Charisma and Leadership

Posted April 30, 2008 | 03:30 PM (EST)



Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

Barack Obama has "charisma", the special power of a person to inspire fascination and loyalty. But with the eruption of the Reverend Jeremiah Wright's recent remarks and a worsening economy, a new situation is testing Obama's charismatic appeal, and this raises an important question. Does charisma originate in the individual, in the followers, or in the situation? As I argue in my recent book The Powers to Lead, the answer is all three.

Charisma proves surprisingly hard to identify in advance. Dick Morris, the political consultant, reports that in his experience, "charisma is the most elusive of political traits because it doesn't exist in reality; only in our perception once a candidate has made it by hard work and good issues." Political scientists have tried to create charisma scales that would predict votes or presidential ratings, but they have not proven fruitful. Like Obama, John F. Kennedy is often described as charismatic, but obviously not for everyone since he failed to capture a majority of the popular vote, and his ratings varied during his presidency.

Followers are more likely to attribute charisma to leaders when they feel a strong need for change, often in the context of a personal, organizational or social crisis. For example, the British public did not see Winston Churchill as a charismatic leader in 1939, but a year later, his vision, confidence, and communications skills made him charismatic in the eyes of the British people given the anxieties they felt after the Dunkirk evacuation. Yet by 1945, when the public focus turned from winning the war to the construction of a welfare state, Churchill was voted out of office. His charisma did not predict his electoral defeat. The change in followers' needs was a better predictor.

The columnist Peggy Noonan has written, "Barack Obama has a great thinking look. It's a very present look. He seems more in the moment than handling the moment." Clearly this is one of the reasons that Obama has a reputation for charisma. But another part of his charisma is in the eyes of his followers. We know it when we see it, but in the case of charisma, we are also looking in a mirror. As the economy worsens and old racial divisions re-emerge, the national debate changes. This will be the true test of Obama's charisma. Charisma tells us something about a candidate, but even more about ourselves, the mood of the country, and the types of change we desire. The coming weeks will be an interesting test.

 

Comments
102
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

Hint sample
View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

Joseph Nye, who has written an excellent book, asks a perfectly good question about the origins of charisma. He asks:

Does charisma originate in the individual, in the followers, or in the situation?

In the case of Obama the answer is none of the above. His charismatic gifts are mostly borrowed and are not his own. They do not belong to him though he wants us to think otherwise. He is not a Churchill or a Reagan or an FDR. He is not a JFK or Martin Luther King. He is a one dimensional Music Man, a holy rolling politician fooling the shallow, the weak, the empty and unaware.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:43 PM on 05/04/2008

Thank you for explaining Obama and charisma so well; though he's a master of personal change, no doubt even Tony Robbins will be surprised at all the write-in votes he'll get, making him our next President.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:59 PM on 05/04/2008

WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF OBAMA'S CHARISMA?

I'll give you a hint: It's a secret that Obama learned from his pastor and that his pastor, whose energy and chrisma is greater, is now turning against him with great effect. Without this secret Obama could not have gotten so far in politics in such a short time. If Obama were to suddenly lose this secret his campaign would quickly die..

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:24 PM on 05/04/2008

There are charismatic figures and there are snake oil salesmen (in modern English, "motivational speakers") Barak Obama is a snake oil salesman, take away the buzzwords and the faux- psychology from his sppeches and there is nothing left. The politician he reminds me most of is the young Tony Blair, a man who whose apparent charm disguised a similar package, a bucketful of hopes, dreams, visions and empty slogans.
And we all know how the warmonger Blair turned out.

http://greenteeth.blog.co.uk/2008/05/03/londoners-your-mayor-for-the-next-four-y-4126402

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 AM on 05/04/2008

The O-man will sell out to corporate groups, to benefit a few Blacks. Small change. That's all folks.
He has not even carried a single piece of legislation through the Senate. Now he is going to become ... a one man revolution.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:59 PM on 05/03/2008

He wasn't able to impact his relationship with Wright over 20 years or make any difference with the man. Did he even try to have a private conversation with him and yet he wants to lead the world in unity? His failure to restore his relationship with Wright and simply had to denounce him is a sad predictor of how he'll govern. How is he going to relate to republicans that strongly oppose him? Remember. He's about 'unity' and 'change' yet his handling of Wright was old school. Pathetic.
Hillary has been able to face people who've trashed her or set out to destroy her and her husband such Tom Delay, Richard Mellon Scaife, Keith Olberman and Bill O'Reilly. Nest to her, Obama is a chicken.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:45 AM on 05/04/2008

We still don"t know how much McCain"s spiritual leader, Hagee, was influenced him.
Old people tend to be easily taken in, and McCain asked for Hagee"s endorsement even after those foul, anti-American things Hagee said.

