Princess Diana Killed By Reckless Driver And Paparazzi, Rules Jury

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

ROBERT BARR | April 7, 2008 09:33 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Show your support.
Buzz this article up.
In this image made available Tuesday Oct. 2, 2007, from evidence presented at the inquest into the death of Diana Princes of Wales and Dodi Al Fayed. The head of Diana Princess of Wales, in the rear seat, her bodyguard Trevor Rees left, and driver Henri Paul are seen shortly before the car crash that killed Diana, her companion Dodi Fayed and the driver in Paris Aug. 31, 1997. A coroner's jury in London Monday April 7, 2008 has ruled that Princess Diana and boyfriend Dodi Fayed were unlawfully killed through the reckless actions of their driver and the paparazzi in 1997. The jury had been told that a verdict of unlawful killing would mean that they believe the reckless behavior of their driver Henri Paul; and photographers amounts to manslaughter. It was the most serious verdict available to them Monday. .(AP Photo/H.M. Coroner, HO)

LONDON — A coroner's jury returned the most serious verdict within its power Monday, ruling that Princess Diana and her boyfriend were unlawfully killed because their driver and pursuing paparazzi were reckless _ behavior tantamount to manslaughter.

Criminal charges were unlikely, however, because the incident happened in France outside the jurisdiction of British authorities.

Rejecting claims by the father of Diana's boyfriend, Dodi Fayed, that the couple were murdered, the jury concluded after six months of testimony they were victims of reckless speed by their drinking chauffeur and the pack of photographers chasing after them in Paris in 1997.

"The verdict is unlawful killing, grossly negligent driving of the following vehicles and of the Mercedes" carrying the couple, the jury foreman announced.

That was the verdict of nine of the 11 jurors. There was no indication why there were two dissenters.

All 11 agreed that the car slamming head-on into a concrete pillar rather than striking the wall on the other side was a key factor in their deaths. The jury also faulted Diana and Fayed for not buckling their seat belts.

But jurors laid the heaviest blame on the couple's driver, Henri Paul, who had been drinking shortly before the high-speed crash that killed all three in a Paris underpass on Aug. 31, 1997, and on the paparazzi following them.

Diana's sons, Princes William and Harry, issued a statement expressing support for the verdict and thanking the jurors for their long work.

"We agree with their verdicts, and are both hugely grateful to each and every one of them for the forbearance they have shown in accepting such significant disruption to their lives over the past six months," the princes said.

Fayed's wealthy father, Mohamed Al Fayed, declared that the jury got it wrong. "The most important thing is, it is murder," he said as he left the Royal Courts of Justice.

The coroner, Lord Justice Scott Baker, had instructed the jury there was no proof whatever for Al Fayed's contention that the couple were victims of a murder plot orchestrated by Prince Philip and carried out by British secret agents.

John Stevens, the former chief of London's Metropolitan Police, said the verdicts vindicated the force's two-year investigation.

"What they have said, of course, is that the deaths were caused by Henri Paul and also by the paparazzi," Stevens said. "If you read the report, you will see that's exactly what we said."

Because the accident happened in France, no British charges can be laid against the photographers.

Nine were charged with manslaughter in France, but the charges were thrown out in 2002. Three photographers _ Jacques Langevin, Christian Martinez and Fabrice Chassery _ were convicted of invasion of privacy for taking pictures of the couple and were each fined one euro in 2006.

The couple's deaths came six weeks after romance bloomed while Diana and her two sons were guests of Mohamed Al Fayed in southern France.

In following weeks, Diana and Dodi Fayed shared sea cruises, dinners in Paris, even a helicopter trip in England to visit a medium trusted by Diana. Fayed showered Diana with lavish gifts, including a ring that may or may not have been intended to seal an engagement.

When the couple flew to Paris on Aug. 30, 1997, they were pursued from the airport by paparazzi, who then swarmed outside the Ritz Hotel _ owned by Mohamed Al Fayed.

Hoping to shake off the paparazzi, Dodi Fayed agreed to a plan to sneak out the back way in a single car. At least three photographers weren't fooled, and the chase was on.

Fayed died instantly when the Mercedes, traveling more than 60 mph, slammed into a concrete pillar in the Alma underpass at 12:22 a.m. Medics initially thought Diana would survive her severe injuries, but she died at Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital around 4 a.m. Only Diana's bodyguard, Trevor Rees, lived.

French police announced a day after the crash that tests on Paul's blood showed his blood-alcohol level was three times over the national drunk-driving standard.

The finding was disputed, and British experts said the French documentation could have been better. But even Al Fayed's security chief discovered Paul had downed two double Ricards _ equivalent to four shots of whiskey _ in the hours before taking the wheel.

