Barack and Bruce: What Impact Will Springsteen's Endorsement Have?

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

Posted April 16, 2008 | 12:03 PM (EST)



Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

Here's what Bruce Springsteen said in 1987: "In '75, when I went into the studio to make Born to Run, I wanted to make a record with words like Bob Dylan that sounded like Phil Spector, but most of all I wanted to sing like Roy Orbison."

Now that's the "the audacity of hope." No wonder he just endorsed Obama. But how will Bruce's move resonate in Pennsylvania? Will it make a difference? First, some context ...

I came slowly to the Bruce Springsteen phenomenon. I was more of a soul and country guy when he came up. So I didn't connect with Greetings From Asbury Park that much. It felt too self-aware, too artistic. Bruce's second album resonated more, especially standout tunes like "Candy's Room" (oops! I'm told that's from the fourth album) and "Rosalita." Born to Run was recorded up the street from where I was living, and I was crazy about the guitar tone on the title track. But all that hype ... self-consciously trendy guys like me figured that if Newsweek says you're the next big thing, you ain't. But I became a big fan of "off-label" Springsteen, tunes like "Fire" and "Hearts of Stone" that he wrote for other people and only played live.

Still, Darkness On the Edge of Town? Yeah, now I was starting to get it. And when I first saw him sing "The River" live, I realized what he had done: He had become a rock 'n' roll Steinbeck. As put off as I had been by the academic "rock music as literature" movement, it was impossible to deny that songs like "The River" were playing the same role that novels by Steinbeck or Dreiser or Sinclair had done in decades gone by.

Plus they had a good beat and you could dance to them.

With Born in the USA, Springsteen found the mass audience he had been seeking. Songs like the title track and "My Hometown" became hits because they were great songs, but also because the spoke to devastated industrial regions like my own birthplace of Utica, NY.

All this is by way of background for Springsteen's Obama endorsement. "Born down in a dead man's town/first kick that I took was when I hit the ground," he sang. "Like a dog that's been beat too much/'til you spend your whole life just coverin' up." You want "bitter"? I got yer bitter right here ... But Springsteen sang about the disillusionment and hopelessness of these places in a way that made people feel less disillusioned and less hopeless. That's not an easy trick.

Springsteen's endorsement comes at an opportune time for Obama. Obama's "bitter" and "cling" words were ill-chosen -- and not particularly accurate, either. There are a lot of reasons people like guns and religion, and bitterness isn't at the top of list. But there's an underlying truth behind them. So Springsteen's right on the money when he says "these matters are worthy of some discussion." He doesn't have to agree with the statements wholeheartedly in order to condemn the way "they have been ripped out of the context and fabric of the man's life and vision."

When Springsteen says Obama is "head and shoulders above the rest," it has some resonance in certain quarters. He brings credibility at a needed time when he says that Obama "...speaks to the America I've envisioned in my music for the past 35 years, a generous nation with a citizenry willing to tackle nuanced and complex problems, a country that's interested in its collective destiny and in the potential of its gathered spirit."

But will it make a difference in the primaries? It could bring a few votes Obama's way, but it won't change the outcome in Pennsylvania -- not unless Springsteen hits the hustings in the next few days with the candidate (and he probably has other commitments.) Same with Indiana, which is shaping up as even more critical than Pennsylvania in certain ways.

I've been to Springsteen gigs with right-wing friends from New York City and Yonkers. They tune out the sign-up tables and political endorsements, look a little unhappy when he talks about cops shooting innocent black men, and wind up voting just the way they would otherwise. But then, they weren't Democrats. Can Bruce move votes in the upcoming primaries? Probably not that many, but we'll have to wait and see.

Still, the Springsteen endorsement helps Obama in one crucial regard. It helps take the edge off this recent controversy. And it gives Obama a certain authenticity among voters who aren't quite sure yet whether he's a "regular guy" or not.

The Democrats' destructive orgy will continue, though. Clinton supporters won't be moved, and some of them will feel their own bitterness about this endorsement. This is a fractured party and a fractured time. Anyone who still says this protracted contest is good for Democrats is fooling themselves.

But Springsteen's an articulate man with a good heart and a lot of soul. His endorsement will boost morale among Obama supporters, and it sure can't hurt in Pennsylvania and Indiana.

And as far as West Virginia and North Carolina are concerned, two words come to mind:

Where's Willie?