I fear McCain"s hate and anger comes from the same place that Hagee"s hate and anger comes from. That will only further reduce America"s place in the world.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:17 PM on 05/01/2008

Obama is a proven liar. His problem with Jeremiah Wright shows lack of character and excess opportunism in the soul and mind of the charismatic Obama. I fear he is a lot closer to Wright liberation theology than he is willing to accept. If he betrays the American people the way he did his pastor we are headed toward a great disaster. Mc Cain is honest but not very smart, Obama is smart but we do not know what is he really thinking, Hillary we know is a flip flopper and very smart I will vote for Hillaryt if she gets the nominaion if not i think I will have to vote for Mc Cain. I am not going to vote for somebody that maybe a socialist or a leftist and do not say so.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:41 AM on 05/01/2008

"...somebody that maybe a socialist or a leftist..."

I've heard people claim that Obama is Muslim, as if he's a villain with a secret identity. Then, according to some of the same people, he's a radical Christian. Then he's an angry black man. Then he becomes a socialist. Probably next he'll be called a secret Scientologist.

All these delusions are in the minds of people who can't believe that he is just what he looks like: a charismatic black man with a brilliant mind and a centrist political stance.

They demonize him so that they can justify hating him, which was where they started.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:57 PM on 05/01/2008

Charisma and Charismatic derive from a Greek word denoting a unique giftedness in persons that makes them effective leaders, or persuasive teachers, orators, preachers, Nineteen centuryGerman sociologists including Max Weber contributed greatly to the understanding of this social phenomenon. Weber says the charasmatic leader is endowed with authority that is personal and not derived from the an institutional endorsement, or based on professional credentials, and who functions outside the establishment . Cult leaders almost always start out as charismatic. leaders who accorting to Carl Young usually become inflated and abusive of power. Senator Obama is without a doubt exceptionally charismatic at times but people like David Brooks were unfair in accusing him of being a cultist. Senator Obama has credentials and intelligence, Have we ever seen a candidate for the presidency paying a greater price in blood, sweat, and tears right before our eyes?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:18 AM on 05/01/2008

I AM VOTING FOR OBAMA BECAUSE CLINTON IS A LIER AND SO IS MCSAME AND I DO TRUST OBAMA. :)

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:18 AM on 05/01/2008

Would you mind a little advice? Try spellcheck.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:42 PM on 05/04/2008

Hillary is probably at least a better speller than you are.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 AM on 05/04/2008

Jakie vote for Obama but do not trust any politician, please

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 AM on 05/01/2008

You make a good point, ultimately that is the most important thing in leadership and charisma, that opportunity it provides for everyone to look at themselves and ask how do I get involved? How do I make change? It is a frightening proposition for those who profit in the trade of fear and loathing, those who dash dreams and cling to the status quo. Barack Obama is very scary, very threatening to some of us and it has nothing to do with a ranting and raving pastor.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:44 AM on 05/01/2008

Barack Obama ideology is the same of his pastor Jermiah Wright I fear.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 AM on 05/01/2008

What are you so afraid of? The idea that someone might actually disagree with someone else and still remain assoiated. I love my mom but I can't stand the way she thinks. Does that mean I don't talk to her. No. Does that mean that we don't go out to lunch. No. Does that mean we don't assoiate with each other. No. What that means is she has the right to think, do, or say what she wants and I still respect her. Don't forget, this is America, we have the right to think, do , or say what we want. Even if it is BS, I'll still love her.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 AM on 05/01/2008

Obama's charisma and ability to stand in front of a row of American flags & gaze thoughtfully off into the distance thinking big thoughts is not going to cut it. His handling of his racist pastor proved that. While he spits & sputters & backtracks over lies trying not to dis black voters or trying not to offend TWP he looks like an incompetent idiot. And thinking people who want to make a rational decision are seeing this. All style, no substance. He's no different than Clinton or McCain - except for 1 thing - he hasn't got the experience to lead the country in such bad times.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:17 AM on 05/01/2008

Yep, if he's such an idiot, why are his core supporters the EDUCATED?

Is it not more likely that the uneducated voters (no, i dont suggest for a nanosecond that you belong in this group) who have never been in a position of power or leadership (management positions after all, go to those with the degrees and/or diplomas) so wouldnt know what a thoughtful, reasoned response to a problem was if one bit them on the bum ... simply confuse thoughtfulness for 'spits & sputters'?

