Charges Dropped Against Marine In Haditha Case

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

ALLISON HOFFMAN | March 28, 2008 04:42 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Show your support.
Buzz this article up.
Marine Lance Cpl. Stephen B. Tatum arrives for his Article 32 Investigation Hearing at Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Base in San Diego County Monday, July 16, 2007. The Marine Corps is dropping all charges against Tatum who was accused of involuntary manslaughter in his squad's killing of 24 Iraqis in Haditha in 2005. The Marines dropped the case against Tatum Friday March 28, 2008 as jury selection was about to begin for his court-martial at Camp Pendleton. (AP Photo/Denis Poroy)

CAMP PENDLETON, Calif. — The Marine Corps dropped charges and gave full immunity Friday to a serviceman who was accused of involuntary manslaughter in a squad's killing of 24 Iraqis in Haditha in 2005.

The case against Lance Cpl. Stephen Tatum, 26, of Edmond, Okla., was dismissed as jury selection was about to begin for his court-martial. The government has been seeking Tatum's testimony against the squad leader, Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich of Meriden, Conn.

Prosecutors say Wuterich directed the assault immediately after a roadside bomb killed one Marine and wounded two others in a convoy. Wuterich and another Marine shot five men nearby before the squad leader ordered his men to clear homes with grenades and gunfire, killing unarmed civilians.

In February, Tatum received an order to testify against Wuterich and an unrequested immunity order that said anything to which he testified would not be used against him in his court-martial. On Friday, a new immunity order was issued, along with the dismissal of charges.

"Lance Cpl. Tatum will testify truthfully if called as a witness," said his attorney, Jack Zimmerman.

Tatum was relieved by the news and considered it an affirmation of his contention that he and his squadmates responded to a perceived threat as they had been trained to do, Zimmerman said.

"It has been a very happy morning," he said.

Tatum was the third enlisted Marine to have all charges dismissed.

Four enlisted Marines were initially charged with murder, and four officers were charged with failing to investigate the deaths. Over time the case has shrunk, including removal of all murder charges. Only two officers remain charged.

The highest-ranking defendant is Lt. Col. Jeffrey R. Chessani of Rangely, Colo., commander of the Camp Pendleton-based 3rd Battalion, 1st Marine Regiment at the time of the Nov. 19, 2005, Haditha killings. He is the highest-ranking officer to face a combat-related court-martial since the Vietnam War and is scheduled to face court-martial in April.

Chessani, accused of dereliction of duty and violation of a lawful order, has said he didn't order a formal investigation because he believed the deaths resulted from lawful combat.

His attorney said Tatum's dismissal gave additional credence to Chessani's claims.

"This is a house of cards, and it's all falling apart now," said Brian Rooney.

In addition to two counts of involuntary manslaughter, Tatum had been charged with reckless endangerment and aggravated assault.

Zimmerman said there was no agreement with the government before the dismissal.

"Absolutely, there is no deal," he said.

Tatum, who has been assigned to administrative duties, has extended his enlistment for an additional six months in order to remain available as a witness for the remaining scheduled courts-martial, Zimmerman said.

Camp Pendleton spokesman Lt. Col. Sean Gibson said the dismissal was signed by Lt. Gen. Samuel Helland, who currently oversees the Haditha prosecutions. The decision to refer Tatum's case to court-martial was made by Helland's predecessor, Lt. Gen. James Mattis, who overrode a finding that prosecutors didn't present enough evidence to prosecute Tatum.

Wuterich is the only enlisted man still facing prosecution. He faces nine counts of voluntary manslaughter, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment and obstruction of justice. There is no date set for his court-martial.

Wuterich's civilian defense attorney, Neal Puckett, contended that the Tatum dismissal showed the government has a poor case against his client.

"I think it's a further demonstration of how weak the government's case has become," Puckett said.

A judge has set an April court-martial date for 1st Lt. Andrew Grayson, of Springboro, Ohio, the second officer still facing charges. He is accused of making false official statements, obstruction of justice and attempting to fraudulently separate from the Marine Corps.


 
 

Comments
153
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

"It has been a very happy morning..."

And, after all, isn't that what we all want?

A very happy morning in BushWorld.

