Hidden Pentagon Hand Helped Shape Network Military Analysts

New York Times   |  David Barstow   |   April 19, 2008 04:44 PM


Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

In the summer of 2005, the Bush administration confronted a fresh wave of criticism over Guantánamo Bay. The detention center had just been branded "the gulag of our times" by Amnesty International, there were new allegations of abuse from United Nations human rights experts and calls were mounting for its closure.

The administration's communications experts responded swiftly. Early one Friday morning, they put a group of retired military officers on one of the jets normally used by Vice President Dick Cheney and flew them to Cuba for a carefully orchestrated tour of Guantánamo.

To the public, these men are members of a familiar fraternity, presented tens of thousands of times on television and radio as "military analysts" whose long service has equipped them to give authoritative and unfettered judgments about the most pressing issues of the post-Sept. 11 world.

Hidden behind that appearance of objectivity, though, is a Pentagon information apparatus that has used those analysts in a campaign to generate favorable news coverage of the administration's wartime performance, an examination by The New York Times has found.

The effort, which began with the buildup to the Iraq war and continues to this day, has sought to exploit ideological and military allegiances, and also a powerful financial dynamic: Most of the analysts have ties to military contractors vested in the very war policies they are asked to assess on air.

Read the whole story here.

 

Comments
202
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

Hint sample
View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)

I don't care how late this story was in coming, if the press had any integrity left, this story, complete with meticulous documentation rather than unnamed sources and mere (if accurate) hunches, should be the top story of every news outlet.

Unfortunately, the media is controlled by the same corporate interests that benefit from the continued presence of the U.S. in Iraq.

So much for a free press.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:25 PM on 04/21/2008

Charge them with treason........PERIOD, along with chimp and company.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:45 AM on 04/21/2008

We need to do away with the united nations, what good do they do. nada.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:57 AM on 04/21/2008

Stop the presses, on second thought, hold three full inside pages as well. Notify the Pulitzer jurors. The New York Times has a blockbuster scoop. Its ace reporter, David Barstow, has uncovered shocking evidence that . . . the Pentagon tries to get out its side of the story about Iraq to the news media.

Are you surprised? Outraged? Furious? Apparently the Times is: it"s found a new wrinkle in what it views as an insidious military propaganda campaign. You see, the Defense Department isn"t content to try to present its views simply to full-time reporters who are paid employees of organizations like the New York Times. It actually has the temerity to brief retired military officers directly, who then opine on TV and in print about matters such as the Iraq War.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:34 AM on 04/21/2008

Whatever method you use, its not working in convincing the country very much. We are clearly losing in both Iraq and Afghanistan

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:44 AM on 04/21/2008

Most Americans will not read this story, because they get their 'news' from TV networks, and there is no network that will post a story about its own criminal activity. Alternative news sites on the Internet will keep the story alive...but, it will go the way of all truth in the US in the end....and that is nowhere.

Good read on this: Pimping for the Pentagon:
http://tvnewslies.org/tvnl/index.php/editorial/reggies-commentary/20-regs-thoughts/1263-tv-news-pimping-for-the-pentagon-

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 AM on 04/21/2008

Oh my! Tell me its not true. Our own government would lie to us ? Why , that would not be possible!

And I bet even after this many people will still blindly believe every lie that they puke out of the pentagon, Congress, and the white house. We are the pawns, and they are the chess masters. At least in their minds. But we seem to help them by eating it all up and being morons , going along with them all the way. I can see why we have become the laughing stock of the world. We only think we are the greatest country on earth, and thats because the majority of Americans have never been anywhere else, they just eat the BS and regurgitated as ordered.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:36 PM on 04/20/2008

You missed the real story and real point Mr. Barstow. If it weren't for media creeps like Kaplan, Klein, Murdoch, Ailes, Zucker, Westin, and Shapiro - these military contractor opportunist schills would be sitting at home twittling their thumbs - where they belong. The aforementioned bumbs are the one's with Iraqi and American soldier blood on their hands for it is they who gave these lobbyists a voice on national television - enabling them to spread their propaganda unchecked - as if fact. These businessmen control the media corporations that pass for today's "free press" - setting warped agendas that represent the interests of oil companies, insurance companies, military hardware manufacturers, and zionists to name but a few. The retired military officials you cite in your article are little more than minor partners in the bigger crime.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:58 PM on 04/20/2008

Uniformed and exuniformed service men have been shilling White House lies, for pay, at least since Vietnam; as well as so called "experts" for hire.

