Clinton Wants Bush To Boycott Olympic Opening Ceremonies

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

DEVLIN BARRETT | April 7, 2008 06:58 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Show your support.
Buzz this article up.
Democratic presidential hopeful, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., cups her ear as reporters ask her about Mark Penn, the pollster and senior strategist for Clinton's presidential bid who left the campaign Sunday, at the airport in Albuquerque, N.M., Sunday, April 6, 2008. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

WASHINGTON — Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton on Monday called on President Bush to boycott the opening ceremonies for the Olympic games in Beijing, a fresh sign that politics, not sports, may take center stage at the summer games.

The Democratic presidential candidate said a boycott would underscore U.S. concerns about recent unrest in Tibet and questions about China's relationship with Sudan.

"The violent clashes in Tibet and the failure of the Chinese government to use its full leverage with Sudan to stop the genocide in Darfur are opportunities for presidential leadership," she said, charging the Bush administration "has been wrong to downplay human rights in its policy towards China."

She said Bush should not plan on attending the ceremonies "absent major changes by the Chinese government."

Her rival for the Democratic presidential nomination, Barack Obama, recently said he was conflicted about whether the U.S. should fully participate.

Bush has said he will attend the Olympics because it is a sporting event, not a political event.

White House spokesman Tony Fratto told reporters Monday that Bush's position had not changed, nor had the administration's concerns about China's human rights record.

"We have never been afraid to express those views either directly by the president or the president's senior advisers when they travel to China and publicly," Fratto said.

Obama issued a statement late Monday saying he has been "deeply disturbed by the recent events in Tibet, and have communicated my concerns in public and to President Bush," adding that if China does not take quick steps to respect rights and freedoms in Tibet, "there should be consequences."

The political debate over China's hosting role is rapidly overtaking the sports-themed torch ceremonies around the globe.

In Paris on Monday, organizers canceled the final leg of the traditional torch run through the city. In the face of chaotic protests and repeated attempts to douse the torch, organizers snuffed out the flame and put the torch aboard a bus in a humiliating concession to protesters decrying China's human rights record.

At least two activists got almost an arm's length away before they were seized by police. Another protester threw water at the torch but failed to put it out before being taken away.

The disturbances in Paris followed similar efforts in London on Sunday, where the torch was run through another gauntlet of protesters.

Clinton's announcement comes as her campaign tries to recover from jettisoning its chief campaign strategist this weekend for his involvement with a U.S.-Colombia free trade deal she opposes.

Rival Obama said in a TV interview earlier this month that he was "of two minds" when it came to full U.S. participation in the Olympics.

"On the one hand, I think that what has happened in Tibet, China's support for the Sudanese government in Darfur, is a real problem," he said, before adding: "I am hesitant to make the Olympics a site of political protest because I think it's partly about bringing the world together."

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, among other U.S. lawmakers, has suggested Bush should consider staying away from the opening ceremonies following China's crackdown on protesters in Tibet.

___

Associated Press writer Deb Riechmann contributed to this report.

 
 

Comments
363
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)

As I understand it, an American President has never attended the opening ceremonies outside of the US.
Moreover, heads of states don't usually attend the opening ceremonies.

I don't got a problem the President and other Heads of States boycotting the opening ceremony but it's sort of like a Catholic saying that they're going to give up meat on Fridays during Lent.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:21 PM on 04/10/2008

Apparently Bill Clinton tried to talk Spielberg into NOT backing down from working on the opening ceremony on the 2008 Olympics in Beijing.

That's what happens when couples do not sleep in the same bed. They don't know what the other one is thinking.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/08/bill-clinton-encouraged-s_n_95677.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:16 PM on 04/08/2008

Hillary .. Boycott.. Pelosi... Boycott...... when asked ,Barack said Present

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:38 AM on 04/08/2008

I DID NOT HEAR ANY OF HILLARYS OUTRAGE ABOUT HUMAN RIGHTS WHEN PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON OPENED UP TRADE WITH CHINA BACK IN 1998!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 AM on 04/08/2008

Are you thinking of Nixon??!!! We have been trading in some form or another for much longer than 10 years with China. Think even Pepsi and Coke were in China by then.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:36 PM on 04/10/2008

Today the local TV confirms Communist China has a middle class. I still cannot understand How the cubans can control for not dealing with Castro on a Island because he run a communist state. They are on an island on 90 miles from U.S.

