Bush Unlikely to Boycott Olympics

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

FOSTER KLUG | April 12, 2008 08:11 AM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Show your support.
Buzz this article up.
President Bush waves as he is escorted by a Chinese military escort while leaving the Great Hall of the People after a meeting with Chinese counterpart Hu Jintao in Beijing in this Nov. 20, 2005 file photo. For Bush, it seems a small gesture would make a big point: Staying away from the opening ceremonies of the Beijing Summer Olympics would send a clear signal of U.S. anger over China's crackdown against anti-Beijing Tibetan protesters. Yet Bush is giving no indication that he will skip the event. Too much may be at stake for him to do so. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak, File)

WASHINGTON — For President Bush, it would seem a small gesture to make a big point: Staying away from the opening ceremonies of the Beijing Summer Olympics would send a clear signal of U.S. anger over China's crackdown against anti-Beijing Tibetan protesters.

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and German Chancellor Angela Merkel will not attend the opening ceremonies. John McCain, the Republican senator Bush has endorsed as his successor, says he would go only if China improved its rights record. And the two Democratic presidential candidates, Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton, are urging Bush to miss the ceremonies.

Yet Bush is giving no indication he will skip the event. Too much may be at stake for him to do so.

Any Olympic protest by the United States would deeply offend a proud Beijing leadership that hopes the games will show China's emergence as a new world power. It also would run the risk of hindering a host of international efforts the Bush administration needs China's help to solve, including efforts to confront Myanmar's military junta and North Korean and apparently Iranian nuclear programs. China holds a veto on the U.N. Security Council, and the U.S. and Chinese economies, as well as many of the countries' political efforts around the world, are increasingly intertwined.

Pressed repeatedly by reporters this week, the White House said Bush is attending the Olympics but would not announce his specific schedule so far ahead of the games, which begin Aug. 8. The administration did not rule out the possibility of Bush missing the opening ceremonies.

On Friday, Bush repeated his position that the Olympics are for sports, not politics. He told ABC News that his decision to attend the games is not affected by pleas from activists who want world leaders to skip the opening ceremony to protest violence in Tibet. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice says the United States will "press the Chinese on human rights issues before, during and after these upcoming Olympic Games."

Bush maintains his presence at the games will allow him to raise human rights problems directly with Chinese President Hu Jintao while watching the best athletes in the world compete.

That position could change if Beijing were to stage a crackdown reminiscent of the one against pro-democracy protesters at Tiananmen Square in 1989.

But Michael Green, Bush's former Asia adviser, says the president probably will attend the opening ceremonies.

"The problem with a boycott is you end up taking 1.3 billion Chinese _ who have different views of democracy, of the U.S., of human rights, but all want the Olympics to be successful _ and you turn them all against the U.S.," said Green, an analyst with the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank. "It's a crude and blunt instrument to just boycott."

Bush, he added, is "stubborn when he thinks he's got the right decision."

Green said he thinks the administration is using decisions by world leaders to skip the opening ceremonies to push Beijing to work with the Dalai Lama, the exiled Tibetan spiritual leader who Beijing accuses of pushing for independence from China.

On Friday, Rice again urged China to talk with the Dalai Lama. "China would really do itself a great service, and not to mention the people of Tibet, if it were willing to have a more open attitude toward responsible Tibetan cultural and religious authorities," she said.

Bush has been outspoken in his support of the Dalai Lama and presented the monk with a Congressional Gold Medal last year over strong Chinese protests.

But U.S. lawmakers are urging Bush to take a stand on Tibet at the Olympics.

Clinton and two other Democratic senators sent Bush a letter this week saying the crackdown in Tibet "should be unacceptable to anyone who believes in basic human freedoms."

Bush's attendance of the opening ceremonies, they wrote, "would send the implicit message to the world that the United State condones the intolerance that has been demonstrated by these actions of the Chinese government."

China is working hard to contain violence in Tibet ahead of the games. It has sent thousands of police and army troops to the region to maintain an edgy peace, hunt down protest leaders and cordon off Buddhist monasteries whose monks led protests that began peacefully on March 10 before turning violent four days later.

Victor Cha, director of Asian studies at Georgetown University and another former White House adviser, said Bush is a "sports purist" who sees "the games as sport only, not politics."

"He will go and will not call for a boycott," Cha said in an e-mail.

