Clinton Campaign A Study In Missteps

Politico   |  JIM VANDEHEI & DAVID PAUL KUHN   |   April 9, 2008 09:14 AM


Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

Hillary Rodham Clinton wants voters to decide the nomination based on who can coolly and competently run the country. She had better hope they don't study her recent campaign too closely for the answer.

Clinton has overseen two major staff shake-ups in two months. She has left a trail of unpaid bills and unhappy vendors and had to loan her own campaign $5 million to keep it afloat in January. Her campaign badly underestimated her main adversary, Barack Obama, miscalculated the importance of organizing caucus states and was caught flat-footed after failing to lock up the nomination on Super Tuesday.

Read the whole story here.

 

Comments
241
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

Hint sample
View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

The Hillary Clinton campaign will be studied, and talked about for years to come, as one of the worst run campaigns in modern political history. It's a laundry list of 'what-not-to-do's' , and its a very clear example of how poor Hillary's judgement is. She picked this cast of dysfunctional characters to advise her and now she's reaping the negative returns of all their failed ideas and strategies. Even you Clinton supporters have to wonder how she could have made so many mistakes. This election WAS Hillary's to lose - and she lost it.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:04 PM on 04/09/2008


All you need to know about the Clinton Presidency is that they knew all about the horrific genocide in Rwanda and ignored it. Detailed declassified documents are damning in the extreme.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:55 PM on 04/09/2008

YOU MIGHT BE AN IDIOT:-) If you think Barack Obama with little or no experience would be better than Hillary Clinton with 35 years experience. You Might Be An Idiot! If you think that Obama with no experience can fix an economy on the verge of collapse better than Hillary Clinton. Whose ;-) husband (Bill Clinton) led the greatest economic expansion, and prosperity in American history. You Might Be An Idiot! If you think that Obama with no experience fighting for universal health care can get it for you better than Hillary Clinton. Who anticipated this current health care crisis back in 1993, and fought a pitched battle against overwhelming odds to get universal health care for all the American people. You Might Be An Idiot! If you think that Obama with no experience can manage, and get us out of two wars better than Hillary Clinton. Whose ;-) husband (Bill Clinton) went to war only when he was convinced that he absolutely had to. Then completed the mission in record time against a nuclear power. AND DID NOT LOSE THE LIFE OF A SINGLE AMERICAN SOLDIER. NOT ONE!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:56 PM on 04/09/2008

First, Hillary has little "management" experience beyond managing the First Lady's White House staff (I'm betting that you don't see Laura Bush particularly qualified to be president). Oh wait, she did "manage" to run the health care initiative into the ground in the 1990s (she made an already difficult task more of an uphill climb with her insistance on secrecy and eliminating key members of Congress (Democrats controlled Congress) from planning; apparently, she believed that the best way to go was to bring in outside experts to help her develop a finished plan and then just bully her own party in Congress into accepting it.

Second, I can never get it straight with Clinton and her supporters. Are we supposed to see them as joined at the hip and a vote for Hillary as a vote for four more years of Bill or are we supposed to see them as two separate entities? We are supposed to believe that her "35 years of experience" should include giving her credit for the economy of the 1990s, but that she was not a full supporter of NAFTA even though her public statements at the time show that she was. We're supposed to welcome the notion of the two-for-one bargain that we get with the Clintons but believe the fact that Bill is a paid supporter of the trade deal with Colombia that Hillary says she opposes means nothing. We're not idiots, and you can't have it both ways.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:36 AM on 04/10/2008

The fact that some are even debating that Clinton is not more quailified than Obama for President is pathological.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:29 PM on 04/10/2008

And you might be an idiot if you support someone who voted for a war against a sovereign nation, which is now bankrupting our economy.

The woman has no sense of responsibility when she foolishly cast a vote giving Bush authorization to go to war and did not have the intelligence to envision the consequences of such a disastrous vote the way Obama did.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:04 AM on 04/10/2008

Obama was not in the Senate, (lack of experience) and his riskless speech only proves that he was lucky not visionary. To date they both vote exactly the same on the War.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:48 PM on 04/10/2008

Well, lets get going with some facts.