Yet we let President Nixon do a back door deal with Henry Kissinger (Google it) to start business in a very large communist country. If the toys have lead. We have no clue what the hell we are putting in our bodies that is making us sick, so are forced to go to the doctor, to take the medicine made in china. If we get any dumber we should be on a TV reality show.
100 on the show a week. the comedians are having us laugh at ourselves. So sad

We voted our jobs away. We knew Nixon was corrupt when they voted him in office, The Clintons the same way, yet we want to go back to past to go forward.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:45 PM on 04/08/2008

Boycotting the opening ceremony? what a useless gesture. THAT'S gonna influence their human rights policy?

How about trade sanctions? Oh wait, that would hurt the US more economically. China could enact a 'solyent green' law and America would still be kissing its feet.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:07 AM on 04/08/2008

You and I know American have and need to continue kiss more than just feet. We start there and work our way up. The world know more than America know China own us. We are their goose laying gold eggs, until it may start to look we are being What Ms Mayhill Fowler called Mr. Obama arrogant.

They will not blink an eye to demand their money which we do not have.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:50 PM on 04/08/2008

She can say that and some will swallow it. She knows we cannot act for we are owed by
China. Nice try though!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:27 AM on 04/08/2008

He should skip the Olympics and come see the Paralympics.

One of the legacies of World War II was the creation of the Paralympics which was started as venue for wounded soldiers to compete in international sport and represent their country. With over 4000 athletes with disabilities from over 100 countries, it is the second largest sporting event in the world, although most people in the USA are unaware of it taking place two weeks after every Olympics since 1960.

George W. Bush has given many young men and women (and children) around the world the opportunity become Paralympic competitors, including many injured veterans of his current conflicts of choice who will be competing in Beijing and future Paralympics. He should show his support and show up at these games instead of at the Olympics.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:41 AM on 04/08/2008

*

Hey Hillary, why not Boycott Outsourcing American Jobs to China?!

*

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 AM on 04/08/2008


Of course George, skip the "Opening" Ceremonies : !!!

Shew dem terrists wat we be made of !!

But, then again George, we do owe the Chinese a S**T Load of Money !!!

Never Mind !

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:05 AM on 04/08/2008

Our super power is starting to look like a steamed wiener not as firm it use to be.

Wake up America, it is time for your ass to first STOP digging the hole we in deeper. second, start climbing out of this darn hole. We can be a super power again, but right now the 3rd step come together and be more than just a title nation do and be the United States. Don't forget it is WE the People.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:57 PM on 04/08/2008

I think Bush should go to China for the Olympic only on one condition: he must never be allowed back to the US. Bush, a war criminal and a traitor must be sent to hell. And China would be close to hell than any other nation on Earth. While are at it, we should send Bush and Cheney to do hard time in North Korea.

As far as I am concerned the Olympic games this year would just be a show the Chinese want to show the world that they too can play. However, so far, the Chinese only show that they are only capable of copying what might look like an Olympic rather the real Olympic.

The issue with Tibet and Taiwan isn't just about human rights and independence. It has every thing to do with our OWN security and safety: the Chinese will use their power and iron fists to crush our own freedom and liberty when they grow up, if they do. So let's stop the monster when we still can.

The games this summer in Beijing reminds me of the one in Berlin when Hitler was in power. The force of evil wants to display its strength rather than the spirit of the sport valued by mankind. Thus, boycotting Beijing Olympic is not only the right thing to do, it's necessary to preserve the integrity of the true spirit of the Olympic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:33 PM on 04/07/2008

Politicians, like everyone else, are entitled to their opinion reqarding our political representation in Beijing.

Many of the athletes have been devoted, for as long as they can remember, to what may be a once in a lifetime opportunity.

China's disrespect for Tibet is hardly a revelation. Who are we kidding.

America's addiction to consumption and subsequent demand for cheap products has become far more important than our willingness to pay our own workers a decent wage,

Instead, let's blame the corporations and the government.

Watch or don't watch. Buy or don't buy.

