Secretary Gates Slams Air Force: Getting Them To Send Equipment To Iraq "Like Pulling Teeth"

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

April 21, 2008 03:30 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Show your support.
Buzz this article up.
Residents clean up their damaged house in the Shiite enclave of Sadr City in Baghdad, Iraq, Sunday, April 20, 2008. The house was damaged during sporadic clashes which took place after midnight on Sunday and killed 6 and wounded another 15, police and health officials said. (AP Photo/Karim Kadim)

WASHINGTON — Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Monday the Air Force is not doing enough to help in the Iraq and Afghanistan war effort, complaining that some military leaders are "stuck in old ways of doing business."

Gates said in a speech at Maxwell Air Force Base, Ala., that getting the military services, largely the Air Force, to send more unmanned surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft to Iraq and Afghanistan has been "like pulling teeth."

Addressing officer students at the Air Force's Air University, the Pentagon chief praised the Air Force for its overall contributions but made a point of urging it to do more and to undertake new and creative ways of thinking about helping the war effort instead of focusing mainly on future threats.

While Gates' comments were directed mainly at the Air Force, his concern about faster fielding of unmanned surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft included a broader appeal to the entire military. The Army, Navy and Marine Corps have been expanding their fleets of drone aircraft.

"In my view we can do and we should do more to meet the needs of men and women fighting in the current conflicts while their outcome may still be in doubt," he said. "My concern is that our services are still not moving aggressively in wartime to provide resources needed now on the battlefield."

He cited the example of drone aircraft that can watch, hunt and sometimes kill insurgents without risking the life of a pilot. He said the number of such aircraft has grown 25-fold since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, to a total of 5,000.

Gates has been trying for months to get the Air Force to send more surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft, like the Predator drone that provides real-time surveillance video, to the battlefield.

"Because people were stuck in old ways of doing business, it's been like pulling teeth," Gates said. "While we've doubled this capability in recent months, it is still not good enough."

Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell said Gates' complaint about struggling to get more drone aircraft to the battlefield was aimed not only at the Air Force but at the military as a whole.

Still, the Gates remarks come at a stressful time for Air Force leaders, including the service's top officer, Gen. Michael Moseley, and its civilian chief, Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne. They have come under fire on a number of fronts, including criticism from some quarters that the Air Force is too wedded to Cold War-era weaponry like the F-22 stealth fighter at the expense of less glamorous items that could be used in smaller-scale conflicts like the counterinsurgency fight in Iraq.

To push the drone issue harder, Gates said he established last week a Pentagon-wide task force "to work this problem in the weeks to come, to find more innovative and bold ways to help those whose lives are on the line."

He likened the urgency of the task force's work to that of a similar organization he created last year to push for faster production and deployment of mine-resistant, ambush-protected armored vehicles that have been credited with saving lives of troops facing attacks by roadside bombs in Iraq.

"All this may require rethinking long-standing service assumptions and priorities about which missions require certified pilots and which do not," Gates said, referring to so-called unmanned aerial vehicles that are controlled by service members at ground stations.

The military's reliance on unmanned surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft has soared to more than 500,000 hours in the air, largely in Iraq, according to Pentagon data. The Air Force has taken pilots out of the air and shifted them to remote flying duty to meet part of the demand.

Gates, who served in the Air Force in the 1960s as a young officer before he joined the Central Intelligence Agency, urged the officers in his audience to dedicate themselves to thinking creatively.

"I'm asking you to be part of the solution and part of the future," he said.

He said the Air Force and the other branches of the military need to protect those in their ranks who are maverick thinkers, who defy convention and push for creative solutions to hard problems. He said he intended to make a similar point about the value of dissent in the military in remarks later Monday at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, N.Y.

"Dissent is a sign of health in an organization, and particularly if it's done in the right way," Gates said.