Hillary, as the unelected, unappointed, unnominated, first lady, tried to take control of 1/7th of the entire US economy, and did it in closed meetings. She threatened anyone who did not agree with her with public humiliation. She then unveiled such a monstrosity of a plan that EVERYONE from both sides of the aisle ran in terror. It scuttled healthcare reform for almost 2 decades.

SHE had nothing to do with the economy. Dig through her files as first lady, as the press has, and you will see she did not do very much of consequence at all, hence the fabrications and distortions.

Hillary has has not seen a middle eastern war YET that she has not loved. She has PUSHED HARD to vilify and start wars with; Iraq, Iran, and lebanon, and thats just so far. Meanwhile, she is AGAINST going after bin laden in Pakistan, because the dictator that hosts him, tens of thousands of his followers, and the taliban and their leadership, is supposedly our ally.

She has SOLD OUT to ultra right wing hawks and the big 7 insurers, who pay her more money than anyone in the US government than George Bush.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:42 AM on 04/10/2008

You seem to be pathologically and falsely projecting everything you hate about Bush onto Clinton.

Who are you trying to fool given your fanaticism and intelligence insulting attempts to find connections and conspiracies where not exist.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:34 PM on 04/10/2008

Also remember the famous images of dead American soldiers being dragged through the streets in Somalia. Or don't they count as lost lives?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:25 AM on 04/10/2008

And he had the sense of not invading. What is the point? Overall Clintons record in office was one of most successful in at least 50 years.

He won a war, with a true coalition 22M new jobs, a 70% approval rating, budget surplus, an economy that raised most if not all boats, passing Kyoto, fighting the tobacco industry and getting them to admit that smoking causes cancer and I have not even gotten to oil prices yet!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:51 PM on 04/10/2008

Until we get someone in the white house other than a Bush or Clinton who have close ties with the bin laden family, there will be no active search for this tyrant. Bill Clinton has amassed his fortune by working with all kinds of world leaders - his hands are in the pot in all kinds of situations. He even tried to maneuver a foreign company into having all power over our ports. Who does he owe and what has he promised? Everyone seems to think that he's all right because he's an ex-president, but times have changed and so has Bill. One has to wonder why the urgency of getting Hillary elected. Were there strings attached to his dealings?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:14 AM on 04/10/2008

Yeah it really sucked when Clinton was in office. Frankly it only sucked for the DNC establishment leaders like Kennedy, Carter, Hart, Kerry and a bunch of other losers who were so envious and jealous they still have not gotten over it.

He won a war, with a true coalition 22M new jobs, a 70% approval rating, budget surplus, an economy that raised most if not all boats, passing Kyoto, fighting the tobacco industry and getting them to admit that smoking causes cancer and I have not even gotten to oil prices yet!

It really was bad, let me tell you!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:54 PM on 04/10/2008

You might be an idiot if you discount how Hillary has run her campaign and doesn't pay the small business owners. But that would be rude to suggest that.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:24 PM on 04/09/2008

I for one am not going to be watching the debates. I have seen 20 too many. I also don't want to watch her either glaring at Obama with contempt or telling him what a pleasure it has been to be on stage with Barack Obama.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:56 PM on 04/09/2008

She loves throwing rocks from the GLASS house she resides!!! Her claim as her presidency as a CEO job has proved she cannot run a business or campaign from day one, two, three strikes your out HRC!!!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:10 PM on 04/09/2008

flattering pic of hillary for this post.

i understand obama wants to stay above the fray and run a pretty clean campaign, which he, for the most part, has managed to do. however, i think he could possibly win or keep it within a few points in PA if he would run ads hammering hillary on her NAFTA bs, as well as the conflict of interest regarding Colombia. It would just be pointing out the truth with facts to back it up.

if it were up to me i would run ads day & night showing her getting off the plane in Bosnia with background sound of her lying about the trip.

of course i can be a real prick.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:42 PM on 04/09/2008

I agree but even if not ads (from surrogates, not Obama himself) couldn't they get more media to pay attention?

It's so OBVIOUS that Clinton knew and approved of Penn's visit to Colombia. Why doesn't anyone ask her--and insist she go on record with a direct answer? (Undoubtedly another lie, but still worth having on record).

