Blue-Collar Workers = The Taliban: John McCain's "Elitism" Problem

What if an adviser to one of the presidential candidates -- one who writes regularly for a major American newspaper and frequently appears on television -- had not just described residents of small-town America as "bitter," but had actually equated laid-off blue-collar workers with the Taliban?

What if this statement had not been just an off-the-cuff remark at a campaign event, but had actually been published in an official US government publication?

Specifically, what if he had said this:

The American who graduated from high school in the 1960s expected a good job that would allow his family security and reasonably increasing prosperity. For many such Americans, the world has collapsed... These discarded citizens (his emphasis) sense that their government is no longer about them, but only about the privileged. Some seek the solace of explicit religion.

And:

These noncompetitive cultures, such as that of Arabo-Persian Islam or the rejectionist segment of our own population, are enraged... The laid-off blue-collar worker in America and the Taliban militiaman in Afghanistan are brothers in suffering.

Yes, you read that right. Laid-off American blue-collar workers are no different than the Taliban -- just two noncompetitive losers in the great game of globalization. And "bitter"? No, they're "enraged."

And it happened.

While doing research for another article this weekend, I ran across these and other rather astonishing quotes from Ralph Peters, a retired Army Lt. Col. and, according to the Center for American Progress, an informal national security adviser to the John McCain campaign. It kind of puts the hullabaloo surrounding Barack Obama's "small town bitterness" remark in a whole 'nother light. It makes that clumsy but rather minor gaffe look like child's play.

You want "elitist," as McCain described those remarks, or "condescending," as described by a Hillary Clinton supporter? How about "callous," "contemptuous," or "cruel"? And unlike Samantha Power, the Obama foreign policy adviser who resigned after calling Clinton a "monster" in front of a reporter, this was not a spontaneous aside that Peters hoped would be kept off-the-record. This was written and issued in an official US Army publication.

The article was entitled "Constant Conflict," and it was published in the Summer 1997 issue of Parameters, the US Army War College Quarterly. Peters was then an Army Major working for the Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence.

Peters, now a spy novelist and columnist for Rupert Murdoch's New York Post, held nothing back in putting his spooky, Nietzchean ubermenschen worldview on display. Almost every paragraph contained an equally breathtaking remark. Here are a few more choice ones:

We are entering a new American century, in which we will become still wealthier, culturally more lethal, and increasingly powerful. We will excite hatreds without precedent.

There will be more democracy -- that deft liberal form of imperialism -- and greater popular refusal of democracy.

It is fashionable among world intellectual elites to decry "American culture," with our domestic critics among the loudest in complaint. But traditional intellectual elites are of shrinking relevance, replaced by cognitive-practical elites -- figures such as Bill Gates, Steven Spielberg, Madonna, or our most successful politicians -- human beings who can recognize or create popular appetites, recreating themselves as necessary. . . . The genius, the secret weapon, of American culture is the essence that the elites despise: ours is the first genuine people's culture. It stresses comfort and convenience -- ease -- and it generates pleasure for the masses. We are Karl Marx's dream, and his nightmare.

There will be no peace. At any given moment for the rest of our lifetimes, there will be multiple conflicts in mutating forms around the globe. . . . The de facto role of the US armed forces will be to keep the world safe for our economy and open to our cultural assault. To those ends, we will do a fair amount of killing.

Dr. Strangelove, I presume.

Peters even includes a bit of psycho-sexual fantasy in his essay, just to spice things up:

The films most despised by the intellectual elite -- those that feature extreme violence and to-the-victors-the-spoils sex -- are our most popular cultural weapon, bought or bootlegged nearly everywhere... The action films of a Stallone or Schwarzenegger or Chuck Norris rely on visual narratives that do not require dialog for a basic understanding. They deal at the level of universal myth, of pre-text, celebrating the most fundamental impulses... They feature a hero, a villain, a woman to be defended or won -- and violence and sex. Complain until doomsday; it sells...

..If religion is the opium of the people, video is their crack cocaine.

Dr. Strangelove, indeed.

Peters has some other strange ideas. While the Bush administration has talked about making a "new Middle East," Peters has actually drawn up the map, which basically calls for the dismemberment of Iraq, Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey. Apparently this map was displayed at the NATO War College in Rome in 2006, and somewhat predictably, the Turks, as members of NATO, were not amused.

Clinton should also be held to account for this, even if not so much as McCain. The article's 1997 publication date places it square in the middle of her husband's presidency, an association she has used often when favorable. Of course, the federal government issues millions of pieces of paper each year, and it would be difficult to monitor it all. Still, this was not an obscure document, and for something that inflammatory and outrageous to be published by the US Army, it seems someone in the Clinton administration was not doing their job. And ultimately, the president is commander-in-chief.

The McCain and Clinton campaigns were offered the opportunity to respond to Peters' statements prior to posting, but these efforts were unsuccessful. Peters also could not be reached for comment.

Gregg Gordon is a freelance writer in Columbus, Ohio. He can be reached at [e-mail].

Comments

[charon]

Peters seems quite intelligent, in that immoral way so characteristic of Nazi intelligentsia. No wonder the right-wing is anti-education. An educated populace is not so easily manipulated, a frightening prospect for the new imperialists.

[SamThornton]

Frankly, it wouldn't surprise me to learn that Sen. McCain was a Scientologist, let alone that he employed people with insane ideas. Mr. McCain is a good example of what happens to a human being insulated from the real world for an extended number of years, and I'm not speaking of his sojourn in a North Vietnamese POW camp.

No matter how intelligent, well-educated, or compassionate, isolation does strange things to the human mind. Witness those who, like Howard Hughes, started from near genius and ended in madness. Witness the tales told by political candidates about their own lives that are astonishing in their divorce from the real world.

Wealth and position don't necessarily have to drive the privileged mad, but it is a problem that needs to be recognized and dealt with at some level, if only to protect the rest of us from their inevitable malevolence.

[Hullaballoo]

Indeed. The MSM will ignore this as usual, and give Clinton & McCain a pass. Clinton because she might whine at them, and again accuse them of misogyny and sexism, McCain because he feeds them the sticky pig, and the sweet tender loin (I mean BBQ, but go ahead & infer what you will). And really, what's the difference between the two of them anymore anyway?

[MPeter]

They are hypocrites who speak from both sides of their mouths. They have ganged up on Obama and rushed to pass judgment without even regard for what tyhey had said and done, which is worse!!!!!! Shame on you MCcLinton.

[runswithscissors]

The two parties have been collaborating, against the will of the people, behind the scenes for quite some time. It's a shame that this rare opportunity to expose both parties for the frauds that they really are will probably slip by as standard political bickering.

[apoyo]

It will only be a shame if we the people let it slip by.