) and the power and the vibration of Shakti that is needed to achieve them (usually depicted as the goddess-consort of each of the three.) So yup education is indeed needed, so perhaps it would be a good thing to listen to the "leaders" as a Hindu, I can both think for myself and listen to those more learned than I (even if they"re not "official".)

For the most part, our religion, culture, and these days even our country are among the most demonized and attacked. People know very little about it other than the minor trappings.

Mike Meyer's character speaks to the yet another packaging of the mystical that non-Indians in general seem to adore. It is irritating, as a group we tend to laugh at it, and the people it tends to insult, which is usually rich gullible non Hindus.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:16 PM on 03/28/2008

Yeah, I new there was something annoying about the title, I mean besides it being about a new Mike Myers vehicle.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 PM on 03/28/2008

Considering Meyers isn't that funny to begin with I can't see how this would be any different.

His stuff pretty much sucks but somehow the masses seem to give him money for it. Go figure.

I think he's about as funny as a heart attack.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:47 AM on 03/28/2008

Hmm... you exhibit no sense of humor, while Mike Myers has raked in millions for his comedic work. I'm not sure who to trust here: the humorless critic or the star of Austin Powers and Shrek.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:41 AM on 03/28/2008

Mike used to spoof his former mother-in-law on SNL.
Remember Linda Richmond? One of his funniest characters!
"I'm a little verklempt! Talk amongst yourselves..I'll give you a topic: Rhode Island, it's not a road, nor an island...discuss!"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:56 AM on 03/28/2008

It sounds hilarious. Mariska Hargitay must have a good sense of humor, too.
I can't wait to see this movie.
No one should take Mike Myers seriously, including Hindus.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:47 AM on 03/28/2008

Maybe one develops a sense of humor through repeated consumption of beef products.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 PM on 03/27/2008

wow. That was a dumb ass comment. You ignorant fool.

One might hazard a guess that the lack of prions swimming around your brain is what contributes to a functional sense of humor.

You illustrate the reason people get a little antsy about stuff like this, seriously what the hell?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:42 PM on 03/28/2008

Memo to Hindu "leaders" quoted here: please go out and purchase a sense of humor, since it's clear you don't have one. And FYI, the character isn't even identified as Hindu. To assume movie goers will equate this silliness to actual religious practices is as ridiculous as assuming Borat is representative of actual citizens of Kazakhstan. Lighten up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:41 PM on 03/27/2008

Perhaps you should go out and purchase some sensitivity and some sense in general? If they had a character dressed up in the attire of a priest or a rabbi etc. and called him a priest or a rabbi would they also have to specifically say the character is a christian or a jew? Same goes here. He's dressed as a guru, a hindu teacher, goes unsaid.

The problem here is that so many are sooooooooo ignorant about what Hinduism is, that quite a lot of the masses DO think this is it. Hence the problem. We're a bit tired of trying to explain to people how we're actually monotheistic, that the dot on our forehead doesn't mean we're married and etc. etc. etc.

The portrayals of our religion is usually negative and ridiculous and after several hundred years of the West depicting us in these ways, we're finally saying, hey can you let us take a look at what you're going to be spewing before you show it? That's unreasonable? That shows a lack of a sense of humor? Were Hindus intolerant or unable to laugh at ourselves etc. well you'd have felt it quite a bit ago.

It's already being taken fairly lightly, so perhaps you're that one that needs to lighten up already?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:36 PM on 03/28/2008

"If they had a character dressed up in the attire of a priest or a rabbi etc. and called him a priest or a rabbi would they also have to specifically say the character is a christian or a jew? Same goes here. He's dressed as a guru, a hindu teacher, goes unsaid."

Sorry, don't buy it. The still picture above looks like every hippie I've encountered since 1967. As for the film depicting the appropriate portrayal of your religion, that's not the purpose of this film's existence. It's satire, not devoted to ridiculing Hinduism but to ridiculing self- appointed "holy men" in general. The character could have easily been Jewish or Christian in this context, but isn't; more than likely because those portrayals are not unique.

In reality, I take no one's given faith lightly, based on the sanctity of personal belief. In comedy, I take everyone's faith lightly, because that's its purpose.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:54 PM on 03/31/2008

Okay, so perhaps its just that I've never seen a hippie of your generation. He does look like several of the older men I've seen wandering around holy places in India. Quite a few seem to hang around the larger temples. Guess it's about perspective.

I realize its satire. I've no problem with satire. I giggled my way through this movie when it was The Guru, and the "self appointed guru" was an out of work actor in the porn industry. My comment above was not to imply that this is some sort of documentary.

My point here is that there is nothing wrong with a community leader asking to view the film first. These "hippies" you speak of and the Hare Krishna movement (which if you've noticed is usually made up of disaffected members of the Judeo-Christian community) and the various god men rolling around or doing other stunt like things in India are the only portrayals you see of Hinduism.
This is a Mike Myers movie, and people will watch it. People generally believe that what they see is somehow true of whatever is being portrayed, especially within the overall vacuum of ignorance of other religions. So hey if the local community has to have info sessions or invite people into the temple and explain a few things, well its good to get a heads up. You know, before some ignorant fool decides to spray paint the place with swastikas or something?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 PM on 04/01/2008

"We're a bit tired of trying to explain to people how we're actually monotheistic"

Sorry, I must have missed this session. Can you explain again how Hindus are monotheistic? I thought that they were given as an example of a polytheistic religion.

Thanks

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:48 AM on 03/29/2008

You've probably never had the session. Even after I'd corrected my 9th grade global studies teacher about how what he and the book were saying were totally wrong, he went on teaching it anyway. But here is are a few sites that will give you a primer.

http://www.religionfacts.com/hinduism/beliefs/theism.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindu_views_on_monotheism

Hope it helps. And cautionary tale, just cause everyone says something, it doesn't mean it's true or even based in fact. :-p

Happy reading. :-)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:56 AM on 03/31/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in