Joe Trippi: I Should Have Told Edwards To Stay In Race

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

The Huffington Post   |   May 1, 2008 04:47 PM


Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

Joe Trippi writes about what he wishes he would have told John Edwards:

I didn't tell him what I should have told him: That I had this feeling that if he stayed in the race he would win 300 or so delegates by Super Tuesday and have maybe a one-in-five chance of forcing a brokered convention.That there was a path ahead that would be extremely painful, but could very well put him and his causes at the top of the Democratic agenda. And that in politics anything can happen-even the possibility that in an open convention with multiple ballots an embattled and exhausted party would turn to him as their nominee. I should have closed my eyes to the pain I saw around me on the campaign bus, including my own. I should have told him emphatically that he should stay in. My regret that I did not do so-that I let John Edwards down-grows with every day that the fight between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama continues. ...

I thought we could make a big dent in Ohio by appealing to middle-class working people. The same in places like Kansas, Colorado and the Dakotas. It was possible to make those a dead-heat for all three candidates in terms of delegate wins. And today, as I write this, I realize we might have had as many as 500 delegates heading into Pennsylvania and North Carolina, two states that would probably be strong for Edwards.

That would mean Edwards, Obama and Clinton would go into the convention without any of them close to sealing the nomination. You would have had months of Obama and Clinton banging away at each other, with Edwards able to come across to weary Democrats as a welcome, fresh face.? You'd have the electability argument begin to play to Edwards' advantage, since he always did well against McCain in polling. These possibilities and more played through my mind.

 
 

Comments
318
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)

Please stop beating yourself up. If Edwards had stayed in the race Clinton would have been attacking him as viciously and sleazily as she is attacking Obama. She would have found a way to destroy and twist his reputation into something unrecognizable. If you thought he was hurting that early in the race, he would have been on medication and bed rest by now having suffered the wrath incurred by having the nerve to deny Clinton what she believes is owed to her and only her, and to hell with the Democratic party or anyone else who has a different opinion.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:05 PM on 05/03/2008

I couldn't even read this post for days- the headline was too painful.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:56 PM on 05/03/2008

Only if the Dems really wanted to win instead of committing political Hara Kiri one more time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:21 AM on 05/03/2008

So, I am to believe that Edwards was/is gone only because this genius told him to step out?
Don't think so, maybe these backers did not do their job and vote for him!

While the RNC is frantically digging for the worst, they have found NOTHING on Obama!
They cannot seem to find out anything NEGATIVE on him personally.BUT who he knows!

As Hillary, they are saying there must be some woman some theft, some political crookedness, Something that this guy has done personally--YET they can find nothing even with Hillary's help!

The worst the 'Blue Collar Worker' Find, he is Black --- Some Blacks don't think he is Black enough!
Well, his mother is White and he was raised by White People what's the problem.
This guy is in a NO WIN situation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:45 PM on 05/03/2008

Good grief! Can Joe Trippi not hear his own words?? "extremely painful path"? "forcing a brokered convention"? "embattled and exhausted party"? "weary democrats"? That's where you would have us be in August with no time to generate unity and a strong campaign for the general. But that's OK if it means your candidate is the nominee. That's exactly why I have come to so disrespect the Clintons because of this kind of egocentric approach and the resultant scorched earth tactics. Hey, Joe, there's another "Joe" with a blog here. Joe Andrews. Read it. And if you really love this country and this party and still have some influence with John Edwards, you can ask him for me if he has the backbone to endorse Obama NOW. Before next Tuesday. When it could conceivably do some good. As opposed to waiting to see "what's in it for him"!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:40 PM on 05/02/2008

They were perhaps trying to follow the old nixonian playbook--- v.p. for 8 years-- then an 8 year lull-- then Pres.-- but at least he won v.p. -- took a long break after losing big to the dems-- then reigned triumphantly-- Edwards is still young-- he can wait another 8 years too--

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:44 PM on 05/02/2008

Trippi and David Axelrod are two peas in a pod. Their both losers. Has Trippi ever won anything but a loud whining contest?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:33 PM on 05/02/2008

How the hell is this Trippi's decision to make? If Edwards was incapable of making the decision to pull out, he was ill-equipped to become president.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:33 PM on 05/02/2008

You really should read the entire article before you make your comment.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:11 PM on 05/03/2008


Trippi screwed up Dean's presidential run and now he' admits he screwed up Edwards' second run for president.

2 for 2.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:26 PM on 05/02/2008

THE CLINTONS SUCCESSFULLY FROZE/INTIMIDATED THE EDWARDS FOR MONTHS INTO MORE IRRELEVANCY THAN BILL RICHARDSON

At this point, they're probably too scared of suffering any Clinton backlash to do anything other than back The Clintons or stay neutral.

The Edwards have overplayed their hand and allowed the Clintons to persuade them early on, as they did with Bill Richardson and others, to just wait when they were previously inclined to endorse Obama.

Superdelegates that acceptedThe Clintons' invitation to wait were, knowingly or unknowingly, agreeing to be willing accomplices to everything The Clintons have done in the interim to raise Obama's negatives, which has been the #1 Clinton Campaign priority since the IOWA results were fully absorbed.