Nah. Of course not.

I bet you like leaders like GWB who can decide on a whim, and WITHOUT EVIDENCE to invade a sovereign state (such as Iraq) huh? THAT kind of experience? No time to engage the brain... or wait ... in the case of GWB ... was there ever even a brain TO engage?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:32 AM on 05/01/2008

Are you dissing the 90% of blacks who support Obama who are not ever included in the 'educated' demographic of Obama's base. Please explain that contradiction, SVP?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:51 AM on 05/04/2008

The far left is awash with very educated people. And the very young tend to be more educated simply because college is more likely for them today. Sometimes, however, both groups tend not to notice real life or to understand the needs of the masses.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:38 PM on 05/01/2008

Many very educated people went for communism and fascism look at the many nazy nobel lauerates as Knut Hamsun and look at Malaparte and Sartre and many others, Mostly young people have the tendency to follow charismatic leaders regardeless of the education level, the idea of hope and change and a new world order and so on... it is an easy sell to young people that do not know better.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 AM on 05/01/2008

"Obama's charisma and ability to stand in front of a row of American flags & gaze thoughtfully off into the distance thinking big thoughts is not going to cut it."

Actually, it is. =)

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:05 AM on 05/01/2008

I think there's a danger in confusing charisma with relevance. I think what Obama has more than charisma is relevance. He is like water for someone lost in the desert. He speaks what people are thinking themselves and not hearing from anyone else. We're just not getting a lot of truth these days from our media or from our executive branch. Obama dares to speak the truth. That isn't charisma. That's relevance. And courage.

George Bush has charisma. Charisma is pretty worthless.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:50 AM on 05/01/2008

Charisma is irrelevant.

If George Bush had the charisma of Jesus Christ and made the same moronic decisions, he'd still suck.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:53 AM on 05/01/2008

No charisma is very relevant and dangerous, Charisma is subliminal in the sense that we do not see it coming. Hitler charismatic capabilities were not perceived by the german people at the time.


When people talk about charisma they really mean be careful this guy can talk you into anything

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:04 AM on 05/01/2008

I don't require hope, audacity, the audacity of hope, charisma, or old spice. I require a leader who knows what they are doing, who knows the ins and outs of Washington, the government and foreign affairs and how to put our country back to its' former self. I simply need a leader with great practicality and skills, and not that charisma bs. As far as I'm concerned Barack Obama is like the EWF song, saying nothing, talking loud, and that's not what's needed. My nickname for him sums it all up; the Flimflam Man from Nowhere, Bamboozle. If Hillary is not the nominee at the end of all this then it's going to take all my will power to vote for this man. I don't want to have voted for him, then lose the race, or worst yet, have the presidency fall apart under his tenure. With things the way the are for him I'm glad she did not drop out of the race leaving us stuck with this fool. A strange thing. I saw that speech he gave four years ago, and for all of five seconds he had me, then it disappeared, and all I was left with was that he was just another politician with nothing to offer, and my opinion has not changed.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:30 AM on 05/01/2008

Substance and charisma are not mutually exclusive. If you really wanted specific facts you would only have to visit the official sites of all three candidates. Dont be so disingenous, I would have more respect for you if you just said you had a bad "feeling" about Obama and left it at that.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:54 AM on 05/01/2008

A talented actor like Clinton can make you believe anything she said. They are make-believers. She can be a soothingly understanding grandma talking to her grandchilren. She can be a tiger jabbing finger in an outrage just like her husband "I didn't have sex with that woman". She can be anything as she had shown on her circus tours.
What she doens't say is what she did behind voters' back because she knows they don't like it. Do you hear about Bill's sexual escapades from her mouth? Her ruthless intimidation of his ex-lovers to tell lies? His impeachment? His lawyer license suspended? Imagine a First Gentleman/co-president with this kind of recods? Her opposing NAFTA and supporting it? Her supporting Iraq war and opposing it? Her attack Bush about Chinese companies but it was Bill who signed the sale? Her lies (seriously) about sniper fire, the most popular votes by adding her own but none for Obama? Her pastor or her secret club? Her sly insinuation that she wouldn't stay in a church but it is OK to stay in a marriage with a husband playing around and when it's discovered, the wrongdoings are his lovers' not himself?
Do you ever recognize the audacity of a liar who stands in front of voters telling lies with such a straight face that you believe falsehood to be the truth? That's outrageous to many voters that is why she has come from an inevitable to an unelectable now.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:47 AM on 05/01/2008

Why not take a breather from your name-calling, Jazzy, and pay attention to what's actually going on?