What the hell took you so long to figure that out?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:44 PM on 04/20/2008

The only thing worse than a career politician is a career military hack. Bush has used the military as his personal praetorian guard. The decepetion to involve this country in a phony illegitimate war that has been so badly mismanaged in terms of planning , strategy, tactics, logistics and an exit maneuver cannot be smoothed over by the TV commentary of the supporters and apologists for the greatest foreign policy blunder in our history. From the very start of this debacle in Iraq, the conspiracy betweeen the Bush administration and its enablers in and out of congress, the MSM and these so-called partisan military analysts was discernible. While our honorable soldiers and marines were losing life and limb in Iraq, these charlatans were "spinning" out of control in favor of a war that the majority of Americans now know they have been duped into and want it stopped before more are killed and the nation is bankrupt.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:00 PM on 04/20/2008

i thought everyone who gave it any thought presumed that all these old heroic guys matthews pees in front of were government shills as soon as they got a load of His Eminence The August Most Reverend Really Really Major Generalissimo Colin Powell lying his little behind off at the UN. but i guess some people have to have things like this painstakingly explained in such a way as to avoid the conclusion that antidemocratic capitalists are manipulating the free institutions of this country: the press, freedom of association, privacy rights and possibly the free ballot.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:14 PM on 04/20/2008

Did anyone notice if the "propaganda generals" wore flag lapel pins? Because THAT would be an Outrage!!
Now do we wait to see the same networks report their own complicity?
Why do the "propaganda military analysts" not "support the troops" or is it that they were supporting their corporate interests while "supporting the troops".
To me, this story is one of the ugliest of all coming out because it covers conspiratorial corruption and direct war propaganda efforts from the Pentagon, the Bush Administration, Department of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, AND Mainstream Media.
Journalist David Barstow and the New York Times have done an amazing job but this story will trickle away because the "corporate media" won't report it.
And people like "No Spin Zone" Bill O'Reilly should be outraged because he is directly named in some of the emails and communication as being easily "duped" and a "target show" to get booked on.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:11 PM on 04/20/2008

Not sure if anyone watched FACE THE NATION today, but this was good and hopefully some of the older voters in PA still watch him and listen to him!!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-4elxJouBY&eurl=http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/4/20/14840/3341/838/499528

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:15 PM on 04/20/2008

This is a familiar story. Is Judy Miller a General? Do the Generals sleep with members of the Bush Administration too?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 PM on 04/20/2008

Just disgraceful, we all know it's true. This is treaon in my opinion, and I would like to see these guys with stiff prison sentences. It would be a warning to other's who might think about selling out our coountry for a paycheck.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:10 PM on 04/20/2008

["We lost the war " not because we were outfought, but because we were out Psyoped," he wrote. He urged a radically new approach to psychological operations in future wars " taking aim at not just foreign adversaries but domestic audiences, too. He called his approach "MindWar" " using network TV and radio to "strengthen our national will to victory."]

No, we lost the Vietnam war because we backed a corrupt regime that couldn't raise an army to fight. Sort of like now.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:52 PM on 04/20/2008

Please bump this article above the fold. It's a serious indictment of all MSM - Fox, CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS, NYT, WSJ, and yes, even NPR were either complicit or duped.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:30 PM on 04/20/2008

This is indeed the story of the day. Why are you hiding it?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:08 PM on 04/20/2008

NPR? Oh, you mean those Nice Polite Republicans?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:47 PM on 04/20/2008

Torie Clarke, she used to stand next to Gen. Meyers making sure his answers at press conferences had the right spin. If there was not enough spin she would rephrase to give it more spin. Would have loved to read his mind, she was his boss.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:12 PM on 04/20/2008

I always find it distasteful to have a constant stream of military types on TV selling the war when we are supposed to be a country with a civilian led military. The civilians, supposedly represented by the POTUS is supposed to tell the military what to do. Instead it seems we have David Patreus in that role. The whole system has been turned on it's head. I guess this is what happens when you let Chicken Hawks rule.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:01 PM on 04/20/2008

