Chris Matthews Really Plays Hardball, Demands New Guest Name Sources For Obama Claim

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

Huffington Post   |  Rachel Sklar and Danny Shea   |   March 28, 2008 06:33 PM


Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

Wow - talk about playing Hardball. Tonight Chris Matthews absolutely went off on guest Crystal McCreary Anthony, host of BET-J's "My Two Cents", demanding that she provide sources for her statement that Barack Obama had taken some heat today for anti-Semitic comments sourced to a surrogate. Well, she didn't exactly say it quite so succinctly. She talked about "senior Barack Obama advisors" who "were making some anti-Israel comments" and raised the question of "does Barack Obama have issues with Jewish people, does his campaign."

Exaggeration? Yes. Inelegant? Yes. Incorrect? Not really, insofar as Obama advisor General Tony McPeak has come under fire this week from Jewish groups for perceived anti-Israel comments blaming influential U.S. Jews for hindering a Middle East peace plan, and considering that yesterday new information surfaced about anti-Israel articles published in the newsletter of Trinity United Church of Christ, where Jeremiah Wright is pastor and Obama is a longtime parishioner. This was news that ran today and yesterday across mainstream news sources — including MSNBC.

So one would have thought that Matthews and other guests Chrystia Freeland of the FT and WaPo's Dana Milbank would have known what she was getting at. Instead, Matthews leapt on Anthony's comments, demanding that she source them, taking a flustered (and obviously less than prepared Anthony by surprise):

MATTHEWS: Who's pushing that?
ANTHONY: The blogophere.
MATTHEWS: No, but who's pushing it?
ANTHONY: Um, well, is it the Republicans pushing it?
MATTHEWS: You tell me. You just told us about it, you just put it on the television.
ANTHONY: People who have serious issues with Jeremiah Wright's comments that he made....
MATTHEWS: It didn't come from the Sandman, it didn't come from Jesus, it didn't come from anybody good, it came from someone meaning to do him harm - who was it?
ANTHONY (Stammers)
MATTHEWS: I like to know the source of these when you throw them on the air like this, Crystal - you're new to this show, don't put something on the air unless you give me a source for it - where did this come from?

Anthony agreed with Matthews and volunteered that she was sure she'd seen it in the New York Daily News, saying "it's out there, though. It won't be very difficult to find."

She's right — it's not difficult to find, it just takes a quickie Google, and she's also right that right-wing sources have definitely been on this. I am guessing that Milbank and Freeland knew what she was getting at, and probably Matthews' "Hardball" producers did too. Matthews probably should have been aware of breaking campaign news that day. We're thinking his response was a little extreme, especially his warning to her exactly what was expected of a guest on his show. Watch the video below and let us know your thoughts in comments .




Update: After reading through the comments, I just wanted to clarify that I didn't consider this issue to be so much about Obama as what I found to be odd about Matthews' response, because I watch a lot of Hardball and I have never seen him press someone for sources like that on a matter that was in the headlines that day. That said, when allegations of anti-Semitism are involved, everyone is (and ought to be) very, very careful, and as I mentioned above, Anthony misstated the matter and could not elaborate with facts when pressed to do so. Answering "the blogosphere" isn't acceptable as a response, though of course it's easy because somewhere in the blogosphere someone is always pushing something! What I found odd though was the fact that neither of the other guests jumped in to clarify (though Freeland tried to break in at one point) and that Matthews evinced no recognition of what she was referring to (and it was also sort of random when he noted that the comments didn't come from 'the Sandman, Jesus or anyone good' -- an odd sort of normative judgment to make. Also, he interrupted her answering his question when he said that). So that is what I found odd. But I do want to make clear that I agree that guests on these shows need to come in prepared and know what they're talking about. I suspect that Anthony will never, ever make that mistake again.



All Sorts Of Background:
Obama's "Jewish Problem" (?)
[Marc Ambinder - The Atlantic]
No, Marc, Obama Does Have A Jewish Problem [Hotline Blogometer]*
OBAMA: Not Kosher? [Hotline Blogometer]*
Top Obama adviser: NYC, Miami Jews 'the problem'
[WorldNet Daily]
Obama: I disagree with aide who blamed 'NY, Miami' for failed peace talks [Ha'aretz]
Clinton Camp Circulates Article that Accuses McPeak of Being Anti-Semitic [NPR]
Hillary's Team Crosses The Line [Salon]

*Note that these are round-ups - in this case, round-ups of conservative opinion on the topic.


 
 

Comments
458
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (10 pages total)



THE WAR IN IRAQ IS HAVING SERIOUS NEGATIVE EFFECTS ON OUR ECONOMY and those who voted for the war (i.e. hillary) should be to blame, in part, for the state of the US economy.

Look how the WAR IN IRAQ is affecting the US economy...

