Obama Climbs On The Vaccine Research Bandwagon

RSS stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com Share this on Facebook

Posted April 22, 2008 | 11:29 AM (EST)



Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

No matter who wins in Pennsylvania today, the next President of the United States will support research into the growing evidence of some link between vaccines and autism.

Senator John McCain has already expressed his belief that vaccines and the mercury containing preservative thimerosal could be implicated in what he has rightly termed an "autism epidemic."

Senator Hillary Clinton, in response to a questionnaire from the autism activist group A-CHAMP, wrote that she was "Committed to make investments to find the causes of autism, including possible environmental causes like vaccines." And when asked if she would support a study of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated children, she said: "Yes. We don't know what, if any, kind of link there is between vaccines and autism - but we should find out."

And now, yesterday, at a rally in Pennsylvania, Barack Obama had this rather surprising thing to say:

"We've seen just a skyrocketing autism rate. Some people are suspicious that it's connected to the vaccines. This person included. The science right now is inconclusive, but we have to research it."
(Note: The Washington Post reports that when Obama said "this person," he pointed to someone who had asked an autism question).


So there you have it, our next President will share the views of such radical fringe crazies as, well, me, Democrat Robert Kennedy, Jr., Republican Joe Scarborough, former NIH and Red Cross chief Bernadine Healy, and several researchers at Harvard, Johns Hopkins, the Universities of California and Washington and elsewhere.

All of us agree: Current evidence suggests the need for more reseach into whether vaccines could be a contributing factor in some cases of autism.

And yes, now the comments to this piece will come flying in, repeating the tired mantra that "this case is closed," that vaccines and thimerosal have been "completely vindicated," and that people like me are just trying to scare the public and drive them away from vaccines, leaving their children vulnerable and sick.

Of course, none of the above is true. So stay tuned.

To begin with, government researchers are currently looking into a number of factors that may trigger autism, including vaccines, their ingredients and the crowded vaccine schedule itself.

Secondly, on April 11th, I attended a top-level meeting in Washington where vaccine safety officials discussed all of the above issues, and more. Now, included on the CDC's recommended Federal Research Agenda for vaccine safety, are questions such as:

Can vaccines cause neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism?


Can vaccines in children with mitochondrial dysfunction cause significant "neurological deterioration?"

Can the combination live-virus measles, mumps and rubella vaccine cause seizures and long term damage in children?

Can vaccines cause autoimmune disease?

Can thimerosal cause tics or Tourette syndrome?

Can attenuated viruses in vaccines cause asthma in children?

So, no matter who is President next year, top government researchers will be examining the role of vaccines in autism and other childhood illnesses. Thus, the declarations of McCain, Clinton and now Obama, make good scientific sense.

But there is more.

Dozens of autism cases (and perhaps more) currently filed in so-called Vaccine Court will almost certainly be compensated this year. Why? Because a little girl named Hannah Poling with a supposedly rare mitochondrial condition was recently compensated for her own vaccine injuries, including autism and epilepsy.

But I have personally identified at least a dozen (and there are reports of many more) children with cases in the court who meet the exact same medical criteria as Hannah, and whose cases will almost surely be compensated as well -- each time with the attendant media fanfare.

My prediction is that, by Election Day, few Americans will still believe there is absolutely no evidence to link vaccines to at least some cases of regressive autism.

So the remarks by all three candidates not only reflect good science, they reflect good politics as well.


 
 

Comments
74
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- emjay1954 See Profile I'm a Fan of emjay1954 permalink

Fucking great. Instead of spending our national biomedical research dollars, not adequate to start with, on real problems, we're going to waste money looking for bogeymen. To say "more research never hurts" is false, when it means that scientists and funding are taken away on a wild goose chase. Which is what this is.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:41 AM on 04/25/2008
- DannysVoice See Profile I'm a Fan of DannysVoice permalink

We can only hope whoever wins this election will actually stick to their word about researching vaccines and Autism. ENOUGH children have already been permanently damaged by the CDC's vaccine quest!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:57 AM on 04/24/2008
- mbaty See Profile I'm a Fan of mbaty permalink

Yes, let's research this some more...like we've been "researching" global warming for years. And guess what, some people still want to claim that the "science isn't there," or that there is some "reasonable doubt." But this smokescreen is just an effort to stop endless lawsuits that will be coming in soon. It doesn't take a scientist to prove what is happening, but it might take a scientist to de-bunk this obvious connection--in name only, of course, added to the study later after money has exchanged hands--just not into the hands of the parents who are left with disabled children, trying everything they can to undo the toxic effects of far too many vaccines given to children who are far too young to handle it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:16 AM on 04/24/2008
- linlou34 See Profile I'm a Fan of linlou34 permalink

http://www.wanttoknow.info/060215vaccinesmercurydangers
I just found this. I found it interesting to share.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:59 PM on 04/23/2008
- londubh See Profile I'm a Fan of londubh permalink

Obama needs a science advisor ASAP. I suspect he knows better and is pandering to "bitter" voters.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:45 PM on 04/23/2008
- rolandcassard See Profile I'm a Fan of rolandcassard permalink

RE: "(Note: The Washington Post reports that when Obama said "this person," he pointed to someone who had asked an autism question)."