 
 

Comments
96
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

No surprise here. It's completely in keeping with everything things he's about. Can you imagine? Pissing off the Chinese!? No way. People think he has a back problem these days, but it's really that he's in a permanent posture of kowtow to China.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:03 PM on 04/12/2008

I guess I have to side with Bush and the Dalai Lama on this one. Strange bedfellows but drawing attention ot Tibet is a good idea and turning people off of it as an annoyance is not. If I were capable of going to Beijing to watch the games personally, I think I would use it as an opportunity to draw attention to the plight of the people when all eyes are already in my direction...I don't think the authoritatian leaders of china are going to find that they'll get the sort of results they're anticipating, which is of course the lesson to be learned here. Big authoritarian governements are an embarrassment and will change when they realize it when they try to pretend that they arent.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:23 PM on 04/12/2008

Bush probably has a lower approval rating in America then China does - so this is no surprise. If he had any sense he'd be boycotting himself.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:12 PM on 04/12/2008

Naturally. Why shoud The World's #1 Terrorist, the Torturer-In-Chief, the Polluters' Whore Himself boycott an event put on by panty-waists-in-comparison, the Chinese Government?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:04 PM on 04/12/2008

What?!?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 PM on 04/12/2008

Of course he will not boycott the opening ceremonies, because while other World leaders (London's, Frances....) follow the will of their public, Bush is loyal to the corporations as is most of the rest of our elected officials and they China, they can make MONEY.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:59 PM on 04/12/2008

Bush will attend because the public will be overwhelmingly against it . . . simple, just like every Decider Guy move.

As a matter of fact he asked if the could hand out the Medals for the Waterboard Competition. He even asked to light the Olympic Monk . . .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:20 PM on 04/12/2008

This bullshit story has been buzzing around the media for a week now. When was the last time a U.S. President attended the Olympic opening ceremonies? UH LIKE PRETTY CLOSE TO NEVER. No body in the MSM has bothered to make that point. The fact is, Bush never had any intention of attending the opening ceremonies and everybody knows it. This is all deliberate deceit by both democrats and republicans.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:40 PM on 04/12/2008

Don't we know our CINC by now...? He LOVES crackdowns, he LOVES torture, he LOVES violence,be the victims innocent or guilty,and most of all...he just LO-O-O-OVES him some PARADE!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:35 PM on 04/12/2008

dumbya is gonna jawbone the Chinese to open the spigots of democracy, just like he did with Saudi oil.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:29 PM on 04/12/2008

BUSH ***LIKES*** THE WAY...

The Chinese have "cracked down" on Tibet. That's exactly what he would do in their situation. So what's to boycott?...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:12 PM on 04/12/2008

So he goes over there when other presidents have not. Is something going to happen to him?
Is this a pawn sacrifice to open the game for something else the neocons want to get started?
Since the tv coverage will be regulated, Bush can be as crazy as he wants and we will not see it.
Is he openly losing it and this is the way to get rid of him? Kind of like the bad general who gets fragged by his own men and it is reported back home that he died heroically in battle.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:50 PM on 04/12/2008

What? I thought the libs were opposed to our meddling in another country's internal affairs.

But then again, today is another tough day for libs worldwide; according to AP (today), Raul Castro is "allowing" Cubans to own their homes, which were formerly owned by the state.

That one will really give the libs something about which to cry & whine..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:35 PM on 04/12/2008

Okay, here's what I don't get. Why and how has this become an issue? Had Bush planned to attend the opening ceremonies? I heard on Diane Rehm that no American president has ever attended an Olympic opening ceremony. If that is true Bush would be breaking tradition by attending the opening ceremony for the first time. Again, was this something he's planning to do? If so, it begs the question. Why is the first American president to attend an opening ceremony doing so in a country run by communist dictators?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 PM on 04/12/2008

He's a moron. What do you expect? He does what he is told by the one with the dark glasses, reflecting the naked woman. He's a good little boy. Moron!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:19 PM on 04/12/2008

We can't blame this one on George. After all, he has mortgaged this country lock, stock and barrel. How can he graciously decline an invitation to such a massive party thrown by our landlord?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 PM on 04/12/2008

Surely no one thinks Bush has any right to say anything to anyone about "human rights" issues.

We have met the enemy, and it is US.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:54 AM on 04/12/2008

This is a joke right?? President George Bush who bombed, invaded, occupied Iraq resulting in hundreds of thousands of deaths is going to protest China's occupation of Tibet?? Oh yes, and the man who authorized torture to achieve his goals.
This is ridiculous.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 AM on 04/12/2008

Exactly. Bush is merely going to support another country that occupies and tortures. He might learn an additional thing or two. Bush walks hand in hand with the Saudis who are running the insurgency in Iraq. More funding comes from Saudia Arabia, more freedom fighters, most of the terrorists on 9/11 were Saudi, Osama been Forgotten is Saudi, etc... yet you never ever hear the MSM talk about it. Why would he not let the Chinese hold the other hand?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 PM on 04/12/2008

Interesting how Obama's position has quietly moved into line with Clinton's.

