McCainomics: A Double Dose of the Same Poison

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

Posted April 15, 2008 | 07:47 PM (EST)



Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

On Wall Street, the masters of the universe have turned to prayer and worry beads. At the Federal Reserve, a full night's sleep is a fading memory. Across Main Street, the recession is starting to hit, stores are shutting down, bankruptcies are spreading, houses are being foreclosed or abandoned. The pain of the recession is just beginning to hit.

But John McCain, the Republican presidential nominee in waiting, owner of 10 homes and, by marriage, one of the wealthiest men in the Senate, simply doesn't get it. Today, he delivered what the campaign billed as a major address on the economy. And while McCain says he understands people are hurting, he hasn't allowed this to clutter his thinking.

States across the country are starting to slash spending on Medicaid and schools, as declining tax revenues force harsh budget cuts which in turn will add to the recession. But John McCain offers not one word about emergency aid to states and cities, dollar for dollar the most efficient counter to recessionary pressures.

Over 250,000 workers have lost their jobs in recent months and face dim prospects, and an unemployment system with more holes than net. Not one word from John McCain about extending unemployment benefits or covering those left in the cold.

Over 2 million manufacturing jobs have been lost over the last seven years; wages aren't keeping up with the costs of basics. America is selling off assets or borrowing from abroad at the rate of $2 billion a day to cover unsustainable trade deficits. John McCain shovels up only the same corporate trade policies that dug us into this hole.

A shadow banking system, stoned on risk and complexity, threatens to bring down the whole shebang. Already the Federal Reserve has thrown up about half a trillion dollars in guarantees to stave off the furies. McCain offers nothing about how to bring this system under accountability and control.

What is McCain concerned about?

First, foremost and repeatedly, he is outraged by earmarked spending by the Congress which he vows to veto if president. This is cute, but a joke. Earmarks total less than $15 billion a year in a $2.7 trillion budget. Erasing them all will make utterly no difference in our economic posture.

Second, the Senator believes that the US spends too little on its military and too much on domestic programs such as education, the environment, and public health. He believes George Bush hasn't lowered the taxes of corporations and the wealthy enough.

The reality is that we already spend more than the rest of the world on our military which is the largest source of waste, fraud and abuse in the federal government. Domestic investment has been starved by conservative presidents and congresses over the last thirty years. Corporate loopholes riddle the tax code. Billionaire hedge fund operators already pay a lower tax rate than their secretaries. Inequality has reached levels not seen since just before the Great Depression. Yet McCain's proposed tax cuts would increase our national debt to lavish billions on oil and pharmaceutical companies already enjoying record profits.

While offering up another round of tax cuts for the wealthy, he does say that Bill Gates and Warren Buffett and their ilk can pay for their own prescription drugs. He then goes on to define as rich anyone making $80,000 a year or more, all of whom will be on their own.

Otherwise, Senator McCain, like George Bush, recycles the old platitudes of the market fundamentalists -- about lower taxes, free trade, smaller government, less spending. Forget the global debt, the $12 billion a month squandered in Iraq, the financial crisis, the deepening recession. For Senator John McCain, Bush's only mistake has been that he hasn't been extreme enough. The Senator should do well with all of those Americans who are yearning for even more of the same.

 
 

Comments
87
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

Robert, I think his PRIMARY CONCERN right now is being elected PREZ. That is truly all he is really concerned about because if it doesn't happen this time for him, he will never have another chance - and the funny thing is that he actually KNOWS it. When are we going to see his medical records and his tax returns? I bet he's scared for the american public to see these documents and he is trying to avoid releasing them until he absolutely has no other choice. He could care less about all the other real issues facing the public - don't anyone kid themselves about that. All he cares about is being elected PREZ - he does not have to worry about finances or the war that he loves so much in Iraq. Its for damned sure that he has no concern about money and he doesn't have to go to Iraq (except to stay inside the green zone where he is completely protected), so he has no concerns except his possible win to give this country another 4 or 8 years of Bushco. God help us all if this occurs!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:57 PM on 04/16/2008

EVERYONE should read David Cay Johnson's "Free Lunch". It documents the extremes to which this government is controlled by the top few percent of the wealthy, by corporations and lobbyists. Once the invisible subsidies to those groups have been taken out of the budget, precious little remains for the good of the rest of the people - education, social programs, infrastructure, research and so on.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:34 PM on 04/16/2008