A Night Light

 
 

Comments
44
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

What's the difference between Springsteen endorsing Obama and a person canvasing on a street corner? It's that Springsteen has a louder megaphone. If he sways 5000 Pennsylvanians towards Obama, good for him...and Obama...and me. Maybe that person on the street corner should know his/her place as well.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 PM on 04/20/2008

I guess Springsteen needed some press. Obama said what he said, and now he has to live with it. It is tiresome watching him always trying to slither out from under. This scrutiny he has been experiencing is nothing compared to what will come down the road.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:10 PM on 04/17/2008


I don't really see the point in being intimidated by the Sean Hannitys and the Karl Roves, when its been proven that these guys are bought and sold hacks playing and working for the rich elite. It's also been proven that they're liars of the slimiest order and that America as a whole is beginning to see through their lies that many of us have been seeing for a long time, and we cannot stop the pressure now.
For that reason, we need to take it to them forthrightly and strongly, with no backing down. Obama has already begun, and Hillary has shown what she's made of which has been an incredibly huge disappointment. To my great astonishment, my mother, my three sisters of five who vote Democratic were all for Hillary, but not anymore. They were so mad at the way she has attacked a fellow Dem so below the belt that they began to look into what Barrack stands for, and are now wholeheartedly supporting him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:47 PM on 04/17/2008

Exactly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:27 PM on 04/18/2008

Just the idea that a rock star's endorsement could effect the way people vote is good enough reason for our legislators to consider some kind of literacy at the polls. I know they were deemed unconstitutional but that was due to the way they were administered. If a system that attempted to weed out the mental incompetents, those who would cast their vote based on the endorsement of a rock star or religious leader for that matter, or movie star or used car dealer...that their vote weighs in the same as someone who at least is current on what's happening and can locate countries on a map and knows something about science and history...is that too much to ask? I like ideals, but really when the ideal is wrapped around an anvil and the row boat is going down, I say, toss it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:30 AM on 04/17/2008

My favorite still is "New York Serenade" on "Wild, Innocent and the E Street Shuffle" with the finest piano intro I've ever heard.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:10 AM on 04/17/2008

My fave from his second album was this one.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFsPa6lYHoQ

It's kind of a strange video though.

I kept harassing a friend who is a DJ on http:myvradio.com to play it after 9/11. He didn't. Oh well.

To the snarky responders upthread about what Bruce's endorsement did for Kerry, voter caging and suppression, and those nefarious Diebold machines, are all why people think he lost. And NO, gross malfeasance didn't just occur in Ohio.

If you don't think Barack is a regular guy then consider checking this one out.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyuLD8FHwJc

We totally need a hoopster in the WH IMHO.

". . . .so walk tall. . .or baby don't walk at all. . ."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:30 AM on 04/17/2008

Somebody please explain how and why Indiana is shaping up as a more important Dem primary than PA? Indiana is the MOST republican state in the midwest, reliably in the R column for Nov and thus not predictive of anything. There is no way that any democratic nominee, be it Clinton or Obama, is competitive there in November and they ought not to spend a dime contesting it in any serious way. Now, PA is a different story in November and that's a state that Obama will have to figure out how to address should he get the nomination.

I'm glad Bruce endorsed Obama, but like most people I don't pay much attention to what celebs think. I'm (now -- was strongly for Edwards earlier) an Obama supporter DESPITE not because of the endorsement of the pompous, self-important and truly annoying Oprah. I guess that endorsement helps with some people but if I were Obama, I'd have said, 'thanks, O, glad to have your vote in the booth, but please don't tell anyone about it'.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:21 AM on 04/17/2008

Being endorsed by Springsteen would be a big deal ... if it were the years 1975 through 1990 again, that is. "The working class", as anyone who is actually a participant in it may have noticed, stopped giving a shit about Bruce long before he flipped his wig and started jabbering about the ghost of Tom Joad. The sad fact of the matter (for quasi-geriatric rockers like The Boss) is that celebrity endorsements don't count for anything in presidential contests any more, and haven't counted much PERIOD in very long time.

The Oprah Cult gets a pass, because from what I can see, her fans seem inclined to buy, read, or do whatever the hell she tells them to. Chalk one up for Senator Obama there!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:39 AM on 04/17/2008

Didn't seem to do any good for the last candidate. LOL! I doubt that it will do a thing this time ether, except maybe to push them further away.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:49 AM on 04/17/2008

It's nice that Springsteen endorsed him. It may push some undecideds who are also fans of the Boss into the Obama column. In any event, it can't hurt. Hopefully he'll do some GOTV concerts in the months heading into November, should Barack win the nomination (which I hope is the case). I can't decide my favorite album by him, but I have a soft spot for The River.