Only two days ago, on this site his backers were pointing to his wait-and-see approach as superior. Of course, he didn't want to spoil Chicago's chances of getting the 2016 games, particularly since some of his backers are tied to the application.

Oh well, his wishy-washy position was getting any traction. I'd just like to hear him admit, "Hillary was right."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:26 AM on 04/12/2008

Obama and Clinton are both wrong. I am surprised by both of them actually. Bush should go. I can count on one hand the number of times that I agree with bush, but this is one of them. What if every time the Oympics are held in the U.S., leaders of other countries boycott us because of our lousy policies. It would get to be ridiculous. I could name about 20 countries right now that have every right to protest U.S. behavior in the world. This is about the celebration of gifted athletes. Not everything has to be about politics or policy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:27 PM on 04/12/2008

Bush for one welcomes our new Chinese overlords

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:22 AM on 04/12/2008

His daddy is their "Blessed Leader of the Western Capitalistic Corp"

George H W Bush has done more damage to the United States of America than any despot or 'fearless leader' of China could imagine accomplishing.

George H W Bush and his whole family dynasty are on the payroll of the Chinese/Sauds/Unification Church and anyone else with a couple mill to through at his pathetic little Mayberry Mafia set up.

The whole family are nothing but traitors to our country.

They all need to be deported and or charged with the crimes against humanity that the facts support.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 PM on 04/12/2008

You have no facts to support that. You, like most bloggers here, do nothing but repeat things you hear without doing any sort of investigation for yourself. You are proof that our education system has failed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:38 PM on 04/12/2008

If this tit for tat is all you have, then Good Night and you are ALL pissing me off.

FREE TIBET!
I thought that this was what this thread was all about. In the mean time F.U!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 AM on 04/12/2008

Reagan at Bitburg - Shrub in Beijing.

Can't wait for Shrub to refer to the Chinese troops and the Hans sent to take over the economy of Tibet as "Victims", ala Reagan mouthing the words of Pat Buchanan at Bitburg.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:36 AM on 04/12/2008

Our spring 08 economic stimulus checks are being funded by China.

You know what they say .........the hand that feeds ya...............

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:35 AM on 04/12/2008

You know what they say.........scratch a hufftard.......find a dhimmi.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:36 AM on 04/12/2008

That is strange. I thought it was..... you wiil always find a dhimmi trying to scratch
a huffy with a conscience.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:11 AM on 04/12/2008

I just don't understand how it is Tibet isn't free. Libs have been putting bumper stickers on their cars for decades now in their all out effort to free what they consider cute little brown men.
Imagine that; real tyrants, as opposed to make believe ones induced by BDS, don't follow demands by smug libs.
Should have followed the same strategy for Iraq and Afghanistan. People would still be fed through paper shredders, families would still be raped and dismembered, public beheadings and stonings would still be happening. Those very events are needed so the libs can feel good about protesting them while doing absolutely nothing about it.
As long as people viewed as quaint by the libs are being brutalized, the libs can have their bumper sticker righteousness. And they're just fine by that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:25 AM on 04/12/2008

ThePodiumIsMine~

..."cute little brown men''...??

How crude.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:57 AM on 04/12/2008

decades now in their all out effort to free what they consider cute little brown men.
---------
That is a straw man. Hence, what follows the above line should be discarded as pure rubbish.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:30 AM on 04/12/2008

Absolutely, discard inconvenient facts. They hamper Hume's propaganda campaign, and they make the huffsheep uncomfortable.

But truth speakers such as I will remain to shine the light on you cockroaches. As with your bumper stickers, your fascist tactics will remain ineffective.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:39 AM on 04/12/2008

"Truth speakers" generally do not use words such as "cockroaches", "fascist tactics" in the same sentence to further the truth.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 PM on 04/12/2008

So please feel free to tell us exactly how you feel about the rest of
world suffering?
!.) Care a little bit. None of my business, real
2,) Well if they trade with us, it means they must be civilized.

3.) Who gives a shit, they can't vote here anyway.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:59 AM on 04/12/2008

Hilarious!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:46 AM on 04/12/2008

At this stage of the game, Bush will not pass up any opportunity to get out of town. Help our country, think of other events he could go to and forward your suggestion to the White House.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:17 AM on 04/12/2008

Why would he? He has no morals, integrity, sense, brains...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 AM on 04/12/2008

Its time to recognize the "facts on the ground" as we have done with other governments of 'occupation'.The Chinese hold that Tibet is a province of China and when Chinese are attacked they have the right to retaliate for security reasons.At least it hasn't come to bulldozing houses or cutting off supplies of fuel, food,and medicine.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:09 AM on 04/12/2008

but...but...but...The JEWS!!!