Al Fayed, who also owns Harrod's department store in London, has spent lavishly to investigate the crash and propound his theory of a royal plot against the couple.

British taxpayers have paid a heavy price as well. The expense of the inquest, including lawyers and staff assisting the coroner, has passed $6 million, and the Metropolitan Police says it spent $16 million on its two-year investigation.

Those totals don't include the cost of lawyers who represented the London police and the Secret Intelligence Service during the inquest.

John Loughrey, who painted the names of Dodi and Diana on his face before attending the inquest every day, gave the verdict his approval.

"I'm happy for Diana, now she can rest in peace," he said.

But it may not be over. Al Fayed's aides weren't ruling out an appeal, perhaps arguing that the coroner erred in his instructions to the jury or in conduct of the proceedings.

"That is a very difficult route, but we are keeping all our options open," said Al Fayed's spokesman, Michael Cole.

___

On the Net:

Inquest transcripts, evidence: http://www.scottbaker-inquests.gov.uk

Police report: http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Nl1/Newsroom/DG_065122

Mohamed Al Fayed: http://www.alfayed.com

 
 

Comments
65
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

When did this happen? What terrible news. Charles must be devastated.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:36 AM on 04/08/2008

How about Mr. Dodi (before he tells Monsieur Henri to loose the paparezzi) tells his girlfriend to "Fasten your seat belt It's going to be a bumpy ride".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:56 AM on 04/08/2008

Mohamed Al Fayed is responsible for the deaths. He hired a drunk as a driver and the accident was a direct consequence. He should be grateful that Will and Harry did not launch a wrongful death suit against him.
Al Fayed has always been a man of low character. He initially made his money working for his brother-in-law , a notorious arms dealer. He was also caught trying to fast track his UK citizenship by bribing MPs to ask questions in the House of Commons. As a result, he has lost the chance to become a citizen. This is what fuels this vindictive, low-life's rage.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:15 AM on 04/08/2008

Every normal, logical person knows that she was murdered. Don't you get tired of being treated as if you are stupid? Everybody knows that the press says what they are told to say. The big corporate money THINK they can manufacture the truth. How's that for arrogance?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:23 PM on 04/07/2008

The following issues remain unanswered:

6. Whether any bright or flashing lights contributed to or caused the collision and, if so, their source.

7. Whose decision it was that the Princess of Wales and Dodi Fayed should leave from the rear entrance to the Ritz and that Henri Paul should drive the vehicle.

8. Henri Paul's movements between 7pm and 10pm on August 30, 1997.

9. The explanation for the large amount of money in Henri Paul's possession on August 30, 1997 and in his bank account.

10. Whether photographer James Andanson was in Paris on the night of the collision.

11. Whether the Princess's life would have been saved if she had reached hospital sooner or if her medical treatment had been different. (It took 2 hours to get her to a hopspital in Paris.)

12. Whether Princess Diana was pregnant.

13. Whether the Princess and Dodi Fayed were about to announce their engagement.

14. Whether, and if so in what circumstances, Diana feared for her life.

16. The circumstances in which the Princess's body was embalmed.

17. Whether the evidence of ex-spy Richard Tomlinson throws any light on the collision.

18. Whether the British or any other security services had any involvement in the collision.

19. Whether there was anything sinister about burglaries at two photographic agencies in the days after the crash.

20. Whether correspondence belonging to the Princess (including some from the Duke of Edinburgh) has disappeared, and if so, the circumstances.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:49 PM on 04/07/2008

I know it seems a bit of a drag, but if you had bothered to follow the 6 month inquest you would know that every one of these points were answered. Of course that doesn't satisfy some who choose to maintain fanciful theories for entertainment value, or to sell newspapers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:14 AM on 04/08/2008

So the British (so called) justice system was going to come down with a guilty verdict against anybody in the Royal family??? Not Bloody Likely!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:43 PM on 04/07/2008

Unlike you, obviously, the British justice system requires EVIDENCE to convict.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:34 AM on 04/08/2008

Logic plays no part with the anglophobic Revere, does it little Paulie? Just because you got banned with one moniker doesn't mean we don't know who you are.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:23 AM on 04/08/2008

Mohammad Fayed is in an impossible situation: he cannot admit that it was his own negligence (hiring an alocholic as his chauffeur) that killed his son and his son's girlfriend. In order to avoid accepting this, he has concocted a conspiracy fantasy. It is incredibly sad, and if he had any sense he'd let it go.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 PM on 04/07/2008

Can't Huffpo find a more appropriate section to place this item than the entertainment section? Even the living or politics section would make more sense.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:08 PM on 04/07/2008