Conservatives have largely had their way with the economy for the last 6 years and starting with Reagan, they have pretty much contolled the debate over what makes the economy tick. Lower taxes,(although they lie about actually doing this, try owning a small business and paying the "Reagan" tax which is FICA that he doubled) free market , less regulation,yadayada. The question I never hear from the left and it should be asked is "Well? Why isn't it working? You got your way, you have the presidency, you controlled the house and senate for six years, you have the corporate- loving judges on the supreme court that you want. Why in the hell, with all your expertise, Mr. Norquist, Mr Greenspan, Mr Ben Stein, Mr Rightwingwhoever, has your model failed so miserably?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 AM on 04/16/2008

Not just the last 6 years, it is still going on...check this out

The bill, dubbed the Emergency Assistance for Secure Elections Act of 2008, fell short of the two-thirds majority it needed to pass, even after clearing a House committee unanimously. The vote was 239-178 in favor, with all but two Democrats supporting it and all but 16 Republicans opposed.

The bill would have allowed states and jurisdictions to be reimbursed by the federal government for converting to a paper ballot system, offering emergency paper ballots or conducting audits by hand counts.

The measure was designed to ensure that every vote is properly counted. Voters in all or parts of 20 states including New Jersey now cast ballots electronically without backup paper verification, according to the bill's sponsor, Rep. Rush Holt, D-N.J.

Looks like the reps don't want all of the votes to count. Typical of a dictatorship....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:39 PM on 04/16/2008

Excellent point and very much appreciated. Thanks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:25 PM on 04/16/2008

The economy is in trouble. So lets raise taxes and give the government even more of our dollars to waste . Yeah that makes lots of sense. If you're a class warfare liberal.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 AM on 04/16/2008

I would be completely in favor of a "war tax" that forced the people in this country to actually pay for this war right fucking now. Not pass it on to people yet to be born. People born after Reagans folly of a presidency are paying for his tax cuts to the rich. Yes raise taxes to pay for this war now. You want your war, righty? Yous should be willing to pay for it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:14 PM on 04/16/2008

"The economy is in trouble". Who ran the economy into the ground? Who increased the national debt by fifty percent in seven years. Who flushed a trillion dollars down the Iraqi shithole? Was it a class warfare liberal? No, it was the the party in control of the ALL branches of the government for most of the last seven years. Funny how people like yourself can overlook that reality, isn't it? By the way, just so you wont be confused anymore, the class warfare party is the Republican party. If you are in the top two percent economically, they are fighting for you (and winning). Otherwise, if you support them, you are an idiot. You know, part of the 29% of the people who can be fooled all of the time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:02 PM on 04/16/2008

Chinaasskisser or whatever you call yourself,

I have a new concept for you right wing nut jobs out there in cyber space; it"s called reality!! The 'Raise Taxes" rule would only apply to the top .5% of earners, you know, the one's who have seen their wealth triple during the Bush years.

Least I remained you that under the Bush tax cuts if you made $50K you received a $1k tax cut, but if you made $1MM you got a $50K tax cut, or for the mentally challenged out there, you made 20 times the income but received 50 times the tax break!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:02 PM on 04/16/2008


Warren Buffet recently made the comment that there is indeed class warfare, and his class is winning.
"so lets raise taxes and give the government even more of our dollars to waste".
... If you want to see some waste watch the Farm Bill come out of committee this week, or look at the 600 plus billion dollar spending bills passed in the last few months.
THE GOVERNMENT IS RUN BY AND FOR CORPORATIONS, so while you struggle to fill up your gas tank, go ahead and blame it on those tax and spend liberals;
or wake up and smell the coffee.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 PM on 04/16/2008

That's a false choice argument.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 PM on 04/16/2008

Unfortunately, nobody is paying attention to the issues. It's all about the campaign horse race. We have turned presidential politics into a super American Idol competition that goes on seemingly forever. Pretty soon it will last all four years, smothering completely any real news that tries to bubble up from this pervasive layer of campaign manure.

What's this post got to do with "bittergate?" That's where the action is. Nobody cares about this stuff.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:40 AM on 04/16/2008

Here"s a few choice words about McCain's gas tax proposal in todays Crooks and Liars.

"McCain wants to shave 18 cents off the price of a gallon of gas by temporarily waving federal taxes. It would cost $11 billion a year.
This is a remarkably bad idea.
The federal gasoline tax represents a flat fee of 18.4 cents a gallon nationwide. With gasoline currently averaging $3.39 a gallon, the tax represents a mere 5 percent of today"s pump price. While that"s not trivial, consider that gasoline prices have more than doubled since 2004.
For that matter, federal gas taxes go towards rebuilding and maintaining roads and highways. Cutting the gas tax would mean less investment in infrastructure " a very dangerous approach right now " and fewer jobs."

