Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer Knocks Obama On Health Care, Energy

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

The Huffington Post   |   April 10, 2008 10:44 AM


Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

ABC's Teddy Davis has a new interview with Montana's unorthodox Democratic governor, Brian Schweitzer, who says he'll support whoever wins his state's upcoming primary.

But he offers some rough words for Barack Obama:

Despite a political profile that could help underscore the Democrats' determination to win in traditionally Republican areas, it is easier to imagine the blunt-speaking Schweitzer making his own presidential run in 2012 than it is to see him playing second fiddle this year.


While Schweitzer has not proposed his own universal health care plan in Montana, he believes Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., is right to have endorsed a mandate on the national level.

By not requiring individuals to purchase insurance, Schweitzer believes Obama's plan to forbid insurance companies to deny coverage because of pre-existing conditions will lead to healthy people opting out and sick people opting in.

"You've got to get everyone in the system," said Schweitzer.

He is dismayed that Obama cast a vote for President Bush's 2005 energy bill while regularly criticizing the president on the issue.

"Sounds like Senate-speak," said Schweitzer.

Read the full interview here.

 
 

Comments
352
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

Unfortunately, the issue of Health care reform is a process. Senator Obama knows that a Mandate is a non-starter in the House and Senate. He has to start off more practically. It's all find for the Gov of Montana and Mrs Edwards and Hillary to speak glibly about a mandate, but to me it punishes the people who are already suffering. Why punish people who don't have health insurance further. It presumes that if you don't have health insurance, you are somehow irresponsible. Maybe its because you can't get any or you can't get any that you can afford.

That is what people with no health insurance tell ME.

So its the people's fault ! At least so says Hillary, and Mrs Edwards and the Gov of Montana!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:00 PM on 04/10/2008

Then, those people shouldn't mind an affordable offer that is also coupled with a mandate! Since they have already 'commited' to buying health insurance if it becomes affordable...how would a mandate negatively affect any one of them?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 AM on 04/11/2008

Several women in Montana reported that they received emailed invitations to a Missoula fundraiser for Hillary Clinton that were sent from Governor Schweitzer's office. His brother Walt was one of the people who was hosting the fundraiser. HMMMM....

And word has it that a couple of Montana Super-delegates were told they were not to endorse Obama until after the June 3rd primary. HMMMM....

Could there be a connection here? Ya think?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:22 PM on 04/10/2008

Absolutely there is a connection. The Governor and his family are supporters of HRC and he campaigning for HRC without officially "endorsing" her. Sounds like "senate speak" to me!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 AM on 04/11/2008

What is your point, Margie?

Is there a law against hosting a fundraiser?

Did someone put a gun to those super-delegates' heads?

What's your point? HMMMMM?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:14 PM on 04/10/2008

My point is this: The Governor is not supposed to be campaigning for a primary candidate from the Governor's office. At all. The Governor, as a man who insists on keeping a somewhat inordinate amount of control on the Montana Democratic Party, has apparently pressured certain super-delegates not to endorse Barack Obama until after the primary in June, yet by his actions he appears to be endorsing Hillary Clinton. It is, to put it politely, most unseemly at the very least.
So to be putting down Obama in the national press, on top of this, is to make a lie out of any pretense of neutrality he has insisted other super-delegates in the state follow.
He should just come right out with it and honestly endorse Clinton, and let the Obama supporters endorse Obama.
If one is going to make aw shucks, us folks out here in ranchland are just plain-spoken old cowpokes compared to those liars in D.C. type of comments, then one should be plain spoken.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 AM on 04/11/2008

You are making excellent points, here. Boy does he seem to be handling the local party with a tight rein. I thought he was more enlightened than that. That whole thing with the Montana superdelegate having to "take it back" seemed odd.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:25 AM on 04/11/2008

Governor Schweitzer is for Hillary? Seemed clear to me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 PM on 04/10/2008

Yeah I thought the dots were pretty close together too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:08 PM on 04/10/2008

Yes, I believe the article makes clear the Governor endorses some of Clinton's policies.

But indie17, if you failed to notice, Margie asked if there was "a connection?"

Regarding the endorsement of Obama by a Montana super-delegate, the super-delegate stated herself that she learned, after endorsing him, that it was against state party rules for her to do so at this stage:

"Campbell said Montana Democratic Party rules prevented her from endorsing a candidate in a contested primary."

