Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Howard Dean May Intervene In Dem Primary

Huffington Post   |   April 24, 2008 01:43 PM


Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid took his comments about the state of the Democratic primary one step further today, suggesting that he and other prominent Democrats would intervene in the race if primary season concludes without a clear winner:

Reid said he would consider writing a joint letter with Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) demanding that superdelegates make their endorsements public.


"The three of us, we may write a joint letter [to superdelegates]," said Reid. "We might do individual letters, we are in contact with each other."...

However, when asked by a reporter if he would be forced to intervene if the undecided superdelegates did not make up their minds, Reid replied "I might have to."

This might explain Harry Reid's primary remarks last month that "things are being done" to end the nomination:

Q: Do you still think the Democratic race can be resolved before the convention?


Reid: Easy.

Q: How is that?

Reid: It will be done.

Q: It just will?

Reid: Yep.

Q: Magically?

Reid: No, it will be done. I had a conversation with Governor Dean (Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean) today. Things are being done.

Nancy Pelosi has abstained from such comments, though she has repeatedly suggested that superdelegates should not overturn the will of primary voters, a position that sits well with the Obama camp:

"If the votes of the superdelegates overturn what's happened in the elections, it would be harmful to the Democratic party," Pelosi said in an interview taped Friday for broadcast Sunday on ABC's "This Week."...


"It's a delegate race," she said. "The way the system works is that the delegates choose the nominee."

Meanwhile, Howard Dean has decided that superdelegates should not wait for the primaries to conclude; they need to state their endorsements now:

An increasingly firm Howard Dean told CNN again Thursday that he needs superdelegates to say who they're for - and "I need them to say who they're for starting now."


"We cannot give up two or three months of active campaigning and healing time," the Democratic National Committee Chairman told CNN's Wolf Blitzer. "We've got to know who our nominee is."

 

Comments
2724
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

Hint sample
View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (19 pages total)

I am so sick of this election. It seems as it has been going on for years . PLEASE IN & NC, put an end to it. Please just vote for Obama and get it over with.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 AM on 04/28/2008

It would be nice to see those three actually demonstrate leading by example. If they want the super-delegates to declare their preferences, then why don't they?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:23 AM on 04/28/2008

I think it's time for the superdelegates to make a decision - a religious litmus test - the media is trying to force a presidential candidate to leave his church, disown his religion and a large portion of his community - is anybody out there listening?? it's getting really scary - I think this is stirring up some bad feelings among the races - the superdelegates should be more interested in holding the democratic party together than worrying about their political careers -

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:03 AM on 04/28/2008

Since when do we have every state's vote count in a primary. I would be interested in knowing how often that has happened. I thought once it was clear who the winner was going to be, it was declared

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:19 AM on 04/28/2008

Does anyone else remember back when Obama had no delegates on his side and was insisting that the candidate should be nominated based on popular vote not delegates or super-delegates. He was adament about that.
But now that Hillary might end up with the popular vote - Obama is saying the opposite, that the one with the most delegates and super-delegates should be the winner. He is not an honest and forthright person, he is selfish and self-serving.
Well, I bet most people don't give a damn about the delegates - it is the popular vote they care about.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:36 PM on 04/27/2008

OK, I'll admit that he flipped if you admit that she flopped.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:44 AM on 04/28/2008

I wouldn't call getting the popular vote a flop but I would call his change in attitude a flip for sure.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:49 PM on 04/28/2008

When races are close you wait until it's over and it's not over yet, just ask the states who haven't voted the primary yet.
You don't pull a horse from a race before the finish line and the primary finish line has not come yet - what's the bums rush all about? Are they afraid Obama might loose? Too bad, when the primary's are over then it's done.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 PM on 04/27/2008

So now Hillary's a horse, eh?? Wow. How sexist.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:27 AM on 04/28/2008

It is my expectation that Obama will end the primary season June 3 with about a pledged delegate margin of about a hundred votes.

Shortly thereafter, the DNC and Obama's campaign will announce they will recommend that the credentials committee seat the Florida and Michigan delegations selected at their state conventions, giving Clinton a 60 net delegate gain. Obama will continue to lead the total pledged delegate count by about 40 votes.