Like most of the McCain platform, this idea was created by pollsters not so concerned with what will work, but what will play with the American voter. McCain"s economics, as his politics, are for a lost era where the public would buy anything, and genuinely believed that what was good for General Motors WAS good for America.
Times have changed Senator. Time to come out of the bubble and take a long hard look at what remains of our infrastructural economy and start promoting what IS good for America; investment IN America.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:25 AM on 04/16/2008

McCain claims to be a "Teddy Roosevelt" Republican.
Nowhere is his hypocrisy brought into greater relief than in this statement.
TR was to the left of any of the Democrats today on social issues, unions and fairness in the labor market - i.e. he opposed all the "elite" in the economy - those in the stock market and corporate world and favored legislation that limit the formation of extreme wealth in any economic sector.
He crusaded for unions, child and other labor laws and against the exploitation by the wealthy.
And he feared that inequity in the distribution of income could injure the democracy and bring down the whole system - which it shortly was to do.
McCain is a product and ally of bankers, lobbyists, large corporations and the wealthy classes, exactly as Bush is.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:24 AM on 04/16/2008

Much of McCain"s economic platform seems to involve simplistic notions with a bow to the Holy Grail of Republican dogma, Reganism; this unwavering insistence that by making the Rich richer, the economy as a whole will be strengthened. The message seems to be designed for blind followers who have little knowledge of economics, or history, and will except a flawed premise on the weight of dogma alone.

Take for instance the McCain healthcare "plan": Reduce taxes so Americans can afford insurance.
Only in Republicana, that mysterious Ayn Rand utopia, could a few hundred dollar tax reduction purchase full medical coverage, but no matter. We are left to believe that allowing the insurance industry to pick and choose participants on "pre-existing" conditions while pocketing 22 percent of the healthcare dollar is indeed the American way. Other systems are branded "socialist" even while employed in such capitalist bastions as Japan and Switzerland.

McCain"s message is old and stale and its result obvious across America; that is the America where one in ten Americans are expected to be on foodstamps by the end of the year. While FOX and Rush continue to preach that all is well in Republicana, at the end of the day being unable to fill the gas tank or put food on the table provides its own argument for change.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 AM on 04/16/2008

McCain scares the hell out of me. But what is even scarier is how the msm continues to give him a pass on his blunders and fail to challenge his assertions. I truely hope this time around that most Americans are not relying on the "news" reported by the msm. His so call reputation as a "maverick" is a joke. We will have a Bush 3rd term presidency if this man is elected.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:38 AM on 04/16/2008

Indeed.
Chris Matthews for one seems to be a regular McCain cheerleader.
Lately he's been constantly making the statement that McCain has a 50 percent chance of becoming President.
Apparently Matthews has been reading some insider poll not available to the rest of us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:07 PM on 04/16/2008

McCain spews the same horse manure that every republican does about smaller government and cutting spending but they never have done it, not once. Why should we believe him? Only a complete moron or liar would. Oh wait, because this time he blames it on congress, you know, the congress that has been controlled by republicans for 6 of the last 7 years while we ran up half of our 10 trillion in debt. The same congress that he's been a member of for 20+ years while we ran up the rest of it. Holy crap Americans are stupid!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 AM on 04/16/2008

John McCain= Three trillion dollars for Baghdad, but not one red cent for Americans!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:06 AM on 04/16/2008

Just about everything in this entire post is apparently a well-kept secret. Why is it that the majority of Americans don't know they are economically oppressed by the greediest people on the planet?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:08 AM on 04/16/2008

The greediest people on the planet get good press. The American mythic ethos demands that you oppress yourself when you wonder of your economic problems.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:34 PM on 04/16/2008

Senator McCain's response: "Hey you punks, get offa my google!"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:06 AM on 04/16/2008

daddysboy, they don't know it because the press is corporate owned and complicit in the scam. This country is in trouble, big trouble.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:19 AM on 04/16/2008

Unlike bitter and resentful conservatives I do not allow people to become hurt, and I do not allow my thinking to become cluttered.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:03 AM on 04/16/2008

The US and the world cannot afford another 4 years of the same bankrupt policies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:56 AM on 04/16/2008

To a true believer, conservative policies can never fail they can only be failed. That's why you now hear people on the right saying "Bush isn't really a conservative". It's not that the policies are screwed up, it's just that Bush wasn't enough of a true believer to make them work.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:52 AM on 04/16/2008

You are absolutely correct. I think this is because these 'believers' HAVE to believe this or they will be forced to acknowledge the true reality that they are simply greedy. Concepts like 'trickle down' are nothing more than smokescreens for hoarding.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:13 AM on 04/16/2008