Gates made no direct mention of a series of mistakes and missteps involving the Air Force in recent months, beginning with an episode last August when a B-52 bomber flew from an Air Force base in North Dakota to another in Louisiana with the crew unaware that it was carrying nuclear weapons.

Last month Wynne announced that four Air Force nose cone assemblies designed for use with nuclear missiles were mistakenly shipped to Taiwan in 2006. The error was not verified until shortly before Wynne made the announcement, and the matter is under Pentagon investigation.

Last week the Pentagon said its investigators had found that a $50 million contract to promote the Air Force's Thunderbirds aerial stunt team was tainted by improper influence and preferential treatment. The Defense Department's Inspector General found no criminal conduct, but laid out a trail of communications from Air Force leaders _ including from Moseley _ that eventually influenced the 2005 contract award.

 
 

Comments
86
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

Are we talking about the great United States Air Force? The same one that continually and consistently has cheating scandal after cheating scandal at their academy? The same Air Force that allows their cadets to rape and sexually assault female cadets and then punishes the women? Are we speaking of the Air force that allows proselytizing at a United States Military Academy then abuses Jewish cadets for taking acception to the abuse by their fellow Christian cadets?
Well, well. Now we find out that Secretary Gates has to scold them for not sharing their toys. Admonishing them for not playing nice with others. It appears to me that what we, as a nation, are confronted with is the twenty-first century warmongering version of the government sponsored "Welfare Queen". Only these boys don't drive Cadillacs. They fly fighter-bombers and have nuclear weapons at their fingertips.
footsore

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 AM on 04/22/2008

They say the air force is the more intelligent arm of the military.This proves it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:01 PM on 04/21/2008

The Air Force should hold their own impeachment hearings for Bush and Cheney. They should fire Gates, as well.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:49 PM on 04/21/2008

I think the Marines, Navy, Army, Coast Guard, and Merchant Marines would have something to say about that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:51 PM on 04/21/2008

May be there is a reason that Gates does not understand. Something called lost cause? Or a polite mutiny? Or, a lamedckyness?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:53 PM on 04/21/2008

Isn't the Air Force the main guardians of our nuclear arsenal? Didn't they have a run-in with higher-up over some nukes going the wrong way against command orders, that were later found? Bigger question is, who really gave the orders to move the nukes over the system of command in place and why?
Is Gates retaliating over the Generals that handed out severe discipline over the incident?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:41 PM on 04/21/2008

Just saw Retired Gen. Robert Scales on Fox news reinforcing Gates' claim saying the air force needs to get more aerial drones to the field. I'm sure Patton Boggs, LLC, is very proud of him. Just more teleprop.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:40 PM on 04/21/2008

Once I had some hopes for Gates after ridding ourselves of Rummy but like Condi Rice another slow follower of Bush without brain to rationalize with. The entire Bush administration are juvenile.

Now the Air Force, hope they are slowing down this lunacy on purpose since it will show me someone has intelligence, not Gates, all he knows how to do is suck up to his king. At least with Rumsfeld you knew where he was coming from, Neo Con Land.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:13 PM on 04/21/2008

There, clearly, is more here than meets the eye. The very fact that the Secretary of Defense makes a public statement admonishing a branch of the armed services for not meeting its wartime responsibilities is stunning. Are we dealing with a coup? Gross insubordination? An Air Force message to the country? Whatever it is, we need to know more--someone and something is out-of-control. We need, fast, an investigation by the Armed Services Committees of the House and Senate. An urgency is sensed that does not permit us to wait until Bush is out of there.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:12 PM on 04/21/2008

All the Democrats understand is that it is politically 'safer' to wait it out. Has there ever been a moment in our country's history when we were more bereft of leadership?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:07 PM on 04/21/2008

Why does the Air Force hate our troops?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:19 PM on 04/21/2008

Why does Gates hate our AirForce?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:16 PM on 04/21/2008