Bodies everywhere.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:54 AM on 03/31/2008

I read all these pseudo intellectual, liberal, whiny posts about what bad guys we are and it just makes me sick what a bunch of frauds you are. It's easy to stand behind a Marine or Ranger or Seal and poo-poo war while you sip your latte in the shade of protection their strength provides.
The problem in Iraq isn't that we are hurting and killing too many civilians... it's the opposite. Only in the last fifty years or so did we come up with the concept that hurting the population of the warring country is a bad thing.
The idea of a war is to destroy the enemy's will to fight. We need to treat Basra like Dresden and Bagdad like Berlin. The Iraqi people provide cover and material support for those who harm our soldiers. When the Iraqi people decide they've had enough, they'll chase the insurgents out of town.
I don't really care if this war is about oil or crispy cream doughnuts. The survival and prosperity of nations is about strength and power. In this world you either kick ass or get it kicked. If this war is about oil, then they'd just better freakin pony it up and be quick about it. If it's about doughnuts..., then I want chocolate covered, cream filled, otherwise I say we drop some daisy cutters on them till they get the point.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:41 AM on 03/30/2008

Exactly what type of idiot are you? The one that wrote this post or the one that wrote the one just below this one?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:18 PM on 03/30/2008

The comment below is a montage made up of comments that can be found in overwhelming abundance on every thread within Huffingtonpost. Based on your own posts, I am sure you can appreciate the sentiment expressed.

The comment above is from the perspective of a career soldier accustomed to loyalty, an appreciation of the natural order of the world and a practical, been-there-done-that, idea of what it takes to win a fight. You get in a brawl you don't slap the other guy and try not to break his glasses. You shove his glasses down his throat and bite his ear off. All the rest of this is just drivel from arm-chair warriors and peanut gallery sniping.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 AM on 03/31/2008

Well there you go skippy! In true liberal form, the absence of something intelligent to say has provoked from you an ad hominem response. I wrote the comment below for you because I knew it reflects your world view. The one above, for the rest of us. Note it was the one above that pissed you off, not the one below.

Now, if you'd like to test my assertion, suspend your hyper partisanship for a few minutes and start reading down these columns of comments. Where a commenter identifies them self as a progressive/lib/democrat, the comment is almost always, rank anti-American. You can rationalize the remarks all day long but it comes down to the same thing.

I have a perspective you lack. I'm a Canadian who served in your military because I believe in your country in a way that you could not possibly comprehend.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:31 AM on 03/31/2008

We are such a disgusting country. We do bad things to everyone, everywhere. It just makes me want to puke every time I see an Amerikkkan flag because I know that it represents a us. And what do we represent? We are fascist, nazi, dirty raping pigs that oppress everybody (especially brown people).
I used to be a repug and thought we were a noble country, a nation of mostly good people, trying to do the right thing, but after awhile I smartened up. Now that I am a dem I realize that the only good and nice people are the dems and that repugs are the scourge of the earth. I know that the democratic congress and senate had absolutely nothing to do with the war and claims that they authorized it, is a big fat repug lie.
So I say, let's get the word out... the more people in AmeriKKKa that we make understand how crappy this country is the better our chances are of having a democratic president. And you know what, if the Amerikkkan people reject our view... well, then we were right all along and they are just a bunch of stupid morons that don't understand the issues (like us).
Anyway, have a nice day. And as we are fond of saying here in San Fransisco "Piss on Amerikkka!!"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 AM on 03/30/2008

It would be interesting if the internet was around when this great country said enough is enough and nuked Japan. I'd like to see the lame anti-American rants you people would have posted. Enough is enough, let's nuke these neanderthals. These fanatics have no regard for life. No great loss. God Bless America!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:59 PM on 03/29/2008

There are those here who either do or will try to excuse this behavior. It doesn't work no matter how you turn or twist the truth. Even the Army has said that this was homicide. To the less enlightened and educated that's murder, cold blooded murder. You can use the old 'that happens in war', but it doesn't wash either. It doesn't jibe with the oath that a soldier takes and it doesn't match up with the code of conduct of the services. This is neither moral nor ethical and nothing will make it so. If the argument that war is sometimes necessary is used it does not mean that random killing is defensible. It would be akin to saying that negligent homicide is excused in a collision because you were drunk. If solders are properly trained, prepared, and led in the field by their officers then the chances of this type of travesty is minimalised. Also, and this is especially true in an all volunteer army, psychological testing is imperative to a mentally healthy army, as well as field analysis of soldiers mental health. If soldiers are treated as humans with limited stress points and fragile psyches then the odds of this happening is reduced, but if you look at soldiers as simply cannon fodder this will be common. I say support our troops in boot camp, in the field, and in retirement. And I say, end all war and have a strong DEFENSE.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:07 PM on 03/29/2008