I think all paparazzi are absolute scum. The ones who chased Diana that night especially so. If I had had my mother killed in the circumstances Diana was, and I had the wealth, power and influence her sons do, then those responsible would eventually pay for their crimes. Since they can't be forced to pay in a court of law, then other means would be used. It might have to wait 20 or 30 years, but it would happen. Revenge is dish best served COLD.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:06 PM on 04/07/2008

You know, maybe the Fayed's, for all of their dirty money, could have afforded to hire a decent driver. I mean look at this piece of crap Henri, a drunk, a doper, a piece of crap, and he is going to get into high speed hijinks with the press? Forgetaboutit.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:31 PM on 04/07/2008

Who cares . It took six million, to come up with a terrible conclusion. Its not the paparazzi's fault princess diana got in a car with a drunk driver. I am glad she is dead. She was ugly, and annoying.

And why should anyone in America care about what some fruit from England has to say.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:04 PM on 04/07/2008

WhinyDemocrat See Profile I'm a Fan of WhinyDemocrat

Who cares . It took six million, to come up with a terrible conclusion. Its not the paparazzi's fault princess diana got in a car with a drunk driver. I am glad she is dead. She was ugly, and annoying.

And why should anyone in America care about what some fruit from England has to say.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You sound kind of whiny yourself, there buster.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:39 AM on 04/08/2008

The only thing ugly and annoying is your hateful and hate-filled post. Saying that you're glad that a woman you never met is dead, is the depths of depravity.

I thought Democrats were supposed to be compassionate, and have concern for others.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:06 AM on 04/08/2008

Many posters choose names which are the opposite of their qualities. I don't think a Democrat would call Democrats whiney, but a Republican would.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:57 AM on 04/08/2008

True, but I've met damn few Republicans who hate the Royals. OTOH, that kind of nasty anti-royalist garbage is just what some "progressives" would say.

There were plenty of nasty hate-filled comments over at Democratic Underground when Charlton Heston, William F. Buckley and other Republican / Conservatives died.

Compassionate my.......... donkey.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:57 PM on 04/08/2008

Oh dear, poor little peavey has a new login name but it's the same old song.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:33 PM on 04/07/2008

The French newspaper La Figaro printed a George Harrison interview the Wednesday before the Saturday death of Diana. Saturday I went to the former site of La Figaro Cafe in L.A., where the menus were like newspapers. Then I went onto the freeway and was surrounded by cars with license plates that brought to my mind the letter Paul McCartney sent me in 1978 when I was at CalArts. Suddenly I was surrounded by buses and trucks that had things on them that brought to my mind things I associated with George Harrison and interview. I made a mental note of the slight strangeness of this, though in my experience it was not something entirely strange. An hour later, from the timeline I constructed, Princess Diana's car was surrounded by paparazzi, including La Figaro reporters. I experienced a similar set of circumstances a year later, this time things tied in with the death of Sarah Ferguson's mother when she was killed in a car accident in South America.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:02 PM on 04/07/2008

Mohamed, re Dodi Fayed,
Get over it; your son is long dead
With Princess Diana
That poor polyanna
And you are just sick in the head.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:55 PM on 04/07/2008

There was no plot of Fayed The Egyptian Trader and Hasni Mubarak to ostracise muslims families..There was no 300 dollor crisis allover the world ,the judge stopped by a cmarket polacxe to ask a shopkeeper what is it? the 300 bucks?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:49 PM on 04/07/2008

Eh?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:54 PM on 04/07/2008

After all these years we learn that it is not a good idea to be in a car without a seatbelt on while someone is driving very fast while drunk ---- imagine that...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:31 PM on 04/07/2008

yep..very DUH

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:45 PM on 04/07/2008

I cannot care less.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:29 PM on 04/07/2008

CORRECTED:

The jury was not given the option of giving a vedict of murder or murder under suspcious circumstances. The alternative was an "open verdict" which I understand it to be essentially no verdict at all. There were two hold outs on the jury but all the jury needed was a majority to render its verdict.

Already the people posting to British websites are saying it was a whitewash because the judge gave the summation instead of the attorneys representing each side and that the judge's summation was completely bias, as he stated to the jury emphaticallly that it was an accident and the drivers fault. The judge went on to cautioned the jury to take Paul Burrell's (Diana's former butler), testimony with a grain of salt because they had conveniently video taped Paul Burrell in his hotel room after he had testifed stating that he lied in court.

Burrell says he was drunk and no doubt the person he was talking to set him up, Just like this inquest was a set-up to find the dead driver guilty instead of the real murders the British Royal Family.