This realization is what gave Bill Richardson pause and has also startled others into action who either had underwritten The Clinton Insurgency unwittingly or had just grown weary of the time it was taking to impact the race. It's more likely that the Edwards, who had been arguing that Obama needed to be "tougher" all along, played along savvily with The Clintons by staying on the sidelines up to this point.

Whatever they do now will appropriately be viewed as driven purely by their calculated self-interest, particularly if they split their endorsements or in any way endorse The Clintons (health care mandates not withstanding).

The net result is that they have fiddled while the DEM Party needed leadership; and have thus contributed greatly to their own current & future irrelevance.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:33 PM on 05/02/2008

the point is that you NEVER GIVE UP!!! this is AMERICA.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 AM on 05/02/2008

Trippi should have persuaded Edwards to endorse Obama early on when his nod would have meant something. However, one gets the impression that the Trippi-types look at the world through the lens of there own careers, not the good of the party or the country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 AM on 05/02/2008

Ha Ha this is funny if Edwards had Stayed in the race Obama would have LOCKED up the nomination. Remember he was sharing the White blue collar vote with Hilary. She is the one that benefited from Him getting out of the race.

Then theres the little thing of Edwards FAILING to win a state which affected Edwards ability to RAISE money. Edwards was in the race and even when Obama and Clinton were squabbling like at the SC debates he FAIILED to capitalize that is why he is out of the race. People preferred Hilary and Obama it wasnt some big conspiracy to run him out. There is no mystery with these races you just need to win.

Carol

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:33 AM on 05/02/2008

Carol, For many months, Edwards was giving both Obama and Clinton their platforms. He was the the leader in ideas, and had the mainstream media given him equal coverage, Edwards would have been able to raise the money, and possibly win the nomination. But because Edwards was so honest and told the truth -- in the process making clear he would put the well-being of the people and the country ahead of corporate greed -- the MSM, which is controlled by a handful of mega-corporations who WANT a corporate-friendly president -- purposely refused to give him the coverage they knew he needed to be able to compete. That included letting people know that in the general election matchups against McCain, Edwards FAR out-performed either Obama or Clinton. And does anyone actually believe the Republicans could do to Edwards what they are doing to Obama and Clinton? Please. With Edwards as the nominee we would have easily taken back the White House. But Americans are lazy. They are too easily manipulated by the media. They don't look for the Truth. So, at last, we get what we deserve, don't we? And that may well be McCain.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 PM on 05/05/2008

I'm an Edwards supporter. Everyone can dis the MSM yet fall for all they dish out to you; including the 2 worst choices. Edwards is right not to endorse either. People jumped on a bandwagon and drank Kool-aid. Edwards was right there with us on the issues facing our country and that was too easy for the MSM. They wanted to hand us the 2 most controversial. These 2 just don't cut it with the right stuff to get our country out of this mess. Edwards won by forcing the others to speak to the real issues. Yet the best Hillary did was copy his healthcare plan. Both BO & HC have changed their tunes on things like trade, stopping global warming,(yet they are for coal plants!) they are up and down on what they'll do with Iraq. John led the platform. Now there is no one to keep them in check. We lost 2 other great candidates in Biden and Dodd to the Media's BO, HC blitz. This election is all about them. MSM is having a field day. People are so blinded by their Idolized candidates they can't see beyond them to the needs of the country. None of it is going to get our country on the right track.
Pray God we have a brokered election and real Democrats stand up for the right reasons and issues for the country and find us a real leader to beat McCain.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:31 AM on 05/02/2008

How about Edwards as Obama's VP? Sounds pretty potent. Then Edwards could get some experience and run after Obama's two terms.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 AM on 05/02/2008

Surely you jest. Edwards could get some experience by serving under Obama? Who do you think gave Obama and Clinton their platforms? Who do you think drove this campaign with his ideas, positions, strength and will to change this country? Obama did not get his voice until he listened to Edwards. It was when he started copying Edwards (who was not getting the media coverage for what he was saying) and emulating Edwards, that he finally started moving forward.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:10 PM on 05/05/2008

I agree

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:48 AM on 05/02/2008

No, I disagree. He'll be a weak link to Obama's candidacy. We need to make an offer that the Dems can't refuse. No, not Hillary. But someone who can complement Obama. Maybe a woman candidate from one of the rural states.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 PM on 05/03/2008

The twisting of logic in this primary race is just insane. Now someone's saying that the THIRD-place candidate should have won because voters would be turned off by the top-two fighting for first? The top two ALWAYS fight because they each have the biggest chance - from elections to the Olympics - and Edwards would have been battling just as hard if he had come nearly as close.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 AM on 05/02/2008

I think he should have stayed in as well, as should have most of the candidates of both parties.
Things change quickly in politics and without an incumbent on the ballot it could go to any Democrat.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:06 AM on 05/02/2008

Joe Trippi,

How can you claim that Obama and Clinton would have been "banging away at each other" allowing Edwards to "come across as a fresh face?" For most of the time Edwards was in the race, he was the most strident and argumentative, attacking Hillary's positions much more forcefully than Obama did. That's what turned people away from him (setting aside the fact that he was wrong on Iraq, No Child and trade with China).