Both the Governor's endorsement of Hillary's policies, and the fact that the super-delegate realized her endorsement was against the rules at this time, are public knowledge. I fail to see any dark "connection" between a fundraiser and a super-delegate realizing she had acted prematurely, against the rules.

HHMMMMM...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:46 PM on 04/10/2008

Universal health care cannot be so complex that it is impossible to cover everyone. I agree that it should be mandated, but that the Congress needs to recapture funds from the health care industry as a mandate, not penalize the people that can't afford it, rather the subsidy should come from the industry and the government, cost share. The goverment may want to create incentives to the industry for best practices. In MT, Gov. Schweitzer is a great Gov. but still not in the same stratosphere as Obama. Not exciting enough to be Prez.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:31 PM on 04/10/2008

Factual note: Obama supported the energy bill because it was the first bill sent through the Senate that ACTUALLY had a substantial amount of research and development money for renewable resources in it.

Oh and FYI - until we HAVE the renewable resources developed and in place, we still need to rely on the current forms of energy. So we still need to fund those for a while yet. Or would you rather go back to kerosene lamps and moonlight?

The Republicans control the purse strings at the moment. The pragmatic thing to do is to get whatever funding you can to help create the technology that will create the opportunity and the impetus to be able to Go Green later.

This is not controversial and it's not hard to understand. Let's get with the program people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:51 PM on 04/10/2008

Agreed. And I'm tired of the over-arching statements about 'energy', as if the subject doesn't have multiple facets and complexities that have to be examined.

Here's someone who has studied the subject:

Austin,TX mayor Will Wynn chairs the Energy Committee of the U.S. Conference of Mayors and worked on energy-efficiency grant legislation. "For too long, we've allowed old divisions to hold us back," Wynn said. "Recently, I've had conversations about energy policy with presidential candidates from both parties, and I believe Sen. Obama is the only person who can move us forward on this critical issue."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:10 PM on 04/10/2008

Still more different opinions on Obama, just today:

http://www.oregonlive.com/newsflash/regional/index.ssf?/base/elections-0/1207839848150850.xml&storylist=orlocal

PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) " Two former Oregon governors say they will support Barack Obama for president.
Barbara Roberts and John Kitzhaber gave their endorsements to the Illinois senator on Thursday, just before the Democratic Party of Oregon holds its platform convention this weekend...
Roberts praised Obama for his opposition to the war in Iraq and his support for sustainable environmental policies. Kitzhaber said Obama is the best candidate to bring some real change to American politics.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:40 PM on 04/10/2008

Here is a different opinion from a superdelegate today:

CHICAGO, IL"Utah Democratic Party Chair and Democratic superdelegate Wayne Holland today endorsed Barack Obama, citing his ability to energize the Democratic Party and plan to strengthen the economy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:37 PM on 04/10/2008

Heres the deal children instead of bashing Obama or Hillary actually try being civil to one another. Neither one of their plans is possible.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:21 PM on 04/10/2008

"Heres the deal children instead of bashing Obama or Hillary actually try being civil to one another. Neither one of their plans is possible." Syco.

I do not expect any healthcare plan being proposed now to be passed intact into law. I expect that either Clinton or Obama would move us in the direction of more coverage for more Americans and that is all I hope for now. I would prefer a real socialized national healthcare plan. So, I am not going to be voting on the basis of the Clinton or the Obama healthcare plan. I will be making my choice based on the character of the candidate and my estimation of the candidate's ability to move the nation forward and establish new less corporate priorities. That is why, I choose Mr. Obama.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:32 PM on 04/10/2008

As long as someone realizes that neither one of there plans is possible I'm satisfied.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:48 PM on 04/11/2008

I must say...I've been reading over the posts on this thread, and it's obvious that all of the adults that frequent HuffPo are here. This is the way it should be. Everyone arguing their point, without name calling, insults, or put-downs for the opposing supporters. Wow. Sadly, I guess class will be out soon and the youngsters will be home and hitting the boards. Well...we'll enjoy it while it lasts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:01 PM on 04/10/2008

I'm guessing you were typing when frustratedinohio made his/her "Jesus-boy" crack below. No, wait, there you are referring to Senator Obama as "The Chosen One" in a reply. I guess the references to "adults" and "name calling, insults, or put-downs" in your post is like so many things spouted by Hillary and her Clintonistas, applicable to others but not themselves.

