Al-Sadr Considers Restarting Full-Scale Fight Against US-Led Forces

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

HAMZA HENDAWI and QASSIM ABDUL-ZAHRA | April 24, 2008 09:37 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Show your support.
Buzz this article up.
In this Oct. 24, 2006 file photo, Muqtada al-Sadr, radical Shiite cleric and a chief of the Mahdi Army militia, addresses his followers after Eid al-Fitr prayer in Najaf. Iraq. Muqtada al-Sadr is shifting his focus away from politics and toward fighting U.S. and Iraqi government forces as a top priority, a change of course that maybe the result of Iranian influence on the cleric, according to Shiite lawmakers and politicians. (AP Photo/Alaa al-Marjani, File)

BAGHDAD — Muqtada al-Sadr is considering setting aside his political ambitions and restarting a full-scale fight against U.S.-led forces _ a worrisome shift that may reflect Iranian influence on the young cleric and could open the way for a shadow state protected by his powerful Mahdi Army.

A possible breakaway path _ described to The Associated Press by Shiite lawmakers and politicians _ would represent the ultimate backlash to the Iraqi government's pressure on al-Sadr to renounce and disband his Shiite militia.

By snubbing the give-and-take of politics, al-Sadr would have a freer hand to carve out a kind of parallel state with its own militia and social services along the lines of Hezbollah in Lebanon, a Shiite group founded with Iran's help in the 1980s.

It also would carry potentially disastrous security implications as the Pentagon trims its troops strength and Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki finally shows progress on national reconciliation.

In a key step toward unity, al-Maliki announced Thursday that all political blocs have agreed to return to the Shiite-led government, a week after lawmakers with Iraq's main Sunni political bloc said the group has agreed to the plan in principle.

A return of the Sunnis would be a boost to al-Maliki and seen by Washington as a significant step forward.

Though the bloc, the National Accordance Front, has not made a formal announcement, al-Maliki said that "national reconciliation has proved a success," according to a statement issued by his office.

The Sunnis are pleased with the squeeze on al-Sadr's movement as well as an amnesty law that could free many detainees.

"Muqtada has shown a great deal of patience not calling for an all-out war yet with so much pressure on him," said Mohan Abedin, director of research at London's Center for the Study of Terrorism and an expert on Shiite affairs. "The Mahdi Army is by far the most powerful Iraqi faction. It can cause damage on a massive scale if it goes to war."

Al-Sadr's next move is still uncertain, but he clearly holds important cards.

The Mahdi Army is estimated to have about 60,000 fighters _ with at least 5,000 thought to be highly trained commandos _ and is emboldened by its strong resistance to an Iraqi-led crackdown launched last month in the southern city of Basra and elsewhere.

Al-Sadr's movement also holds sway over the densely populated Shiite parts of Baghdad and across the Shiite south by controlling vital needs such as fuel and running social services such as clinics.

A cease-fire declared last summer by al-Sadr has been credited with helping bring a steep drop violence.

But al-Sadr _ who has been in the Iranian seminary city of Qom for the past year _ is seriously considering tearing up the truce and disassociating himself from his political bloc in parliament, according to loyalists and Shiite politicians interviewed by the AP over the past two weeks.

Then al-Sadr would be free to unleash Mahdi attacks on U.S. and Iraqi forces, the political insiders said.

They include members of the 30-seat Sadrist faction in parliament and members of rival Shiite parties, including two who saw al-Sadr recently in Iran. All requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject.

"The emphasis is now on weapons and fighting, not politics," said one of the lawmakers in the Sadrist bloc. "(Al-Sadr) now only communicates with the Mahdi Army commanders."

Any Mahdi Army offensive could have serious repercussions. Mahdi fighters engaged in fierce battles with U.S. forces in 2004 and then were blamed for waves of roadside bombings that were once the chief killer of American troops.

Mahdi militiamen also fought Iraqi security forces to a virtual standstill last month in Basra before an Iranian-supervised truce.

It's unknown how much al-Sadr's Iranian hosts are shaping his views.

Al-Sadr, who is in his mid-30s, is studying in Qom under the supervision of Ayatollah Kazim al-Haeri, a reclusive Iraqi cleric close to Iranian hard-liners.

Washington accuses Iran of aiding Shiite militias in Iraq, including so-called "special groups" with murky ties to the Mahdi mainstream. Iran denies the allegations.