A few hundred superdelegates will announce their committment to vote for Obama at the convention. Obama will be the presumptive nominee, AND Michigan and Florida will have been counted in the total.

If the situations were reversed, and Clinton was ahead by any number of pledged delegates, she would be the nominee. To do anything else would leave her supporters feeling severely alienated and cheated. The Democrats won't do that to either side. Since Obama will almost certainly be in the lead, he will be the nominee.

I hope that the Democrats can then unite around Obama, our nominee, and win in November.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:57 PM on 04/27/2008

Why don't you two intervene in stopping The Idiot's War and making sure our wounded veterans are provided with the proper medical care which they ware not recieving now and protect and restore the constitutional rights of the American people, remember us the US?. A bunch of monkeys on acid could got more accomplished in congress than you two have.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:22 PM on 04/27/2008

Obama gets the nomination. Obama beats McCain in November. That's just the way things are pointed. Anything else is a fantasy.

The real question is whether the people will get off their spoiled butts and give his administration the support it needs to effect real change. Change comes from the bottom up, people.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:26 PM on 04/27/2008

These people are a joke!
All this smoke and fury is BS. The dems were voted in to Clean out the Snakes in the Whitehouse. after the election they take Impeachment off The table.
Meanwhile, Our country slides futher down the Crapper!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:29 PM on 04/26/2008

She said it:"The way the system works is that the delegates choose the nominee". Let the superdelegates choose the nominee.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:31 PM on 04/26/2008

I guess the act of the 'people' to vote is just a formality to the Washington Democrats - not our right. Since they want to take away our right and elect the person THEY want. . . . . . How many of U are happy with that!?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:26 PM on 04/27/2008

To 'elect' our candidate is to achieve 2025. Since that didn't work supernuts will need to jump in.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:24 AM on 04/28/2008

Reid and Pelosi to intervene in the Primary Process? What a laugh. These two are weaklings, pure and simple. What have they done to get Bush be accountable to the people? Nothing. Zilch. Nada. Would they dare go against the woman more steely than Margaret Thatcher?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:21 PM on 04/26/2008

Unfortunately, this type of leadership has left Cheney & the Chimp essentially unchallenged, and not impeached. And what magic will be applied on Florida and Michigan, and on their superdelegates? On to the smoke-filled rooms??

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:18 PM on 04/26/2008

Votenader.org

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:21 PM on 04/26/2008

You bet we will vote for Nader, if the Washington Dems don't stop the assault on their voters.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 PM on 04/27/2008

yah... waste your vote!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:28 AM on 04/27/2008

Can you say election tampering?

Once Barrack felt it was acceptable to have 57% of the delegate while only having 51% of the popular vote, all bets are off that the superdelegates need to fall in line with the delegates.

Obama should not get to have it both ways. By accepting 57% of the delegates when only having 51% of the popular vote, Obama was the first to go off point about delegates matching the popular vote. If the superdelegates are manipulated into following the popular vote when the delegates did not, that should be cause for an election tampering lawsuit.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:27 PM on 04/26/2008


Just ask Hillary if she can mantain a 68% win in all the upcoming primaries if not she needs to get out and quit stabbing the democrats in the back.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:49 AM on 04/26/2008

disagree bratzilla.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:28 PM on 04/26/2008

I would love the Democratic Leaders to show some leadership. Instead they portray the same old stereo type wishy-washy indecisive leadership. She needs to go there was no decisive double digit lead. Stop the blood letting, She needs to be stopped we need a new adminstration that is strong without our own party stabbing us in the back. Hillary is running a Win/Win campaign, she will win even if she loses. STOP this now.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:47 AM on 04/26/2008

Since when is an additional 1% a "decisive double digit lead"? The difference between a 9% lead and a 10% win is only 1%. Decidedly LESS than I assumed of her, all too familiar with the state of PA and its voters. Any victory Hillary had in Pennsylvania, will be a 'Pyrrhic' victory, for the Democratic party. Talk about Greek tragedy, Arianna...

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:06 AM on 04/26/2008

YES, SOMEONE PLEASE STOP HILLARY WITH HER THREATS OF NUCLEAR WAR!
She is also easily the most annoying person in the country.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:32 AM on 04/27/2008

It wasn't double digits and it was ten or fifteen percentage points less than she supposedly had early in the Pennsylvania race.

Mainly thanks to Republicans rushing for Hillary--temporarily!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:46 PM on 04/26/2008

The sad factoid of this whole mess is that if HRC was in Obama's position, Obama's bid would have ended more than a month ago. HRC is still a candidate because of name recognition and fearful Democrats. Fearful Democrats? Yes, those superdelegates who are not as brave as Gov Richardson. The Democrats should be directing the machine towards McCain and the Republicans.......

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:41 AM on 04/26/2008

Richardson is just a turncoat who went agianst the New Mexico vote. Why the big promotion for Obama? He is more controllable than Hillary. She is the stronger candidate.

This country is in deep trouble. We cannot afford to have a guy being run by a bunch of destructive advisors who have their own agendas. What is so impressive about him anyway. His strong voice spewing out a string of impossible promises.?? Maybe Rev. Wright will be one of his advisors as he has been for so many years.

If you elect him you will find out the truth and it will be too late. Here we go again with another election scam.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:51 AM on 04/27/2008

Hillary squeaked by in New Mexico, winning by less than a percentage point. Richardson hardly qualifies for a "turncoat" when voters are divided almost exactly in half about which candidate they support.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:34 PM on 04/27/2008

disagree, Obama's group would have been screaming about having all the big states.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:28 PM on 04/26/2008

I don't care how long it takes to choose a nominee, as long as the process is fair, and I get to vote for someone who is against the Iraq war, is for economic fairness, and doesn't have shit for brains. Sure, I have a favorite, but I am only one voter, and realise that it takes a whole lot of votes to get nominated. I'll wait, just give me someone on the ballot I can vote for.
At this point, it does not look like there is any chance at all that there will be a Republican on the ballot whose views on the war and on the economy agree even remotely with my own.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:54 AM on 04/26/2008

Ah great when those three get involved Clinton will get the nomination... Reid, Pelosi, Dean, and Clinton are the four who really live up to the stereotype of the liberal elite.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:21 PM on 04/25/2008

Pelosi and Dean are hardly Hillary fans.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:47 PM on 04/26/2008

I'm not so sure. What I do know is that a certain number of women are planning to vote on "gender-based" criteria and that should show in the African-American female vote in the two upcoming primaries. A black female named Mckinney is running with a minority party and should Clinton lose the nomination, Mckinney is SURE to get more votes than Nader did in either of the previous elections. So, we'll be back to square one with another Republican extension of the Iraq situation.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:06 AM on 04/26/2008

The media has diagnosed every demo there is....the old...the young...the rich....the poor...the educated....the uneducated....the bowlers, gun toters and beer drinkers.....And somehow ALWAYS finds a way to give the advantage to Clinton. But just today, the media is finally starting to raise the most incredible point in the whole race. HILLARY HAS LOST THE SUPPORT OF AN ENTIRE RACE OF PEOPLE !!!!!!!! Do you know how incredibly sad this fact is ? Hillary Clinton (who's husband was so loved as to have been called The First Black President) has alienated the black people of America to such a degree that there is no way blacks will support her EVER. This has nothing to do with Obama !!!! Keep in mind folks....Hillary started this campaign with close to 82% of the black support. But as blacks learned more about her (Goldwater Girl....Against Civil Rights Act of '64...etc.) combined with her LBJ statements and Bill's minimizing of Obama (fairy tale...Jesse won S.Carolina too...etc) blacks were first of all shocked...and then incredibly offended by these realities to a degree that can never be recovered. WE FEEL DECEIVED !!!! We hope that our friends of all races understand how we as blacks feel. This is the main story that needs to get out to the superdelegates. Hillary ABSOLUTELY KILLED HER ELECTABILTY. Simple as that !

Greg Jones
Blacks4Barack.org
(A Multi-Racial Organization...Dedicated To Truth)

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:38 PM on 04/25/2008

I have to agree, If Hillary loses(and i think she has)she has no one to blame but herself.
Politics buy nature, is a Dirty Buisness. But Hillary has raised the level to a new LOW.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:06 PM on 04/26/2008