I wonder why this story was allowed to slip by? This is not a shock to many who already know how our government operates. They took over the telly long ago. The difference between us and Russia is that in Russia, they tell the people TV is state controlled. Here, they lie to us. Why, Obama had the audacity to deny he was a memeber of the CFR -- on live television no less!!! His mentor, Zbigniew Brzezinski is, also a member of CFR and is a founding memeber of the Trilateral Commision. Oh, not to worry, just a bunch of people who get together and talk about foreign policy, is what Obama said. Why? Why do these wealthy and influencial people spend their time, money , and energy, to sit around and talk foreign policy if it doesn't manifest itself somewhere? Your bullshit meter should scream on this one. Another ploy they use is called "problem, reaction, solution". Cause the problem without the people realizing your own government agents (or those hired from other governments) created it, wait and watch the people's reaction (which you know what it is going to be - shock, horror, etc), and then come forward like an innocent good little government and offer the solution, come to the rescue of the people (who rely too much on government to begin with). Perfect ploy. Keep it in mind when shit happens.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:45 PM on 04/20/2008

I wonder how long the Times sat on this story, as they've been sitting on other stories recently.

Don't look for this to be a big topic on tomorrow's TV shows. To cover this story is to cover the news organizations own complicity and incompetence in hiring these guys as "experts" without fully vetting their conflicts of interest or daring to question what they said in the face of conflicting evidence. CNN, especially, knew better -- they have the wonderful John Burns and Michael Ware, who consistently provided the most devastating reports from on the ground, whose blistering first-hand accounts contradicted virtually every other piece of fluff coming out of Iraq, DC and the rest of the network's own mouth. There will be much kudos due to the first network that takes this on and discusses its own failures, but I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for any one of them to do it.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:58 PM on 04/20/2008

Why did they wait?

They've been waiting until the amount of money they've got saved up will tide them over until Jan 15 2009. They waited until after they done paid their income and property taxes for '07, too.

Given what the current Admin can be counted on to try to do to them--disemployment and character assassination--this was probably the earliest they could release this story and have the people involved in the rreporting actually be able to survive until we get a democrat in the White House.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:53 PM on 04/20/2008

This is much more important that McCain's fight with another (GOP) senator - This should be the Huffington Post's headline!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:40 PM on 04/20/2008

Amen to that -- why isn't this the lead headline??

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:59 PM on 04/20/2008

Flashback

Military Pays People to Spend Time Asking Bloggers to Post Pentagon Propaganda
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=15287

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:37 PM on 04/20/2008

It is disconcerting to say the least to see former bosses and peers make the case for a war that none them have to endure. Some were in Vietnam, which really blew me away as I listened to them make the case in late 2003 that Iraq was not spawning an insurgency or at least had taken on a dimension of guerrilla warfare.
To read that there was a thoughtful diabolical machine behind the apparent objectivity is another reason I have left the conservative right for good.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:35 PM on 04/20/2008

This is no different than what the government and their "experts" did to cover up the JFK assassination. I think this article should finally put to rest the notion that conspiracies don't exist. They do, and our own government is at the head of some whoppers.

How many more people did our own government murder? RFK? MLK? Malcom X?

How many?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:12 PM on 04/20/2008

about 3000 in one day, about 4040 over 5 years

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:49 PM on 04/20/2008

Budget of pentagones is 700 billion??whyyy any one??These pimps are responsible for the death of american kids,war criminals death merchants.how can these sick fff s sleep??LIES LIES LIES=DEAD AMERICANS..WAR CRIMINAL REGIME LIED AMERICANS DIED.MORE WARS..

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:09 PM on 04/20/2008

One more time,

"In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.

...Down the long lane of the history yet to be written America knows that this world of ours, ever growing smaller, must avoid becoming a community of dreadful fear and hate, and be instead, a proud confederation of mutual trust and respect".

-- Dwight D. Eisenhower, January 17, 1961 (Farewell Address to the Nation)

To view the speech in its entirety go to YouTube.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:11 PM on 04/20/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in