Edwards had name recognition from his VP bid and had spent nearly four years campaigning in Iowa, but outside of Iowa people viewed him as a slick trial lawyer who was changing his positions just to get elected. And that's why people are suspicious of his failure to endorse now. They think he's waiting to see which way the wind blows, since his positions clearly align much more with Obama than with Clinton.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:25 AM on 05/02/2008

I am a John Edwards supporter and made several donations to his campaign but my and other supporters paltry donations were never going to be able to match the rivers of cash Obama and Clinton are raising and that dynamic was not going to change. The reality is that the best candidate doesn't always win and that would have been the case had Edwards stayed in. The sad truth is that its all about the money. The most effective way to get a message out is by television advertising and that requires boat loads of money. As for those who want Edwards to be a Vice Presidential candidate, I take him at his word that he isn't interested in going down that road again. I think he would be most effective as Attorney General, it will take someone with his character to clean up the Justice Department after the train wreck caused by Bush and Alberto. I fully understand why Edwards doesn't endorse either Obama or Clinton, I see no need for him to burn any bridges at this point.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 AM on 05/02/2008

Let us not forget: When it came to fundraising: Hillary had Bill and many years of political alliances; Obama had Oprah, and the electorate that has, over the last 20-25 years, dramatically increased the numbers of minority voters. And, as Elizabeth said: We cannot make John a woman, and we can't make him black. And hasn't the media just loved pitting the first viable woman against the first viable black? Sadly, Americans bought it, without considering the fact that neither race nor gender should be the deciding factor in how we choose a President.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:18 PM on 05/05/2008

Trippi your are a day late and a dollar short ! I was just sick when Edwards dropped out and many times have wished he was still in, but the main stream media wasn't going to give him the time of day, they are so gung ho for the Hillary, they can only keep repeating Rev. Wrights rants and raves and try and eliminate Obama also. Bush has really screwed up every thing and now the media is trying to.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:00 AM on 05/02/2008

It's easy to be a Monday morning quarterback.

Edwards was "RIGHT" when he said he was the most "ELECTABLE" candidate.

Unfortunately, Joe Trippi, you are a second rate campaign manager, and did not give him the "CORRECT" advise when it counted.

John Edwards was and still IS my choice.

You let him - and his loyal supporters - down, Joe Trippi.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:50 AM on 05/02/2008

John Edwards is as much a fake and an opportunist as Hillary Clinton. The difference between them is that he has enough integrity to not trash another Dem candidate and to eschew Rovian tactics. Voters just didn't connect with Edwards. He should have dropped out. If he really cared about the Democratic party, he'd help end this nightmare primary by endorsing Obama.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:49 AM on 05/02/2008

.....by endorsing Obama.

I knew you had an ulterior motive here. ......Obama at all costs.

Well, I can't jump on the Obama train as so many here on the HuffPost - and that's your perogative.

But, it everyone were honest with themselves, Edwards, was the ONLY one with the POPULIST message that BOTH illary (successfully) and Obama are FINALLY embracing.

Edwards' message wasn't sexy or exciting, but the bottom line, it's what the American want to hear after all the rah, rah speeches and empty rhetoric.

Edwards was shunned and mocked by the MSM, when he was the BEST choice to RUN this country.

Now, we the American people have to settle for what's remaining.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:17 AM on 05/02/2008

It would be great if voters could simply trust the candidate with the most populist message, but we've been burned time and again being promised magic ponies in primary contests. Edwards' populism looked a lot like Hillary donning a Yankees cap - too convenient by half.

The one candidate who has eschewed primary pandering is Obama. You won't get any promises from him that he would have to ditch in the GE.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 AM on 05/02/2008

I beg to differ. Before Edwards dropped out Obama was practically channeling John Edwards in order to appeal to Edwards' voters.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 PM on 05/03/2008

No, Joe. You're one of the reasons JE didn't make the cut -- you're totally clueless.

Edwards got swiftboated by either the Repubs or the Clintons. Blogs were percolating on a pretty regular basis, that he pimped his wife's cancer for contributions. That was his death warrant -- and you never picked up on it.

It's too bad, too. JE is far and away a better person than Hillary -- at least he respected his fellow Dems enuf not to attack them. The Clintons are nothing more than Republicna moles.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:34 AM on 05/02/2008

He's such a loser. Wasn't he in charge of Howard Dean's campaign? When Dean dropped out just because of some stupid bad press for a hoarse-throated yell? I still am pissed that I didn't get to cast a meaningful vote for Dean in that election--in Massachusetts. It seems that this guy is a really BAD campaign advisor, and as such, he isn't doing his COUNTRY any favors.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:19 AM on 05/02/2008

Too little, too late. I voted for Edwards and I'd vote for him again. He shouldn't have pulled out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:13 AM on 05/02/2008

Dear Mr. Edwards and Mr. Trippi,

Your lack of loyalty to the Democratic Party and your spinelss commentary begs the question: "Can I have the money I sent you back?"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 AM on 05/02/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in