I am a lefty war protestor.
"War is immoral" was the answer given by one who dropped an atom bomb. Those who decided to go to war are responsible for the crimes, not those whom we have sent into the inferno.
War is chaos, do not expect to impose order on chaos.
Support the troops, bring them home.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:00 PM on 03/29/2008

Part 2 of 2

Or how about the US kidnapping and holding for ransom the wife and daughter of Izzat ibrahim Al Douri, who was one of Saddam's right hand men. They took them "into custody" without charges, and never claiming they'd done anything wrong, and then held them while they demanded that al Douri give himself up. This is hostage taking, aka kidnapping, and in this country the maximum penalty for this sort of thing is DEATH. The US did this many times.

The wife and daughter were sent to Abu Ghraib, and haven't been seen or heard from since. I personally wrote to Human Rights Watch about them, and no one knows what became of them. I can tell you, odds are good they were raped, tortured and murdered in that US run Concentration Camp. They were disappeared. And the news media did NOTHING.

The same media that protected Prescott Bush from scrutiny during his 1951 run for the US Senate...which he won. He served two full terms. This man, and his business partners, had their financial assets seized in Oct. 1942 for violating the Trading With The Enemy Act. How did he manage, less than ten years later to "win" a Senate seat? By owning the media...at least his business partners did, and they covered his ass so he could go to work for them in the Senate.

How blatant does this shit have to get before Americans will wake up and smell the nightmare?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:54 PM on 03/29/2008

Part 1 of 2

DOD protects it's own. It should however, be DOW...Department of War, not DEFENSE!!! Defense has nothing to do with anything they do.

How many atrocities have come and gone with nary a word from the US "liberal" media? God only knows, cause DOD moves on. One I can think of was a wedding party far out in the desert, where video footage showed it was a WEDDING PARTY, replete with dancing and frivolity and celebration for the newly married couple...who were then slaughtered by Apache gunships. The attack didn't manage to kill everyone, but it did kill scores of children and the bride and groom and their families. "Bad people have parties too," was all the swine Brig Gen Mark Kimmitt had to say about that ...the DOD barking pig at the press conference that proudly announced the slaughter of at least 40 people in the wedding party. THERE HAS BEEN NO FOLLOW-UP ON THIS CASE. The news media reported it, and moved on and never looked back. And DOD? Yahh...sure they looked into it. NOT.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:47 PM on 03/29/2008

I do support the troops,I don't support killing innocent civilians.That being said,if somebody got in the line of fire it would be an accident,but over twenty dead............?I guess it's possible,but if it were,why not tell us what happened.....................now?I hate to say it but we all know there are innocents dying there all the time,these just happened to much in the open to sweep under the rug.We all know it's the person who dispatched these soldiers that's to blame but he'll never have to answer for anything.The name of the game is staying alive,I won't pass judgement on these soldiers,I wasn't there.I do know there will be some very damaged people coming back though and the POTUS is trying as hard as possible to cut VA benefits,discharging troops, days before they have their healthcare benefits locked in.I wonder if he has a sticker on his car?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:16 PM on 03/29/2008

"...Wuterich and another Marine shot five men nearby before the squad leader ordered his men to clear homes with grenades and gunfire, killing unarmed civilians."

Please note the sanitized language. The American media, even those liberal inclined, simple can't call America what it is.

ALLISON HOFFMAN probably has a good ostensible and ulterior reason for the writing style.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:05 PM on 03/29/2008

The American media, even those liberal inclined
----------
That's a joke if I ever read one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:38 PM on 03/29/2008

Its easy to condem without bullets flying by your head.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:54 PM on 03/29/2008

Yes, ask the children in the homes in Haditha about bullets flying by their heads.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:27 PM on 03/31/2008

Had we not invaded a country that never did us any harm, there wouldn't be any bullets flying. Besides, killing of innocent civilians is murder, regardless.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:40 PM on 03/29/2008

Invasion
Occupation
Escalation

Lets keep the truth and words correct folks.