You want substance? I don't think you really do. Witness, for instance, the "Gas Tax Holiday." With fuel prices going through the roof, Senator Clinton joins McCain in pitching a cynical, useless, consumption-boosting $28 giveaway because she thinks it might buy her a few votes. Every economist says it won't address the problem, and many say it will make it worse. She offers pretend responsibility by saying that we'll make the oil companies pay for this election-year, calculating sop. And both she and McCain, who know "the ins and outs" of Washington, know that such a measure could never be passed before the summer anyway. That is the kind of "leader" you "require." What a load of baloney!

Senator Obama's response to the problem is, yes, we should raise windfall profits taxes on the oil companies, but direct the proceeds to fuel subsidies for the poorest Americans, instead of trying to buy middle class votes with the bogus promise of a "gas tax holiday."

Seems that what you want is more of the same craven triangulation that gets us nowhere. Your post doesn't just insult Obama, it insults the intelligence of serious Democrats.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:09 AM on 05/01/2008

Substance, not Charisma.

We all are starting to realize that Hillary Clinton would work 10x as hard as Obama...
...and she is probably more capable.

The 3 AM commercial wasn't a joke...
...this is a serious job and Obama could seriously blow it.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:51 AM on 05/01/2008

Charisma is substance when it comes to leadership. The ability to influence, persuade, inspire, and motivate are very important. So is working hard, of course, as well as exceptional judgment and intelligence. But when it comes to working hard, which campaign has done that? One campaign rolled up its sleeves, did its homework (including the tedious stuff, like figuring out the Texas primary/caucus system), put together a bona fide 50-state strategy, and worked extremely hard to implement that strategy. The other campaign rested on its establishment-supported, early money-advantage, name-recognition laurels, content to ignore caucuses and most states in favor of achieving a "knockout" on Super Tuesday. It was a lazy strategy and lazy campaign without even the work put in even to prepare a Plan B in case the main strategy failed. It is only after losing the frontrunner luster and having inevitable victory turn into inevitable defeat that this campaign began to work hard, out of shock and desperation. Unfortunately, that hard work was devoted to a "kitchen sink," tear-your-opponent-down strategy, when further positive competitive campaigning could have done much good for the candidates' Party and discussion of issues important to the country.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:35 AM on 05/01/2008

Well said! As always, it is a lie! During the Clintons' years and even in Bush's, no one in the WH has ever received a 3am phone call, unless of course Hillary herself did. About where was Bill, that is!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:58 AM on 05/01/2008


(Greek). A special divine gift which endows the recipient with a supernatural ability to know and proclaim the will of God. ...
www.mises.org/easier/C.asp

is "the ability to develop or inspire in others an ideological commitment to a particular point of view." (Frank 1993, p.383)
www.latinoleadership.org/research/library/dictionary.html

Refers to the ability of a politician or public figure to lead and inspire veneration among followers or a constituency. ...
www.historysolutions.com/servlet/prezview

a personal attractiveness or interestingness that enables you to influence others
wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn

The word charisma (from the Greek word χάρισμα (kharisma), "gift" or "divine favor," from kharizesthai, "to favor," from kharis, "favor": see also charism) refers to a rare trait found in certain human personalities usually including extreme charm and a 'magnetic' quality of personality ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charisma

charisma (k-rzm)
n. pl. charismata (-m-t)
1.
a. A rare personal quality attributed to leaders who arouse fervent popular devotion and enthusiasm.
b. Personal magnetism or charm: a television news program famed for the charisma of its anchors.
2. Christianity An extraordinary power, such as the ability to perform miracles, granted by the Holy Spirit.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/charisma

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:28 AM on 05/01/2008

Personally, all I see is Obamanation! As for talent Obama has NO actual comparable accompliments that an empty suit does not have!

He may be" charismatic" in his delivery of empty rhetoric to blinded sheep or those seeking a plastic mannequin for a candidate! (which is reall why I suspect he is so popular with the left)

His judgement when not just plain impaired is secular humanistically leftist biased and can be manufactored and duplicated onscreen by unholywood!

Carter and B. Clinton may both be intelligent dispicable talents but at least they were not totally loose cannons like Obamanation!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:26 AM on 05/01/2008

What kingdom are you from? Only the British kingdom spells judgment the way you do. Obviously you are not from this country, although entitled to your opinion... Whose your leader? Gawden (I love Bush) Brown? or worse, that Canadian capitalist? Fix your own country why doncha? Are ya tryin?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:14 AM on 05/01/2008