$3,000,000,000� 3 billion dollars PER WEEK! That is the amount America is paying for the Iraq War PER WEEK, money that should have been used here, at home.

Add to this:

Interest. We are financing the war with borrowed money (e.g. treasuries) that carries interest; so in actuality, the war is costing the United States MORE THAN 3 billion dollars PER WEEK.

Higher oil and energy prices. Instability in Iraq is adding roughly 30 dollars per barrel as a premium.

High utility bills. Due to high oil prices, demand shifts to other sources of energy - gas, coal, etc. - and greater demand will raise the equilibrium price of all sources of energy

Our dollar is weak and getting weaker. Since we have a trade deficit and is growing in large part to the rising cost of imported oil, the value of goods and services we import exceeds the value of goods we export. Everything we buy that's made abroad will cost more, Ceteris Peribus, because the dollar is weak.

Lastly, how do you think the world views our country since the argument was made for war? The evidence was weak and circumstantial, yet we rushed into war with Iraq thanks to hillary"s authorization.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:57 PM on 04/01/2008

I wish someoen would clarify for me does disagreeing with something Israrel does mean you are anti semetic. Much in the same way that criticizing America means you are Unpatriotic. I want to know where these ideas are coming from are they written in a book somewhere codified in laws so that we can read it and know whats accepatble and what isnt.

Carol

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:37 PM on 04/01/2008

Chris Matthews over at Obama TV... I mean CNN, should be
so demanding when someone says something negative about
Hillary Clinton.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:39 PM on 04/01/2008

Clarity is good and I applaud Chris for seeking it, I just think that man likes Obama just a little too much.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:12 PM on 04/01/2008

Actually he went after taht Texas State Senator to name a law that Obama had written or passed and basically ambushed the guy-- and at the same time gave the Hillary supporter a total pass as she talked about "aal the things" Hillary had done to help chldren without demanding some specific examples....I thought that was really lame and biased on his part in Hillary's favor --Hillary even quoted it in one of the debates-event hough it was totally misleading-- (just because one dumb Texan was ill prepared said nothing about Obama's legislative accomplishments -which actually dwarf any of Hillary's lame legislative efforts)

So it was good that he challenged this sort of half-a&&ed attempt to smear Obama by a clear pro Hillary "pundit"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:22 PM on 04/01/2008

Or maybe she was taling about Rev. Wright and his anti Semitic rants and raves, ya think???

Go Hillary!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:42 PM on 04/01/2008

I' don't agree with the idea of my country, right or wrong, I want my country to be right, which I
why I consider Bush to be such a disaster. I'm certainly not willing to go along with the idea
of Israel, right or wrong, and that does not make me an anti Semite, nor in my first example
unpatriotic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:09 PM on 04/01/2008

I heard he has a youtube clip out now called "Obama Boy" Our media suxs

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:57 PM on 04/01/2008

uht -oh someone was hurting his boyfriends reputation on TV?? and on his program no less.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:56 PM on 04/01/2008

I wonder why Hillary won't agree to a college tour show with Matthews? I guess she is waiting to see how Obama and McCain do. Maybe she might get tough questiions. or maybe she might get booed off the stage.
Maybe FOX news will do a Nursing Home tour......She should do well there. LOL

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:40 PM on 04/01/2008

Andrea MItchel:

from one old newsman to ... well... you know. Anyway... my point is: you need to grow a "set"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:22 PM on 04/01/2008

i've seen him do it many times. NOT a REAL BIG FAN of his, but he isn't wild about people just tossing crap around from a bad game of "telephone". if you are going to pitch a fastball like the one she did... attribution baby!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:16 PM on 04/01/2008

I LIKE his style.,... we, as a country, NEED a newsman that will not let bullshit go
undenied!!!!
If ALL newsjournalists were that dogged, we PROBABLY wouldn't be in HALF the mess we are NOW!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:37 PM on 04/01/2008

Perhaps ms. cma should invest a bit more time on her child and a Lot less time in "the blogosphere".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:56 PM on 04/01/2008

The story would be if the Lobby--that represents 30% of Jews and should be specifically identified as such in fairness to mainstream Jews--did not slime someone not under their total control. The story would be the media acting as if this isn't totally predictable, and treating the public like fools. But that is "free" speech as defined by corporate media.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:46 PM on 04/01/2008

We Americans too often can't get past the difference between opinions on foreign policy toward Israel and anti-Semitism

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:46 PM on 04/01/2008

I think Chris was right on the money. Especially knowing that Crystal McCreary Anthony's boss at BET (Black Entertainment Network) is one of the 20 Hillary 'rich fat cats" that sent the threatening letter to speaker Nancy Pilosi. Ms. Anthony was clearly trying to sling mud at Obama for her boss, and Chris called her on it. Good for him!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:27 PM on 04/01/2008

Matthews rules.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:19 PM on 04/01/2008