Flankly, I'm surprised at the number of things this administration does for public consumption (political reasons) that should be done in private. They try to negotiate foreign crises with macho public pronouncements that are ususlly counter-productive. Now they want to publicly shame the Air Force leaders to get them to cooperate? Alter forcing Airforce personnel to cross-train for urban ground combat duty because the Army and Marines have been stretched beyond capacity, they now want to pick a public fight with personnel they supposedly supervise? Any good leader deals with issues even ranging to insubordination behind closed doors. They will get little more than resentment from the officers they are charged with leading. Good move, Bush, Chaney, and Co.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:11 PM on 04/21/2008

Relax 'Doc' Gates. A few more months and you won't have to worry about sending anything to Iraq. You can go back to worrying about pulling the bucks out of American wallets and transferring them to yours.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:44 PM on 04/21/2008

I say good for the AirForce. They want to reserve their resources for something important. Why throw everything away on some sandy,little two-bit country. We have to start thinking about ourselves.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:33 PM on 04/21/2008

Do you know of any other warzones where surveilance is needed?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:13 PM on 04/21/2008

It's not a war zone. We're just sittin' and occupyin'

When we run out of money we will come back home. The Iraqis live there and will be there forever.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:13 PM on 04/21/2008

So, you will volunteer to check a hill and see if there are any insurgents hiding out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:50 PM on 04/21/2008

In the early months of 1940, before Dunkirk, the RAF was under extreme pressure to send more fighter squadrons into France and Belgium to fight the advancing Germans and was hugely criticised for refusing to do so. Because it did refuse the RAF was, just, adequate to win the Battle of Britain in September of that year - preventing an invasion of Britain and ultimately enabling Allied victory in WW2.

Sometimes the Military have to remind themselves what their priorities are.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:08 PM on 04/21/2008

Yeah, f you people of France!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:13 PM on 04/21/2008

Such an intelligent response, awcbuddy. You are growing increasingly paranoid as the Bush administration collapses.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:48 PM on 04/21/2008

Perhaps the powers-that-be in the Air Force are dumb like foxes. They know that any equipment sent to Iraq will not be available for use anywhere else. Besides, if this war is ever over, it is going to cost U.S. taxpayers up to $6 billion to care for the 300,000 military personnel who already have P.T.S.D. and depression. Then, we have put the total cost of this debacle on credit, at interest, with the Chinese. After we take on all that debt and spend what we need to for our troops' mental health, just how much more money will John Q. Public be willing to pony up to replace all the equipment used up in this desert disaster? Even if he wanted to do so, John Q. Public will be tapped out, and his children and grandchildren bogged down with the debt from the current war And to think that we had a budget SURPLUS when Bush entered office in 2001............................. .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:32 PM on 04/21/2008

"Addressing officer students at the Air Force's Air University, the Pentagon chief praised the Air Force for its overall contributions but made a point of urging it to do more and to undertake new and creative ways of thinking about helping the war effort instead of focusing mainly on future threats."

So Gates wants the AF to focus on ways to increase war spending TODAY, rather than focusing on the future protection of our nation. As others have said, "Who's in charge?" Gates makes it sound like the AF is acting independently of his command.

I say he's wrong on both counts. They should be focusing on the past, particularly 9/11/01. Where the hell was NORAD on that fateful day? The Air Force, under the command of the CIC, was nowhere to be found, just like the CIC, himself. On 9/11, Bush, his SecDef, and the entire Pentagon were MIA, and if anyone should be credited for stopping further disaster, it is the straight-thinking, non-military man who was acting director of the FAA. He at least had the presence of mind to ground all flights, possibly averting the deaths of thousands more.

Either the USAF is busy memorizing Gates' newly created, color-coded "Chain-of-Command-At-A-Glance" chart, or it's trying to wash sand out of, and glue wings back on the equipment returning from Iraq. Gates needs to cut them some slack.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:22 PM on 04/21/2008

The Air Force has never really liked close air support.

