She's The Boss: I'll Withdraw Regardless Of Military Advice

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

New York Times   |  Julie Bosman   |   April 10, 2008 06:27 PM


Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

The New York Times reports:

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton reiterated her campaign pledge to begin withdrawing troops from Iraq within 60 days of taking office, and added on Thursday that she would carry out the policy regardless of the advice she might receive from military commanders.


At a news conference here, Mrs. Clinton was asked if she would keep to her promises on withdrawing troops, even if she is advised differently by military leaders on the ground.

"Well, let me just describe to you the way our system works," Mrs. Clinton said. "Policy is set by the civilian leadership. The president of the United States sets the policy. Our military, and thankfully so, carries out the policy that is set. You ask the military for their best advice about how to implement the policy that you have set."

Keep reading.

 
 

Comments
899
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (9 pages total)

She sounds more and more like a dictator to me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 PM on 04/11/2008

Say What?

She asserted the very true fact that in this country we have civilian leadership of the military. Civilian leadership of the military combined with a democratic system for choosing those civilian leaders is the polar opposite from a dictatorship.

While there are plenty of reasons for not wanting Hillary, each of us gets an equal opportunity to voice our opinion by voting. Additionally, there are internet postings and the ability to write a letter to the editor of a printed media publication.

Those who think HIllary is some kind of monster, a threat to democracy, or is damaging the Democratic party by staying in the race lack both perspective and respect for our system of government.

Some of the Obama fans on this site are extremely childish. Some HIllary posters are as well. However, Obama is most likely going to win the nomination. Seems like there is little to gain by bitching about Hillary. Seems like the most useful thing to do at this point (if you are rooting for Obama) would be to ignore her.

Let the process play itself out. Let the all the voters vote. Count up the votes and declare (Obama most likely) the winner.

As Bill said recently "Everybody just chill out. We're going to win this thing in November if y'all just chill out". Those who cannot do this do not really trust our form of government. Those who insist that Hillary must drop out immediately are the ones sounding like dictators.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:25 PM on 04/11/2008

I hope this comes up in the debate.

Judgement. Obama has it. She doesn't.

The reason she is saying this, is because they both want to pull out, as does the majority of USA, but she needs to set herself apart. She is saying what ever she thinks you want to hear. Poor judgement again.

How long do we need to listen to this? This woman/family will say anything and when it turns out to be a fabrication, they have clever "i'm sorry" lines that her supporters eat up. It gets old, it has been old and even her supporters need to take a step back and ask how much can they take.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:04 PM on 04/11/2008

"This woman/family will say anything..." This is such a tired and pointless argument about the Clintons. It can't be proven, of course, because they have said only what they have said.

There are many other evil things that they could have said and done over the years; and yet didn't.

Bill, was a President who didn't seek to demonize any segment of the population through lies and misrepresentations: Reagan referred to "welfare queens"; Bush 43 refers to anyone who doesn't support his policies as a terrorist. Bush 41 seem to thrive on using the word "liberal" as a slur. The Clintons, both Bill and Hillary, do not seem to stoop to this level at all. If they were willing to "say anything" to get elected, we'd be hearing all kinds of slurs and ad hominens. Instead, what we get from them, in terms of falsehoods, are delusional self aggrandizing statements about themselves.

Face it. You don't like her. You don't want her to be President. I'm not sure I do either.

However, this idea that she is a bigger liar, or tells more damaging lies, than your average politician isn't really true. And the idea that she will say or do anything to get elected isn't a supportable accusation because she only does and says what she says and does. What she doesn't say or do, she doesn't say or do.

It's a logic trap and folks should stop acting like it's an actual argument to be made.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:39 PM on 04/11/2008

Neutralizing . . . ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:08 PM on 04/11/2008

Why do u clinton supporters blame Obama for Hillary's troubles?
Obama has nothing to do with her bosnia sniper fire story which has affected her credibility and all the other stories.
It's like saying Hillary is responsible for Rev Wright.

Also obama has told Patraeus what he needed to tell him. DId u watch the hearings?
He can't hold Patraeus responsible for Iraq now becos Patraeus does not have a say. Patraeus is only following what Bush has outlined for him.
Look closely next time u see Patraeus. He's one of the most humble personalities I've seen IN MY ADULT LIFE.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:58 PM on 04/11/2008

People used to think John McCain was a war hero, too-then we found out he was a mentally deranged dick.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:29 PM on 04/11/2008

What I find interesting is how she's sticking to the 60 day thing now. As I recall in a former debate, when Edwards, Obama, Richardson and others (when asked when they would begin a draw down) Clinton was the only one who said she couldn't provide a timeline. Now she was adamant about it early this year when she said no one could give a clear time line for bringing home the troops. Then she went from 180 days to eventually 60 days to start bringing them home (when she noticed her poll #'s slipping and realized the Iraq War is a thorn in American flesh).

