Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki Disagrees With Petraeus: US Forces Can Start Withdrawing

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com

KIM GAMEL | April 10, 2008 05:54 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Show your support.
Buzz this article up.
A minibus with coffin leads a funeral march in the Shiite enclave of Sadr City, Baghdad, Thursday, April 10, 2008. Iraqi police say four more people were killed and six injured by U.S. helicopters in Baghdad's Sadr City district on Thursday. (AP PhotoKarim Kadim)

BAGHDAD — Iraq's prime minister got a show of support from political leaders of both Muslim sects on Thursday as he moved to isolate anti-U.S. Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr and his followers.

The meeting drew warnings from Sadrist lawmakers that the government's effort against them could backfire even as fighting between Shiite militants and U.S.-Iraqi forces eased somewhat after days of fierce clashes in Baghdad's Sadr City district.

The fighting has taken its toll on all sides. The U.S. military announced that an American soldier was killed by a roadside bomb Wednesday in central Baghdad, raising to 18 the number of Americans who died in Iraq the first 10 days of April.

Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, himself a Shiite, convened the meeting of the main political blocs to discuss the Iraqi-led crackdown on militias that began March 25 in the southern city of Basra, triggering the current crisis.

But the notable absence of the Sadrists signaled that al-Maliki was making good on a threat to try to isolate the movement politically if its Mahdi Army militia is not disbanded.

The Sadrists complained they were not invited to the meeting.

"The Iraqi prime minister is waging a political war," Sadrist lawmaker Falah Shanshal said. "But he is committing a big mistake because the Sadr movement enjoys the support of a large portion of the Iraqi public."

The developments came a day after Iraqi authorities announced they would lift a 2-week-old vehicle ban on Sadr City and another Shiite militia stronghold, Shula, this weekend. The intent is to provide relief to the residents who have suffered from food shortages as well as the violence.

Sheik Salman al-Feraiji, al-Sadr's chief representative in Sadr City, welcomed the decision but warned "the battle is not over yet because the U.S. helicopters are still hovering over the city and U.S. forces are still surrounding it."

He also accused al-Maliki of waging a personal vendetta against the Sadrist movement, despite the government's assertion it is only targeting criminal gangs.

"Al-Maliki is refusing to listen to us or meet our leaders," al-Feraiji said. "We think that al-Maliki is determined to continue his mission, and the recent lull happened because of the U.S. criticism of the fruitless performance of his security forces."

Violence in Iraq had declined last year and early this year following a 7-month-old cease-fire by al-Sadr, an influx of American troops and a Sunni revolt against al-Qaida in Iraq.

But the recent government crackdown on the Mahdi Army has provoked fierce retaliation, underscoring the fragility of the security gains.

A marked reduction in casualty rates began around September 2007, and daily averages continued to decline throughout the rest of that year. However, since reaching a low this past January of 20 Iraqis killed per day, casualty levels have once again started to rise, with 26 killed per day in February and 41 per day in March, an Associated Press tally showed.

At least 261 Iraqi civilians and security personnel were killed or found dead across Iraq in the first nine days of April, an average of 29 per day, according to the tally. That's still about half of what they were a year ago; the daily average for April 2007 was 62 Iraqis killed.

The clearing of former insurgent strongholds also has led to the increasing discovery of mass graves. More than 30 bodies believed to have been buried for more than a year were unearthed Thursday by Iraqi troops at a house south of Baghdad, the military announced.

The killing of the American soldier pushed the average U.S. death rate to 1.8 per day so far in April, compared with 1.2 per day last month, according to the AP tally.

That was still lower than the 3.47 deaths per day in April 2007, but the percentage of deaths caused by roadside bombs was sharply higher.

During April 2007, at least 40 percent of the deaths were from roadside bombs. So far this month, at least 56 percent have been caused by the planted explosives.

Many of those were in northeastern Baghdad, which largely comprises Sadr City, a sprawling impoverished area that is home to some 2.5 million people, nearly half the capital's population. U.S. and Iraqi soldiers have restricted access to the area since the fighting broke out in late March between Shiite militants loyal to al-Sadr and government security forces.

Al-Maliki has found himself on the defensive after Iraqi forces were surprised by the fierce resistance by Shiite militias to an offensive that began March 25 in Basra.

