Clinton's Rendell: There's 50% About Obama We Don't Know

If my chief strategist was on the Columbian government's payroll I'd be quieter and hush my surrogates too.

What we know about Rendell: He insulted all of his white constituents in Pennsylvania by implying that they are ignorant bigots, not ready to vote for Obama. I think the people of Pennsylvania are smarter than he thinks.

Link to court filings in the Peter Paul vs. Clinton lawsuit:

Go to www.lasuperiorcourt.org (Los Angeles Superior Court) and look in the CIVIL Column, then Click on CASE SUMMARIES then enter these numbers in the box BC304174.

Next court date I believe is April 24th.

Reading the article, it looks as though Rendell is attempting to whitewash (not Whitewater) Hillary by bringing up largely discredited or minimalized stories about Obama. Obviously if there were serious issues with Obama, the Clinton's well known and highly regarded attack machine would have gone after them. This seems a slightly lame attempt to grasp at straws hoping to bundle enough to keep the Clinton Campaign alive a while longer.

http://rezkowatch.blogspot.com/

For folks who would like to know about Obama.

MSNBC and NBC both owned by General Electric who is the largest corporation on the planet is promoting Obama - possibly to have him take a dive in the general election against McCain. Or, possibly because Obama is supporting nuclear energy and voted consistently on this. General Electric controls all of the nuclear plants in american, and many throughout the world.

General Electric is rapidly buying up from it's competitors all alternative sources of energy such as coal, wind, and solar.

Obama would be one more candidate owned by an energy company. Why else would a complete unknown with absolutely no presidential experience be allowed so much media press positioning him to be the President.

Americans are being had again.

Correction: I meant "controversial in their entirety".

A comment that there's 50% we don't know is illogical and pure spin. You can't attach a percentage to something you don't know. And if somehow you could know what you don't know in order to attach a percentage to it, the statement would still be false! Because now you know! Parse it out and you've gotta love this whirlpool of nonsense.

Decisions need to be made on what is known instead of on the specter of what isn't. To me, this is pure garbage played by the weak hand.

I'm extremely concerned about a campaign that plays the boogie man around every corner. That basically tells me there's no substance to build on within the Clinton camp. This is all one big, self-serving smokescreen.

Oh ED you sad man, we already know what we need to know about you and your Candiate, billary, and it's enough that many people realize she's a liar and would sell her own family to be in the WH.

Ed Rendell.

Joe Scarborough.

Robert Byrd.

Pat Buchanan.

Rush Limbaugh.

These "gentlemen" are ALL of similar ilk and beliefs. Ethnic diversity is certainly not one of them, regardless of qulifications.

http://www.hillcap.org
While Hillary Clinton battles Barack Obama on the campaign trail, a judge in Los Angeles is quietly preparing to set a trial date in a $17 million fraud suit that aims to expose an alleged culture of widespread corruption by the Clintons and the Democratic Party.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=56868

And there is a 100% of Hillary which we shouldn't trust.


I'm sorry, but you Hillary supporters are a bunch of idiots for trying to down play Hillary's huge and stupid lie! How overly sympathetic do you have to be to say that her bold faced lie was a misstatement? It was no exaggeration! An exaggeration is something that has some truth to it.

It boggles my mind that you Hillary supporters are trying to play this lightly and still support her after all this. If she is dumb enough to lie about something so easily provable, how the hell are you expected to believe her, possibly for something so important or vital and even earth shattering if she were to be in office??

Quick! Give me a list of all the things you don't know you don't know!

Yeah.

And just HOW does Rendell know that it is 50% and not 10%? If there are things you don't know about a person, then you CANNOT POSSIBLE be able to know the percentage that you don't know.

Rendell is an idiot!

If Hillary had attended a church for 20 years with a Reverand preaching white supremacy and anti government rhetoric from the pulpit - and adopted that pastor as her mentor - do you really imagine anyone would consider her Presidential material?