Petraeus Plays Defense in Testimony

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

Posted April 10, 2008 | 11:38 AM (EST)



Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

This piece was originally posted on The Washington Independent

In September, Gen. David Petraeus's mission on Capitol Hill was offensive.

He had to roll back the advance of congressional Democrats who were gathering the political momentum to stop President George W. Bush's surge of U.S. troops in Iraq. Before the summer recess, Senate Democrats were peeling off nervous Republicans for a measure sponsored by Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.) to harmonize the amount of time soldiers spent at home with their time deployed. Because of the obscure, complex math guiding Iraq deployments, Webb's innocuous-sounding measure would have killed the surge dead.

By the time Petraeus testified on Sept. 11, 2007, the Democrats were three GOP defections away from a veto-proof majority. Thanks to Petraeus' bravura performance seven months ago, it never became law.

But now that the surge has died of natural causes, Petraeus' goal on Capitol Hill this week was as hazy as the mission of the Iraq war itself. In the short-term, Petraeus argued that when all the surge brigades return home in July, Congress should allow him a 45-day "pause" to assess the situation before even considering further troop reductions. Beyond that, however, Petraeus demonstrated little inclination to describe how his strategy for actually fighting the war will change once he no longer has roughly 30,000 extra troops at his disposal. Nor were four congressional committees particularly interested in the answer to that question.

Continue reading at: The Washington Independent.

 
 

Comments
1
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

It has always amazed me that the Bushwa gang wants the federal Iraq as one nation. The very requirement that makes the "reconciliation" so impossible. Yet if the gravitation of the natural Balkanization on ethnic/relitious lines were permitted, there would not be the national reconciliation problem. (think of Serbia and Croatia as "one" country). I have always thought this as a necessity for the "oil" purpose in general that were part of Little George's marching orders from the beginning. You know, like Ron Reagan used to say "there is more than one way to skin a cat".
Imagine Patreus trying to babysit the matrimony between/amongst Serbia, Croatia, and Bosnia? Think it would work well?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:18 PM on 04/10/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 

 
 
Related Tags
 

 Site  Web ask.com