Let the athletes be.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:25 PM on 04/07/2008

I agree whole-heartedly.

Most of these athletes have devoted their entire life for this sole opportunity. Take gymnasts for instance. Female gymnasts are considered to be over the hill pretty much at the age of 18. Most of them go on to collegiate gymnastics, but for their elite status to be part of a 6 person team out of tens of thousands and then be denied their earned opportunity to represent our country in a sporting event is absolute injustice to them and our nation.

If it were a security threat to their lives then absolutely we should not attend but that is not the case here. To use political posturing as a means to deny these athletes the priviledge to represent our nation is absured. Why would we boycott the once every four year sporting event due to something that takes place in the host country? The IOC approved the Olympic Games to be held in China, and the US had a voice in that decision.

In my opinion a better option to boycotting the Olympic Games would be to ban them from attending sporting event in the US until they start granting the desired human rights to their citizens. But for us to isolate ourselves from them is not the way to go, to isolate THEM from us is a more effective means of protest.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:18 AM on 04/08/2008

This is why they should NOT boycott the games themselves but just the Opening Ceremonies. It would shame the Chinese Government but not punish the athletes.

Hillary is actually right this time. Obama is slow to react.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:31 AM on 04/08/2008

I disagree.....the athletes take part in the opening ceremony as well. The Opening and Closing ceremonies are part of the excitement for these athletes. The opening ceremony gives them energy and excitement they need during the games. It isn't just about being a part of the athletic even themselves.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 PM on 04/08/2008

Of course not, what if there is snipers in China, she is not opposing OG, she is just worried about the snipers

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 PM on 04/07/2008

Where did all the rupublicans come from to post on this site? Hate.com servers crash or somthing?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 PM on 04/07/2008

Who do you guys think more sincere, Clinton or Obama?

This seems pretty fake to me. But, I have trouble believing Obama is that much better. My trust in politicians is quickly deteriorating. What do you guys think, anyone have facts to back it up?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:17 PM on 04/07/2008

Hillary is doing the right thing here and Obama should follow suit.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:02 PM on 04/07/2008

This is pure hypocrisy. Hillary used to be on the Board of Directors at WalMart, the company that built the New China.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 PM on 04/07/2008

On this one, I do agree more with Hillary than with Obama. However, I remain opposed to Hillary's candidacy because she is pro-NeoCon in her general approach to foreign policy and on the issue of war.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:21 PM on 04/07/2008

My goodness Hillary has problems with countries with human rights violaitons. Yet she does not bring up people or countries that put money in her's and Bill's bank account. Look at the Yucaipa trail.
It"s been reported that Yucaipa manages the financial portfolio of Dubai"s ruler - Emir Mohammad bin Rashed al-Maktoum.
So how much of Bill"s earnings came from Burkle really come from the Emir"s petrodollars?
And what does Bill bring to Yucaipa? A rolodex of contacts made while he was president, and nothing else.
By the way, this is the same Emir who aggressively boycotts Israel and has been cited for human rights violations by the State Department.
Hillary's split faces are working again. Maybe if the Clintons give all the money back to Yucaipa she might have some creditability. NAW she never will earn creditability. If her lips move it probably means she is lying.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 PM on 04/07/2008

Hillary does not give a shit if Bush goes to China for the Olympics. She makes these statements just to get her name in the media more than Obama is in the media. Of couse the media will honor her wishes and put her in the front of all of us. If Bush should boycott shouldn't the US boycott with all its athletes too? Why didn't Hillary ask the athletes to boycott, I think that would have more of an effect. Maybe Hillary wants to keep everyone out of China so some of the secret deals with China and the Clintons remain secret, that's my guess.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 PM on 04/07/2008


Yep, Bush who presides over an executive branch which has made torture a systemic practice in our military and CIA is going to sit out the opening ceremony of the Olympics and show those human rights abusing Chinese because he has such moral superiority. Hillary,you are clueless.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:54 PM on 04/07/2008

She is showing some spunk. Good idea Hillary and I for one will not be watching the Olympics.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:18 PM on 04/07/2008