The Colombia trip is just like the doublespeak the Clinton campaign (probably Penn himself) gave to Canada about NAFTA. Why, why, why won't Obama's people get SOMEONE to pursue this? When CNN thought Obama's campaign had been secretly dealing with Canada, they talked about it hour after hour. After the truth came out---that it was really CLINTON'S-- there was.....silence.

Secret Colombia talk. Penn NOT resigning (he's still doing everything JUST. AS. BEFORE. What does that say about Hillary's reaction?) Bill's big money payments from corporations. Penn (and other ex-Clinton staffers) getting big payouts from Colombia? The tax return problems....including the missing 2007 return....no earmarks...library donors list....is this too cerebral for the media? Or too potentially anti Clinton for the pro Clinton / pro McCain stations like CNN?

And, while they're at it, what about asking about the Charlie Black / Mark Penn relationship? ARE the Clinton and McCain campaigns coordinating strategy and deciding to criticize Obama? We should know.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:43 PM on 04/09/2008

Sen. Obama pledged to support the winner of the campaign for nomination. What would Hillary do?
Disenfranchise all the people who voted for Sen. Obama by winning from second place as decided by some secret vote? Tell all her supporters (even though she finishes second place) that the race was unfair, FL and MI did not vote, poor her (cry). Obama has followed the DNC rules all along. Hillary has until they did not suit her.

Will Hillary tell her voters to vote for McBush? After all she repeatedly claimed only he and her were qualified. She has run a dirty campaign and it will not end well for her unless they give her a important position of power. After all she deserves it, right? Why??

She ought to bow out gracefully now. She cannot win, and she is turning Democrats against each other.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:42 PM on 04/09/2008

i dont think she should bow out. but i do think bill & her should stop campaigning for john mccain.

of course she is looking 4 years down the road, which is why she wants obama to lose the general.
the funny thing is she will never ever be president. there are too many dems who see right through her, and republicans hate her now more than ever.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:09 PM on 04/09/2008

American Postal Workers Union Endorse Obama

The union, which claims to be the largest postal union in the world, said its executive board voted to endorse Obama today.

"We are most impressed by Sen. Obama's commitment to eradicating the undue influence of special interests in the political process, union president William Burrus said in a statement. "Our current political system does not allow for the voices of average citizens to be heard over the demands of lobbyists and big-money campaign contributors."

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:49 PM on 04/09/2008

American Postal Workers Union announces its executive board voted to endorse the Illinois Senator Wednesday. (300,000 members). Hillary and McCain supporters: No mail for you!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:49 PM on 04/09/2008

Hillary - Return to Sender.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:51 PM on 04/09/2008

Hahahahaha!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:54 PM on 04/09/2008

GREAT NEWS!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:13 PM on 04/09/2008

I think Hillary's problem is two-pronged, though each is related to the other.

She really did think she'd win the nomination on Super Tuesday, so she didn't plan for anything beyond that, or if she did, she was assuming she'd be far ahead and staying ahead would be cheap and easy.

The second part of the problem is that she chose an EXTREMELY unfortunate campaign centerpiece -- her "experience", which was primarily ceremonial as FL, certainly not indicative of political experience. Her one fling at political experience was her attempt to develop a Health Care program for America, and that failed miserably. Furthermore, she claimed she'd been vetted, but boy, was she wrong! Instead, a close look at her record puts her as close to George Bush's agenda as she can be and still claim to be a Democrat.

Her campaign missteps are above and beyond these factors, and they will no doubt do her in.

But she isn't operating in a vacuum. Obama's campaign is NOT ugly politics (one of HRC's "missteps", which she continues to commit). He represents something very personal to people, something people may be shy about expressing for fear of being laughed at -- maybe their best selves. To many people Obama is not perfect, but he is someone America can be proud of after 8 years of GW Bush's destruction of what has made America great. It is this connection with Americans that draws people to Obama, maybe more than anything else.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:48 PM on 04/09/2008

Barack Obama has two young daughters who could benefit from a good, decent and honest campaign without being taught that lying, stealing and cheating are okay as long as there is a win. Hillary has already tainted her own daughter who has lied right alongside her parents.

