Scientists: Big Quake Likely in Calif.

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

ALICIA CHANG | April 14, 2008 11:01 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Show your support.
Buzz this article up.
Geophysicist Ned Field of the United States Geological Survey, refers to an illustration, during a news conference Monday, April 14, 2008, at the University of Southern California, Davidson Conference Center U.S. Geological Survey. California faces an almost certain risk of being rocked by a strong temblor by 2037, scientists said Monday in the first statewide forecast of the seismic threat. (AP Photo/Nick Ut)

LOS ANGELES — California faces an almost certain risk of being rocked by a strong earthquake by 2037, scientists said Monday in the first statewide temblor forecast. New calculations reveal there is a 99.7 percent chance a magnitude 6.7 quake or larger will strike in the next 30 years. The odds of such an event are higher in Southern California than Northern California, 97 percent versus 93 percent.

"It basically guarantees it's going to happen," said Ned Field, a geophysicist with the U.S. Geological Survey in Pasadena and lead author of the report.

The 1994 Northridge earthquake under Los Angeles' San Fernando Valley was magnitude 6.7. It killed 72 people, injured more than 9,000 and caused $25 billion in damage in the metropolitan area.

The damage created by an earthquake depends greatly on where it hits. A 7.1 quake _ much stronger than Northridge _ hit the Mojave Desert in 1999 but caused only a few injuries and no deaths.

California is one of the world's most seismically active regions. More than 300 faults crisscross the state, which sits atop two of Earth's major tectonic plates, the Pacific and North American plates. About 10,000 quakes each year rattle Southern California alone, although most of them are too small to be felt.

The analysis is the first comprehensive effort by the USGS, Southern California Earthquake Center and California Geological Survey to calculate earthquake probabilities for the entire state using newly available data. Previous quake probabilities focused on specific regions and used various methodologies that made it difficult to compare.

For example, a 2003 report found the San Francisco Bay Area faced a 62 percent chance of being struck by a magnitude 6.7 quake by 2032. The new study increased the likelihood slightly to 63 percent by 2037. For the Los Angeles Basin, the probability is higher at 67 percent. There is no past comparison for the Los Angeles area.

Scientists still cannot predict exactly where in the state such a quake will occur or when. But they say the analysis should be a wake-up call for residents to prepare for a natural disaster in earthquake country.

Knowing the likelihood of a strong earthquake is the first step in allowing scientists to draw up hazard maps that show the potential severity of ground shaking in an area. The information can also help with updating building codes and emergency plans and setting earthquake insurance rates.

"A big earthquake can happen tomorrow or it can happen 10 years from now," said Tom Jordan, director of the earthquake center, which is headquartered at the University of Southern California.

Researchers also calculated the statewide probabilities for larger temblors over the same time period. Among their findings: There is a 94 percent chance of a magnitude 7 shock or larger; a 46 percent chance of a magnitude 7.5 and a 4.5 percent chance of a magnitude 8.

The odds are higher that a magnitude 7.5 quake will hit Southern California than Northern California _ 37 percent versus 15 percent.

Of all the faults in the state, the southern San Andreas, which runs from Parkfield in central California southeast to the Salton Sea, appears most primed to break, scientists found. There is a 59 percent chance in the next three decades that a Northridge-size quake will occur on the fault compared to 21 percent for the northern section.

The northern San Andreas produced the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, but the southernmost segment has not popped in more than three centuries.

Scientists are also concerned about the Hayward and San Jacinto faults, which have a 31 percent chance of producing a Northridge-size temblor in the next 30 years. The Hayward fault runs through densely populated cities in the San Francisco Bay Area. The San Jacinto fault bisects the fast-growing city of San Bernardino east of Los Angeles.

___

On the Net:

U.S. Geological Survey: http://www.usgs.gov

Southern California Earthquake Center: http://www.scec.org

California Geological Survey: http://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/

 
 

Comments
98
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

Among the things that most concern me is this: Americans, from our collective government to individuals, have been squandering our resources like drunken sailors on leave, from the financial black hole in Iraq to irresponsible personal spending. Our Nation is in debt, credit lines are maxed out, even our military resources are stretched to the limits.

So what happens when (notice I didn't say if) there is a serious national emergency?

While we are flushing our financial and military resources down the unnecessary Iraq War tiolet and running like little girls from the proverbial "terrorist" the Bush/Cheney administration loves to dangle in front of us, especially at election time, we are totally ignoring natural disasters and challenges that are certain. They will happen, it's just a matter of when and how bad.

Massive earthquakes, fires, droughts, crop failures, pandemics? These are a natural, expected part of life on this planet.

If we are prepared, we can manage and survive.

If we are not prepared, we will see catastrophic consequences from chaos to massive loss of life.