It's just interesting to me is all...that this woman can speak to millions with a straight face and bash Obama, Bush & McCain but she has really had a campaign of blunders that has ultimately ended her chances. She doesn't even FLINCH! Now THAT's gangsta. lol

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 PM on 04/11/2008

hmmmn....w/out the advice of the military leaders.....sounds like she already knows best! this is scary and so political. She is a machine in her logic here and I read it as the hell with the right thing to do but I have to win the nomination NOW!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 PM on 04/11/2008

That's not what she said.
I support Obama, but still, that's not what Hillary said. There are plenty of ridiculous things Hillary has said- sniper fire, for instance- there is no need to twist her words on this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:35 PM on 04/11/2008

SAY ANYTHING TO WIN AT IT AGAIN!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 AM on 04/11/2008

She's been talking about this for almost two years, so your point is...what?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:52 PM on 04/11/2008

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/youve_got_mailers.html

More Hillary Negativity and LIES, when will it STOP

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:39 AM on 04/11/2008

Right back at you:

"A widely forwarded e-mail claims that Obama's bills are more substantive and numerous than Clinton's. Don't believe it."

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/substance_abuse.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:53 PM on 04/11/2008

big difference. the first mis-statement comes from the CLINTON CAMPAIGN MAILER
yours refers to an ANONYMOUS EMAIL>

so, right back at YOU

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:09 PM on 04/11/2008

Has anyone heard about Elton John at his concerto to come out for Hillary, suggesting that people that don't vote for her might be misogynists? Yes. Here we go. And here's the link:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/04/11/wuspols111.xml
Why does it always have to be that if someone doesn't want to vote Hillary, they are deeply dysfunctional? Why can't they just be disagreeing?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:59 AM on 04/11/2008

Completely agree. I had a conversation recently with a woman (and HRC supporter) who all but said that I just "don't get it" and that not supporting her was sexist. I laid out my reasons and she still told me that I have inherent bias.

That may be true to some extent, after all you can't get away from the larger realities (and ills) of society, but when I have political, non-sex based concerns with her decisions, leadership, and direction, can't I just decline to vote for her without being branded a sexist??

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:06 PM on 04/11/2008

I'm with Sink. I too have had conversations with HRC supporters who have questioned how I can call myself a liberal feminist yet not support Sen. Clinton. Of course I want to see a woman US President in my lifetime. Does that mean I'd vote for Ann Coulter or Libby Dole? Absolutely not. So why should I vote for HRC if I believe there is another candidate more qualified for the job?

It would be sexist of me to blindly support a candidate based on their gender. Any feminist guilt I feel when I vote for Obama will be fleeting at best.

Plus, no disrespect to Sir Elton, since when was it the duty of British male pop stars to question the ability of American women to vote responsibly?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:44 PM on 04/11/2008

This is an interesting dynamic in this race. I have been told by women that they are voting for Hillary "because she's a woman, and we need a woman president." I've also been told that "I'm voting for Hillary because I'm a woman," as if it's every woman's duty to vote for her. Strange how issues of electability in the national election, experience and judgment never come up in these conversations until pressed. And I've found that the more I press, the more it seems that for some of the women that support Hillary, it simply doesn't matter what she says or does or what her record shows.

They have taken some sort of psychic blood oath with the sisterhood, and they will stick with Hillary even if they think it's unlikely she can beat McCain. They want a woman to have gotten "that close."

Which seems to indicate that for all of their yammering about the good of women and the good of children and the good of the country, they actually don't give a damn about any of those things. They'd rather have their kids or grandkids drafted into McCain's Pan-Islamic Wars and die in the deserts of the Middle East than betray the "woman candidate." Which is sad, and evinces a true dearth of rational or moral clarity.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:51 PM on 04/11/2008

"Why can't they just be disagreeing?"

Or simply have a reality-based long-term memory? To be honest, the Hillaristas don't seem bothered by anything Hillary says or does, which could be a good definition of "dysfunctional".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:06 AM on 04/11/2008

I wasn't very clear. What I meant was, in Hillary's eyes, if someone prefers another candidate to her, she tries to label them as sexists or misogynists, rather than just facing the fact that they don't prefer her. I can just hear Bill off stage to Elton before the show, "If you feel like saying, oh, that there is some misogyny out there, feel free." Wink, wink. No, I don't know if it was him, but I think it's a cheap shot. You can tell she's gearing up for PA. But then if Obama thought something was racist, she would have a fit, saying that he is just dragging that in to up his vote. I hate this stuff.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:41 AM on 04/11/2008

I agree with you nohat. I know so many educated independent women for Obama and it feels like joke when some include us as sexists against Hillary.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:59 PM on 04/11/2008

She's right.