If Hillary pulls off this theft, God help us all! Not only does she lie, but she can't even GET AWAY with it. Not only does she NOT pay her bills, she can't even coerce vendors to keep mum about it until after the nomination. Good leader? NOOOOOOOOOO.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:15 PM on 04/09/2008

Of course!

Obama was the "inevitable" candidate.

Hillary is the relative unknown who has come from way behind to *almost* overtake him.

She's so plucky!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 PM on 04/09/2008

ENJOYED! THANKS!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:15 PM on 04/09/2008

Very good point.

If Obama didn't start out as the presumptive nominee, he would be nowhere.

But, Hillary has the 3 am Phone experience..."hold on, I'll get him" That must count for something.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:10 PM on 04/09/2008

At some point in time it is probably worth pointing out that not everyone who supports the candidate you do not support is somehow either not intelligent, too young or whatever. There are many thoughtful, intelligent people who are supporting both candidates whose opinion deserves respect. So I think the debates on these blogs need to turn less attack like as we near a conclusion and people should start thinking about what to do if their candidate is not selected.

As a Barack supporter, I would like to offer to a HRC supporter that if Barack wins the nomination you consider the fact they did run a really great campaign as evidence he would be a good leader. Especially considering how you went from HRC's inevitability to where we are now.

Please forget the filtered articles as to why one candidate is bad, or a liar, or whatever and really decide for yourself. Voting for a candidate out of spite against your own self interest is really counterproductive.

Peace!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:38 PM on 04/09/2008

True democrats will fall back into the fold - it's only the independents and republicans who would be unaccountable. That's where the two campaigns really differ.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:18 PM on 04/09/2008

Either way, the republicans don't have a chance. There is NO WAY McCain is going to win. Look at voter turn out. Which democrat is more electable is a non-issue. Hillary Clinton is a scandalous liar, but she'd beat McCain. The American people would elect a retarded, one armed monkey over a rebulican. But enough about Hillary

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:46 PM on 04/09/2008

RIPHRC: You said "The American people would elect a retarded, one armed monkey."

They did in 2000 and 2004 and we are trying to get him out of office. You are not helping by trying to take over the Democratic Party and spliting the Democratic vote by bashing the other Democratic candidate. You do not realize that you are not supporting "unity", but just the opposite.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 AM on 04/10/2008

Clinton -- both Hill & Bill = hubris personified.

After the "inevitability" theme failed and Obama began to surge, she didn't (and obviously still doesn't) know what to do.

She's tried it all . . . tears, fake southern accent, fake cowgirl accent, lie after lie . . .

What's she going to do when she loses the nomination? She was going to be the next President!! It's her RIGHT! She EARNED it by being the second-most-cheated-on-woman in history!!!

And now, not only is she NOT going to be the next President, she isn't even going to get to compete against the Republican candidate! Oh, the humiliation!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:41 PM on 04/09/2008

Oh, I enjoyed all the fake accents. Only $7000 of acting lessons, and she's turned into Meryl Streep!

And the stories she tells while pandering are enjoyable, too. My favorite was in NM, where she talked about a "great" job "slimin' fish in Alaska" and how it "prepared me for this". (No, she didn't seem to be joking).

I just watched her commercial in NC. So down-home and folksy. She tells us how she's not some slick person talking on television, and if we want to talk with her we can go to the website and ask questions and she'll answer right back, on television (that's that big box opposite the couch). She ends it by saying, "Thanks, it was really nice talkin' with you."

I guess she subscribes, as Bill does, to the idea, "You can never go wrong underestimating the intelligence of the American people."

Hopefully, Pennsylvania will prove them both wrong.....

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 PM on 04/09/2008

Wow, "slimin' fish in Alaska"? Haven't heard that one yet.

I did hear the audio of a television ad she's running now in PA on NPR on the way home from work this afternoon . . . all about how her father worked in a manufacturing plant in Scranton, they went on vacations to some cottage with no running water in northern PA (mental image of Hillary using a corn cob in an out house . . . . eewwwwwwww!)

Even the NPR reporter was incredulous . . . why doesn't she just sit back and enjoy her $110 million? That's more money than even my wife could spend in a lifetime.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 PM on 04/09/2008