But prominent Sunni politician Adnan al-Dulaimi, who leads the largest Sunni bloc in parliament, emerged from Thursday's meeting to say the operation was "a courageous step."

"We stand beside this government and support it. It was a good and blessed step to prevent militias in all provinces," al-Dulaimi said, adding his Accordance Front would begin discussions soon on ending its Cabinet boycott.

The meeting also was attended by Shiite lawmakers Hadi al-Amiri and Khalid al-Attiyah, the deputy parliamentary speaker.

Fighting continued in Sadr City but at a slower pace. The U.S. carried out two airstrikes targeting suspected rocket-launching sites, the military said.

It did not cite any deaths from the strikes, although Iraqi police said at least three people were killed in one of them.

U.S. and Iraqi soldiers also engaged in several gunbattles on Thursday, but "it has been relatively quiet," compared with recent days, said Lt. Col. Steve Stover, a military spokesman in Baghdad.

Police also said few mortar attacks were reported and more people were moving about the streets.

"We are happy with the decrease in violence. I was able to go to the market today and buy some food for my family," said 32-year-old resident Haider Jassim. "The prices have dropped slightly and more shops were open. We hope that this crisis will end soon."

___

Associated Press writers Sameer N. Yacoub and Qassim Abdul-Zahra in Baghdad, and the AP News Research Center in New York, contributed to this report.

 
 

Comments
242
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
- getoffmedz See Profile I'm a Fan of getoffmedz

Guess Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki didn't get the memo?

Iraq is no longer a sovereign country. It belongs to the U.S., the UK and Turkey via conquest and is claimed by General Petraeus under the authority of Bush/Cheney.

Anyone else confused?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:48 PM on 04/11/2008
- JAMES GORMAN See Profile I'm a Fan of JAMES GORMAN

HURRAY FOR IRAQ''S PRIME MINISTER--he must see a wedge possible for November--Bush does not
dare slam down the Prime Minister while other forces here are urging Iraq to step up--pitting our
"liberated" government against our sainted General is going to be a tough syllogism if any logic pretext
is attempted--and it just aint going to play well with Mr.and Mrs. Blue Collar paying the bill and the mortgageg house. Goreman12

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 PM on 04/11/2008
- SaintN See Profile I'm a Fan of SaintN

I can forsee by the old crystal ball hanging from my keychain that outspoken Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki will now soon come to a horribly tragic and untimely demise!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:25 AM on 04/11/2008
- robXdion See Profile I'm a Fan of robXdion

This is more about them wanting to turn their country over to the Iranians and Bush wanting to stay for the oil fields to make his homies rich and leave a legacy of .30 cent p/gal oil. Never gonna happen, but let's just be honest for once. The Shiites want to unite and create a new unified Persia. The Sunni will remain a thorn and seek help from Saudis. While "new Persia" and the Saudis are tussling, Iran will still provoke Israel. The Israelis will feel threatened and launch a preemptive strike because of Iran's aggressive moves and we will have the beginnings of WW3. Before this is over a mushroom cloud will hover somewhere in Iran. Russia will get involved and the ball game is over.

Heckuva job, Bushie!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:03 PM on 04/10/2008
- KQuark See Profile I'm a Fan of KQuark

You are spot on I was going to write something similar. The deal between Iraq's government and Iran is already done. That's why Bush and Cheney want to keep our troops there to fight a proxy war with Iran. When we withdraw it doesn't matter when anymore because when they popped of the top of the champaign and fumbled any kind of peace the path was set. I still think Bush's main purpose in waging aggressive war was to speed up the end times for his nutty religion.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:00 AM on 04/11/2008
- ajax2 See Profile I'm a Fan of ajax2

You are way out of line Tonto.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 PM on 04/10/2008
- Grannysue See Profile I'm a Fan of Grannysue

Anyone who believes the Bush Bullcrap machine are simply as stupid as him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:50 PM on 04/10/2008
- timothe See Profile I'm a Fan of timothe

This article has nothing to do with the US troops. Why such a skewed headline?

