Report: Lawmakers Have Nearly $200M Invested In Companies Doing Defense-Related Work

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

ANNE FLAHERTY | April 3, 2008 09:00 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

WASHINGTON — Members of Congress have as much as $196 million collectively invested in companies doing business with the Defense Department, earning millions since the onset of the Iraq war, according to a study by a nonpartisan research group.

Not all the companies in which lawmakers invested are typical defense contractors. Corporations such as PepsiCo, IBM, Microsoft and Johnson & Johnson have at one point received defense-related contracts, notes the report by the Washington-based Center for Responsive Politics.

The center's review of lawmakers' 2006 financial disclosure statements suggests that members' holdings could pose a conflict of interest as they decide the fate of Iraq war spending. Several members earning money from these contractors have plum committee or leadership assignments, including Democratic Sen. John Kerry, independent Sen. Joseph Lieberman and House Republican Whip Roy Blunt.

The study found that more Republicans than Democrats hold stock in defense companies, but that the Democrats who are invested had significantly more money at stake. In 2006, for example, Democrats held at least $3.7 million in military-related investments, compared to Republican investments of $577,500.

Overall, 151 members hold investments worth $78.7 million to $195.5 million in companies that receive defense contracts that are worth at least $5 million. These investments earned them anywhere between $15.8 million and $62 million between 2004 and 2006, the center concludes.

It is unclear how many members still hold these investments and exactly how much money has been made. Disclosure reports for 2007 aren't due until this May. Also, members are required to report only a general range of their holdings.

According to the report, presidential hopefuls Barack Obama and John McCain did not report any defense-related holdings on their filings; Hillary Rodham Clinton did note holdings in such companies as Honeywell, Boeing and Raytheon, but sold the stock in May 2007. All three candidates are members of the Senate.

Earning dividends from companies tied to the military "could be problematic" for lawmakers who oversee defense policy and budgeting, noted the center's Lindsay Renick Mayer. Avoiding every company with a military contract, however, would not be easy for an investor.

"So common are these companies, both as personal investments and as defense contractors, it would appear difficult to build a diverse blue-chip stock portfolio without at least some of them," Mayer wrote

Kerry, D-Mass., a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, is identified as earning the most _ at least $2.6 million between 2004 and 2006 from investments worth up to $38.2 million.

Spokesman David Wade said Kerry, who staunchly opposes the war in Iraq, is one of many beneficiaries of family trusts that he doesn't control. Wade also noted that Kerry does not sit on the Appropriations Committee, which has direct control of the defense budget.

"He has a 24-year Senate record of working and voting in the best interests of our men and women in the military, not of any defense contractors," Wade said.

Lieberman, I-Conn., chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee and a member of the Armed Services Committee, held a considerably smaller share at $51,000. A spokesman said the senator, who supports continued operations in Iraq, is "careful to make his policy decisions based only on what is best for the country."

A spokesman for Blunt, R-Mo., a senior member of House GOP leadership who held at least $15,000 in Lockheed Martin stock in 2006, said the insinuation that lawmakers' votes might be affected by their portfolios is "offensive." Like Lieberman, Blunt has been a fierce supporter of the war.

"I don't pretend to speak for other offices, but I am fairly certain that no member would consider their personal finances when voting on issues as important as sending our men and women in uniform into harm's way," said Blunt spokesman Nick Simpson. The Lockheed Martin stock was given to Blunt's wife by her mother, he said.

___

On the Net:

Center for Responsive Politics' Capital Eye:

http://www.capitaleye.org/inside.asp?ID342


 
 

Comments
36
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

Looks like you did some real investigative reporting. I note that DICK Cheney isn't mentioned. Why? Haliburton/KBR made a killing(no pun). Let's see, He was Secretary of Defense under Bush I. Then heads up Haliburton. Then is VP. Haliburton/KBR get no bid contracts. Looks like you missed the big fish in the pond. That doesn't even count Carlyle

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:59 AM on 04/04/2008

John McCain wants to build up our military. He can only achieve this by bringing back the draft.

Are you ready for your children to die or be crippled for life in Iraq ?

The Exxon Forever War must go on at taxpayer expense, while Exxon reap the profits.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:53 AM on 04/04/2008

Hillary holds stock in Honeywell, Boeing and Raytheon - All three of these corporations are on Hillary's list of earmark recipients, as well as on the list of "campaign contributions from earmark recipients."


Conflict of interest?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 AM on 04/04/2008

Now we know why we are still in IRAQ, these crooks are making money off the backs of our troops. How sad and pathetic. Once America finds out which lawmaker(s) Dem or Repug they should vote them out of office in public humiliation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:22 AM on 04/04/2008

Just One More Reason To Vote For Barack Obama !

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:08 AM on 04/04/2008

They say they are busy, often trying to raise funds so they can run again - like on a treadmill, run, raise fund, run..., so when do they find time to make investments. Maybe they just don't spend much time working with all the fund raising, running and deciding on investments?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:47 AM on 04/04/2008

"Kerry, D-Mass., a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, is identified as earning the most _ at least $2.6 million between 2004 and 2006 from investments worth up to $38.2 million."

Gee....to think he almost president. Or at least he would have been had he not lost by so much.

