FCC Chief: No Need To Make Internet Regulations More Clear, Open

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

JOHN DUNBAR | April 22, 2008 03:51 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Show your support.
Buzz this article up.
Writers Guild of American West President Patric M. Verrone is seen in Washington, Monday, April 21, 2008, prior to being interviewed. During the recent writers strike that virtually paralyzed television production for three months, Verrone learned the value of the Internet. It was his job as president of the Writers Guild of America, West, to keep his members unified during the highly public, 100-day strike, and the Internet proved invaluable. (AP Photo/Lawrence Jackson)

WASHINGTON — Federal Communications Commission Chairman Kevin Martin said Tuesday his agency has all the authority it needs to prevent Internet service providers from discriminating against Web surfers and that new legislation is unnecessary.

"I do not believe any additional regulations are needed at this time," Martin said at a hearing before the Senate Commerce Committee. "But I also believe that the commission has a responsibility to enforce the principles that it has already adopted."

The FCC has conducted two hearings on "network management" following admissions by Comcast Corp. that it sometimes delayed file-sharing traffic for subscribers as a way to keep Web traffic flowing.

The hearing was called at a time when the issue of "network neutrality" _ the principle that people should be able to go where they choose on the Internet without interference from network owners _ has heated up.

The network neutrality debate has divided Congress, with Democrats largely in favor and Republicans mostly opposed, a point that became clearer at Tuesday's committee meeting.

"It is a political division now and it's getting more so," said Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska. "It is unfortunate." He said a return to "intense regulation" of the Internet is "entirely unwarranted."

The hearing included some star power, with the appearance of Justine Bateman, best known for her role on the TV sitcom Family Ties. Bateman is now a founding partner of a new online media venture.

"The idea of your site succeeding or failing based upon whether or not you paid the telecom companies enough to carry your material or allow quick access is appalling," she told the committee.

Also speaking for a free-flowing Internet was Patric Verrone, the president of the Writers Guild of America, West, which recently ended a 100-day strike that virtually paralyzed television production. The Internet was a valuable organizing tool for the writers, he said in an interview.

"When your employers are the same companies that control the media, it's hard to get your message out," Verrone said.

To maintain contact with one another, guild members used blog postings, e-mail and videos. It was the success of that campaign that prompted Verrone to come to Washington and push for legislation that he hopes will guarantee the Internet's status as an open forum for communication.

Verrone, a television writer and producer for over 20 years, supports legislation proposed by Sens. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, and Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., that would force those who control Internet service to treat all traffic equally.

Large network owners like cable and telecommunications companies are opposed to network neutrality legislation, saying it would add a layer of regulation that will hurt consumers. They say it is unnecessary and amounts to a solution in search of a problem.

Kyle McSlarrow, president and CEO of the National Cable and Telecommunications Association, described the picture painted by pro-net neutrality commenters as "a complete fantasy."

McSlarrow said of the tens of millions of people who use the Internet every day, "no one is being blocked" and if they were, they could go to another service provider.

Martin told the panel that the FCC's anti-discrimination "Internet Policy Statement," approved in 2005, is enforceable and gives the commission adequate authority to protect consumers.

When the policy was approved, Martin had a different opinion, however.

In his statement at the time, he noted "policy statements do not establish rules nor are they enforceable documents" but that the commission decision "does reflect core beliefs that each member of this Commission holds regarding how broadband Internet access should function."

 
 

Comments
19
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

I fail to see how an organization who's duty is to license radio frequencies would have anything to do with the internet. Were they given this authority as part of some law or act of congress? Or did they just decide they would rule the net one day on their own?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:25 PM on 04/23/2008

Its called the Federal Communications Commission not the Federal Radio commission. And its charter is (from their web site) -- "The FCC was established by the Communications Act of 1934 and is charged with regulating interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire, satellite and cable."
Communication via radio, wire, satellite, and cable. Sounds pretty relevant to me. The real question is how we can expect the Bush administration to manage this or any regulatory agency. They have demonstrated that they are completely incompetent and corrupt.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:39 PM on 04/23/2008

Then you KEVIN MARTIN are part of the problem in government, not the solution. Get stuffed, fascist enabler.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:52 AM on 04/23/2008

Senator Ted Stevens (R) Alaska of "the internet is a series of tubes" fame and now under investigation by the FBI is the Chairman of the committee regulating the internet. God help us all !

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:26 AM on 04/23/2008

They're all kids spawned in the Reagan era, not really human, just people with faces and no conscience who still worship the precepts of Ronnie the old fart.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:06 AM on 04/23/2008

Were these the hearings that Comcast paid seat warmers to take up all of the seats so opponents were locked out?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:58 PM on 04/22/2008

Yes- you notice that was squashed in the media. The internet is all we have to get reliable information. The fascist Republicans control the MSM.


This Kevin Martin is a real creep.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 PM on 04/23/2008

Where do they clone these dweeby lookin' tools anyway?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:25 PM on 04/22/2008

Paying corporate gatekeepers reminds me of paying the mafia for protection.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:14 PM on 04/22/2008

Oh it's Kevie-poo. Looks about twelve, don't he? He's the same fargin' bastidge who called an open meeting for Seattle residents to voice concerns over relaxation of market share regulations. He gave little notice of the meeting and then totally ignored what people had to say.

Wonder what corporate media giant he'll be employed by when he leaves the FCC?

We havin' fun yet?

Menopausal Mick

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:51 PM on 04/22/2008

He sure is the one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:19 PM on 04/23/2008

Need we hear more about the "liberal" media? The FCC was established to protect the PUBLIC airwaves. Their mandate has expanded to all electronic media. Nobody, however, has officially chnaged the mandate from PUBLIC to CORPORATE. When any entity tries to control a country, the first thing they target is the media. Today, we are traveling down a road to fascism. This is one more brick in that road.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:04 PM on 04/22/2008

Yes, and remember in the days of public service messages. You don't hear them anymore because of Ronald Reagan - "fairness doctrine: fairness to big business. What a mofer he was.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:20 PM on 04/23/2008

Unfortunately the road to fascism began at Reagan and we have reached the end of the road at Bush. Trip is over.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:29 AM on 04/23/2008

You got that. He rests in peace while we live in the hell he created.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:09 AM on 04/23/2008

People do not want to face up to it. FASCISM that could never happen here?
WAKE UP PEOPLE!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 PM on 04/23/2008

Kevin Martin is in the class of Rummy and Brownie and the other incompetents Bush has appointed, who are tools of Bush's paymaster pals. One could mince words, but why bother: the man is an idiot. His performance at the "further media consolidation" hearings was outrageous--even the Rpublicans on the committee told him that there was no call, nor need, for his proposed regulations.

The only chance this country has is to survive until next Jan 20th, when, hopefully, a Democrat will be Prez. I don't know how long thereafter Martin's tenure lasts (FCC is an independent agency, not co-terminus with a Presidency; I wonder what the "unitary executive" people think about that!?), but we should have a Congress that will overturn ANYTHING he does, soa new FCC-Chair can be appointed.

That is not to say that the Clinton FCC was any good. IT was not. It gave us media consolidation that, but for the web that was not on the horizon at the time, would have shut down free idea exchange forever.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:18 PM on 04/22/2008

I agree Kevin Martin is a very dangerous Bush appointee. He's obviously a Rupert Murdock pal and If Kevin Martin of the FCC says there is no need for further internet regulation you know it's a lie.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:58 PM on 04/22/2008

Of course, if the Democrats wanted to they could overturn his decisions, but their tails are too tucked in between their legs to act.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:08 AM on 04/23/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 

Related Tags
 

 Site  Web ask.com