The Air Force is mostly run by fighter pilots, who don't like to do "air to mud" as they call it. They want sleek, pointy-nosed fighter jets that go Mach 2 and shoot down other airplanes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:17 PM on 04/21/2008

These remarks by the Secretary of Defense are simply the flip side of Bush's "the generals call the tune" coin. Without a doubt, they rank among the most craven utterances of a war/defense minister in American history. I can only imagine what the cadets must have been thinking, having been indoctrinated in the supremacy of civilian control over the armed forces of the United States.

In fact, it leads me to again wonder what really happened when those nuclear weapons were "mistakenly" loaded in the Dakota's and flown to Louisiana. Was there a cabal of Air Force officers prepared to do the bidding of administration officials outside the chain of command? That is not civilian control. That is treason. If that guess is anywhere in the ballpark, Gates message would send a message loud and clear that refusal to comply with illegal orders is unacceptable. Frankly, I can think of no other reason that would have prompted his blatantly subversive message.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:09 PM on 04/21/2008

This shows the terrible danger of complacent Democrats who allowed Gates to take Rumsfeld's place rather than what they should have done, which was to disassemble Bush's Cabinet piece by piece if necessary, while they worked up the courage to impeach him.
Another gross Dem error: Allowing the waterboard-loving Mukasey to cover the Admin's criminal tracks after Gonzo was run out of town.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:26 PM on 04/21/2008

So now we have the twilight of the neocons - step 1 - blame the military, start with the Air Force, then the Navy and work your way up to the Army and Marine Corps.

Step 2 - blame the media - well, it would serve the a**kissing MSM right if the neocon noise machine blames them after they've spent all this time carrying the administration's water on Iraq.

Step 3 - Blame the people.

Step 4 - Blame Bill Clinton - heck it must be his fault, he slept with an intern - after all.

Step 5 - Retire to Paraquay.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:06 PM on 04/21/2008

I thought that fool was the boss.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:02 PM on 04/21/2008

Boo Hoo! The people we are sending to their deaths are a little resistant to us. WTF does it take to get these insubordinate cowards in line. Maybe a fat contract down the road will smooth their ruffled feathers. Or better yet, we can threaten them with a hundred year occupation that will surely take the lives of many of their children...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:46 PM on 04/21/2008

Maybe the USAF is tied of losing aircraft for nothing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:36 PM on 04/21/2008

They're not losing aircraft. There hasn't been a fixed wing aircraft shot down since the first weeks of the war in Iraq.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:59 PM on 04/21/2008

It seems like you're being a bit picky in your "criteria" to disclaim GravitonX's comment. He mentioned "losing aircraft" and you reply with "fixed wing aircraft shot down". Well, we HAVE lost aircraft (still are and will) of all types since the onset of the Afghanistan / Iraq campaigns. This includes being shot down, accidents, and other "incidents".

IMHO, GravitonX is correct about the loss of aircraft (no matter how it gets qualified; though, I will admit, the majority of losses seem to have been helicopters)...!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aviation_accidents_and_incidents_in_Iraq_War

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:51 PM on 04/21/2008

Methinks the Air Force might know a lost cause when they see one. Since nothing currently in Iraq will ever see Amerikan soil again, why send perfectly good killing machines to that dumping ground?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:33 PM on 04/21/2008

This is just too bizarre. Isn't this dude in charge? Can't he get the guys who are dragging their feet fired? And then he uses a simile that evokes torture.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:29 PM on 04/21/2008

Secretary Gates, call the boss...oh yeah you are the boss. WTF? That's all we need is a branch of the service going renegade with nuclear weapons at it's disposal. Sounds like it needs a serious house cleaning.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:21 PM on 04/21/2008

As a Vet of VN I feel we have failed miserablly in our effort to learn from our MISTAKES ie VN . Why do we get involved in other civil wars and why do we not set the example to the world as to how democracy works , that is how to spred democracy not cramming it down the throats of people who can't get along with their own countrymen. Think OIL

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:12 PM on 04/21/2008
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry