Congress Sees Video Evidence Of Alleged Syrian Nuclear Facility

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

PAMELA HESS and DEB RIECHMANN | April 24, 2008 11:01 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Show your support.
Buzz this article up.
This undated image from video released Thursday April 24, 2008 by the Central Intelligence Agency shows a photo a covert nuclear reactor being built in Syria's eastern desert near Al Kibar, according to the narrated video. (AP Photo/CIA)

WASHINGTON — The White House said Thursday that North Korea's secret work on a nuclear reactor with Syria was "a dangerous and potentially destabilizing development for the world," raising doubts about Pyongyang's intention to carry through with a promised disclosure of its nuclear activities.

Seven months after Israel bombed the reactor, the White House broke its silence and said North Korea assisted Syria's secret nuclear program and that the destroyed facility was not intended for "peaceful purposes."

Top U.S. intelligence officials who briefed reporters said they had high confidence in the judgment that North Korea had aided Syria with its nuclear program and the intention was to produce plutonium. But they claimed only low confidence for the conclusion that it was meant for weapons development, in part because there was no reprocessing facility at the site _ something that would be needed to extract plutonium from spent reactor fuel for use in a bomb.

The Bush administration's assertions could undermine six-party negotiations to try to resolve the nuclear standoff with North Korea. But a senior administration official told reporters he hoped the disclosure would instead provide leverage to officials trying to get an accurate accounting of North Korea's nuclear and proliferation activities.

The White House issued a two-page statement after lawmakers were given details about the reactor in a series of briefings on Capitol Hill that included a video presentation of intelligence information the administration contends establishes a strong link between North Korea's nuclear program and the bombed Syrian site. The briefing also included still photographs that showed a strong resemblance between specific features of the plant and one near Yongbyon in North Korea.

Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Del., chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said the revelations make it clear that any deal to eliminate North Korea's nuclear programs must also stop its proliferation activities and include vigorous verification. But he said the information in the briefings was not a cause to end the talks.

"To the contrary, it underscores the need for pursuing the talks, which remain our best chance to convince North Korea to abandon its pursuit of nuclear weapons and to stop proliferation," Biden said.

The White House said the International Atomic Energy Agency also was being briefed on the intelligence.

While calling North Korea's nuclear assistance to Syria a "dangerous manifestation" of Pyongyang's nuclear weapons program and its proliferation activities, the White House said it remained committed to the talks.

The United States became aware North Korea was helping Syria with a nuclear project in 2003, said intelligence officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the matter's sensitivity. The critical intelligence that cemented that conclusion, they said, came last year: dozens of photographs taken from ground level over a period of time, showing the construction both inside and outside the building.

The Israeli strike on Sept. 6, 2007, ripped open the structure, known as the Al Kibar reactor, and revealed even more evidence to spy satellites: reinforced concrete walls that echoed the design of the Yongbyon reactor.

After the attack, Syria tried to bury evidence of its existence and erected a new building to hide the site. The building is not believed to house a new reactor, the officials said.

"This coverup only served to reinforce our confidence that this reactor was not intended for peaceful activities," White House press secretary Dana Perino said. "The Syrian regime must come clean before the world regarding its illicit nuclear activities."

The Syrian reactor was within weeks or months of being functional when Israeli jets destroyed it, a top U.S. official told The Associated Press, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter. The official said the facility was mostly completed but still needed fueling and significant testing before it could be declared operational.

"We had to assume they could throw the switch at any time," a senior intelligence official said.

No uranium, which is needed to fuel a reactor, was evident at the site, a remote area of eastern Syria along the Euphrates River. But senior U.S. intelligence officials said the reactor was similar in design to the North Korean reactor at Yongbyon, which has in the past produced small amounts of plutonium, the material needed to make powerful nuclear weapons.

A senior intelligence official said the intelligence agencies believe North Korea was motivated by "cash" rather than a desire to obtain plutonium from the reactor.

Syria has maintained in the past that the site was an unused military facility, and on Thursday, its embassy denounced what it called the U.S. "campaign of false allegations." It accused the administration of trying to mislead Congress and world opinion "in order to justify the Israeli raid in September of 2007, which the current U.S. administration may have helped execute."

Senior U.S. officials said the U.S. military was not involved in the attack, and the U.S. government, although informed in advance, did not approve it.

"Israel made the decision to attack," a senior administration official said. "It did so without any so-called green light from us. None was asked for and none was given."