As far as I can tell, this little "note" pretty much demolishes the entire point of this post.

Nice try, though.

(You can see the video for yourself here: http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2008/04/dr_obama_and_dr_mccain.html )

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:03 PM on 04/23/2008
- Heraldblog See Profile I'm a Fan of Heraldblog permalink

Exactly. There's no substantial reason to believe that Obama is buying into the vaccine conspiracy nonsense. Just more hype from Mr. Kirby.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:40 AM on 04/24/2008
- bernarda See Profile I'm a Fan of bernarda permalink
Moderator's Pick

HuffPost's Pick

You describe yourself accurately "the views of such radical fringe crazies as, well, me,"

Yes you are crazy. There is no "growing evidence" of a connection between vaccines and autism. In fact there is no evidence at all. Go to medical blogsites like Aetiology or Respectful Insolence to get your well-needed debunking.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:28 AM on 04/23/2008
- DannysVoice See Profile I'm a Fan of DannysVoice permalink

No growing evidence??...How do you explain the thousands and thousands of walking, talking, normally developing children who then received sets of vaccines and within hours, days or weeks turned into children who are unable to function...children with Autism.

There is plenty of science...just ask the CDC for it!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:13 AM on 04/24/2008
- Heraldblog See Profile I'm a Fan of Heraldblog permalink

Danny, you're confusing anecdotes with data. They're not the same.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:05 PM on 04/26/2008
- bernarda See Profile I'm a Fan of bernarda permalink

This is what the CDC says at their site:

"Many studies have looked at whether there is a relationship between vaccines and autism. The weight of the evidence indicates that vaccines are not associated with autism. But CDC knows that some parents and others may still have concerns about this issue. CDC is committed to protecting the health of children and to identifying the biological and environmental causes of autism and other developmental disabilities, so we will continue to study the role of vaccines"

Furthermore, the product supposedly responsible, Thimerasol "Since 2001, with the exception of some influenza (flu) vaccines, thimerosal is not used as a preservative in routinely recommended childhood vaccines."

Also, "Carefully performed scientific studies have found no relationship between MMR vaccine and autism. CDC continues to recommend two doses of MMR vaccine for all children."

So the CDC still has to waste time on this because the "fringe" is still worried.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:07 AM on 04/25/2008
- fil See Profile I'm a Fan of fil permalink

If David Kirby is crazy, so am I.
I too believe that there will be many to be compensated this year. My grandson doesn't have the convulsions but "had" every thing else. With the help of "DAN" doctors we have gotten most of him back. The methylB12 helps overcome the disorder ( caused by the "vaccine") and is getting better. As for the studies.....There were no REAL studies. No doctor injected themselves with enough ethylmercury that I have heard of yet.The studies were based on methyl-mercury, and they are not the same. Just because they seem to have similar names does not make them the same. I hope someone that espouses putting mercury in the vaccine would test a little bit of mercury in their own veins. How about 10 mccg of di-methylmercury, injected into a 180 pound person. When one of the researchers does that for me, than I will apologize and have the other grandchildren vaccinated.

Fil

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 PM on 04/23/2008
- LindsE See Profile I'm a Fan of LindsE permalink

I'm sorry, but I missed the jump to dimethylmercury. Could you clarify what you mean in reference to that? Thanks!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:08 PM on 04/23/2008
- CraigWilloughby See Profile I'm a Fan of CraigWilloughby permalink

Well then, loop our presidential candidates in that crazies group! All 3 of them are acknowledging a connection, so they must be nuts, too.

Here's to being loopy!

And no, I'm pretty sure Mr. Kirby is far more interested in more important things, oh, like washing his hair, than going to a hate-mongering site like Respectful Insolence.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:27 AM on 04/23/2008
- foe2Hg See Profile I'm a Fan of foe2Hg permalink

" Go to medical blogsites like Aetiology or Respectful Insolence"

medical...? You are very mistaken. Grandiose bullshitting with hints of narcissism....yes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:54 AM on 04/23/2008
- LindsE See Profile I'm a Fan of LindsE permalink

I won't argue the narcissism, but these are typically based on legit scientific research and usually include references. And do note that the OP said "medical blogsites".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:03 AM on 04/23/2008
- dadelp See Profile I'm a Fan of dadelp permalink

You know David, I would love to believe that "the next President of the United States will support research into the growing evidence of some link between vaccines and autism." After the lie told to us by the current idiot residing in the White House, you know the one, he made during the 04 re-election campaign when he said he would remove thimerasol from vaccines. When he had the opportunity in November of 07 he vetoed the bill because of the ban on thimerasol.

So.....trusting politicos and their promises especially while running for office is not the smart move. IF we want investigation then sadly we will have to fund it ourselves. Politicians can NOT be trusted and will say ANYTHING to get elected. That fact, has been proven over and over and over again.