OBAMA 08

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:42 PM on 04/10/2008

v4vendetta....you could not resist the bashing of Hillary, now could ya. You are part of the problem, not the solution.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:58 PM on 04/10/2008

You'd have at least a shred of credibility if you weren't easily revealed as a shameless basher yourself by just one click away to your profile.

Are you part of the solution?

Hypocrite.

:)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 PM on 04/10/2008

I agree, this is a productive thread.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:09 PM on 04/10/2008

one step closer to a hillary endorsement!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:56 PM on 04/10/2008

I almost fell off my chair. A post critical to Jesus-boy. Am I at HuffPo? What planet am I on? Something about the issues? Not blaming Hillary? Where am I?

I like this Schweitzer. I'd vote for him. Either he has big kahunas or the Kool-Aid hasn't gotten that far out west.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:48 PM on 04/10/2008

HRC is a LIAR! Hows that?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:24 PM on 04/10/2008

Don't get too happy. I'm sure HuffPo will block comments on this thread before long. The Chosen One is not allowed to be criticized for long.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:51 PM on 04/10/2008

The chosen one, a title given by the clintons and their supporters........He really is white with a great tan?..........Sounds like envy!!!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:49 PM on 04/10/2008

unenrolled....is that as in never going to school? Obama bestowed that name on himself, his wife has helped perpetuate the myth and his supporters try to prove it everyday on ObamaPost.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:00 PM on 04/10/2008

You mean the one's who aren't voting on name recognition?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:27 PM on 04/10/2008

Big whoop what Montana's Governor thinks...He's in charge of a state who's popluation is less than that of the county I live in that's 1/500 of Montana's size.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:13 PM on 04/10/2008

Careful. You're edging into Hillary small states don't matter land.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:50 PM on 04/10/2008

I have NO PROBLEM with people deciding to not buy health insurance if they want to take their chances. BUT, they must sign their rights away at that point as far as I'm concerned. If they get sick they pay for their own healthcare and if they can't afford it, no one is obligated to take care of them with govt money. the hospital would be free to turn them away and let them die.

Or, at that point they could sign up for health insurance. They would be forced to pay all their back premiums plus a penaly. And, their future premiums would be adjusted higher as a penalty for not buying insurance earlier.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:29 PM on 04/10/2008

That's such a great plan. It's not mean or angry at all.

Got sick, couldnt work and lost your healthcare coverage? Screw you weakling.

Your banished from the herd.

Only bad people can't aford healthcare. They are defective anyway so who cares?

This is how people write that are LUCKY enough to have affordable healthcare already. Screw you I got mine so suffer. thanks NoGood.

It never occurs to them that we can spend $12 BILLION per month in Iraq. No problem.

But provide healthcare for the poor. Nope. Sorry. Can't afford it. That would cost like a whole 3 months of Iraq money! No can do.

The real reason we can't have universal single payer healthcare is because most of the idiots we live with hate everybody and hope they die so they can get their stuff.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:01 PM on 04/10/2008

i was talking about people who will be able to aford it and choose not to buy it. I believe there wil be enoug hsubsidies involved that the poor will get insurance for a very small price or for free

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:18 PM on 04/10/2008

The Hip-Hop Artist Tupac Shakur said in a song recorded in 1994:
When it Rains it Pours
We always have enough to fight a War
But never enough to feed the Poor.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:30 PM on 04/10/2008

This is why Obama's plan isn't workable. We must treat uninsured now, by federal mandate.

I don't think his plan is even constitutional.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:50 PM on 04/10/2008

Good one Ann! LOL!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:48 PM on 04/10/2008

then change the mandate
or punish them

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:11 PM on 04/10/2008

Annin you keep repeating your post so i will keep repeating the answer, which I believe you can understand. There are childwelfare laws in every state and county in the nation that mandate that parents provide, food, clothing, shelter, a safe environment and send them to school. Amending the laws to mandate parent to provide health care could not possibly encounter a constitutional barrier.

Please think about it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:00 PM on 04/10/2008

Of course telling people what they have to b