Blackwater gets to kill at will ... why not our troops? We are there for the oil ... the citizens just keep getting in the way is all. Plus, it's so much easier and safer to kill unarmed children and woman afterall. As long as they keep the pictures off our TVs, anything goes. Murdering for America, the NeoCons and Jesus.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:22 PM on 03/29/2008

Very well said ... as sad and horrific as the truth is, you said it very clearly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:28 PM on 03/29/2008

Okinawa's rapists (dozens of cases.)
Italian Alps' ski gondola murderers.
Afghanistan's Canadian and British troop killers.
Iraq's Italian secret agent murderer.

All acquitted.

American military justice is nothing more than an oxymoron.
American troops can rape and murder the innocent at will and nothing will be done to them.
The US is not a signatory of the World Court, so that their military thugs can be shielded from war crimes charges.
The US reinforces its status as a world's pariah.
Kharma will be a bitch.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:08 PM on 03/29/2008

Oh, boy amanda is at it again-lying up a storm. First, there are cases of military rape cases in Japan that have been tried and found guilty and are currently rotting in prison. The pilots in the gondola incident weren't murders, you dolt. It was an accident still 2 went to jail for their actions that contributed to it. In the Canadian incident, the Canadians were shooting live rounds for practice-some in the air as US planes flew overhead, they admitted so in court. Unfortunate but not the brightest thing to do in a war zone. And, the Italian secret agent muderer, as you so ignorantly put it, is complete bunk. The whole story is complete bunk. Nobody went to jail for that because the story was a LIE. Like most of your posts.

The World Court is the true kangaroo court and the US will never be a party to it, thank god.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:33 PM on 03/29/2008

All military courts are kanagaroo courts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:41 PM on 03/29/2008

Military courts allow weight to extenuation and mitigation in determining guilt.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:51 AM on 03/30/2008

reading all these lefty posts sort of throws the notion of "supporting the troops" into the bin of lies of the left, right next to Alger HIss, etc.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:31 PM on 03/29/2008

So that's why all those Germans supported Hitler....it was the troop thing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:12 PM on 03/29/2008

oh, dear! let me get my lapel pin and BuyBull lest I be branded UnPatriotic. You know, you can speak against any American policy and still be Patriotic. You can speak against the war and the way it is being handled and still be supportive of the Troops. You get that, Kundera, don't you?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:35 PM on 03/29/2008

There are good soldiers and bad ones, no different than teachers, mail carriers or doctors.

The question is what does our military system create? Good ones or bad ones?

http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/latestnews/index.php?id=11203

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:14 PM on 03/29/2008

Leave it to depraved right-wingers to call a rapist and child killer a "hero"...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:12 PM on 03/29/2008


Somehow the notion that these are lefty posts in a misnomer. Why not people who have
a moral code that does not condone what America does to the rest of the world?

Murder is murder and there are no two ways about it.

This so-called war is about murder and thievery. No one should support the president and the
people that voted for it nor those that execute it. From George Bush the lesser to the generals
and soldiers to supporters of this massacre, they are all war criminals.

Each and every God Damned one of them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:48 PM on 03/29/2008

The reason that your patriotism and support for the troops is questioned is because you view America on the whole, as evil. Well, guess what. Troops swear an oath to defend this nation and the Constitution-which by the way specifies the terms under which any commander-in-chief may use the military. If you think America is evil, on the whole, in its use of force, how can you morally support the troops!? You can't. And you don't.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:27 PM on 03/29/2008

You're right, the troops do, in fact, swear an oath on the CONSTITUTION! However, the constitution has NOTHING to say about this type of action! Please go back and re-read it, so that you will understand what the hell you're talking about!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:09 AM on 04/01/2008

reading all these lefty posts sort of throws the notion of "supporting the troops" into the bin of lies..
----------
But, luckily, only in the minds of the utterly depraved like you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:47 PM on 03/29/2008

When did reasoned questioning become 'lefty?'

I guess it happened when our schools went to crap, and people got their edu-macation from Lush Rimbaugh.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:34 PM on 03/29/2008

Yawohl, mein Führer!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 PM on 03/29/2008

That's a sweet plea-bargain.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 PM on 03/29/2008

If Blackwater can have immunity then why not our solders. This whole debacle is all this Administrations and the GOP fault.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:45 PM on 03/29/2008

Bingo, now on to The Hague, for the real trials!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:49 PM on 03/29/2008

thank you! you're exactly right. Our troops are just as victimized as the rest of us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:36 PM on 03/29/2008

Our troops aren't victims. You, probably.