But Iran has obvious and well known connections to the main Shiite political groups in al-Maliki's government. During the recent battles in Basra, Iran supported al-Maliki's crackdown on so-called "criminals" but did not make a clear statement on the spillover confrontation with the Mahdi Army.

Backing a Mahdi Army uprising would allow Tehran to effectively play both sides in a Shiite showdown.

A flurry of recent statements by al-Sadr has emphasized his first public role: as a firebrand militia leader after the U.S.-led invasion in 2003.

In a statement posted Saturday on his Web site, al-Sadr gave a "final warning" to the government to halt its crackdown or face an "open war until liberation."

Senior Mahdi Army commanders, speaking on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to discuss strategy with media, said they have taken delivery of new Iranian weapons, including sophisticated roadside bombs, Grad rockets and shoulder-fired anti-aircraft missiles.

The militia's top field commanders, they said, were senior members of the special groups.

One commander, who identified himself by his nickname Abu Dhara al-Sadri, said scores of militia fighters were prepared to carry out suicide bombings against U.S. forces. Suicide bombings are the signature attacks of Sunni militants in Iraq's conflict, but the tactic was introduced against Americans in Lebanon by Shiite militants in the 1980s.

Sadrist lawmakers and aides have sent compromise-seeking proposals to al-Sadr in Qom. The ideas seek to appease al-Maliki enough to forestall his threat: barring al-Sadr's followers from running in this fall's key provincial elections unless al-Sadr disbands the Mahdi Army.

But the proposals have gone unanswered, said al-Sadr's aides.

One offer, they said, would allow for creation of a new political party with no formal links to the Mahdi Army. Another would permit candidates sympathetic to the Sadrists _ but with no direct links _ to run as independents in the fall election.

One of the authors of the proposals, moderate cleric Riyadh al-Nouri, was gunned down April 11 in Najaf, the spiritual center for Shiites in Iraq. The reason for the slaying was not clear.

Lawmakers and politicians told the AP that al-Sadr's more belligerent tone is motivated, in part, by his wish to secure a place for himself in history as a nationalist leader and anger over the recent arrests of hundreds of supporters despite his unilateral cease-fire.

At talks this month in Qom between al-Sadr and former Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari, the young cleric vowed never to disband the Mahdi Army while U.S. and other foreign forces remain in Iraq, according to Shiite political figures familiar with the meetings.

Al-Jaafari has said he was mediating an accommodation between al-Sadr and al-Maliki's government.

Salah al-Obeidi, al-Sadr's chief spokesman in Iraq, acknowledged that al-Sadr and the Iranians were at present bound by close ties and common goals.

However, he was quick to add that while al-Sadr and the Iranians shared common interests _ namely fighting the Americans in Iraq _ the cleric was nobody's puppet.

Vali Nasr, an expert on Shiite politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, said the Iranians may want al-Sadr to stay in Qom to keep him in check for the moment.

"Muqtada is forcing everyone's hand right now when they (the Iranians) may not be wanting their hand forced," said Nasr.

 
 

Comments
225
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

From Times Online:
***

April 25, 2008
Iraqi forces see victory in Basra

"Iraqi soldiers are standing proud in Basra one month after launching a surprise offensive to wipe out murderous gangs of Shia militants that had been allowed to flourish under Britain"s watch."


Read story here:
http://timesonline.typepad.com/inside_iraq_weblog/2008/04/iraqi-forces-se.html


Note:
The groups the Times refers to as "murderous gangs" are called "freedom fighters" by many on HuffPo.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:38 AM on 04/26/2008

This story must have been written after the more than a 1,000 Iraqi forces refused to fight in Basra.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:43 PM on 04/26/2008

Iraq....and for that matter most of the Arab world...is not worth one American life.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:16 AM on 04/26/2008

Question to moonbats that think Mookie was winning in the last dust-up.......If he was winning, why did he quit?

Seems to me if he was winning he would just continue on and take Iraq back or at least the city they were fighting in. Fact is he lost a lot of members and he does every time he starts something. Mookie just gets your hopes up then dashes them by losing and going into hiding.