Let's face it. We are not prepared.

Time to get prepared dammit. Start with yourself and your family. Set aside emergency supplies including adequate food, water, and medicine for the likely challenges in your area. Set aside some extra for your neighbors; get to know your neighbors; create a sense of community, and demand a government that actually does it's one legitimate function: Protecting the life, liberty, and property of the People.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:39 PM on 04/15/2008

This "statistic" is really meaningless. Of course there's likely to be a big quake in Southern Cal. They're predicting a 99.7% chance of a 6.7 quake before 2037? Well, the Northridge quake in the 90s was 6.7? So all they're saying is there's likely to be another Northridge-like quake within 20 years... Why this should be a big, shocking surprise to anyone is unclear.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:05 PM on 04/15/2008



....................THIS JUST IN: I predict its going to rain in Oregon within the next few days.......stay tuned...........news and pictures at 11:00pm....................................

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:45 PM on 04/15/2008

I read this story a few days back but I didn't catch the estimate richter scale info...

5% chance of an 8.0 earthquake? Holy crap... Northridge was only 6.7, and I was bounced around like crazy in that one. If anything that big comes through here we're going to be sifting through rubble for years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 PM on 04/15/2008

If and when the bigone comes, some Pat Robertson type fundie nuts will say God did it because California is open to all life styles and in all his vast wisdom the big sky daddy decided to clean house

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:07 PM on 04/15/2008

And this is new information in what way?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:54 AM on 04/15/2008

Predicting earthquakes is like predicting the stock market - easy to be wrong.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:52 AM on 04/15/2008

Those underground nuclear tests in the 70's in Nevada helped that fault line out also.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:05 AM on 04/15/2008

Thank God we had Clinton in the White House after the 1994 Northridge quake! Can anyone imagine how the Republicans would have reacted? If Bush had been the President, does anyone doubt that the relief efforts would have been primarily aimed at making his big-business cronies richer, while doing almost nothing to help people and repair the infrastructure? The example of what happened in New Orleans, when this do-nothing President played the guitar for reporters at his ranch, while people were literally drowning in New Orleans, should remind us all how important it is to elect a Democrat this time.

As to the likelihood of an Earthquake in Southern California, another big one is overdue. Let's hope that when another big one does hit, the California National Gaurd is available to do its job, because they will surely be needed here at home.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:36 AM on 04/15/2008

Well, it's astounding to me that they just put these statistics out. Hasn't there always been fault lines in California? And they just now have finished studying them? This is another example of America's poor budget financing. This is an issue that I would not be upset to see the government spend more time, effort and resources on. This pertains to our basic need for a safe place to have a home and raise our families, so this is very necessary and certainly deserves some national attention.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:17 AM on 04/15/2008

We're in a bit of danger of having either Bill Clinton's mendacious, vainglorious wife Hillary or demented hatemonger Jeremiah Wright's loquacious, done-nothing protege Obama in the White House, and at the same time people have to be concerned about a relatively benign thing like another natural disaster. Nothing can stop the world, but thankfully those two disasters are doing a pretty good job of stopping each other.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:50 AM on 04/15/2008

Feh.
Epic fail.
Get off the computer and go caress your gun barrel with nice, warm, fragrant oil until you find satisfaction and release.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:29 AM on 04/15/2008

McCain will just have a heart attack. So old he smells!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:46 AM on 04/15/2008

John McDisaster's lies will be shredded soon enough.
You'd better get used to one of those other two disasters in the White House.
Most of the population does not want more Bush.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:26 AM on 04/15/2008

We need to know if this is a possible terrorist conspiracy......

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:27 AM on 04/15/2008

Note to Californians: Just try to avoid underground parking lots between now and "the big one," because even though George Kennedy is still around somewhere (ancient though he is), we no longer have Charleston Heston around to rescue you. You are on your own, people!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:22 AM on 04/15/2008

The quake will happen if Obama does not become president. We must elect Obama so we can save our souls, our home, make us feel smart and most importantly so we can save California.

Please America, elect our wise and mighty saviour "The One" Obama. California is counting on you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:51 AM on 04/15/2008

I say it will not happen- and...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:41 AM on 04/15/2008

Well you know you may have a point that no place is immune to a disaster but Vancouver, Canada is as immune as you can get. No wind storms, no floods, no bizzards, no earth slides, no fires, no earthquakes (at least not big ones), no droughts, no problems of any kind when you get right down to it. I guess thats why more and more people are pouring in here and keeping the real estate prices at unbelievable highs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 AM on 04/15/2008

Some years back, I read an article in Scientific American magazine about the natural disasters that have struck in the Vancouver area.
Apparently the Juan de Fuca plate makes some very, very big earthquakes. Not very often, not like in Southern California or Alaska, but nonetheless, some very big quakes hit the region. But, and this was the intent of the article, not only do huge earthquakes hit the Vancouver area every few hundred years, but when they happen, unbelievably immense tidal waves accompany the earthquakes. From my reading of the article, I gathered that the tidal waves that hit the area in the past were over one hundred feet tall. This phenomena of giant tidal waves is due to the way the earth's plates interact in the region. I don't remember the details, but I imagine one could go through the magazine's archives and find the article.