Had he been elected president, he would be worth a lot more now. It must be nice to marry money....twice.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:58 AM on 04/04/2008

What will we find in Hillary's Tax Return or are the war profits in Bill's?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:09 AM on 04/04/2008

The proper name for it is Insider Trading, but none will be held accountable.
and social security is a pyramid scheme, witch none of them pay into.
Its time for term limmits in congress... kick out the pro. politician and put the people back in charge.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:48 PM on 04/03/2008

I thought insider trading was illegal? But wait, they are in congress and everyting congress does is legal so it must be ok. Throw all the bastards out and start over again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:58 AM on 04/04/2008

I'm shocked, SHOCKED, that lawmakers would vote for war simply so that the defense contractors, which they have stocks in, can make a ton on money!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:43 PM on 04/03/2008

Most state government retirement funds are heavily invested in "defense" contractor stocks.

Due to the patriot act, it is mandatory for schools to allow the Pentagon to keep records of all middle school and high school age children to facilitate recruiting. You have to opt out of this list for your children to not be subject to predatory recruiters.

The United States of America is waging a war of aggression and occupation.

Welcome to the machine.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 PM on 04/03/2008

Yes, and if a student opts out the penalties include not being able to walk across the stage at graduation or have your photo in the yearbook. That is a little known part of the No child Left Behind act. Big Brother knows how to inflict added pain.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:58 AM on 04/04/2008

WTF ! Are You Kidding Me? Tell Me where to find this info Please!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:14 AM on 04/04/2008

Oh this is easy! Two Choices ... Divest or Resign ... Simple.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 PM on 04/03/2008

i've got a third. Impeachment.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:59 AM on 04/04/2008

Is corporate personhood truly the best we can hope for in a "free" society? Is this the ultimate fruition of Adam Smith's free market and John Calvin's mindless work ethic? Can we do no better than this?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:19 PM on 04/03/2008

They used to have a word for this kind of government: Fascism.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:17 PM on 04/03/2008

You can bet "Impeachment off the Table" Nancy Pelosi has her dirty little hand in the pot. Dirty little Bush Enabler that one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:15 PM on 04/03/2008


Every body is in on it and That is no surprise.

After the loss of Vietnam, the MIC invested

heavily in the MSM and Congress so that

the next war lasted much longer, allowing

even greater opportunities for profiteering.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 PM on 04/03/2008

You are right, but I take exception to calling Vietnam a "loss" in this case, since i think the stock of Bell Helicopter and other similar defense contractors did quite well.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:17 PM on 04/03/2008

Duh! Why else would Congress continue unlimited funding? So long as they prolong the war, they get richer, and do not care the war has endangered us more than any terrorist group could imagine:
We've lost Constitutional rights and freedoms.
We're $9.35-trillion in debt, much of this note owned by the Chinese, whom we dare not offend, so they can continue unfair trade practices, sell dangerous toys and defective goods to our public.
The military is stretched beyond its capabilities, and we have no troops or equipment to answer the call should any crisis erupt.
Our national guards troops and equipment are engaged, so when disasters happen at home, we can't rescue people, secure order or take care of our own public and cities.
While law-abiding, tax-paying citizens are under surveillance (should they voice objections to the war), our ports, borders and airports are porous, vulnerable and easy to penetrate by anyone with anything they want to bring in.
While we're preoccupied in Iraq, Al-Qaeda and Bin-Laden are recruiting, regrouping, refortifying and refinancing themselves with help from warlords and people (without leadership in Afghanistan), and a complicit government in Pakistan.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:58 PM on 04/03/2008

can someone please tell me how to post a link on this site?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:58 PM on 04/03/2008

Please go to OpEdNews.com and look for "Privatizing War" by Francis Ferguson.

I had no idea........

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:22 PM on 04/03/2008

When are people going to wake up, this WAR was done to make people in the parties rich, too take over the oil rich country of Iraq, but oh my slap a flag pin on them and put the troops behind them in a photo shoot and paint anyone who questions their wisdom as UNPATRIOTIC. They need to be on trial in the Hague, starting with Bush/Cheney/Rummy/Rice/Wolfawitz/Bremmer and so on.Throw Lie=berman and Kerry on there too. What a sad bunch of murderers and thieves we have running our government.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 PM on 04/03/2008

duh.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:44 PM on 04/03/2008

This is the reason why we foreigners distrust America.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 PM on 04/03/2008

And still people will believe politicians who say they want the war to end. These AzzClowns are all whores and they make all the policies based on 2 things only. What will bring them the most money and power.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:33 PM on 04/03/2008

As I have always said:

Dead Troops = Halliburton Profits = Money in Dick Cheney's Bloody Pockets.

It is no secret many, many other politicians are making a killing - if you will - off the deaths of America's young troops.

Its called the Military Industrial Complex - Lies, killing, insanity - all for profit.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:30 PM on 04/03/2008

Follow...........................the ...............................money................................trail.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:25 PM on 04/03/2008

elloco........REV. WRIGHT WAS RIGHT ON......

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:45 PM on 04/03/2008

god damn right he is

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:18 PM on 04/03/2008

How about their family members, friends, business associates, and anyone else whom they might favor with a good stock/investment tip? They may be more deeply invested in the never-ending Iraqi crusades than indicated by this story.

Of course a good investment is a good investment.

If these people are actively violating their conflict of interest in owning these Defense investments through acts of subjective legislation and purposeful warmongering, they are indeed a vile, disgusting bunch of the lowest stripe. The cynical sure feel vindicated reading stories like this.

Sometimes, when something like this starts to ring true, I'm not sure how far off Rev. Wright was, really. Sigh.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:17 PM on 04/03/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in