Liberals are SOOOOOO naive.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:46 AM on 04/26/2008

The government negotiated a cease fire. Sorry to throw a damper on your propaganda.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:44 PM on 04/26/2008

It is remarkable just how many bloody minded fools there are out there. People who know little or nothing about Iraq, al Sadr or Iran. But are happy to fan the flames of war.

How much bloodshed is enough?

Whenever I hear statements from al Sadr he seems to be making sense. Although provoked he has held a cease fire. He seems to be genuinely concerned about the welfare of Iraq.

He represents a good portion of the Shia in Iraq. He has participated in the political process. Certainly the Mahdi Army has blood on their hands. But then there is no one in Iraq who doesn't anymore.

And he strikes me as more of a nationalist than anything else. If we want to contain Iranian influence in Iraq it would be a good idea to come to terms with al Sadr. He is more likely to stand up to Iranian influence than Maliki.

The one thing I know for certain. Iraq doesn't need any more neo-con advice. Or advice from Cheney or Bush

And what that country certainly DOESN'T need is more killing

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:05 PM on 04/25/2008

Replace turban with backwards ballcap and a cigarette........Shia Silent Bob.........Where's Sunni Jay?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:07 PM on 04/25/2008

Gee, we must be behind in our $urge payment$ or, they've decided their stimulus package isn't high enough. Either way, as long as we're paying to win, we're really losing in the long run. When the $$$urge stops, the fighting will return.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:43 AM on 04/25/2008

Your correct about that. Bush has been using tax payer money to pay these people off, and they know now they can extort more as Bush needs to keep his profit producing invasion going. After all, its not like it is Georges money he is giving away.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:31 PM on 04/25/2008

If our wonderful US of A were to have a foreign army here that had wiped out our standing government and replaced it with one of their own design, then I hope to hell that we Americans would have the sense of honor to take up arms and fight them to the death, much in the same way that al-Sadr is about to do.

If that same occupying army had destroyed our electric grid, allowed pillaging of the Smithsonian, dismantled our military, orphaned 800,000 of our children, told Republicans that they could not hold office or serve in government (well, that part wouldn't be so bad), then, yes, the only solution would be to take the street-level fight to the occupiers (of which, sadly, we are one).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:17 AM on 04/25/2008

Get real. If the EU invaded the US and arrested Bush you guys would throw flowers in the streets.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 AM on 04/25/2008

Yes, then we would turn around and fight them. Would you become a collaborator?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:46 PM on 04/26/2008

Why do I get the feeling that Rush Limbaugh and all the other wing nuts out there would be the first to fall all over themselves to be collaborators.

They would be afraid of losing some of their momey.

Phony patriots all.

Don't know the meaning of the word FREEDOM.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:33 PM on 04/25/2008

Flowers? Where'd that come from? No, man, I'd be the first one out there with my HK91 and my TH3's....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:57 AM on 04/25/2008

America, get ready for the Draft !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Its coming sooner than you think .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:14 AM on 04/25/2008

If we are intent on being on war footing for the foreseeable future....conscription is our only option. The military as it stands is broken and exhausted. Our soldiers have been deployed repeatedly, and over 80,000 have been stop lossed. Time for those who think war is a great idea to step up and do their part.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:55 PM on 04/26/2008

NEVER

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:11 PM on 04/25/2008

"If our wonderful US of A were to have a foreign army here that had wiped out our standing government and replaced it with one of their own design"

It already happened under our noses - thank Lincoln, McKinley, Wilson, Nixon, Reagan and Shrub with the help of the Corporate Goebbels-inpsired Media. The Federalists come back every few decades and try to finish what they started - the all-out destruction of America.

This is America under-siege. If it stays this way, is all up to us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:56 AM on 04/25/2008

You do not like the government much or the media? is that the idea?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 PM on 04/26/2008

moron* and his room full of dopes are savivating at the possibility of Sadr starting a full war. then moron* can have his false flag and blame it on Iran.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 AM on 04/25/2008

Who knows what game the neoCONS are playing between Iran, Maliki and Sadr but it certainly seems like their strategy isn't working.

Face it Bush, your legacy is already screwed and the Irving Kristol All-star Band played you for a fool. Partition what's left of the mess and take your marbles back to Kennebunkport. It's over. Maybe daddys' cronies will buy you a nice-new baseball franchise or something.