"It has become obvious that this maneuver on the part of this administration comes within the framework of the North Korean nuclear negotiations," the Syrian statement said.

And in an apparent reference to prewar claims by the Bush administration that Iraq had possessed weapons of mass destruction, the statement concluded: "The Syrian government hopes that the international community and the American public, particularly, will be more cautious and aware this time around in facing such unfounded allegations."

Top members of the House Intelligence Committee who were briefed on the reactor said it posed a serious threat of spreading dangerous nuclear materials.

"This is a serious proliferation issue, both for the Middle East and the countries that may be involved in Asia," said Rep. Pete Hoekstra, R-Mich.

Hoekstra and Intelligence Committee Chairman Silvestre Reyes, D-Texas, told reporters after the closed briefing that they were angry that the Bush administration had delayed informing the full committee for so long. That delay has created friction that may imperil congressional support for Bush's policies toward North Korea and Syria, Hoekstra said.

The White House also used its statement as an opportunity to denounce the nuclear activities of Iran, which it says is a threat to the stability of the Middle East. Perino said the international community must take further steps, beginning with full implementation of U.N. Security Council resolutions.

While Washington was awash in condemnation of North Korea's proliferation activities, the communist regime is expressing optimism about current six-party negotiations with the United States, China, South Korea, Russia and Japan. The optimism over the talks is raising hopes of breaking the impasse that has deadlocked arms negotiations.

North Korea's Foreign Ministry said Thursday that it had discussed technical matters with the Americans for moving forward on that and other agreements from the arms talks. "The negotiations proceeded in a sincere and constructive manner and progress was made," the ministry said in a statement.

As part of that process, the North is required to submit a "declaration" detailing its programs and proliferation activity, but the talks are stalled over Pyongyang's refusal to publicly admit the Syria connection. However, officials say the North Koreans are willing to accept international "concern" about unspecified proliferation.

___

Associated Press writers Deb Riechmann, Barry Schweid, Matthew Lee, Anne Flaherty, Edith Lederer and Bassem Mroueh contributed to this report.

 
 

Comments
31
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

I saw the video. I also noticed at the top of the video that it said U.S. government video. It was at that time that I determined that the whole video was a lie. When was the last time that the U.S. government ever told us the truth? This is just another excuse to go to war before the elections. What's bad is that the do nothing cowards in congress will go along with whatever president Cheney and his hand puppet want to do.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:56 PM on 04/24/2008

They didn't include the most telling quote from Assad.

He said that they were not about to trust North Korean engineering. That a North Korean designed reactor would most likely end up as another Chernobal.

That sounds sensible to me. Would you buy a used reactor from North Korea?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:58 PM on 04/24/2008

"That a North Korean designed reactor would most likely end up as another Chernobal."

That's a good one from Baby Assad. It's not a power reactor. It couldn't end up in Chernoybal. And in North Korea its working fine.

The only country in the world that complained about the Israeli action was North Korea. Within hours of the event. The rest of the Arab world didn't give a damn and like Turkey does not want to see a nuclear Syria. Well, one other country complained. Iran, but very late and very meekly. Though Assad is their hired puppet, currently, they certainly don't want any competitive Arab nuke states. They were probably embarrassed they didn't know about it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:24 PM on 04/24/2008

There you go. That must be proof positive.

Where have you been the past 7 years?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 AM on 04/25/2008

See that's the problem. Once you have a reputation as a liar there is no reason for anyone to ever believe you again.

And I don't believe this. Not for a minute.

I don't know what the Bushistas are up to. Or how this fits into their plans to expand the war into Iran. But I wouldn't believe the bastards if they told me the sun came up in the East and went down in the West.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:48 PM on 04/24/2008

They have Iraq's WMD to deliver the warheads too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:45 PM on 04/24/2008

First off, I don't believe that the Israelis were the ones who hit this facility, just how hard is it to paint a Star of David on a F-18, and then after the Mission, repaint the Normal American designation back on it? I Don't believe that Israel has the ability to slip out of Israel,much sneak into another Country undetected by her Enemies, although the Americans, operating out of Iraq, Could Pop right over the Border and Demolish this Site and Slaughter off all the North Korean Stooges that were Follish enough to try and build a Covert Nuclear Reactor, in one of the Most Volatile Areas on the planet.