In closing, fellow Obama supporters, please refrain from personal attacks against either Hillary or her supporters. We need to remain united and focused on beating McCain in November. And, this campaign aside, the Clintons have done some good things as well as some things, such as NAFTA and GAAT that I think were bad. I still think their contributions to our country have been a net plus. So, let's treat the Clintons and their supporters with respect. In November, we just might get our country back! And regardless of your preferred candidate, that's gotta make you feel pretty good.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:36 AM on 04/17/2008

Nice post, jstock. My personal philosophy is to try to be a mensch (or the female equivalent). Bruce is one, Obama is one, and while the Clinton's are not, I try not to call them names.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:02 PM on 04/20/2008

Being swayed by endorsements from Springsteen or Oprah speaks volumes. It says that Obama supporters are lightweights who vote on popularity not substance and who vote on talking points not reasoned argument. And people wonder why America is in the state it's in.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:15 PM on 04/16/2008

This is funny. First of all, the term "Obama supporters" suggests a pre-existing state of mind, such that Springsteen's endorsement has not "swayed" them at all. Second, we can assume you are joking when you suggest that Obama is all about talking points rather than substance. Have you seen a Hillary Clinton speech? And more importantly, have you seen an Obama speech? Hate him if you like, disagree with him if you like, but suggesting that "more perfect union" did not have substance points indisputably to your idiocy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:53 AM on 04/17/2008

Of course his endorsement will matter. After all, he's the boss.

Go Obama!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:09 PM on 04/16/2008

For Bruce fans like me under 30, The Rising is his definitive album.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:55 PM on 04/16/2008

It's time to start the snark fest, it's quite probable that regular guys want the most intelligent candidate to become POTUS. They aren't into how a candidate dresses. Male lawyers & senators wear & work in suits. It doesn't matter if a candidate bowls or plays pick-up basket ball. Regular guys want a candidate to have brains & use his/her intelligence as POTUS. The basket ball playing, suit wearing candidate has what regular guys want in a president. I, as an effete snob survivor of RMN's presidency, have have managed to learn that. HRC & JSMcC will find that trying to hang an elitist label on Obama will back fire on them.
l lynch

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:49 PM on 04/16/2008

Well said RjJ. Bruce Sprinstein's songs have always told it how it is. In contrast , Hillary's storyline continues to outpace the length of her Pinnocio nose. Hopefully for all concerned Hillary's artful dodging will come to a conclusion in the near future.

,

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 PM on 04/16/2008

It matters. It gives just that much more legitimacy, for now and November, because even in Seattle the people I saw at Bruce's amazing concert a few weeks ago weren't latte liberals--not most of them. Springstreen bridges a lot of political and cultural divides that are important for Obama to bridge as well, and while his endorsement doesn't erase any of the work the rest of us need to do, it helps

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:23 PM on 04/16/2008

When I first heard "Born to Run" in 1975 I thought Springsteen was a combination of Bob Dylan and Van Morrison. Whatever... It worked.

I vote "Born in the USA" for Obama's campaign song.

Maybe a Beatle tune for Hillary: "Yesterday".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:16 PM on 04/16/2008

Good one.......your the second person to make me laugh today. I'm a nervous wreck with the debates just moments away. I 'm hoping that Obama does well tonight.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:46 PM on 04/16/2008

HILLARY'S POOR JUDGMENT leaves AMERICANS FOOTING THE BILL....

THE WAR IN IRAQ IS HAVING SERIOUS NEGATIVE EFFECTS ON OUR ECONOMY and those who voted for the war (i.e. hillary) should be to blame, in part, for the state of the US economy.

Look how the WAR IN IRAQ is affecting the US economy...

$3,000,000,000¦ 3 Billion dollars PER WEEK!

That is the amount America is paying for the Iraq War PER WEEK, money that should have been used here, at home.

Add to this:

Interest. We are financing the war with borrowed money (e.g. treasuries) that carries interest; so in actuality, the war is costing the United States MORE THAN 3 billion dollars PER WEEK.

Higher oil and energy prices. Instability from the war in Iraq is adding roughly 30 dollars per barrel as a premium.

High oil prices mean high utility bills. Higher oil prices shifts demand to other sources of energy - gas, coal, etc. - and greater demand will raise the equilibrium price of all sources of energy -- Can you say high energy bills?

High oil prices (a raw material used in the production of many goods, fertilizers, gasoline, diesel, plastics, etc.) mean high prices of goods and services -- Can you say INFLATION?

Higher trade deficit.