On behalf of all people and the lives you have destroyed (*in your own country alone*), I hope your family name stays synonymous with failure, treason and arrogance for centuries, at least.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:48 AM on 04/25/2008

Another quisling hero.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:47 AM on 04/25/2008

Which will serve two purposes for the Bush-Cheney Neokons. They can continue their genocide of the Iraqi people with "right on their side"; and they will be able to again point the finger at Iran, opening the door to the invasion that they and the Israeli Likuds have been praying for.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:40 AM on 04/25/2008

"poppy??? can i throw another $6 trillion sledge at this tiny little ant??? PURDY PLEASE POPPY???? UNKA DICK MAKE POPPY PAY!!!!!!"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:00 AM on 04/25/2008

I read these posts admiring Al Sadr, then I scroll up and look at Al Sadr. Then I scroll down again and read a couple more posts. Then In disbelief, I look at Al Sadr again.

The mindset that America is bad and that the duly elected government of Iraq is bad for fighting this guy (who directs his "army" from Iran, incidentally)... is why the far left will never be anything more than a hateful voice off to the side. Nothing more than a stone in the shoe of descent regular folks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:56 AM on 04/25/2008

I want to thank all of you who responded to my comment above. I was at a loss to adequately describe the mindless, left-loon, self-loathing, hatred of one's own country.

While I was gone doing other things today, you all came along and illustrated my point, with examples, beautifully for me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:58 PM on 04/25/2008

You love your country and just hate everyone who lives in it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:37 PM on 04/25/2008

I DO!?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 PM on 04/25/2008

I am an american and live by the same philosophy you espouse for the US in my personal life-- i.e. that I will never consider the possibility that any thing I might ever do could be wrong. Next week I am moving into your neighborhood and will do as I see fit. Better keep your kids inside.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:36 PM on 04/25/2008

Nothing more than a stone in the shoe of descent regular folks.
- Redrover666

Decent folks don't illegally invade a soverign country and murder it's innocent women and children. Decent folks don't torture people. Decent folks don't subscribe to rendition. Decent folks don't commit war crimes.

The people supporting this current administration are not decent folks!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:45 AM on 04/25/2008


If "descent regular folks" invade a country without provocation and kill over a million people,
then your moral compass is clearly thrown off by your own density.

Iraq should get rid if the occupiers of their country any way possible, any way possible.

An illegal war, an illegal invasion of afganistan and Iraq, depleted uranium poisioning the water,the air and the land of both countries.

Yeah, decent people. Be sure to go to church and pray for God to bless Hypocramerica.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:24 AM on 04/25/2008

Any you are calling someone else "dense"?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 PM on 04/25/2008

You "decent regular folks' have conducted a very well-orchestrated class-war against all world citizens and Iraq was merely a stone on the road to a Global Serfdom.

Bush, Reagan, ABC and Fox Noise are conducting povericide/genicide against the lower-classes while pretending to be concerned about liberty and human rights (probably chuckling inside whenever they mention it publicly) Neoliberals are the enemy of all people not Federalist. We are not heckling a leader, we are protesting a criminal and his enterprise.

Ironically, Al Sadr has more in common with the Framers than the well-dressed, two-bit thugs who are trying to occupy, rape and pillage his country using our flag as a cover.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 AM on 04/25/2008

partisan Bush hatred and liberal hateamerica

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:31 AM on 04/25/2008

Arrogant Americans think they own the world. Too bad we can't plant you in the middle of the Quagmire in Iraq. My bet is you would run like a chicken. You live protected in your little tiny house.

Big talker, but a wimp...you never fought in any war.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:03 PM on 04/25/2008

And little georgie directs his army from several thousands of miles furthur away.If he is fighting a "duly elected" government, then that is an internal problem and none of our affair. May I remind you that the US overthrew a duly elected government for us to be there. Again, this is an internal matter to be handled without our intervention.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:40 AM on 04/25/2008

Saddam Hussein was duly "elected"? By whom?

"little georgie" is the President not a general.

Like Saddam, when Germany was exterminating it's jews, lot's of folks like you said exactly the same thing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:48 AM on 04/25/2008

Who elected bush? The supreme court once and Ohio vote fraud the second time. Yeah, real legal here. Why aren't you in Iraq?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:15 AM on 04/25/2008

By the people who voted.

little georgie is commander in chief.

And people are being exterminated as we speak, but we will not intervene because they have no resorces to exploit.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:30 AM on 04/25/2008