I wish to thank the Turkish Government for playing along and I want to thank Israel for them to be willing to take the Heat for it!!!

I Definately FEEL SAFER NOW!!!

THANK YOU PRESIDENT BUSH!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:16 PM on 04/24/2008

The Israelis did it. You can believe that. The nuclear-production part, no so much; but the Israeli warplanes, you can believe. Israel's been overflying Lebanon consistently for 30 years, and enjoyed air supremacy over Syria about as long. Their pilots train in nap-of-the-Earth flight all day while the US Air Force maintains a "hard deck" of at least 1000 feet, usually higher. If any air force could slip across the border, take out a building, and return unscathed, it's the IDF.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:16 PM on 04/24/2008

If a brain-damaged madman like George Bush Jr. had been threatening for five years to attack and invade YOUR country what steps would YOU take to protect yourself?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:32 PM on 04/24/2008

Of course this has AIPAC, Israel, and Cheney all over it. The Syrian issue is 100% Israeli. Syria is no danger to the US. Israel refuses to sign the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty. Israel refuses to allow IAEA inspections of their nuke facilites.Israel refuses to comply with any UN resolutions, which the US protects it from. Make Israel adhere to the standards that it and the US want to impose on Syria and by extension Iran. Israel is the biggest bully,destabilizing,warmongering,belligerent aggressor in the ME and needs to be dealt with before Damascus or Tehran. Syria has every right to defend themselves against Israel. It's absurd the pretense that Israel stands as the pathetic guardian against the proliferation of nuclear weapons in the ME. The IAEA in Israel ? The reaction would be spectacular and filled with claims of persecution and divine right. Unconditional, unquestioned, never ending financial support of Israeli policy is bad for the US. Israeli policies are no longer in line with US policies, and, as a result are making the US more of a target than ever in the Islamic world.The US arms Israel and shields Israel from international and UN repercussions which does us enormous harm in the eyes of the world. Good news? There will be when Israel and the US recognize a two-state solution, a separation between their country and this one, the United States

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:17 PM on 04/24/2008

Just give every country a nuke who wants one and call it a day.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:11 PM on 04/24/2008

It wasn't a video it was a power point of still shots and would this be like Colin Powell in February of 2003 LYING through his teeth about the WMD's being moved in the images he showed us of Iraq.
The Audacity, is there no justice, no accountability! Is every one affiliated with this administration so pathologically drunk on the kool aid that they don't know what telling the truth is? Do they think we are so stupid as to let this blatant craziness continue. I'm sick of this false leadership. Arm yourself with guns pitch fork and torches it way past time to storm the castle.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:05 PM on 04/24/2008

It's a sad day that we naturally assume our government is lying to us and just trying to find a pretext to start another war. Yet that is where we are because this government cried wolf the last time based on "intelligence" that was fabricated. There is no reason to believe it's not fabricated this time as well.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:58 PM on 04/24/2008

Cried wolf the last several times.

Everytime?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:59 PM on 04/24/2008

why was a raid justified?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:26 PM on 04/24/2008

I'm not surprised as North Korea is a one market economy, marketing arms. It can't feed its people. It can't produce enough energy to light their homes or to keep them warm. And it's gripped with a Jim Jones paranoia which is why it wants nukes. Now that it has them, it wants to sell them to other technologies because nuclear technology isn't worth much unless it brings in real money.

It used to blackmail the South into giving it money and food, but I don't think the South is believing the threats anymore. Either that or they are tired of paying the North protection money when they have a better trained (albeit smaller military) , backed by the U.S., and a first world economy.

Syria is a boil on the world's ass. It's behind much of the violence in Lebanon. It's done a masterful job of dividing Lebanese and undermining the government of Lebanon's legitimacy. And if Hezbollah thinks Syria is its friend they need to think again. If they can get the factions to go at it again they can then swoop in and annex Lebanon.

We need to keep the pressure on North Korea and Syria. I don't believe Saddam's WMDs are there because he didn't have any, but I also believe Syria wants nukes. People forget Turkey bullied it into coughing up Ocalan and Israel does what it wants with impunity. Then there's the presence of U.S. troops on its border.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:25 PM on 04/24/2008

Let's see, a country that makes most of its overseas earning from arms sales....

I wonder which country sells the most? Let's see....

Who could that be?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:00 PM on 04/24/2008

"I'm not surprised as North Korea is a one market economy, marketing arms."