While it is important for Democrats to undermine McCain--and his continued alignment with the failed policies of the Bush administration makes this pretty easy--let's keep some perspective: McCain is no George W. Bush. No matter how badly his policies make you squirm, he's not a criminal.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:11 AM on 04/16/2008

It isn't mccain's current record that is of concern; it is his future record should he join forces with those that have proven themselves to be completely unconcerned with the rule of law. Since he is already in their club, it's hard to imagine anything but further collusion unless you believe that mccain has some kind of superb moral character that will set him apart from everyone else.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:21 AM on 04/16/2008

Yes he is. Google Keating 5.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 AM on 04/16/2008

I thought your article was dead on, if hardly cheering. McCain is simply a second Bush, and after
the last seven+ years, how anyone could consider voting for this fool staggers my imagination.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:37 AM on 04/16/2008

And you supported John Kerry? "one of the Senates wealthiest men by marriage"? Amazing what you totally accept in one man you reject in another because his politics does not agree with yours.

Lets see who to vote for, who to vote for. The man that wants to raise my taxes and have a bigger government or the man who wants to keep my taxes down and have a smaller government?

I'll take the lower taxes and smaller government please!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:36 AM on 04/16/2008

"Lets see who to vote for, who to vote for. The man that wants to raise my taxes and have a bigger government or the man who wants to keep my taxes down and have a smaller government?"

If you believe Crash will keep your taxes down, or that he will - in some mystical fashion - shrink the size of the federal bureaucracy, then you have not examined his platform.

First of all, while the federal government has been historically wasteful - and this includes the Regressive Hero, Ronnie Raygun - its function as a conduit of services financed by taxes is not in question. When it is ineffective, when it is wasteful, that is the product of mis- or malfeasance, and I can not think of a more wasteful, criminally negligent group than the current GOP. GAO statistics bear this out. Crash McCain's published platform does not make invasive changes to the Bush policies/practices that have brought us to this point in time. He, with rare exception, plans to continue those practices.

As a business owner who has not been on another's payroll in two decades, I understand what is fiscally responsible and what is, simply, voodoo economics. There is nothing in Crash's platform that is the least bit encouraging to anyone who isn't enamored of governmental constraint of business.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:53 PM on 04/16/2008

The problem with modern conservatism is encapsulated in the above statement. "I'll take lower taxes and a smaller government" And I would have to ask the question, Steve, have your taxes really been lowered that much since 2000? Is the government smaller now then it was in 2000?
If you were truly honest (and a member of the middle class) you would have to say no to both parts. Now, who ran the roost the last eight years? What party had the triple crown?

Steve you are cuaght in some pre-mellenial vortex where you think the middle class still buys that bullshit promulgated by conservatives. But something happened along the way. Americans love words and rhetoric (it's why we fight with ideas and not guns and bombs in the streets of America) But Americans know bullshit when they see it (hell I'm sure we invented the term). And conservatives have nothing left but bullshit. Because once its certain that all the things you promised would happened didn't -- people tune you out and call you on your bullshit.

So, genius, if we keep lowering taxes someone in the future has to pay for them. Who is that going to be?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:12 PM on 04/16/2008

The point wasn't that wealth is bad or having ten houses is bad. The point is the guy is extremely out of touch.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:05 PM on 04/16/2008

Stevelagain, repubs don't lower your taxes; they simply hide them. You'll get a $200 tax break, then spend $10,000 more a year on oil. That's how repubs scam people like you.

Don't be foolish. Repubs work for corporations, not you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:22 AM on 04/16/2008

Yes, let's keep on spending like there's no tomorrow and lower taxes at the same time. The GOP keeps TALKING about being for smaller government, but the reality (remember reality?) is that the government has grown much larger under the "smaller government" party.

I can't quite grasp why there are so many people who will vote for a candidate simply because they promise to lower taxes. It's like they're telling us that 1+1=4...4? Hey! 4 is better than 2, I'm voting for that guy!

Don't you get it? At some point, we have to pay the bill. We're approaching $10 TRILLION dollars of national debt, about 3/4 of which has been created since 1980 (http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/faq.html). Remember Reaganomics? It's magical thinking to believe that we can lower taxes and still spend and spend.

The whole idea of "Trickle-down economics" may have had some basis in reality early on, but in today's world, it makes no sense. For this to work, tax money saved by corporations and wealthy individuals needs to be re-invested IN THIS COUNTRY to create jobs. Unfortunately, this patriotic lot has found that investing it in outsourcing and moving manufacturing overseas gives a much higher return on investment. So not only does it NOT create jobs, it moves existing jobs overseas.

Yes, let's have more of the same...

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
~ Albert Einstein

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 AM