Wall Street Journal Ramps Up Political Coverage

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com

Washington Post   |  Howard Kurtz   |   March 31, 2008 01:09 AM


Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

NEW YORK -- The Federal Reserve's effort to rescue Bear Stearns from imminent collapse was a classic Wall Street Journal story, stripped across the top of the front page amid saturation coverage in the paper.

But just below that was a lengthy piece about Barack Obama's national finance chairman, the "petite billionaire" Penny Pritzker, and a dispatch on violent protests in Tibet.

In the four months since Rupert Murdoch took over the nation's leading financial newspaper, the front page has assumed a harder edge, particularly on politics, establishing the Journal as a high-profile player in the presidential campaign.

Murdoch is "clearly interested in challenging the journalistic establishment," says Robert Thomson, the former editor of Murdoch's Times of London, in his first public comments as Journal publisher. "I think American journalism has some soul-searching to do. American newspapers generally have kept up poorly with change. . . . If there's a presumption that what you might call New York Times journalism is the pinnacle of our profession, the profession is in some difficulty."

Read the whole story here.


 
 

Comments
3
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- Oldbuck See Profile I'm a Fan of Oldbuck

There was a time when I would trust the financial view s of the Wall Street Journal, But not now it is just another rag of Murdochs which you could not pay me to read. Just like if Fox was the last TV out let left I would just throw the damp TV out the door.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:36 PM on 03/31/2008
- MajorKong See Profile I'm a Fan of MajorKong

The WSJ used to be a good newspaper. Even though their editorial page was somewhere to the right of Atilla the Hun it didn't usually spill over into their news coverage. I suspect it will soon be just like the other Murdoch papers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 AM on 03/31/2008
- xrepublican See Profile I'm a Fan of xrepublican

Big surprise there..... Murdoch is hardly 'neutral' when it comes to politics.......

The WSJ was always uber-Republican, but you can expect new extremes with this change in ownership...... but most readers aren't stupid. They're out to make money. And it's pretty clear that Bush has ben a disaster for the economy - excepting a very narrow group of select companies that have benefitted......

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:22 AM on 03/31/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 

 

 Site  Web ask.com