Let me get this straight, Hillary wants Bush the WAR CRIMINAL to skip the opening ceremony of the Olympics to be held in China and you support this stance. With Hillary's help our government invaded Iraq under false pretenses and currently occupy Iraq. Iraq was a sovereign nation that did absolutely nothing to the United States. There has been over FOUR thousand dead U.S. Military personnel, over THIRTY thousand wounded and HUNDREDS of thousands of Iraqi's dead and wounded. Actually the Chinese should not invite Bush nor Hillary.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:33 PM on 04/07/2008

I agree with Hillay and if Obama took this stance, his supporters would be falling all over themselves to agree with it too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:15 PM on 04/07/2008

Wrong. I wouldn't fall all over it. I don't believe that any form of boycott is justified. Us or simply Bush boycotting the opening ceremony is nothing. Do you really think the people of China respects him OR us? Hell no. The only person that this benefits is Hillary.

As far as I'm concerned the only thing that justifies a boycott would be those of security threats.

I also think the most effective form of protest in regards to China is one, STOP buying products made in China which means STOP shopping at Walmart! And two, if you really want to protest China, do so by banning their involvment in any events that take place here in the US until they start extending our desired human rights standards to their citizens.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:26 AM on 04/08/2008

Oh right! And Hillary is so concerned about human rights she's sponsoring a bill to impeach Bush. NOT!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:04 PM on 04/07/2008

Oh right! And Barack is so concerned about human rights he's sponsoring a bill to impeach Bush. NOT!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:29 AM on 04/08/2008

America and every country in the world that values Liberty need to keep the pressure on China against China's imperialist occupation of Tibet. The Communist Chinese should never be allowed to think that the rest of the world believes they own Tibet, because they do not.

I question Hillary's sincerity about this. Don't forget that Bill as president was afraid to be seen with the Dalai Lama, would not meet with him personally and made Al Gore meet him in some anteroom. Too afraid of what China would think and do if pictures got out of Bill with the Dalai Lama. I doubt Hillary would have the courage to boycott the Olympics if she were president.

Wasn't Bill the one who got us going into financial indebtedness to China with trade agreements that grossly favored China over our own workers? I'd like to see more about the Clinton's connections with the Chinese government and businesses.

Despite the apparent hypocrisy, due to America's own transgressions, I think we must not be afraid to push back on China over Tibet and their other brutalities. If we are too afraid to speak and act against them now in merely symbolic ways, doesn't that mean that China is already controlling us?

People say we shouldn't politicize this, but why is China running the torch through so many countries, especially Tibet and over the Himalayas? I think their message to us is "we own you."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:00 PM on 04/07/2008

OH YEAH RIGHT, BUSH IS GOING YO UPSET HIS CHINESE HANDLERS? tHAT'L BE A HOT DAY IN SIBERIA!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:55 PM on 04/07/2008

Sure why not tell Bush to be a torturing cluster bombing hypocritical mass murdering war criminal but as long as she wants to play that card, lets just see how much of her own investments are in china first?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:28 PM on 04/07/2008

not sure that this will help with the Penn problem, Hil. I think that the American people care more about where you REALLY stand on trade deals than they do about if Bush takes a trip to Beijing.
First you tell the Canadians that you don't really mean the BS you're dishing to Ohio voters, then you're caught with an active top trade deal lobbyist for Columbia on the payroll.
Actions do mean more than words, right?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:27 PM on 04/07/2008

PEOPLE PEOPLE This is a problem we have within the dem party. What is this article about? CHINA and its disgusting practices. NOT about who should win the nom. Lets focus for once on the issue. Should our country Boycott or not? I for one SAY YES. It will send a powerful message without actually going to war with another country. We all know the long list of things this country has done wrong preparing for this event and I will not be tuning in. I feel for the athletes (being one myself) some have already decided to not participate..but the Olympic committee should have made a better decision. We are not at fault if we choose to boycott they are at fault for poor decision making.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:58 PM on 04/07/2008

Absolutely, these games should be boycotted, but by the athletes. These individuals have trained and devoted their lives to reach this point in their sport. For them not to participate would send a louder and more important message to the world than any politician's non attendance. Granted, it would be a terrible disappointment to them and they would have to put their aspiration to compete on hold for 4 years, but the impact of their action could not be ignored.