Just pray for Diana's soul and think of what Apostle Paul says in Romans, Chapter 12: "vengence is mine, saith the Lord."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:27 PM on 04/07/2008

Perhaps if their parents had taught Diana and Dodi to do two things they would not have died:

1) Never get into a car being driven by a drunk driver.

2) Always wear your seatbelt.

Very simple answers to such a long, drawn out issue.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:33 PM on 04/07/2008

Lucille, your crazy! The British Royal Family did it? what do you think this is, the middle ages.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:21 PM on 04/07/2008

Duncan77,

I remember reading that upon her divorce, and despite her plea to the Queen to keep her HRH, that Diana would be stripped of that title upon her divorce, as the Royals and their surrogates thought that Diana was the problem for not accepting her husband's adultery.

In any case, at that moment I felt a chill as I called that Henry the 8th killed quite a few of his wives, only one he actually divorced. I thought I was being silly, that this is not the 14th or 15th century, but modern times. Well apparently times have not changed.

Diana was a classic example of an abused woman. She was continually kept isolated (actually kept away from the royals and kept at St. James' Place); she was threaten (yes their surrogates threatened Diana's life and even Nicolas ( fatty) Soames, one of Charles closest friends, has been accused of this but of course he denied he done so in court.

It is not disputed that Charles informed Diana that he would no longer sleep with her. Yet the Royals demanded that Diana pretend everything was fine to protect them, even though it was they who'd duped Diana into a marriage with an miserable excuse for a man.

I can only pray that God gives Diana justice, and that Charles, Camilla and their cohorts someday are as vulnerable, and experience the same treatment, and know the terror that they inflicted upon Diana for the whole of her adult life.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 04/08/2008

Henry VIII divorced two of his wives and had two killed for adultery since any child would usurp the throne.

Try reading a book about the British Monarchy which actually covers a period after the restoration and preferably after the Glorious revolution. Just keep believing what the Daily express teaches you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:35 PM on 04/08/2008

The jury was not given the option of given a vedict of murder or murder under suspcious circumstances. The alternative was an "open verdict" which I understand it to me essentially no verdict at all..There were two hold outs on the jury but all the jury needed was a majority to render its verdict.

Already the people posting to British websites are saying it was a whitewash because the judge gave the summation instead of the attorneys representing each side and that the judge's summation was completely bias, as he stated to the jury emphaticallly that it was an accident and the drivers fault. The judge went on to cautioned the jury and to take Paul Burrell's (Diana's former butler), testimony with a grain of salt because they had conveniently video taped Paul Burrell in his hotel room after he had testifed stating that he lied during court.

Burrell says he was drunk and no doubt the person he was talking to set him up, Just like this inquest was a set-up to find the dead driver guilty instead of the real murders the British Royal Family.

Just pray for Diana's soul and think of what Apostle Paul says in Romans, Chapter 12: "vengence is mine, saith the Lord."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:22 PM on 04/07/2008

Again?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:11 PM on 04/07/2008


That is too eerie. Who do you think is the next target. Dead Pool list the first 2: Britney Spears
and Paris Hilton ?

3.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:05 PM on 04/07/2008

Clint Eastwood. Or, was he the detective?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:28 PM on 04/07/2008

Her Beauty Frozen In Time, Diana is Finally Protected From the Tabloids. Lara Flynn Boyle Can't Say the Same
IT DOESN'T SEEM POSSIBLE THAT IN THE 10 YEARS SINCE PRINCESS DIANA'S TRAGIC DEATH INSIDE A PARIS TUNNEL that tabloid editors could have become crueler. But I'd make the case they have.

As Britain wraps up its six-month investigation into whether the royals conspired to kill the former wife of Prince Charles, the world revisits the fairy tale-gone-awry of a young girl who married her prince. I remember vividly my own personal shock when the news broke that Princess Diana had died in a car accident on August 31, 1997 fleeing papparazzi with her beau of the moment, Dodi al-Fayed. I also remember the callous thought that ran through my head soon afterwards: that THE BEAUTIFUL PRINCESS WAS BETTER OFF DEAD. After all, a picture-perfect princess doesn't come marred with scars. And it would have been painful to have watched Diana's power, her hold on the public's imagination, slip away.

Read more at www.crabbygolightly.com/Diana.html.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:04 PM on 04/07/2008

To CrabbyGolightly,

Even someone said you were better off dead, how would you feel. That is a sick and twisted thing to say.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 PM on 04/08/2008

May we now allow Dodi & Di to rest in peace? Some of us who are conspiracy buffs should allow the couple a moment of silence before we inflict our theories on the survivors & mourners.
larry lynch

    Favorite