Perhaps the moral should be that natural disasters can, and do, happen everywhere. Good government should accept the responsibility of leading in the efforts to save lives and conduct repairs afterwards.

By the way, Scientific American magazine also predicted the New Orleans disaster. Congress authorised about $15 billion to upgrade the levees before Katrina hit, but Bush refused to spend the money, saying it was bad for the budget. ($12 billion per month in Iraq is good for the budget?)
Why this got reported in a scientific journal, but not in the MSM, is a very important question.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:55 AM on 04/15/2008

WOW!!
An earthquake in California?
Who would've thought??

Rove works for Hill!
Linens n' Things going out of business!
Male sex hormones running the stock market?

I used to get on the Internet to get away from the bullshit on TV.
But it's everywhere now.
I'll just turn both off now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:21 AM on 04/15/2008

i live ON the san andreas near the salton sea...the most like scenario for a major quake in socal. do i have my things bolted down as good as i can? do i have my earthquake kit at the ready? yes. do i "worry"? no.

i used to live in tornado alley. we lost everything we owned when i was a kid.

i used to live in cameron, louisiana on the gulf coast. google it and you'll see that nothing is left after hurricane rita.

i used to live in fargo and lived through a mighty flood of the red river. unbelievable.

i lived in portland, oregon and was witness to mt. st. helen in may 1980. what an effing mess that was.

i can't think of one place on earth that is immune to natural disaster. i live life one day at a time and when the shit hits the fan i hope i'm one of the lucky ones. if i'm not, i have no regrets and would not do one single thing differently.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 AM on 04/15/2008

So then, what you are saying is that we should stay as far away from you as possible?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:38 AM on 04/15/2008

lol there's one in every crowd.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:19 PM on 04/15/2008

I was thinking the same thing. Based on this timeline, the big quake should hit Salton any day now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:11 AM on 04/15/2008

Really?? By 2037 there will be an earthquake in Cali?? No Shit!!! There are no less than 10 micro quakes in California per day. I know. I live here and I actually monitor them. If and when those micro quakes stop, that is when you will see me buy some beachfront property in Nevada. Until then, these morons need to figure out the definition of prediction and try something a bit more gutsy than "there will be an earthquake in California...at some point...in the future..and it will be bigger-ish...we think...maybe."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 AM on 04/15/2008

It seems to me that if you're having 10 micro quakes a day, that the chances that tensions could build to result in a major quake are reduced considerably. But what do I know, I'm not a quake expert.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:08 AM on 04/15/2008

In the next 30 years? Big deal. Here's my prediction for natural disasters within the next year: drought in the Southwest, flood in the Midwest, hurricane in the Southeast and a big, friggin blizzard in Buffalo.

Likelihood... 99.7 percent.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:12 AM on 04/15/2008

A major earthquake will hit in the next 30 years in a state with a major fault line in it.

Even Al Gore can make a prediction like that. The only difference is that he will blame global warming for the quake.

This just in: Water will continue to be wet into the forseeable future. Global warming seen as cause.
Film at 11!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 PM on 04/14/2008

I knew someone was going to try to make this a global warming topic. Somehow ohiomark, I'm not in the least suprised that it's you. You are such a clown. Big feet, big hair, huge red nose, the whole 9 yards. Thanx for the laugh.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:12 AM on 04/15/2008

Sorry, "illustrating"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:25 AM on 04/15/2008

It's called illistrating absurdity by being absurd.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:23 AM on 04/15/2008

*

by 2037?????

Too bad, god forbid if McBush gets to the WH, by 2037 we are still at War in Iraq and there will be no money left to help Californians.

*

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:18 PM on 04/14/2008

No shit Sherlock. This not a prediction. This is like saying it will rain in Seattle in the next 5 years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:20 PM on 04/14/2008

Oh My Gosh! So cute!
I have my own little stalkin' name-troll
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/users/profile/kellygrrrrl
be sure and roll out the WELCOME matt

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:05 PM on 04/14/2008

Where's Brownie??? He may be needed to do another heck of a job.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:02 PM on 04/14/2008

Aww, come on, predict another earthquake in Missouri, that would be some news! Something over 8 would really get some attention!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:02 PM on 04/14/2008
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in