One time my brother in law went off on a rant about black people, and everyone just sat at the table and acted like it wasn't happening. We carved the turkey and ate the dressing and smiled at each other the way people do when someone they know makes a real dumb mistake. Barack Obama is not responsible for the racial and political views or statements of every person he has ever met, any more than I am responsible for my brother in law's stupid remarks. Rachel and Danny, you gotta spend your time more wisely or I won't bother reading your posts any more.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:49 PM on 04/01/2008

Gossiping about what is going on inside each campaign is a bit different than repeating an insinuation without facts of any kind of racial, ethnic, religious or other bias by any of the candidates or their campaigns. Chris Matthews is smart enough to know the difference, and tough enough to make it known. The fact that anyone wants to defend the guest that behaved this way is truly mindboggling.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:48 PM on 04/01/2008

The only time Matthews's balls are hard is when he listen to Obama speak...the rest of the time the best he can do is softballs especially when it comes to interviewing Obama surrogates.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 PM on 04/01/2008

And just how worn-out are YOUR kneepads from being Shrillary's personal
carpet-muncher?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:39 PM on 04/01/2008

conservatives divide....this is a conservative tactic...people will try and pin it on obama but the people arising all of these "notions" that the obama campaign is racist....which gets me cuz his campaign is for unity...but ahay.....just recognize its the conservatives people....they want us bickering like this

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:43 PM on 04/01/2008

God Bless Chris Mathews and MSNBC for being REAL journalists. All the time CNN and Fox let crap like this slide.

Unlike republicans and HRC supporters, I love the truth and credibility and will defend them above my candidate any day.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 PM on 04/01/2008

the show IS called hardball.
i like him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 AM on 04/01/2008

And so do I! You've got to have your facts lined up when you talk with Chris. Good going Chris. At least somebody is in the corner of goodness. Keith Olbermann is, too!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:17 PM on 04/01/2008

This NEW person was unaware of Chrisy's CRUSH on Obama.

Even Obama Girl knows about it.

Don't mess with his man - LMAO

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 AM on 04/01/2008

That's a bit unfair. Matthews pulled the same kind of thing on that Mayor from Texas, demanding that he back up what he was saying with details of Obama's voting record. The guy couldnt' and it was painful to watch. So here it was this brainless wonder's turn. Personally, I'd rather see "newswomen" like her off the air. So go at her, Chris. I'm tired of these vapid gas bags with about the brains of a newt, male and female alike.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:36 PM on 04/01/2008

Please state this correctly. Rev. Jeremiah Wright is no longer the pastor of Trinty. He retired a bit ago. There is a new pastor. You all keep going on and on about his statements and he is on a retirement vacation. Move on but move on with the correct statement. HE IS NO LONGER THE MINISTER AT TRINITY!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:36 AM on 04/01/2008

Oh, that's right - last month Mar 31st to be exact ... hmmm, controversy in the Obama campaign, spotlight on the Reverend, trouble in "River City" -- ohhhh, and - the - Reverend - resigns .... how convenient, no?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:08 PM on 04/01/2008

he retired. not resigned. and he retired exactly the day he had planned to retire for almost two years! god... what idiots!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:20 PM on 04/01/2008

That's right. And Obama also said he would have left the church had he heard about the comments before that happend. But they just refuse to let the story go, report on it honestly (a recent CNN story describes Wright as "senior pastor"), or put the comments in cultural context (when Mike Huckabee defended Wright, I knew for sure that there was more to this than politics-- identity or otherwise).

The whole thing is a smear and a distraction. Heaven forbid CNN or MSNBC should report on something a candidate actually did, or something that actually had an impact on Americans' lives, but then that would not make Clinton look very good, so they'll say anything to avoid it.

Here's how it works: every time anyone associated with Obama* _says_ anything controversial, they're alll over it, but when evidence surfaces that Clinton (the candidate herself), _did_ something to get NAFTA passed, they give it a 30 second mention and never touch it again. At least not until after the big primary in the state that was devastated by NAFTA.

*however remotely; if his second cousin's neighbor's hairdresser's dog crapped on a white person's lawn, it'd be on the front page

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:48 PM on 04/01/2008


I really, really, REALLY wish Andrea Mitchell had similarly "grilled" Clinton comm. dir. Howard Wolfson yesterday when he was on her MSNBC news show spouting the same old lies and distortions about Obama and the FL, MI primary mess. Instead, she allowed him to completely trash Obama with false statements about about how these states had held "fair" primary elections, and that they should be counted as such!

It was all completely false and misleading, and she said NOT ONE WORD to counter or question his claims. It showed a disgusting lack of any journalistic integrity, and was basically a 5 minute Clinton ad by Wolfson (of course that's his job, but what the HELL is Mitchell's job??).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:07 AM on 04/01/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (10 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in