Don't answer that. I already know the answer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 PM on 04/10/2008
- julescator See Profile I'm a Fan of julescator

There is no more Iraq - there are only malitias fighting for power including Al Maliki! We have been lied to for many years. We have to end this thing. The is the worse atrocity in American History and Bush will pay for lying to the American people. Al queda is not in Iraq. that is a BIG lie.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:49 PM on 04/10/2008
- mgsorens See Profile I'm a Fan of mgsorens

That's true, but I'm still mad at Bush for blowing up the levy in New Orleans and selling our oil to the planet Kapak!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:19 PM on 04/10/2008
- julescator See Profile I'm a Fan of julescator

Here is what is REALLY happening in Iraq. Print this and give it to all family and friends.

http://www.senate.gov/~foreign/testimony/2008/RosenTestimony080402p.pdf

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:46 PM on 04/10/2008
- HansB See Profile I'm a Fan of HansB

Thank you so much for the link. I read the testimony breathlessly. It is so detailed and clear about what is happening.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:35 AM on 04/11/2008
- williamina See Profile I'm a Fan of williamina

Here is the idea of moonbat journalism.

Slap that headline on an article describing the running of the Kentucky Derby and some moonbat will try and defend it by saying Maliki did say it.

Let me see if I got this right. Some HuffPo meshugana read that stupid Ricey link, decided to post the headline and put it on top of the above story. Got it. No wonder this crowd defends Rather.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:33 PM on 04/10/2008
- maribelle1963 See Profile I'm a Fan of maribelle1963

Does the story match the headline?

I just read this through twice but missed the part where Al Maliki says US troops should start withdrawing.

What am I missing?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:29 PM on 04/10/2008
- JackW See Profile I'm a Fan of JackW

I thought it was just me! I was crazy enough to read it 3 times! This is the second article today on HuffPo where the ehadline was misleading and did not convey what was really said in the actual articles. I guess you can't trust the HuffPo anymore!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 PM on 04/14/2008
- batgirlevi See Profile I'm a Fan of batgirlevi

The msm will make sure this bit of information is buried under the now 24/7 polygamy story.

They could be pointing out video of bush stating that if Iraq asked us to leave we would leave. It would make sense if we had an msm that had some balls or even one ball.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:11 PM on 04/10/2008
- ZsaZsa See Profile I'm a Fan of ZsaZsa

But why should we let what the elected Iraqi leader says get in the way of our spreading democracy in Iraq?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:58 PM on 04/10/2008
- grendl See Profile I'm a Fan of grendl



Exactly right.

When anti Americanism, and the end of occupation become the strongest, most popular political platforms in a country, whether its Viet Nam or Iraq, it's time to leave. But we're not leaving.

Why again? He gave us his blessing to get out. What more do we need.

Sorta makes me think there might be other agendas in play here. Maybe the Iraqis will suspect the same.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:35 PM on 04/10/2008
- Nobrun See Profile I'm a Fan of Nobrun

Right. We are there to educate him about his country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:25 PM on 04/10/2008
- madkey See Profile I'm a Fan of madkey



If the prime minister is telling us we can start letting our troops go home that means they don't want us there. Why are we so interested in democracy in their country more than they are. It' evident that the longer we stay there the more enemies we attract.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:23 PM on 04/10/2008
- Nobrun See Profile I'm a Fan of Nobrun

This war is about democracy? Oh, thanks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:27 PM on 04/10/2008
- Amennyc See Profile I'm a Fan of Amennyc

what will this do to operation furrredum?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:08 PM on 04/10/2008
- mattwin See Profile I'm a Fan of mattwin

He's just saying that so that Bush does not torture him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:02 PM on 04/10/2008
- the964kid See Profile I'm a Fan of the964kid

Thats bad timing (if you're Bush and McCain and want 100 year occupation). If Iraq is an independent nation (which Bush claims it is) then the prime minister should be able to tell US troops to leave. How's McCain/Bush gonna get out of this one??

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:57 PM on 04/10/2008
- JackW See Profile I'm a Fan of JackW

McCain didn't say he wanted a 100 year occupation. Read his speech before commenting.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 PM on 04/14/2008
- Wildcatdiva See Profile I'm a Fan of Wildcatdiva

Okay how is Bush and friends going to spin this one?!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:50 PM on 04/10/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in