Only Ron Paul knows how to address this issue. Quoting here: "government should never have the power to require immunizations or vaccinations."


I hope I am wrong but after dealing with this for almost 8 years I suspect I am right and it's a sad thing. If I am wrong I will gladly scream it from the roof tops.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:40 PM on 04/22/2008
- CraigWilloughby See Profile I'm a Fan of CraigWilloughby permalink

"After the lie told to us by the current idiot residing in the White House"

You mean Dubya only told us one lie?!?!

:P

WMD's, Al Quaida in Iraq. No, this isn't a war for oil!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:09 PM on 04/22/2008
- andreamk See Profile I'm a Fan of andreamk permalink

Thank you Senator Obama. The first step in solving a problem is recognizing there is one.

Thank you for taking that first important step.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:03 PM on 04/22/2008
- erinsull See Profile I'm a Fan of erinsull permalink

Fantastic news. Research is great. Candidate awareness is great.
Right here right now though the conversation needs to trickle down to into these candidates health care proposals.
Any health care proposal that covers the "whole package" of vaccines with well baby visits before age 2 must include the provision to seperate out vaccines from the combos like "MMR" and cover spreading out the individual vaccines so that cost is not the consideration for either the doctor or the patient.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:51 PM on 04/22/2008
- nhokkanen See Profile I'm a Fan of nhokkanen permalink
Moderator's Pick

HuffPost's Pick

Just think of how many more children would have been sexually abused by pedophile priests if the church and the media had not finally dealt with that unpleasant subject.

Think of how many children continue to be injured daily by vaccines while government and media grapple with the paradox that a product intended to improve health is having the opposite effect in countless children.

Thanks to open, ongoing investigations into clergy sexual abuse, church membership is still strong.

People must adjust their mental filters and stop denying the existence of vaccine-induced autism. Physicians and parents must start looking at children's lab tests, and start finding biomedical treatments. Public health administrators must prioritize studies to determine which genetic subsets are susceptible to vaccine injury.

No child should ever be written off as collateral damage in the war on the disease.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 04/22/2008
- linlou34 See Profile I'm a Fan of linlou34 permalink

This is promising news. I just hope that this is not just for votes. I am hesitant to believe until I see something really happening. Don't get me wrong, I am hopeful. I just know I could not possibly be alone, when it comes to having a child with autism and believing the vaccines caused it and having no real money to help my child. It is time for real change and real help for our kids and the kids of the future. I do believe we will find out the truth and something big will have to be done of it.
Thanks again David, for getting it out there. Thanks so much for your devotion to autism.
Peace and take care. Lin

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 PM on 04/22/2008
- CraigWilloughby See Profile I'm a Fan of CraigWilloughby permalink
Moderator's Pick

HuffPost's Pick

This is wonderful news! We now have all 3 candidates claiming that they will look into a link. Sadly, though, I wonder how much lip service they are playing so that they can get votes. I know, call me cynical, but I can't help it.

Interestingly, I wonder what our resident nay-sayers will say when they see that Obama is suspicious that there is a link. Do you think they'll start calling him a crazy conspiracy nut?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:12 PM on 04/22/2008
- Heraldblog See Profile I'm a Fan of Heraldblog permalink

This resident skeptic knows that politicians will say anything for votes. I like Obama, and have been supporting his campaign nearly from the beginning, but I have to admit I'm a little disappointed. Fortunately, he gave himself enough wiggle room to go all evidence - based once he's in the White House.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 PM on 04/22/2008
- bluevalentine See Profile I'm a Fan of bluevalentine permalink

Lip service is where I believe we are heading.
PLEASE LET ME BE WRONG lol.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:16 PM on 04/22/2008
- CraigWilloughby See Profile I'm a Fan of CraigWilloughby permalink

I know. It's difficult to NOT be cynical when it comes to today's polutitians (I know it's spelled wrong. It was deliberate :P).

I hope I'm wrong, too. I truly hope that his current batch of ne'er-do-wells are actually concerned for this epidemic and that they will follow through with their promises. Again, though, my cynicism (that's my religion, btw :P) tells me not to hold my breath.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:06 PM on 04/22/2008
- foe2Hg See Profile I'm a Fan of foe2Hg permalink

Well, this is good news on many levels! I love it!! Buzz it up everyone.

Teresa Conrick

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:17 PM on 04/22/2008
- Heraldblog See Profile I'm a Fan of Heraldblog permalink

Will do!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:52 PM on 04/27/2008
- erykah See Profile I'm a Fan of erykah permalink

I have a child that is deaf and autistic so I am glad the subject of autism has come up in this election. When I had my son in 1994 the statistics for autism was 1 in every 10,000 births. It is now 1 in every 100. Criticize if you want, but this is a national crisis which needs to be addressed. More research is always good and I do not think vaccines should be altogether ruled out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 PM on 04/22/2008
- Heraldblog See Profile I'm a Fan of Heraldblog permalink

Wasn't the DSM-IV adopted in 1994?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:47 AM on 04/24/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in