Lastly, how do you think the world views our country since the argument was made for war? The evidence was weak and circumstantial, yet we rushed into war with Iraq thanks to hillary"s authorization.

Hillary Voted FOR THE IRAQ

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:38 PM on 04/16/2008

It will have the same impact it had when he endorsed John Kerry. Ouch!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:32 PM on 04/16/2008

Well since Bruce got President Kerry elected, I'd say BHO is a sure thing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:51 PM on 04/16/2008
- RJ Eskow - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of RJ Eskow

FYI - John Kerry got 8 million more votes that Clinton got in 1996 - more than any Presidential candidate in history. Bush got more (at least according to the vote counting machines!), but the get-out-the-vote effort in 2004 was non-trivial.

I'm not saying that's Bruce's doing, of course, but it's faulty thinking to assume that anyone involved in the '04 effort was ineffective.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:46 PM on 04/16/2008

Springsteen's endorsement comes at an opportune time for Obama. Obama's "bitter" and "cling" words were ill-chosen - and not particularly accurate, either. There are a lot of reasons people like guns and religion, and bitterness isn't at the top of list. But there's an underlying truth behind them.

See - here's where you're wrong. And why most people who keep listening to the screeching heads on TV who are willfully ignorant don't "get it" either. The point is that YES, there are a LOT of reasons people like guns and religion (like tradition, as Clinton was saying).

But that ONE word "cling" that everyone is pouncing on is very important. The other word everyone is pouncing on "bitter" is very important too. Think about it. There are many reasons people have guns and religion in their lives. But when they become threatened and BITTER, they seek safety and refuge in the familiar and the comfortable (guns and religion) and then they CLING to these familiar things to keep them grounded. When they become BITTER, they CLING to these most familiar things at the expense of reason and rationality - which is why they end up voting against their own economic interests - which brings it right back around to Obama's whole point in the first place. See? The TWO words the pundits and Clinton and McCain are complaining about the most, are the TWO words that make Obama's whole point.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 04/16/2008

i saw the bitter-cling thing totally differently. I think Obama just left out the word "issues" in his sentence by mistake. He meant, I think, that small town people, bitter from being ignored and duped time and again, cling to ISSUES like religion and guns. In other words, frustrated and shut out of honest political debate for so long, some folks seek refuge in wedge issues like gun control, religion, gay marriage etc. I think Obama wasn't even remotely talking about a "bitter" individual's personal ties to God or guns.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 AM on 04/17/2008

Bingo!

The point is that - whatever else you may think about religion, guns, or nativism/ethnocentrism - basing your political participation (your vote or failure to vote) on those items alone simply will not solve the problems we face. It won't put a paycheck in your pocket. It won't put food on your table. It won't take care of you when you're sick.

Politicians have hoodwinked people into voting against their best interests by exploiting strong feelings about those issues. Nobody's saying they're not important. We're just hoping we don't get fooled again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:28 PM on 04/16/2008

DoTheMath:

Tell it!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:45 PM on 04/16/2008

Not to nitpick, but "Candy's Room" was not on Springsteen's second album, but his fourth- "Darkness on the Edge of Town." Based on the ticket sales (or lack thereof) for Bruce's excellent Indy concert last month, I doubt that his endorsement will do much for Obama in the Hoosier state.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 PM on 04/16/2008

Candy's Room was not on the second Album. It was on Darkness on the Edge of Town.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:02 PM on 04/16/2008
- RJ Eskow - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of RJ Eskow

OK! OK! Duly noted! As I was saying, I didn't connect with Springsteen's music until later.

It's a great song, though.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:37 PM on 04/16/2008

For his music, Springstein has a lot to be proud. For this campaign there is not likely to be much less relevant than his endorsement.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:48 PM on 04/16/2008

Makes sense. I know that the CW is that Obama's the alleged elitist now, but let's look at the facts.

John & Cindy McCain: $100 million. 8 houses. 40 years in Washington.
Hillary & Bill Clinton: $109 million. 2 mansions + Priceless White House artifacts. 17 years in Washington.

Obama's never had any of that. He understands normal people because he is a normal person.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:44 PM on 04/16/2008

Scharb Obama made 4.2 million last year. Poor guy, and having to struggle to pay for his children's piano and ballet lessons and summer camp too. Michelle asks do you know how much that costs?

Poor Obama

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:18 PM on 04/17/2008

This is earthshatteringly major in every way. If Obama could only ensnare the coveted Howard Stern endorsement then I have no doubt all Long Island and New Jersey males who aren't too busy on election day will vote!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:08 PM on 04/16/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in