All things considered, with a small adjustment or two, that statment could be used to describe the US.

And as far as Syria wanting nukes...well, why wouldn't anyone in the region want nukes, and why wouldn't that be reasonable? Given Israel's possession of nukes, their alliance with the US, and the US's record of colvert actions and outright agression in the region, it makes sense that any nation in the ME who wants to safeguard against US/Israeli invasion would want nuclear weapons. But still, unless the new so-called "proof" is better than the last, they've got no valid reason to put pressure on Syria about anything, and public skepticism and a public outcry at any acknowledged plan to act against Syria is perfectly justifiable.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:51 PM on 04/24/2008

You know what? I could give a rats ass if Syria is building a nuke site. I mean really, what do we think they are really going to do if they developed a nuke? Oddly enough with all the high profile shrieking going about the possibility of countries in the Middle East developing nukes, the alarmists never seem to mention Israel which has approximately 200 nuclear weapons. No double standard there, eh?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:08 PM on 04/24/2008

So...tough choice, Iran or Syria...which is next on our laundry list of wars to start? Syria would be good, but damn, we've done so much PR work on turning Iran into The Great Satan that it's hard to justify not attacking Iran first. Hmmm...how bout both at once? Sounds like a great big "Bring em on" to me!

Nice to have choices though, dontcha think? The Great Warmonger President needs options if he's to start another unprovoked war...while maintaining at least a modicum of PR to support another war of choice. Iraq has gone so well, we can just see good things ahead in attacking anyone who meets the minimum criteria for preventative war...so many "bad guys" so little time left. But then, if the world situation can be shown to be dangerous enough, perhaps our illustrious Torturer-in-Chief would stay in office for at least one more term of office. God knows, there's no one else who can keep us safe like he can.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:02 PM on 04/24/2008

They weren't getting any traction on bomb, bomb, Iran; so now it is Syria's turn.

NO BUSH, WE AREN'T BUYING THE STORY FROM SYRIA EITHER.

GO LAME YOUR DUCK SOMEWHERE ELSE, WE DON'T TAKE CRAZIES HERE ANYMORE!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:54 PM on 04/24/2008


If only that were true!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:06 PM on 04/24/2008

Why doesn't Israel sign the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and allow inspectors into Dimona?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:51 PM on 04/24/2008

Because then they'd have to acknowledge that they have nukes. They have never openly admitted to their nuclear arsenal, and until they use one, they'll deny they have them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:04 PM on 04/24/2008

Oh deja vu ... where's Colin Powell.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:45 PM on 04/24/2008

More propaganda from the same duo (US & Israel) that displayed evidence and images about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:39 PM on 04/24/2008

This is more propaganda from the Bush administration. When this happened Seymour Hersh talked to many independent security and military specialists: http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/02/11/080211fa_fact_hersh/ They all told him that there was no evidence that those buildings were nuclear. Mohamed ElBaradei, the director-general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations group responsible for monitoring compliance with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, said, "Our experts who have carefully analyzed the satellite imagery say it is unlikely that this building was a nuclear facility."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:34 PM on 04/24/2008

Nice picture.

I wonder who gets to say "slam dunk" this time?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:15 PM on 04/24/2008

US & Israeli arrogance and reliance on their populace's naivety grows ever stronger.

PNAC plans have called for US invasion and occupation of Iraq, Iran & Syria...so, is this development any real surprise? Perhaps because preceding with plans for Iran at the moment is too politically volatile, the NeoCons have decided to refocus on Syria?

This from a Reuters story by Samia Nakhoul:

"Israel is widely believed to have assembled the Middle East's only nuclear arsenal at Dimona, a plant out of bounds to foreign inspection."

WTF??? How do we get away with such hypocrisy? The above statement should reinforce the point I've been making for a while about Israel; they do NOT drive US policy regarding Israel through lobbyists--Israel is a US client state who in reality jumps when we say jump. My guess is that the nuclear arsenal at Dimona is off limits becasue the US has forbade them to give access to any inspection, as the hand guiding the puppet would be obvious to any well-informed inspector.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 AM on 04/24/2008

>The official said no uranium _ the fuel for a reactor _ was evident on site.

I sure get tired of being lied to. At the time there were reports of "soil samples" that contained nuclear materials thereby PROVING the raid was justified.

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/ED0FEEAA-BA97-47ED-99B2-06A653CBB82B.ht

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:36 AM on 04/24/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in