One in a million, eh??

.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:46 AM on 04/11/2008

wow, she scares me. She won't listen to the commanders on the ground? Thats a little out there! At least with Barack Obama we know his intention is to bring the troops out and to bring them out responsibly. Barack Obama will at least take input from all sides involved. HRC says she will take input from HERSELF. One word describes Hillary Rodam Clinton, DIVISIVE! Obama 08!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 AM on 04/11/2008

It is always about her hillary the queen's power... reminded me her effort on health care when she was in White House. i can't see how she will do the withdraw carefully with such limited intellect to apply her pre-made script to complex problems. Same thing with her running her campaign - now that is scary to see how she can ends the war. Blame others doesn't solve any real problems.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:03 PM on 04/11/2008

Hillary is going to pull something 24 to 48 hours before the PA primary, wait and see. Something about Obama. I've been saying this for 3 weeks. That doesn't make it true, I know, but the pattern is there. If she has anything on him, she will wait until the last minute; for if she does it too soon, he will have time to recover, as he has---mostly---with the Jeremiah Wright thing. What she will chiefly want is to spring something so that the voters have just the right amount of time to dwell on it and get nervous. This is just standard ---er, standard dirty---campaign stuff. I did read somewhere last night--sorry I can't find it, I have tried---that she will go very negative on OIbama before PA. Others disagree.
Personally, I don't think Hillary will quit even if she loses PA and five other states too. For she won't face defeat. Don't be surprised if it goes to Denver and she pulls something there or starts litigation or something, just to stall. Many of you will say this will never happen, I hope you are right.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:30 AM on 04/11/2008

my guess is a day or two after the debate...
which is why she wouldn't accept a second debate on the 19th.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:17 PM on 04/11/2008

I agree 100% and am really scared it will be something so bad that she will win big...then it will turn out to be another lie. Too late to do anything about it just like Ohio/Texas.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:31 AM on 04/11/2008

I agree with you too. It is sad that American voters have such a short memory so Hillary knows that she can get away from her lies therefore there is no concern on her part to refrain from lying. Anything goes as long as she can win the battle of today. What kind of future with a leader like that in White House? Depressing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:07 PM on 04/11/2008

It seems that on your world, the one that is disliked the most is the one capable of doing the most good for humanity.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 AM on 04/11/2008

Democrats - Be Careful - the Election will not be decided in California or New York - this election will be decided by Voters are not nearly as left wing as Hillary and Obama. If they over-reach to the Left the Democrats may well find themselves wondering how they possibly could have lost to McCain as he takes the Oath of Office in Jan 2009.

While Americans don't like the Iraq War - the voters who will really decide who takes over the White House - aren't going to like hearing someone say they want to just walk away regardless of what they might get for advice and regardless of the outcome.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:51 AM on 04/11/2008

Gosh, rh654, some of us see Hill/Bill as pretty close to the vast right wing that they so recently have embraced (Richard Mellon Scaife and his PA media empire). Hill's "experience" is largely based on her trying to establish her hawkish persona.

And quick note; neither Democratic candidate has ever proposed "walking away regardless."

That sure sounds like a GOP troll -- or, a rabid McCain supporter. Or, both.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:05 AM on 04/11/2008

There will be a draft. The weary and tired troops will be relieved. Soon the uprisings in the territories will cease. The added troops from the draft will assure the residents of the world that peace and order is on the way. Expect this change to bring together the warring factions with diplomacy. The CRIMINALS responsible for the Iraq FIASCO will be rounded up and disciplined.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:38 AM on 04/11/2008

Yes you will be drafted to the inept & funny farm.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:23 PM on 04/11/2008

Here at a last! Here at last! The end of the Neo-Con Mafia's reign! See you there, but I will be a visitor and you will be a resident.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:10 PM on 04/11/2008

Sorry Hillary but we are not a dictatorship. We have a Congress that sets policy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:24 AM on 04/11/2008

Congress does NOT set military policy - that's what a Commander in Chief does (hence the title Commander in Chief). The Congress DOES control the purse, however, so in that sense they can support a proposed policy. After 7 years of war and failed policy, what do you think the chance are that a popular proposal to start drawing down within 60 days of a new presidency would be rejected by Congress? Pretty damned slim, I should think!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:50 PM on 04/11/2008

Not that I am agreeing with Hillary but a lot of good congress has done us so far!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 AM on 04/11/2008

With Hillary at the helm, Congress will move.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 AM on 04/11/2008

To India... Just kidding!